SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is an unusual desktop combination: a 65 W efficiency-focused Alder Lake CPU sitting alongside the most powerful Blackwell 2.0 gaming GPU currently in the database. The combined percentile of 77 places this pairing firmly in high-end territory, but the imbalance between components is the defining story of this build. The RTX 5090 ranks in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, while the i7-12700E sits at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs — a gap that shapes every workload this machine can handle.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 215 mm² die. It runs a 2.10 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that marks it as the efficiency-oriented "E" variant of the mainstream i7 line. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, which gives builders flexibility between older and newer memory platforms. The multiplier is locked, so sustained performance tuning is limited to what the platform allows — this is not an overclocker's chip.

Benchmark results indicate a capable but not flagship-level processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,879 and single-core score of 3,371 put it in solid mid-to-upper territory, consistent with its 62nd percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database. The single-core figure is the more relevant number for gaming: 3,371 points in R23 means the per-thread performance is strong enough to feed most games without becoming the primary limitation. The Geekbench results — 10,676 multi-core and 2,094 single-core — confirm the same pattern: healthy throughput, competitive per-core speed, but no headroom beyond that.

What do these numbers mean for real workloads? The 12 cores and 20 threads handle mainstream content creation comfortably. A Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,029 and an R15 score of 2,406 describe a CPU that chews through video encodes, code compiles, and moderate 3D renders at a pace well above entry level, but below what enthusiast or HEDT platforms deliver. Its average benchmark score of 6,776 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: it trades blows with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (average score 6,760, a delta of just 0.2 percent), sits 0.4 percent behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (6,803), and edges out the Intel Xeon D-2775TE and Xeon Gold 5317 by roughly 1 percent each. In other words, this efficiency desktop chip delivers workstation-class throughput from a previous era at a fraction of the power draw — but it is not competing with modern flagships on raw performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact CPU and GPU combination — every frame-rate figure below is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a recorded measurement. That caveat matters more than usual here, because this pairing pairs a 62nd-percentile CPU with a 92nd-percentile GPU, and estimating how that resolves in real games requires caution.

Starting from the GPU side: the RTX 5090's PassMark G3D score of 39,650 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 describe a card with enormous raw rendering headroom. Its compute profile — 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, 21,760 shading units, 680 tensor cores, and 170 RT cores — indicates that at 4K with ray tracing enabled and ultra settings, the card should remain the limiting factor rather than the CPU. Estimates for graphically demanding titles at 4K would place frame rates well into triple digits, with headroom to spare.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The i7-12700E's single-core strength (3,371 in Cinebench R23) is sufficient for most engines, but a 92nd-percentile GPU pushing high refresh rates at 1440p will frequently ask more of the CPU than a 62nd-percentile processor delivers at its best. Estimated frame rates at 1440p would likely be very high in graphically heavy AAA titles, but in esports-style and CPU-bound engines the CPU would cap output below what the RTX 5090 could otherwise render. At 1080p, the CPU is almost certainly the limiter in most scenarios; buying this GPU to play at 1080p makes little sense given the estimates.

Ray tracing changes the equation in the GPU's favor: with 170 RT cores and 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, enabling path tracing and RT effects loads the GPU heavily and reduces the relative importance of CPU speed. Estimates suggest the most visually demanding settings at 4K are where this pairing is best balanced, which is a notable inversion of typical mid-range advice.

FAQ

Q: Is the Core i7-12700E fast enough for the RTX 5090?

A: At 4K and in GPU-bound scenarios, largely yes — the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking dominates. At 1440p and especially 1080p with high refresh targets, the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking becomes the limiting factor in CPU-heavy engines. It is a workable but imperfect match.

Q: How much power does this build need?

A: The RTX 5090 has a 575 W TDP and NVIDIA's suggested PSU rating is 950 W. The CPU adds a modest 65 W TDP, so a quality 950 W unit as recommended covers the pairing with headroom.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so the 4.80 GHz boost clock is effectively the ceiling.

Q: What memory should be used?

A: The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus. DDR5 is the natural pairing for a build of this class.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, UHD Graphics 770 is integrated. It cannot drive serious gaming loads, but it is useful as a fallback output.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: Its average score of 79,842 is 0.3 percent ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, 0.6 percent ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, 1.1 percent ahead of the Radeon RX 6850M XT, and 1.4 percent behind the Radeon Pro Vega 64X on the composite average — though its gaming-specific scores like the 39,650 G3D result reflect its intended use.

Q: What display outputs are available?

A: One HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 77 undersells the internal asymmetry of this build. The RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd percentile; the i7-12700E at the 62nd. That gap defines the bottleneck structure across every workload.

For GPU-bound gaming — 4K, ultra settings, ray tracing — the bottleneck is squarely on the GPU, which is exactly where you want it. The card's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth are fully exercised, and the CPU's single-core score of 3,371 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to keep the render queue fed. For high-refresh, lower-resolution gaming, the bottleneck flips: the CPU's 62nd percentile ceiling means frame times become processor-limited long before the 5090 runs out of capacity. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact pairing prevents precise scaling analysis, but the percentile spread alone predicts it.

For compute workloads the picture is different again. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370 and Vulkan compute score of 376,728 belong entirely to the GPU, and the PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 confirms massive throughput for GPU-accelerated tasks. A 10,676 Geekbench multi-core CPU score is respectable support hardware for feeding that engine, but any workload that balances CPU and GPU stages — streaming with x264 encoding on the CPU, for instance — will show the CPU as the narrower pipe.

