SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700

32,942 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER represent a desktop pairing that sits at the 85th combined percentile, blending a 12th Gen Alder Lake processor with an Ada Lovelace flagship GPU. The CPU, with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU, with a 320 W TDP, form a system where the data suggests a distinct imbalance: the processor’s multi-threaded ceiling is high, but the graphics card’s raw output dwarfs what the CPU can feed in lightly-threaded tasks. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the GPU is the dominant performance driver, but the CPU is not a passive partner. The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 34245 in Passmark G3D and 6600 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. In contrast, the i7-12700’s Passmark multi-thread score of 30273 and 3DMark max-threads score of 9446 place it in the 83rd percentile among CPUs. The delta between these percentiles is small, but the workload characteristics tell a more nuanced story.

In single-threaded tasks, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1012 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1894 are respectable, yet the GPU’s compute capabilities in Passmark GPU Compute (19822) indicate that many rendering tasks will be GPU-bound. The bottleneck shifts based on thread utilization: at 2 threads, the CPU scores 1987 in 3DMark, which is only 21% of its max-threads score of 9446, suggesting that lightly-threaded games will see the CPU as a limiting factor. Conversely, at 16 threads, the score of 8764 is 92.8% of the max-threads result, showing that fully-threaded workloads scale well.

The data implies that in gaming scenarios where frame generation relies on single-thread performance, the i7-12700’s 4.90 GHz boost clock will be the constraint, not the GPU’s 2550 MHz boost. The GPU’s 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are far ahead of what the CPU’s dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory bus can supply in latency-sensitive tasks. In productivity, the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 106554 and floating-point math score of 81191 suggest it can keep pace with the GPU in compute-heavy workloads, but the GPU’s 10240 shading units will dominate parallel tasks. The balance is thus: the CPU leads in sequential and moderately-threaded work, while the GPU leads in massively parallel and graphics-specific tasks, with the bottleneck appearing in any workload that cannot scale beyond 2-4 threads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6600 and Passmark G3D score of 34245 indicate it can drive high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K, but the CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1987 suggests frame rates above 144 FPS in esports titles will be CPU-limited. Estimates point to the GPU being the primary renderer, yet the CPU’s single-thread score of 1012 may cap maximum FPS in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming: The GPU’s 320 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture provide dedicated encoding hardware, but the CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 20143 and extended instructions score of 24184 show it can handle software encoding fallbacks. The 16 GB GDDR6X VRAM offers headroom for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding, though the CPU’s 20 threads will be taxed if both share the workload.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 and Passmark multi-thread score of 30273 indicate strong CPU performance for timeline scrubbing and effect processing, while the GPU’s 219065 Geekbench OpenCL score accelerates export rendering. The 25 MB shared L3 cache aids in large file operations, but the dual-channel memory bus may limit bandwidth-heavy 4K timelines.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 and 80 RT cores make it the primary renderer for ray-traced scenes, with Passmark GPU Compute of 19822 confirming compute capability. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10639 supports viewport simulation and physics, but scenes with heavy geometry will rely on the GPU’s 112 ROPs and 320 TMUs.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark find prime numbers score of 101 and random string sorting score of 38970 indicate strong integer and data manipulation performance for compilation and code analysis. The 12 cores and 20 threads handle parallel builds, while the GPU’s compute API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4) enables local testing of graphics code.

Student and office work: The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3864 and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide adequate performance for document processing and web browsing, while the GPU remains idle. The 65 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP mean the system is overkill for these tasks, but the 83rd CPU percentile ensures smooth multitasking in spreadsheet and presentation software.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4080 SUPER is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The memory subsystem features 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s bandwidth with a 1438 MHz memory clock (23 Gbps effective). The GPU’s 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs produce a pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 816.0 GTexel/s.

The Ada Lovelace architecture includes 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, with FP32 and FP16 both rated at 52.22 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating balanced compute for both standard and reduced-precision workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 and Passmark G3D score of 34245 place it in the 86th percentile, but the nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the RTX 4080 scores 54247 (0.1% higher average), while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (1.1% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and Radeon 8060S score 55698 and 55757 respectively, which are 2.7% and 2.8% higher, suggesting the SUPER is not the top performer in its immediate class, despite its high absolute scores.

The GPU’s 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups, and its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface matches the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes functionally, though at half the bandwidth. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures and large 3D scenes, as evidenced by the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 134, which, while lower than DirectX 11 (301), reflects the more demanding API workload. The GPU’s end-of-life status and 999 USD launch MSRP indicate it is a mature product, with the data showing it performs within 3% of its nearest rivals, making it a consistent, if not class-leading, choice.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 4K resolution will benefit most, as the GPU’s 736.3 GB/s bandwidth and 52.22 TFLOPS handle high-resolution textures, while the CPU’s 83rd percentile ensures adequate frame pacing. Content creators editing 4K video will see strong returns from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065, though those working with 8K footage may find the dual-channel memory bus limiting. 3D artists using ray-traced renders will leverage the 80 RT cores, but the CPU’s Passmark physics score of 1558 suggests complex simulations may require patience.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 12 cores and 20 threads, with Passmark integer math of 106554 indicating strong single-thread and multi-thread compilation speeds. Students and office workers will find the system grossly overpowered, but the 65 W CPU TDP means low idle power consumption when the GPU is not active, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output. Small business workstations handling financial modeling or database workloads will use the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 375950 and encryption score of 20143, though the GPU will sit idle unless visualization is needed.

The 86th GPU percentile and 83rd CPU percentile mean this build targets users who need both high-end rasterization and moderate compute, rather than specialists requiring extreme single-thread speed or massive multi-thread parallelism. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 16 GB VRAM makes it suitable for AI inference tasks using the 320 tensor cores, but the CPU’s lack of ECC memory support (eccMemory: false) limits reliability in long-running server workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die. It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that is remarkably low for its performance class. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 25 MB shared L3, which supports the Passmark multi-thread score of 30273.

The 3DMark results show scaling from 1012 (single-thread) to 1987 (2-threads) to 3824 (4-threads) to 6775 (8-threads) to 8764 (16-threads) to 9446 (max-threads), indicating efficient utilization up to 16 threads with diminishing returns beyond that. Cinebench scores confirm this: R15 multicore of 3151, R20 of 10639, and R23 of 21751, with single-core scores of 272, 1501, and 1894 respectively. The Passmark data shows strong integer performance (106554), moderate floating-point (81191), and weak prime number finding (101), suggesting the architecture favors general-purpose computation over specialized math.

The nearest rivals place the CPU in a tight band: the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 32924 (0.1% lower), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (0.4% lower), AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079 (0.4% higher), and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33089 (0.4% higher). This indicates the i7-12700 is virtually indistinguishable from its direct competitors in average benchmark score, despite being a generation older. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 lanes for the GPU, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, and the 4.90 GHz boost clock is the key asset for gaming and single-threaded applications. The 10 nm process and 65 W TDP mean it runs cool under load, but the data shows it is not a multi-thread monster—its Passmark multi-thread score of 30273 is only 8.1% higher than the single-thread score of 3864 when normalized, indicating the 20 threads are not fully utilized in many workloads. Overall, the CPU is a balanced mid-range performer that does not exceed its rivals in any single metric, but offers consistent results across all tests.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 and Passmark G3D score of 34245 suggest it can handle modern titles at high settings, while the CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1987 indicates a potential bottleneck in CPU-bound scenes.

At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1012 in 3DMark will likely limit frame rates in esports titles, as the GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS is underutilized. Estimates suggest high refresh rates (above 144 FPS) are achievable in less demanding games, but the CPU’s 4.90 GHz boost clock will be the ceiling. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more relevant, with the 736.3 GB/s bandwidth providing adequate texture streaming, and frame rates likely matching the 86th GPU percentile. At 4K, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 285.6 GPixel/s pixel rate will dominate, with the CPU’s 8-thread score of 6775 ensuring consistent frame pacing.

The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 134, while lower than DirectX 11 (301), reflects the more complex API workload, and the GPU’s Vulkan 1.4 support indicates strong compatibility with modern engines. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 suggests that games using more than 8 threads will see improved performance, but the 2-thread score of 1987 means older titles or those with poor threading will be constrained. Overall, the data implies this pairing is best suited for 1440p and 4K gaming, where the GPU’s strengths are fully realized, rather than 1080p, where the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the GPU. The 65 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP suggest a 700 W PSU is sufficient, as indicated by the suggestedPsu field, leaving headroom for modest overclocking or additional drives. The GPU’s 16-pin power connector and triple-slot design (310 mm length, 140 mm height, 61 mm width) require a spacious case, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, though at reduced bandwidth.

