SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE

57,367 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700E and AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE form a desktop pairing that sits comfortably in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database. The combined percentile of 75 places this build ahead of roughly three-quarters of all recorded configurations, but the data reveals a notable imbalance: the GPU is the dominant component. The RX 9070 GRE scores in the 87th percentile among all GPUs, while the i7-12700E lands in the 62nd percentile among CPUs. This gap of 25 percentile points suggests that in most gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads, the processor will be the limiting factor, though the CPU’s strong single-thread performance helps mitigate this in less parallelized tasks. The data indicates a system designed for high-fidelity rendering rather than CPU-bound compute, and the benchmark results confirm that the graphics card is the star of this show.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance delta between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The RX 9070 GRE’s average benchmark score of 57,367 dwarfs the i7-12700E’s average of 6,776, a ratio of roughly 8.5 to 1. While these scores come from different test suites (3DMark and Geekbench for the GPU, Cinebench and Geekbench for the CPU), the percentile positions tell the same story: the GPU is in the top 13% of all graphics cards, while the CPU is only slightly above the median. In real-world terms, this means that at lower resolutions or with less demanding graphical settings, the CPU will likely cap frame rates before the GPU reaches its full potential.

The CPU’s single-core performance is comparatively strong. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,371 places it well above the average for its class, and its Geekbench single-core score of 2,094 suggests responsive gameplay in titles that rely on a few fast threads. However, the multi-core scores tell a more nuanced story. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 23,879 is respectable for a 12-core, 20-thread part, but it trails the GPU’s dominance by a wide margin. The nearest CPU rivals—the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX at 6,760 average score (0.2% ahead), the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 at 6,803 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5317 at 6,710 (1% ahead)—are all server or workstation parts, indicating that the i7-12700E sits in a crowded mid-range field.

For gaming, the bottleneck will shift depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s 62nd percentile position will likely constrain the GPU, as the RX 9070 GRE is capable of far more frames than the i7-12700E can feed in lightly threaded titles. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the system’s overall performance will more closely mirror the GPU’s 87th percentile ranking. The data suggests that users targeting maximum refresh rates at 1080p should consider a stronger CPU, while those prioritizing 4K or high-detail 1440p gaming will find the balance acceptable.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database. This places it in the upper-middle tier, suitable for high-refresh 1440p gaming and demanding creative workloads.

Q: How does the RX 9070 GRE compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark scores?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has an average benchmark score of 57,367. It sits within 1.8% of several competitors: the Intel Arc A580 scores 57,756 (0.7% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (1.2% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392 (1.8% ahead). This indicates the 9070 GRE is competitively positioned within its immediate performance bracket.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit gaming performance?

A: Benchmark data shows the GPU is in the 87th percentile while the CPU is in the 62nd percentile. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as 1080p gaming with low graphical settings, the i7-12700E will likely be the bottleneck. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and the system’s performance will more accurately reflect the RX 9070 GRE’s strong showing.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RX 9070 GRE, and does it support modern APIs?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with current and upcoming game titles that leverage these APIs.

Q: How does the i7-12700E’s multi-core performance compare to its direct rivals?

A: The i7-12700E’s average benchmark score of 6,776 is nearly identical to its nearest competitors. It trails the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by just 0.2% and the Intel Xeon Gold 5317 by 1%, while leading the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 by 0.4%. These deltas are within the margin of error, making the CPU functionally equivalent to these parts in multi-threaded workloads.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics, and what is its power envelope?

A: Yes, the i7-12700E includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. It has a TDP of 65 watts and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility for builders choosing between memory generations.

Q: What is the launch date and MSRP of the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE was released on May 7, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $344.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is built on the Navi 48 chip using TSMC’s 4 nm process node, packing 53,900 million transistors into a 357 mm² die. This high transistor density of 151.0 million per mm² enables the card’s impressive specifications: 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation processors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1420 MHz, a game clock of 2220 MHz, and a boost clock of 2790 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). These clocks translate to a pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 535.7 GTexel/s, providing ample fill rate for high-resolution textures and effects.