The practical takeaway: this build is best understood as a GPU-first machine. Any workload that can be pushed onto the 5090's 680 tensor cores or its raw shading throughput runs at flagship levels; anything that depends primarily on the CPU runs at upper-midrange levels.

Benchmark Performance

The full score sheet, in context:

CPU — Intel Core i7-12700E (62nd percentile, average score 6,776):

Cinebench R15 multi-core: 2,406; single-core: 339
Cinebench R20 multi-core: 10,029; single-core: 1,415
Cinebench R23 multi-core: 23,879; single-core: 3,371
Geekbench multi-core: 10,676; single-core: 2,094

Against its nearest rivals — the Threadripper 2970WX, Xeon Gold 6154, Xeon D-2775TE, and Xeon Gold 5317 — the i7-12700E is essentially tied on aggregate, within a ±1 percent band on average score. That is a remarkable result for a 65 W desktop part matching significantly hungrier workstation silicon on composite throughput.

GPU — NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (92nd percentile, average score 79,842):

3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12): 18,355
Geekbench OpenCL: 334,370; Geekbench Vulkan: 376,728
PassMark G3D: 39,650; GPU compute: 26,756
PassMark DX9: 395, DX10: 226, DX11: 341, DX12: 185, G2D: 1,413

The PassMark DirectX-specific scores are synthetic subtests and should not be compared across API generations directly; the G3D composite of 39,650 is the headline gaming figure, and the Steel Nomad result of 18,355 is the modern heavy-load indicator. The compute scores — over a third of a million in both OpenCL and Vulkan — describe a card that doubles as a serious compute device, consistent with its 680 tensor cores and 32 GB of GDDR7.

The combined picture: a 77th-percentile machine whose gaming ceiling is set by the GPU and whose general compute floor is set by the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Strong at 4K, qualified at lower resolutions. The 5090's 92nd percentile performance delivers flagship frame rates in GPU-bound titles, but the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking caps esports-style, high-refresh play at 1080p and 1440p in CPU-limited engines.

4K ultra gaming with ray tracing: This is the sweet spot. With 170 RT cores and 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth pushing maxed settings at 4K, the GPU is fully loaded and the CPU's single-core speed is adequate. Estimates indicate this is where the pairing is best balanced.

Streaming: Workable but CPU-leaning. A single-PC stream using CPU encoding leans on 12 cores and 20 threads with a 10,676 Geekbench multi-core score — sufficient for 1080p streaming alongside gameplay, but the CPU is the component closer to its limit. GPU-based encoding shifts that load onto the 5090 and resolves the concern.

Video editing: Very capable. The 32 GB of GDDR7 and massive GPU compute scores (26,756 PassMark GPU compute) accelerate timeline playback, effects, and exports, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,879 handles general editing duties without complaint.

3D rendering: GPU-first workflows excel. Viewport performance and GPU render engines benefit from 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. CPU-only renders at 23,879 in R23 are respectable but not the reason to choose this build.

Software development: Excellent for the money-class of the CPU. Code compilation scales with multi-core throughput, and 12 cores at 10,029 in Cinebench R20 handle large builds efficiently. GPU-accelerated tooling and local AI inference run on the 680 tensor cores.

Student and office work: Massive overkill in the best way. Documents, browsing, and lightweight applications barely register against a 2,094 Geekbench single-core score, and the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU provides display redundancy if the discrete card is ever removed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, supporting the Alder Lake generation. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, so the platform can start on either standard. PCIe is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes — enough to run the RTX 5090 at its full PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface with lanes left over for a fast storage device.

Power is the critical planning item. The RTX 5090 draws a 575 W TDP through a single 16-pin connector, and NVIDIA's suggested PSU rating is 950 W. Add the CPU's modest 65 W TDP and the 950 W recommendation covers this pairing comfortably. The card is dual-slot, 304 mm long and 137 mm tall, so case clearance must accommodate a full-length flagship GPU.

A sensible next upgrade is the CPU: stepping to a higher-percentile Socket 1700 processor would close the gap between the 62nd-percentile CPU and 92nd-percentile GPU, unlocking more of the card's potential at lower resolutions and in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU, by contrast, has no meaningful upgrade within this database tier — it already sits at the 92nd percentile with a successor generation (GeForce 60) not yet represented.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a mainstream efficiency CPU with a flagship GPU. The Core i7-12700E contributes 12 cores, 20 threads, a 4.80 GHz boost, DDR4/DDR5 flexibility, and 62nd-percentile aggregate performance. The RTX 5090 brings the GB202 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and 92nd-percentile performance. The combined percentile of 77 reflects a machine that is, on aggregate, high-end — but whose composition is deliberately lopsided toward graphics horsepower. Its rivals list on both sides (workstation Xeons and Threadrippers on the CPU side, Tesla and pro-grade cards on the GPU side) confirms that this is a build assembled from components with professional pedigree, run in a consumer desktop envelope.

Who Should Build It

The ideal owner is a 4K gamer or GPU-compute user first and a general-purpose power user second. Gamers targeting 4K ultra settings with ray tracing get the full value of the RTX 5090, with estimated frame rates at the top of what the database can describe. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated video editing, 3D rendering, or local AI workloads benefit directly from 32 GB of GDDR7 and the compute scores in the hundreds of thousands. Developers who want fast compilation (10,676 Geekbench multi-core) plus serious local inference hardware get both in one box. Students and small-business workstation users will find the machine far exceeds typical needs — which is acceptable if GPU workloads justify it, wasteful if they do not. What this build is not: a competitive high-refresh 1080p esports rig, where the CPU's 62nd percentile ceiling wastes the card's potential. Buyers matching this pairing should be GPU-first by intent.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds