SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 12th-generation Alder Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's flagship Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a desktop system that sits at the 75th percentile overall compared to all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The Intel Core i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread processor with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is an end-of-life flagship with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth from its 76,300 million transistors on TSMC's 5 nm process. Together they represent a high-end desktop configuration where the GPU dramatically outpaces the CPU in raw compute capability, a dynamic that shapes every workload profile examined below.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700E employs the Alder Lake-S architecture, Intel's hybrid design that combines performance and efficiency cores within a single die. With 12 physical cores and 20 threads, the processor relies on its heterogeneous core topology to balance throughput and power efficiency. The base clock of 2.10 GHz is modest, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, allowing significant single-thread headroom when workloads demand it. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3, which provides ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data across the hybrid core arrangement.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 62nd percentile among all processors tested. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,879 demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability, while the single-core score of 3,371 indicates competitive per-thread performance. In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 10,676 and single-core score of 2,094 reinforce this pattern. The average benchmark score of 6,776 places it in close competition with several enterprise and workstation processors: it sits 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (avg score 6,760), 0.4% below the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (avg score 6,803), and 1% above both the Intel Xeon D-2775TE (avg score 6,711) and Intel Xeon Gold 5317 (avg score 6,710). This clustering indicates that the i7-12700E delivers performance comparable to high-core-count server chips despite having fewer total threads, thanks to the efficiency of its Alder Lake architecture and high boost clocks.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,029 and single-core score of 1,415 suggest that the CPU handles both heavily threaded rendering tasks and lightly threaded applications with equal competence. The 20 threads enable smooth multitasking, while the 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures snappy response in single-threaded software. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides basic display output capability, though it is not intended for demanding graphical work given the discrete GPU in this system. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, making it flexible for various platform configurations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and represents the apex of the GeForce 40-series lineup. Its AD102 chip contains 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units, alongside 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2,235 MHz with a boost clock of 2,520 MHz, while the 24 GB of GDDR6X memory runs at an effective 21 Gbps across a 384-bit bus, yielding 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The transistor count of 76,300 million on a 609 mm² die produces a transistor density of 125.3 million per square millimeter, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process.

Compute performance figures are substantial: FP32 throughput reaches 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. These specifications translate into benchmark scores that place the GPU at the 88th percentile among all graphics cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 9,223, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores reach 255,416 and 271,631 respectively. The Passmark G3D score of 38,194 and GPU compute score of 26,613 further demonstrate the card's dominance. The average benchmark score of 60,347 puts it essentially level with the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60,326, 0% delta), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140), 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896), and 2.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657).

For rendering workloads, the 128 RT cores accelerate ray tracing operations, while the 512 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated features such as DLSS and compute tasks. The 24 GB VRAM capacity is substantial enough for large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and machine learning inference. The memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s ensures that data-intensive operations are not starved. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full range of modern graphics APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, accommodating multi-monitor setups.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between this CPU and GPU is stark. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile while the GPU occupies the 88th percentile, a 26-point gap that indicates the GPU will frequently be the dominant performer in mixed workloads. The combined system percentile of 75 reflects this imbalance—the GPU lifts the overall position well above the CPU's standalone ranking, but the CPU cannot fully feed the GPU's capabilities in every scenario.

In gaming workloads, the GPU's raw rasterization and ray tracing performance will generally outpace what the CPU can deliver in terms of frame generation. The CPU's single-core score of 3,371 in Cinebench R23 is respectable but not class-leading, meaning that CPU-bound scenarios—such as physics calculations, AI scripting, and draw call processing—may limit frame rates below what the GPU alone could achieve. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios at high resolutions with demanding graphics settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's 12 cores provide adequate headroom to keep frame pacing smooth.

For productivity tasks, the balance shifts depending on the workload. The CPU's multi-core score of 23,879 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle substantial parallel processing, but the GPU's FP32 throughput of 82.58 TFLOPS and 512 tensor cores make it vastly more powerful for compute-heavy tasks like rendering, simulation, and AI inference. In such scenarios, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, and the CPU serves primarily as a coordinator rather than a compute engine. The 65 W TDP of the CPU versus the 450 W TDP of the GPU underscores this disparity—the GPU draws nearly seven times the power and delivers commensurately more compute throughput.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4090's 88th percentile standing and 24 GB VRAM make it exceptionally capable for high-refresh gaming at any resolution. The CPU's single-core performance is adequate for most titles, though the 62nd percentile ranking may limit frame rates in CPU-intensive games. The GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput ensures that even at 4K with maximum settings, frame rates will be limited by the CPU's ability to feed draw calls rather than the GPU's rendering capacity.

Streaming: The GPU's 512 tensor cores and NVENC-class encoding hardware (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) provide robust encoding capabilities without burdening the CPU. The CPU's 20 threads handle game logic, streaming software, and background tasks simultaneously, though the 65 W TDP suggests thermal headroom is limited compared to higher-TDP processors. The combined system can manage simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads, though the CPU may become a constraint in heavily threaded titles.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,029 and the GPU's 24 GB VRAM make this a capable video editing configuration. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export operations benefit from the GPU's compute power, while the CPU handles codec operations and project management. The 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU accelerates texture streaming and effect processing in 4K and 8K timelines.

3D rendering: The GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 128 RT cores make it the primary render engine, with CPU-based rendering also viable through the i7-12700E's 20 threads. The 24 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes and high-resolution textures without spillover to system memory. The CPU's 25 MB L3 cache helps maintain scene data locality, though the GPU will dominate render times in GPU-accelerated pipelines.

Software development: The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads handle compilation and build tasks efficiently, with the Geekbench multi-core score of 10,676 indicating solid parallel compilation throughput. The GPU's compute capabilities accelerate code profiling, machine learning training, and shader compilation tasks. The dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility for developers building on either platform.

Student and office work: This configuration is vastly overprovisioned for typical academic and office workloads. The CPU's single-core score of 2,094 in Geekbench handles document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing with ease, while the GPU's capabilities remain largely idle. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps idle power reasonable, though the 450 W GPU TDP means the system draws significant power under load even if such loads are rare in this usage class.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,776 places it at the 62nd percentile, with its closest rival being the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX at 6,760 (0.2% ahead) and the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 at 6,803 (0.4% behind). The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,879 and single-core score of 3,371 represent the most relevant modern benchmarks, showing strong multi-threaded performance and acceptable single-thread numbers. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10,676 and single-core score of 2,094 corroborate these results across a different benchmark suite.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 60,347 places it at the 88th percentile, with the Intel Arc Pro A60 at 60,326 (0% delta) being the nearest competitor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 271,631 are standout results, while the Passmark G3D score of 38,194 confirms the GPU's high-end positioning. The combined system percentile of 75 reflects the CPU's lower standing pulling the overall score down from the GPU's lofty position.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU contributes disproportionately to overall performance. The 26-percentile gap between CPU and GPU means that applications leveraging the GPU's compute capabilities will see exceptional performance, while CPU-bound tasks will perform at a level consistent with the 62nd percentile. The system is best understood as a GPU-centric build with a competent but not exceptional CPU companion.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes through backward compatibility. The platform supports ECC memory but the CPU does not have ECC support enabled, a consideration for workstation users.

The suggested PSU for this configuration is 850 W, which accounts for the GPU's 450 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP, leaving headroom for other components. The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and occupies a triple-slot width, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. These physical dimensions necessitate a case with sufficient clearance and airflow.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the CPU, as the GPU is already at the 88th percentile and represents the platform's performance ceiling. Moving to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 processor would improve CPU-bound workloads and narrow the percentile gap between components. Alternatively, upgrading system memory to faster DDR5 modules would improve memory bandwidth for both CPU and GPU data transfers, though the GPU's dedicated VRAM reduces the impact of system memory speed on graphics performance. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that next-generation storage devices can achieve full bandwidth, and the 20 CPU lanes provide room for multiple NVMe drives or other expansion cards.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize GPU-accelerated workloads above all else. Gamers at 4K resolution or high refresh rates will benefit from the RTX 4090's 88th percentile performance, though the CPU may limit frame rates in esports titles at lower resolutions. Content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, or machine learning will find the GPU's 24 GB VRAM, 82.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 512 tensor cores indispensable for their workflows. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 20 threads, while those working on GPU-accelerated applications will leverage the CUDA-compatible architecture. Students in engineering, data science, or graphics programs will find the system overqualified for coursework but capable of handling any academic project. Small business workstations serving as render farms or simulation nodes will benefit from the GPU's compute density, though the 450 W TDP requires appropriate power infrastructure.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700E sits at the 62nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 6,776. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 0.4% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6154.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at an effective 21 Gbps.

Q: What is the combined system percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, which reflects the GPU's 88th percentile pulling up the CPU's 62nd percentile standing.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, allowing builders to choose either memory type for their platform.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 850 W, which accommodates the GPU's 450 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP with headroom for other components.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 4090 delivers 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 at the same 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics suitable for gaming?

A: The UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output but is not intended for gaming. The discrete RTX 4090 handles all graphical workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations below are estimated from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4090's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 and Passmark G3D score of 38,194 indicate exceptional rasterization performance, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,371 suggests adequate but not elite CPU-side frame generation. At 4K resolution, the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth will handle the most demanding titles at maximum settings, with frame rates likely limited by the GPU's rendering capacity rather than the CPU. At 1440p, the CPU may become a limiting factor in CPU-intensive titles due to the 62nd percentile standing, potentially reducing frame rates below what the GPU alone could achieve. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance will likely cap frame rates in esports and fast-paced shooters, making the GPU's headroom partially unused. For ray-traced titles, the 128 RT cores provide substantial acceleration, and the 512 tensor cores enable DLSS-based upscaling to boost frame rates further. The lack of measured data means these figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not verified results from this specific pairing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-12700E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The CPU is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-S processor on Intel Socket 1700 with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace flagship with 24 GB GDDR6X, a 450 W TDP, and a triple-slot cooler. The system ranks at the 75th combined percentile, driven primarily by the GPU's 88th percentile performance against the CPU's 62nd percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score of 60,347 dwarfs the CPU's 6,776, reflecting the architectural focus of this pairing. This is a GPU-first system where the graphics card is the clear performance leader, and the CPU serves as a competent supporting component. The 26-percentile gap between components means that GPU-accelerated workloads will see exceptional performance, while CPU-bound tasks will perform at a more modest level. For users whose primary workloads leverage GPU compute, rendering, or gaming, this configuration delivers near-flagship performance with a mid-high-range CPU. The end-of-life status of the GPU and active status of the CPU suggest that this pairing represents a mature platform with established driver support and known performance characteristics.