SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700

32,942 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper tier of the benchmark database, with a combined percentile of 79. The CPU, based on the Alder Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, brings 12 cores and 20 threads with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the GPU, built on the Ampere architecture with an 8 nm Samsung process, delivers 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data; no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the synthetic scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700 employs the hybrid Alder Lake-S design, combining performance and efficiency cores to reach 12 cores and 20 threads. Its base clock sits at 2.10 GHz, but the boost clock of 4.90 GHz is the headline figure for single-threaded responsiveness. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 pool. This configuration targets workloads that scale with thread count while maintaining strong single-core performance, a balance reflected in the benchmark results.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21751 in multi-core and 1894 in single-core. The multi-core figure indicates robust rendering capability for its class, while the single-core score ensures snappy UI interactions and good performance in lightly threaded applications. The 3DMark thread scaling is telling: scores rise from 1012 in single-thread to 1987 in 2-thread, 3824 in 4-thread, 6775 in 8-thread, 8764 in 16-thread, and peak at 9446 in max-thread. This progression shows near-linear scaling up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that, typical of a design where efficiency cores handle background tasks while performance cores carry the primary load.

PassMark results reinforce the processor’s diverse strengths. The multi-thread score of 30273 and integer math score of 106554 point to strong compile and data-processing capabilities. Floating-point math at 81191 supports scientific and engineering workloads. Data compression at 375950 and encryption at 20143 indicate solid file-handling and security performance. The single-thread score of 3864 is competitive, though the find prime numbers score of 101 is notably lower, suggesting some workloads with irregular memory access patterns do not benefit equally from the architecture.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32942 places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 32924 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (0.4% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33089 (0.4% higher). This means the i7-12700 is effectively tied with these parts, differing by less than half a percent in average score. The 7800X3D, known for gaming cache, does not outrun this chip in aggregate benchmarks, indicating the i7-12700 holds its own across varied tasks.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 23356 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 provide the foundation, with the CPU’s single-thread score of 1012 (3DMark) and 3864 (PassMark) ensuring it will not bottleneck in most scenarios.

For esports titles at 1080p, the expectation is very high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS in most cases. The CPU’s 2-thread score of 1987 and 4-thread score of 3824 show strong low-thread performance, which is critical for high-refresh gaming. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, but the RTX 3070 Ti’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth should sustain high refresh rates in competitive shooters and demanding AAA titles at high settings. At 4K, frame rates will drop to the 60 FPS range for many AAA games, with less demanding titles pushing higher. The 8 GB GDDR6X memory may become a limiting factor for texture-heavy titles at 4K ultra settings, but for 1080p and 1440p, this pairing is well balanced.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus. This flexibility is a key advantage, allowing builders to choose between mature, lower-cost DDR4 or newer DDR5 depending on motherboard selection. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth storage and future GPU upgrades, while the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 290 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the system is 600 W, which provides reasonable headroom for the combined power draw of these components plus typical system peripherals. The GPU requires a 1x 12-pin power connector, so the PSU must include this or an adapter. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments on supported boards, but the 4.90 GHz boost already provides strong out-of-box performance.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking leaves room for a more powerful graphics card without creating a CPU bottleneck in most workloads. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means a future GPU using that interface would be accommodated, though the current RTX 3070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0. Memory capacity and speed upgrades are also viable, given the dual-channel support for either DDR4 or DDR5, depending on the motherboard.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong all-around performance without reaching into the extreme enthusiast tier. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile place it above the majority of systems, making it suitable for gamers at 1440p who want high refresh rates in competitive titles and solid frame rates in AAA games. The combined percentile of 79 indicates a well-matched system for this resolution class.

Content creators will find the CPU’s multi-core scores compelling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 and PassMark multi-thread score of 30273 support video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU’s compute score of 11601 (PassMark GPU Compute) and 119718 (Geekbench OpenCL) provide acceleration for GPU-accelerated rendering and encoding tasks. Software developers benefit from the 12 cores and 20 threads, with integer math at 106554 indicating strong build times for large codebases.

Students and small business workstations can leverage the UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics as a fallback, though the discrete GPU handles the heavy lifting. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for office environments, while the 290 W GPU TDP is standard for a performance desktop. The system is not aimed at budget builds—the launch MSRP of the CPU is $349 and the GPU is 599 USD—but for users who prioritize performance across a mix of workloads, this is a capable configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched for 1440p gaming. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 9446 and single-thread score of 1012 indicate it can feed frames to the GPU without stalling in most titles. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 23356 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3478 suggest it is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and with demanding graphics settings.

At 1080p with low graphical settings, the CPU becomes the primary constraint, as lower resolution workloads shift the burden to the processor. The CPU’s 8-thread score of 6775 and 16-thread score of 8764 show it is not a weak link, but the GPU has headroom in such scenarios. At 4K, the GPU is definitively the bottleneck, with the 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth serving as the ceiling for texture detail and fill rate.

The percentile data reinforces this balance. The CPU is at the 83rd percentile, the GPU at the 75th, and the combined system at 79. The GPU is the weaker component, meaning upgrades to the GPU would yield the most visible gains in gaming. However, in CPU-bound productivity tasks like data compression (375950) and encryption (20143), the processor is the star, and the GPU’s role is secondary.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700 has 12 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 Ti have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, depending on the motherboard chosen.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti is at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29945.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, based on the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 290 W TDP.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, but the boost clock of 4.90 GHz provides strong out-of-box performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s compute performance?

A: The GPU delivers 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and has a PassMark GPU Compute score of 11601.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA104 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The transistor density of 44.4M per mm² is notable for its generation. The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, making it fully capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS.

Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, with an effective data rate of 19 Gbps. This bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads, though the 8 GB capacity is the primary limitation for high-resolution texture packs and future titles. The base clock is 1575 MHz with a boost of 1770 MHz, supporting a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores show a strong performer. The PassMark G3D score of 23356 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 indicate solid DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench scores of 119718 (OpenCL) and 139541 (Vulkan) demonstrate good compute and API flexibility. The GPU is at the 75th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6800 (0.5% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (0.5% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 6700 (1.6% higher). This places the 3070 Ti in a competitive bracket, slightly behind newer mobile parts but ahead of the previous generation’s flagship.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-12700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The CPU is a 12th-generation Alder Lake part on Socket 1700, while the GPU is a 30-series Ampere card. The combined percentile is 79, placing it above the majority of systems in the database. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile indicate a slight CPU advantage, but the overall balance is solid for a high-performance desktop.

The platform offers modern connectivity with PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU and PCIe 4.0 on the GPU. Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility, though the user must choose one at build time. The system is production-active for the CPU but end-of-life for the GPU, meaning the graphics card is no longer in production. The GPU’s launch date is 2021-05-30, and it sits between the GeForce 20 and 40 series in the product stack.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32942, with a percentile of 83. Its best results are in PassMark integer math (106554) and multi-thread (30273), with strong Cinebench R23 scores of 21751 multi-core and 1894 single-core. The GPU’s average score is 29945, with a percentile of 75. Its top scores include PassMark G3D at 23356 and Geekbench Vulkan at 139541.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is nearly tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0.4% higher average score) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (0.4% higher), while the GPU is nearly tied with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (0.5% higher). The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 9446 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3478 indicate that neither component is a weak link, but the GPU is the more likely upgrade target for gaming improvements. The system as a whole is in the upper quartile of performance, suitable for demanding applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the estimated frame rates are well above 100 FPS in most titles, driven by the CPU’s single-thread score of 1012 (3DMark) and the GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP32. The 608.3 GB/s bandwidth supports high texture detail, though 8 GB VRAM may limit 4K ultra settings.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores (192) and the CPU’s 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and gaming simultaneously. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30273 ensures background tasks do not stutter gameplay.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 and GPU compute score of 11601 accelerate rendering and effects. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p timelines, with 4K requiring careful proxy management.

3D Rendering: CPU rendering benefits from the 12 cores and 20 threads, with a PassMark floating-point score of 81191. GPU rendering leverages the 6144 shading units and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 for fast viewport and final-frame renders.

Software Development: The 12 cores and 20 threads handle parallel builds, with integer math at 106554 indicating fast compilation. The 25 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for repetitive tasks, and the 65 W TDP keeps power draw manageable during long builds.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for basic productivity, but the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback, and the CPU’s single-thread score of 3864 (PassMark) ensures responsive applications. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking means it will not struggle with multitasking or large spreadsheets.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds