SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines a 12-core Alder Lake desktop processor with an 8 GB Ada Lovelace GPU, producing a balanced mid-range desktop configuration. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards, giving the overall build a combined 62nd percentile placement. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4060's PassMark G3D score of 19545 places it comfortably above the 61st percentile of all GPUs, which suggests it can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming with reduced detail settings. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3371 indicates strong per-thread performance that should keep frame pacing consistent in most titles. For 144Hz monitors, expect playable frame rates in esports titles, though demanding AAA games will likely require medium settings at 1080p.

Streaming: The RTX 4060 includes 96 tensor cores and 24 RT cores, which support hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding workloads. The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding, particularly given its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23879. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10676 reinforces that background tasks like OBS, Discord, and browser tabs will not starve the main game process.

Video editing: The 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handle GPU-accelerated effects and timeline rendering. The CPU's 25 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency when scrubbing through projects with many clips. Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10029 suggests that export times will be reasonable for 1080p and 1440p projects, though 4K multi-stream work will test the 8 GB VRAM limit.

3D rendering: The i7-12700E's 20 threads deliver a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2406 and R23 multi-core score of 23879, making it a capable CPU for CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray. The RTX 4060's 3072 shading units and 96 TMUs contribute to GPU-accelerated render engines, though the 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer will limit scene complexity. The 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate helps with final frame compositing and post-processing passes.

Software development: The 20 threads and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support allow for rapid parallel compilation of large codebases. Geekbench single-core score of 2094 indicates responsive IDE interaction and fast incremental builds. The 65 W TDP means sustained all-core compilation workloads will not push thermal limits in standard desktop cases, and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for fast NVMe storage.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete 4060 handles everyday tasks with ease. The CPU's Cinebench R15 single-core of 339 and R20 single-core of 1415 show snappy application launching and document rendering. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day academic use, and the 8 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for spreadsheet, browser, and video conferencing workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 modules, though the memory bandwidth figure is not specified. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor, which accommodates modern NVMe SSDs and future graphics cards, while the RTX 4060 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface — meaning the GPU will not saturate the CPU's Gen 5 lanes.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU is modest, and the RTX 4060's 115 W TDP with a suggested 300 W power supply means most standard ATX power supplies will have ample headroom. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector, which is a consideration for older power supplies without native 12VHPWR support. The dual-slot GPU design (240 mm length, 111 mm height, 40 mm width) fits in most mid-tower cases without clearance issues.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU from the GeForce 50-series, as the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking suggests it can still feed more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. Conversely, adding more DDR4 or DDR5 memory would benefit memory-sensitive workloads, given the dual-channel architecture. The platform supports up to 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so future storage expansion via Gen 5 NVMe drives is viable. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking headroom is limited, but the boost clock of 4.80 GHz already provides strong single-thread performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. It operates at a base clock of 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and its 65 W TDP is notably power-efficient for a 12-core part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 25 MB shared L3 cache, which collectively reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23879 places this CPU at the 62nd percentile of all processors, outperforming the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 0.2% and the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 by 0.4% (which scores 6803 vs. the i7's 6776 average). The Geekbench multi-core score of 10676 further confirms strong multi-threaded capabilities, while the single-core Geekbench score of 2094 demonstrates that per-thread performance is competitive with workstation-class chips.

In real workloads, the 20 threads handle parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation efficiently. The 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks — such as legacy applications, spreadsheet macros, and older games — run with minimal latency. The 10 nm process node contributes to the low 65 W TDP, which allows for quieter cooling solutions and lower electricity costs over time. The absence of ECC memory support is a consideration for users building a workstation for critical data integrity, though it is not a barrier for gaming or content creation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU occupy nearly identical percentile positions (62nd and 61st respectively), which indicates a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6776 versus the GPU's 17639 reflects their different performance scales, but the percentile alignment suggests that most workloads will be equally balanced between processor and graphics card.

For gaming, the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus may become the limiting factor at 1440p or higher resolutions, where texture data exceeds the frame buffer. The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3371, should not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most titles. However, in CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games, the 12-core processor's multi-threaded throughput (Cinebench R15 multi-core 2406) will be the constraint, as the GPU waits for game logic updates.

The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 76 is surprisingly low relative to its G3D score of 19545, which suggests that driver optimization or workload characteristics may limit DirectX 12 performance in certain scenarios. This could create a bottleneck in modern DX12 games, where the GPU may underperform its raw compute capabilities. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so connection speed is not a limiting factor.

For productivity, the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance complement each other well. Video editing software can offload effects to the GPU while the CPU handles timeline decoding and export encoding. The 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth of the GPU is sufficient for 1080p editing, but 4K multi-layer projects may bottleneck on VRAM capacity rather than compute throughput. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 115 W TDP together draw modest power, reducing the risk of thermal throttling in well-ventilated cases.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers looking for a balanced system that plays modern titles at high settings with decent frame rates will find this pairing appropriate, given the GPU's 61st percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-core performance. Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will benefit from the 20 threads for export and the 4060's hardware encode capabilities. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the 12 cores and 20 threads, along with the fast single-core performance for interactive tooling.

Students building a dual-purpose machine for coursework and light gaming will find the 65 W TDP and integrated graphics fallback practical for dorm room environments. Small business workstations handling office productivity, light photo editing, and data analysis will run comfortably within the CPU's 62nd percentile performance envelope. Enthusiasts planning to upgrade the GPU later will find the CPU has headroom to support a stronger graphics card, given its 62nd percentile placement among all CPUs.

Users who primarily play at 1440p or 4K should consider a higher-tier GPU, as the 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will likely become the limiting factor. Similarly, professionals doing heavy 3D rendering or AI training may need more VRAM or tensor core throughput than the 4060 provides. The CPU's lack of ECC memory support and locked multiplier means it is not ideal for overclocking enthusiasts or mission-critical data integrity applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the RTX 4060 and i7-12700E. These estimates assume standard gaming workloads with balanced CPU and GPU utilization.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 4060's PassMark G3D score of 19545 suggests playable frame rates in most titles — expect roughly 60-80 FPS in AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Valhalla, and 100-140 FPS in esports titles like Valorant or CS2. The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3371) should not bottleneck these frame rates, as most games at 1080p are GPU-limited.

At 1440p ultra settings, the 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will start to limit performance. Estimated frame rates drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, with texture quality potentially needing reduction to fit within VRAM. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 compute should maintain playable frame rates, but the 128-bit memory bus is a constraint at this resolution.

At 4K ultra settings, the 4060 is not recommended for smooth gameplay. The 8 GB VRAM will likely overflow in modern titles, causing stuttering or texture pop-in. Estimated frame rates of 20-35 FPS in AAA games are possible, but the experience will be subpar. The CPU's performance is sufficient for 4K gaming, but the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck.

In CPU-bound scenarios like competitive shooters at low settings, the i7-12700E's 4.80 GHz boost clock and strong single-core scores (Cinebench R20 single-core 1415) will deliver high frame rates — potentially 200+ FPS at 1080p low settings, where the GPU is underutilized and the CPU is the limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: Is this CPU+GPU combination good for 1440p gaming?

A: It is workable but not ideal. The RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus (272.0 GB/s bandwidth) will limit performance at 1440p ultrawide or 4K. Expect 40-60 FPS at 1440p ultra in demanding titles, with texture quality possibly needing reduction. The CPU's 62nd percentile ranking is sufficient for 1440p gaming, but the GPU is the primary constraint.

Q: What power supply do I need for this build?

A: The RTX 4060 has a 115 W TDP and a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. The CPU's 65 W TDP adds minimal load, so a quality 300-400 W power supply from a reputable brand is adequate. The GPU requires a 1x 12-pin power connector, so ensure your PSU has the appropriate cable or an adapter.

Q: Can I use DDR4 memory with this CPU?

A: Yes, the i7-12700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This allows flexibility in choosing memory based on availability and preference. The memory bandwidth figure is not specified, so performance differences between DDR4 and DDR5 are not quantified here.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i7-12700E includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. This provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, and can handle basic desktop tasks. For gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads, the RTX 4060 is required.

Q: How does this CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX?

A: The i7-12700E scores an average of 6776, which is 0.2% higher than the Threadripper 2970WX's 6760 average. This means the two processors are effectively tied in overall benchmark performance, despite their different core configurations.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 good for streaming?

A: Yes, the RTX 4060 includes 96 tensor cores and 24 RT cores, which support hardware-accelerated encoding. The 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB VRAM are sufficient for game capture and encoding, while the CPU's 20 threads handle the streaming overhead simultaneously.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of this CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700E has a launch MSRP of $344, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has a launch MSRP of 299 USD. These are the official launch prices, not current market prices.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-12700E (Alder Lake-S, 12 cores, 20 threads) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (Ada Lovelace, 8 GB GDDR6). The CPU operates on Intel Socket 1700 with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a dual-slot card with a 115 W TDP and a suggested 300 W power supply. The combined percentile ranking is 62nd among all builds, placing it in the upper-mid range of desktop configurations.

The CPU's 62nd percentile among all CPUs and the GPU's 61st percentile among all GPUs indicate a balanced pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6776 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals (AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX at 6760, Intel Xeon Gold 6154 at 6803), while the GPU's average score of 17639 is within 1% of its nearest rivals (AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666, AMD Radeon 780M at 17588). This suggests the build performs consistently across a wide range of workloads without a dominant bottleneck.

The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and includes UHD Graphics 770 as an integrated fallback. The GPU is end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50-series, so future upgrades would likely target a higher-tier GPU rather than replacing the CPU. The 65 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP make this a power-efficient build suitable for a wide range of desktop cases.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 2406, R20 multi-core scores 10029, R23 multi-core scores 23879, and Geekbench multi-core scores 10676. Single-threaded performance is equally solid, with Cinebench R15 single-core at 339, R20 single-core at 1415, R23 single-core at 3371, and Geekbench single-core at 2094. The average benchmark score of 6776 places the CPU at the 62nd percentile, within 1% of its nearest rivals.

The GPU's benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302, Geekbench OpenCL of 95057, Geekbench Vulkan of 48643, PassMark G3D of 19545, and PassMark GPU Compute of 9213. The PassMark DirectX scores are notably varied: DirectX 9 at 236, DirectX 10 at 103, DirectX 11 at 175, and DirectX 12 at 76. The average benchmark score of 17639 places the GPU at the 61st percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at a 0.2% difference.

Combined, this pairing delivers a 62nd percentile ranking, meaning it outperforms roughly 62% of all desktop builds while trailing the top 38%. The CPU's multi-core scores are particularly strong for its class, placing it in the same territory as workstation Xeon and Threadripper parts. The GPU's raw compute (15.11 TFLOPS FP32) and texture rate (236.2 GTexel/s) are respectable for 1080p gaming, though the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM limit higher-resolution performance. The overall picture is a balanced mid-range desktop that excels at 1080p gaming and 1080p/1440p productivity tasks, with clear upgrade paths to higher-tier GPUs if needed.