The CPU’s multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so overclocking is not possible, but the 4.90 GHz boost clock is already high. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer CPU on the same socket, but the data shows the i7-12700 is within 0.4% of newer rivals like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, suggesting diminishing returns. The GPU, being end-of-life, could be replaced with the GeForce 50 series successor, but the 4080 SUPER’s 86th percentile means it will remain relevant for several generations.

Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 would improve bandwidth, but the data does not specify a memory bandwidth figure, so the impact is qualitative. The platform supports Gen 5 storage via the CPU’s PCIe lanes, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface means it does not benefit from Gen 5. The 16 GB VRAM is already high, and the 736.3 GB/s bandwidth is unlikely to be a bottleneck, so the most impactful upgrade would be a CPU with higher single-thread performance, though the nearest rivals show only 0.4% differences, indicating limited headroom.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12700 a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The data shows the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1012 is significantly lower than the GPU’s compute capabilities (52.22 TFLOPS), suggesting a bottleneck in lightly-threaded tasks, but the CPU’s 16-thread score of 8764 is 92.8% of its max-threads score, indicating balanced performance in multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 85, with the CPU at 83 and the GPU at 86, placing this system in the top 15% of all desktop configurations.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209 on average, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080 (54247), 1.1% lower than the Radeon Pro W5700X (54828), and 2.7-2.8% lower than the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698) and Radeon 8060S (55757).

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i7-12700 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, though the data does not specify a memory bandwidth figure, so the performance difference is qualitative.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The launch MSRP is 999 USD, and the CPU’s launch MSRP is $349, but no other pricing details are provided.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM, 736.3 GB/s bandwidth, and 52.22 TFLOPS suggest strong 4K performance, but the CPU’s 2-thread score of 1987 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenes, so 4K is likely GPU-bound with occasional CPU constraints.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), but the boost clock of 4.90 GHz is already high, and the 65 W TDP allows for efficient operation without overclocking.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32942, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The 3DMark results show a progression from 1012 (single-thread) to 9446 (max-threads), with Cinebench R23 scores of 1894 (single-core) and 21751 (multicore). Passmark multi-thread score is 30273, with integer math at 106554 and floating-point math at 81191. The nearest rivals are within 0.4%: the Intel Core 5 213PTE (32924, 0.1% lower), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, 0.4% lower), AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33079, 0.4% higher), and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33089, 0.4% higher).

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 54209, placing it in the 86th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6600, with Geekbench OpenCL at 219065 and Vulkan at 260075. Passmark G3D score is 34245, and GPU Compute is 19822. The nearest rivals show the RTX 4080 at 54247 (0.1% higher), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54828 (1.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55698 (2.7% higher), and AMD Radeon 8060S at 55757 (2.8% higher).

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is slightly ahead of the CPU in percentile ranking (86 vs 83), but both are within the top 15-17% of their respective categories. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 8764 is 92.8% of the max-threads score, indicating good scaling, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 34245 is 63.2% of the average benchmark score of 54209, suggesting the GPU’s performance is more variable across different tests. The combined percentile of 85 reflects a system that is well-balanced overall, but the data shows the CPU is the weaker link in single-threaded scenarios, while the GPU is the stronger link in parallel workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i7-12700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER. The CPU is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake processor with a 65 W TDP and 4.90 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 10240 shading units, 16 GB GDDR6X memory, and a 320 W TDP. The system’s combined percentile is 85, with the CPU at 83 and the GPU at 86, indicating a high-tier configuration that is neither top-of-the-line nor entry-level.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.4% in average score, showing it is a mid-range performer that competes closely with newer AMD and Intel chips. The GPU’s nearest rivals are within 2.8%, with the RTX 4080 and Radeon Pro W5700X being the closest competitors. The data shows no measured FPS for this pairing, so gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores, with the GPU likely dominating in 4K and the CPU constraining at 1080p. The 85th combined percentile places this build in the upper tier of desktop systems, suitable for high-end gaming and content creation, but not for extreme multi-threaded workloads where a higher-core CPU would be needed. The 999 USD GPU launch MSRP and $349 CPU launch MSRP indicate a premium configuration, though the GPU is now end-of-life, suggesting this build represents a mature platform rather than a modern one.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds