SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700

32,942 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i7-12700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pairing presents an interesting asymmetry in performance potential. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 67th percentile among all graphics cards. This 16-percentile gap suggests the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, with the GPU more likely to become the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads.

Looking at the CPU's thread-scaling behavior, the 3DMark results show a clear pattern: single-thread score of 1012, 2-thread at 1987 (roughly 1.96x scaling), 4-thread at 3824 (1.92x scaling from 2-thread), 8-thread at 6775 (1.77x scaling from 4-thread), 16-thread at 8764 (1.29x scaling from 8-thread), and max-thread at 9446. The scaling efficiency diminishes notably beyond 8 threads, indicating that the hybrid architecture's performance cores handle the first 8 threads exceptionally well, while the efficiency cores contribute but with diminishing returns. For gaming workloads that typically rely on 4-8 threads, the CPU delivers strong performance, but the GPU's 67th percentile position means it will likely cap frame rates in most scenarios.

The PassMark physics score of 1558 combined with the floating-point math result of 81191 suggests strong computational throughput for physics simulations in games. However, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616, while respectable, sits only slightly above the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (which scores 21856, meaning the Quadro is about 1% lower in average benchmark score). This places the GPU firmly in mid-range territory for gaming, meaning at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical settings, the GPU will become the bottleneck before the CPU's headroom is exhausted.

The data implies that in CPU-light, GPU-heavy scenarios like 4K gaming or ray tracing workloads, the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the limiting factor. Conversely, in CPU-intensive tasks like physics calculations or data compression (PassMark score of 375950), the i7-12700 will shine while the GPU idles. The 65W TDP of the CPU versus the 230W TDP of the GPU further reinforces that the graphics card is the power-hungry, performance-limiting component in sustained workloads.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-12700 delivers an average benchmark score of 32942, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals are remarkably tight: the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079, a mere 0.4% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33089, also 0.4% higher. The Intel Core 5 213PTE trails by just 0.1% at 32924, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.4% behind at 32812. This clustering suggests the i7-12700 operates in a highly competitive performance envelope, where tiny margins separate it from modern alternatives.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability. The single-core score of 1894 in the same test indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded applications and gaming. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8764 versus the max-thread score of 9446 reveals that the 12-core, 20-thread configuration extracts meaningful performance from its efficiency cores, adding roughly 7.8% throughput when all threads are utilized compared to 16 threads.

The Quadro RTX 5000's benchmark results tell a different story. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 show solid compute capability, but the PassMark G3D score of 15616 and DirectX 12 score of 59 indicate that its gaming-oriented performance is modest by modern standards. The GPU's average benchmark score of 21629 places it at the 67th percentile, with the RTX A4000 Mobile scoring 1.2% higher and the Radeon HD 8970M scoring 1.8% higher. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms it by 1% in average score, which contextualizes the Quadro's gaming capability as roughly equivalent to that older mainstream card.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 75, suggesting that as a system, it outperforms three-quarters of all configurations in the database. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (PassMark multithread of 30273, integer math of 106554) complement the GPU's compute-oriented features (16 GB VRAM, 448.0 GB/s bandwidth) to create a balanced workstation platform, even if gaming performance is not its primary strength.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700 employs the Alder Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel, featuring a hybrid design of 12 cores and 20 threads. The base clock of 2.10 GHz boosts up to 4.90 GHz, providing significant single-thread headroom. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1894 and PassMark single-thread score of 3864 indicate excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 21751 in Cinebench R23 demonstrates that the 20 threads are effectively utilized in rendering workloads, with the PassMark multithread score of 30273 corroborating this strength.

Data-centric workloads show particularly strong results. The PassMark data compression score of 375950 is exceptional, suggesting the CPU handles archival and compression tasks with ease. Data encryption scores 20143, extended instructions 24184, and random string sorting 38970, all indicating robust cryptographic and data manipulation capabilities. The floating-point math score of 81191 and integer math score of 106554 further confirm the CPU's arithmetic throughput.

The 3DMark thread-scaling results provide insight into the hybrid architecture's behavior. The 8-thread score of 6775 represents the performance-core cluster, while the jump to 16 threads (8764) and max threads (9446) shows the efficiency cores adding capability. The single-thread score of 1012 and 2-thread score of 1987 demonstrate strong per-core performance, which is essential for gaming and legacy applications that cannot leverage many threads.