The 12 GB GDDR6 memory pool on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While this is sufficient for 1440p gaming and most content creation tasks, it is not exceptional by modern standards; the card’s 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it competes with higher-bandwidth rivals in raw compute but may lag in memory-heavy scenarios. The FP32 performance of 34.28 TFLOPS, matched by FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, indicates strong compute capability for both gaming and general-purpose workloads.

The RX 9070 GRE includes 48 ray tracing cores, which are part of the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,424 reflects the card’s rasterization and ray tracing performance in a modern DirectX 12 workload. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,309 further confirms its compute power. Compared to its nearest rivals, the card is nearly identical in average score: it trails the Intel Arc A580 by 0.7%, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 1.2%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT by 1.8%. This places the 9070 GRE in a tightly contested performance band where architectural differences, rather than raw score, will determine suitability for specific workloads.

The GPU’s power requirements are substantial: a 220 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and two 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested 550 W power supply. It interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16 and offers display outputs of one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. For rendering, the 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is well-suited to GPU-accelerated effects in video editing and 3D applications, while the 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported games.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who prioritize graphics performance over raw CPU compute. Gamers aiming for high-refresh 1440p or entry-level 4K will find the RX 9070 GRE’s 87th percentile ranking well-matched to their needs, provided they pair it with a monitor that can take advantage of its capabilities. The CPU’s 62nd percentile position means that 1080p competitive gamers seeking maximum frame rates may be disappointed, but those willing to increase resolution or graphical fidelity will see the GPU stretch its legs.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated software will benefit from the card’s 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 12 GB VRAM. Video editors using OpenCL-based effects, 3D artists rendering with GPU raytracing, and developers building machine learning prototypes can leverage the 48 RT cores and 53,900 million transistors. However, the CPU’s moderate multi-core score of 23,879 in Cinebench R23 means that CPU-rendering tasks will not be a strength; this system is better for real-time previews and GPU-based final renders.

Students and small business users building a workstation for general productivity will find the i7-12700E’s 20 threads and 65 W TDP efficient, while the GPU provides headroom for occasional video editing or CAD work. The CPU’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows for flexible budget allocation, though the GPU’s 549 USD launch MSRP will dominate any parts list. This is not a system for CPU-bound simulations or heavy software compilation—the Xeon rivals in its score range are better suited—but it is a capable general-purpose machine with exceptional graphics headroom.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 65 watts. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though it lacks ECC memory support. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback display output, and the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting overclocking potential.

Benchmark results show a balanced part: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 23,879 and single-core scores 3,371, while Cinebench R20 yields 10,029 multi-core and 1,415 single-core. Geekbench results are 10,676 multi-core and 2,094 single-core. These numbers place the CPU in the 62nd percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 6,776. Its nearest rivals are all enterprise or HEDT parts: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (6,760 average, 0.2% ahead), the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (6,803, 0.4% behind), the Intel Xeon D-2775TE (6,711, 1% ahead), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5317 (6,710, 1% ahead). This indicates the i7-12700E delivers server-class multi-threaded throughput at a mainstream power envelope.

For real-world workloads, the CPU’s 20 threads handle video encoding, software compilation, and multitasking efficiently. The single-core performance, evidenced by the 3,371 Cinebench R23 score, ensures snappy application launches and solid performance in games that rely on a few fast cores. The 25 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy tasks, while the 2.10 GHz base clock keeps idle power low. The 65 W TDP is modest, making cooling straightforward, and the Socket 1700 platform offers a wide range of motherboard options. The lack of an unlocked multiplier limits enthusiast tuning, but the stock boost clock of 4.80 GHz is already competitive for its class.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. Users should treat these expectations as indicative rather than definitive.