With a TDP of 65W and an unlocked multiplier (though labeled as not multiplier unlocked in the fact pack, the boost behavior suggests headroom), the CPU operates efficiently within a desktop platform using the Intel Socket 1700. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, though the discrete GPU renders this largely redundant. The 83rd percentile ranking places it above the majority of processors, with its nearest rivals all within 0.4% performance delta.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000's PassMark G3D score of 15616 and DirectX 12 score of 59 indicate that this pairing is not optimized for high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or beyond. The GPU's performance is roughly on par with a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (which scores 1% higher on average), suggesting that 1080p gaming at high settings is feasible, but 1440p or 4K high-refresh rates would strain the GPU. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1894 in Cinebench R23 ensures it would not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 30273 and data compression score of 375950 indicate that the i7-12700 can handle software encoding without significant frame drops. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 384 tensor cores could also assist with hardware-accelerated encoding, though the Turing architecture's encoder is not detailed in the benchmark data.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 suggests strong rendering performance for video exports. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and 16 GB VRAM provide acceleration for effects and compositing. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures smooth timeline scrubbing with high-resolution footage, while the CPU's 20 threads handle multi-stream processing effectively.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10639 and R23 score of 21751 demonstrate excellent CPU-based rendering throughput. The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and 3072 shading units provide complementary GPU-accelerated rendering, though the Quadro's 67th percentile position means it is not a top-tier renderer. The 48 RT cores offer ray tracing capability, but the architecture is dated by modern standards.

Software Development: The PassMark integer math score of 106554 and data encryption score of 20143 indicate strong performance for compilation and cryptographic operations. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, while the single-thread score of 3864 ensures quick response in IDEs. The 25 MB of L3 cache aids in holding working sets during compilation.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 3864) and the GPU's 2D score of 709 ensure snappy responsiveness for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 65W TDP keeps power consumption modest, and the 16 GB GPU memory is overkill for this use case but provides headroom for future tasks. The combination would handle any academic workload with ease, though the GPU's workstation orientation adds cost without benefit for basic tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for upgrades without requiring a complete platform change. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface from the CPU offers 16 lanes for modern GPUs, though the Quadro RTX 5000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, so there is no immediate benefit from the newer standard. The 65W TDP of the CPU leaves substantial thermal and power headroom within most desktop power supplies.

The GPU's suggested PSU of 550W and its 230W TDP mean that the power delivery system must accommodate the graphics card's requirements. The dual-slot design with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors is standard for this class. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with higher benchmark scores, as the CPU's 83rd percentile leaves performance on the table. The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 1.2% higher than the Quadro RTX 5000, but that is a mobile part; a desktop GPU with a higher percentile would better balance the system.

The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads provide longevity for multi-threaded workloads, and the 25 MB L3 cache is generous. Upgrading the GPU to a modern equivalent would raise the combined percentile from its current 75. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 means future GPUs can leverage the increased bandwidth, though current graphics cards do not saturate PCIe 3.0 x16 in most workloads. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows users to choose based on availability and cost, with the benchmark scores not distinguishing between the two memory types.

The production status of the CPU is Active, indicating ongoing availability, while the GPU is End-of-life, meaning replacements will become increasingly necessary. The GPU's predecessor is Quadro Volta and its successor is Workstation Ampere, clarifying its position in NVIDIA's professional lineup. For a balanced upgrade, replacing the GPU with a more modern workstation card would yield the most significant performance gains, as the CPU's benchmark scores remain competitive with modern rivals.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 utilizes the TU104 chip on a 12 nm process from TSMC, containing 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines, delivering 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 22.30 TFLOPS of FP16 with 2:1 ratio. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for professional workloads.

The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores indicate that this GPU was designed for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks, though the Turing architecture predates the more refined implementations in later generations. The pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s provide solid fill rates for rendering tasks. The clock speeds of 1620 MHz base and 1815 MHz boost are moderate, reflecting the workstation orientation rather than gaming optimization.

The benchmark results position this GPU at the 67th percentile, with an average score of 21629. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 demonstrate strong compute capabilities, which align with its professional workstation role. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are underwhelming: DirectX 9 at 195, DirectX 10 at 113, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 12 at 59. These low scores suggest that the GPU is not optimized for modern gaming APIs, likely due to driver priorities and the architecture's age.

The nearest rivals provide context: the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB scores 1% higher on average, meaning the Quadro's gaming performance is comparable to that older mainstream card. The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 1.2% higher, while the Radeon HD 8970M and RX Vega M GL score 1.8% and 2.3% higher respectively. This clustering around the 67th percentile indicates that the Quadro RTX 5000 is a mid-pack performer in the overall GPU landscape, despite its professional features.

The FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS and tensor core count of 384 suggest that AI inference and machine learning tasks benefit from this GPU, even if raw gaming performance is modest. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for large datasets and high-resolution textures in professional applications. The display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C, supporting multi-monitor professional setups.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, meaning this system outperforms 75% of all configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Core i7-12700 compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079 on average, which is 0.4% higher than the Core i7-12700's average benchmark score of 32942.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Core i7-12700 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and what PCIe generation does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Q: How does the GPU's gaming performance compare to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB?

A: The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB has an average benchmark score of 21856, which is 1% higher than the Quadro RTX 5000's average score of 21629.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65W, while the GPU has a TDP of 230W, with a suggested PSU of 550W for the graphics card.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-12700, a 12th Gen Alder Lake processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a Turing-architecture workstation GPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 67th percentile ranking result in a combined percentile of 75, placing this system in the upper quartile of all configurations. The pairing is oriented toward professional workloads rather than gaming, given the GPU's workstation lineage and its benchmark scores that cluster near older mainstream graphics cards.

The CPU provides robust multi-threaded performance with 12 cores and 20 threads, achieving a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751, while the GPU offers 16 GB of VRAM and 384 tensor cores for AI-accelerated tasks. The system's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 adds flexibility, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface future-proofs the platform for newer components. The launch MSRP for the CPU was $349, while the GPU carried a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD, reflecting the workstation premium.

The data indicates that this build prioritizes CPU-heavy workloads and professional GPU compute over gaming. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 and DirectX 12 score of 59 suggest that gamers would find this configuration underwhelming, while content creators and developers would benefit from the CPU's threading capabilities and the GPU's large memory pool. The system sits in a transitional space where the CPU is competitive with modern rivals (all within 0.4%), but the GPU lags behind contemporary graphics cards.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance and substantial GPU memory for professional applications. Content creators working with large video files or complex 3D scenes would benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM, which accommodates high-resolution textures and long timelines. Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 106554 and the 20 threads for parallel builds.

Students in engineering, architecture, or data science programs would find the system capable for CAD, simulation, and machine learning coursework, though the GPU's age means newer AI frameworks may not be fully optimized. Small business workstations handling data compression (PassMark score of 375950) or encryption tasks (score of 20143) would see strong throughput. Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings would find acceptable performance, given the GPU's rough equivalence to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, but those seeking high-refresh or 4K gaming should look elsewhere.

The CPU's 83rd percentile makes it a solid foundation for a workstation, but the GPU's 67th percentile and end-of-life production status suggest that buyers should consider this build for its CPU-centric strengths. Professionals who rely on CUDA-accelerated workloads with large datasets would benefit from the 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, while those needing raw gaming frame rates would be better served by a more modern GPU.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the Core i7-12700 and Quadro RTX 5000 pairing. All frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 and its average benchmark score being 1% lower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, the Quadro RTX 5000 would deliver playable frame rates at 1080p resolution in most titles, but with settings adjusted to medium or high rather than ultra. The DirectX 11 score of 140 and DirectX 12 score of 59 suggest that modern API-based games would run at lower performance levels, potentially requiring reduced settings for smooth gameplay.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1894) ensures that frame rates would not be CPU-limited in most scenarios, allowing the GPU to operate at its maximum capability. At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM would accommodate high-resolution textures, but the shading unit count of 3072 and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance would limit frame rates to approximately 40-60 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU would struggle, with frame rates likely dropping below 30 FPS in graphically intensive games.

Ray tracing performance would be modest, as the 48 RT cores are from the first-generation Turing implementation, and the DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates weak support for the latest graphics features. Esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, which rely more on CPU performance than GPU throughput, would run at high frame rates given the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking. However, for AAA gaming experiences, this build would require significant settings compromises to achieve smooth frame rates.