Given the GPU’s 87th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 62nd percentile, estimated gaming performance at 1080p will be CPU-limited in many titles. For esports games with low graphical demands, the i7-12700E’s strong single-core score of 3,371 in Cinebench R23 should push frame rates well above 144 FPS, but the exact ceiling will vary. In AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 9070 GRE’s 34.28 TFLOPS will drive high frame rates, but the CPU may cause occasional dips in scenes with many on-screen characters.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The RX 9070 GRE’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited to high-detail textures, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,424 suggests strong DirectX 12 performance. Estimated frame rates in demanding titles will range from 60 to 120 FPS depending on optimization, with the CPU providing adequate support. At 4K, the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck, and the system’s performance will closely track the RX 9070 GRE’s position relative to rivals like the RX 6950 XT, which it trails by 1.8% in average score. Ray tracing performance, supported by 48 RT cores, will be playable but not class-leading.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU may limit the GPU, but the 4.80 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread score of 3,371 in Cinebench R23 support high frame rates in less demanding titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 87th percentile ranking takes over, enabling smooth gameplay on high-refresh monitors.
  • Streaming: The 20 threads of the i7-12700E handle encoding and game capture simultaneously, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM buffers frames effectively. The 65 W CPU TDP leaves thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions.
  • Video editing: The GPU’s 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 109,309 Geekbench OpenCL score accelerate effects and exports in OpenCL-based editors. The CPU’s 23,879 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline scrubbing and multi-track workflows.
  • 3D rendering: GPU-accelerated renderers will leverage the 48 RT cores and 34.28 TFLOPS for fast previews and final frames. CPU-based rendering is less competitive, given the 62nd percentile ranking, but the 20 threads provide adequate fallback performance.
  • Software development: The 20 threads and 25 MB L3 cache speed up compilation of large codebases, while the GPU’s compute capability supports local testing of graphics and machine learning libraries. The CPU’s 10,676 Geekbench multi-core score indicates solid build times.
  • Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 make this an efficient workstation for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but provides future-proofing for multimedia projects.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing Intel’s Core i7-12700E with AMD’s Radeon RX 9070 GRE. The CPU is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake processor on Socket 1700, while the GPU is a Navi 48-based card on the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all recorded desktop configurations, with the GPU (87th percentile) clearly outpacing the CPU (62nd percentile). The build is best characterized as a graphics-first system: the RX 9070 GRE’s 34.28 TFLOPS and 12 GB VRAM dominate the performance profile, while the i7-12700E provides capable but not exceptional CPU throughput.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all server or HEDT parts, indicating it competes with enterprise silicon in multi-threaded tasks. The GPU’s nearest rivals are a mix of older and newer cards, all within 1.8% of its average score, suggesting a tightly contested market segment. The system’s 75th combined percentile means it will handle demanding games and creative workloads, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast build. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 220 W TDP make cooling manageable, and the dual-slot GPU with two 8-pin connectors requires a 550 W power supply. Overall, this is a well-balanced system for its intended use case, with the GPU as the clear primary driver of performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistent across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,406 multi-core and 339 single-core; in Cinebench R20, 10,029 multi-core and 1,415 single-core; in Cinebench R23, 23,879 multi-core and 3,371 single-core; and in Geekbench, 10,676 multi-core and 2,094 single-core. The average benchmark score is 6,776, placing the CPU in the 62nd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are within 1% of its average score: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 0.2% ahead, the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 is 0.4% behind, and the Intel Xeon D-2775TE and Xeon Gold 5317 are both 1% ahead. This indicates the CPU is a median performer with strong single-thread characteristics.

The GPU’s benchmark results are equally well-defined. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5,424, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 109,309. The average benchmark score is 57,367, placing the GPU in the 87th percentile of all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.8% of its score: the Intel Arc A580 is 0.7% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 1.2% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 1.8% ahead. The combined picture shows a system where the GPU’s performance is roughly 8.5 times the CPU’s average score, and the 25-percentile gap between the two components highlights the GPU’s dominance. For users seeking a graphics-centric desktop, this pairing delivers a strong 75th percentile overall, with the CPU as a capable but secondary component.