SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700 + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700

32,942 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

11,627 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 67th percentile overall, a figure that places it above the majority of competing configurations. The CPU holds an 83rd percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 51st percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system where the processor is the more dominant component in terms of relative standing. The combined average benchmark score of 32,942 for the CPU and 11,627 for the GPU indicates a substantial gap in raw compute output, but the pairing is designed to leverage the CPU’s strong multi-threaded headroom to feed the GPU in gaming and productivity tasks. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the data contains no measuredFps values — so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12700 delivers a multi-threaded 3DMark score of 9,446 at max threads, which is its peak result in that suite, while the single-thread score of 1,012 shows strong per-core efficiency. The 16-thread score of 8,764 trails the max-thread result by 7.2%, indicating that the processor scales well beyond 16 threads, while the 8-thread score of 6,775 and 4-thread score of 3,824 show diminishing returns as thread counts drop. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 21,751 is particularly notable, as it outpaces the R20 multicore result of 10,639 by over twofold, and the single-core R23 score of 1,894 similarly exceeds the R20 single-core score of 1,501 by 26.2%. Passmark results reinforce this picture, with a multithread score of 30,273 and a single-thread score of 3,864, alongside strong specialized workloads like integer math at 106,554 and floating-point math at 81,191. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32,942 places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core 5 213PTE (32,924) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32,812), while it trails the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33,089) and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33,079) by 0.4% each — a tight cluster that shows this chip is competitive with modern mid-range parts.

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT posts a Passmark G3D score of 24,176, which is its highest graphics benchmark, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 54,228 far exceeds the OpenCL score of 18,290, suggesting strong driver optimization for that API. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,157 is a modest result compared to the Passmark figures, and the GPU’s average benchmark score of 11,627 places it 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (11,680) and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M (11,528), with a 1.3% lead over the NVIDIA Tesla K20c (11,479) and a 1.8% deficit against the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT (11,842). The GPU’s 51st percentile rank means it sits near the median of all GPUs, which is a different class than the CPU’s 83rd percentile — the latter is a top-tier processor while the former is a mid-pack graphics card. The combined picture shows a CPU that can handle heavy compute workloads with ease, but the GPU’s average benchmark score of 11,627 is the limiting factor for graphics-bound tasks, as the CPU’s 32,942 average score provides ample headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize in every scenario.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU’s 83rd percentile rank versus the GPU’s 51st percentile rank means the graphics card is the primary bottleneck in GPU-heavy workloads like gaming at high resolutions, while the CPU is the stronger component in compute tasks. The CPU’s max-thread 3DMark score of 9,446 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,751 indicate it can process complex physics, AI, and simulation tasks faster than the GPU can render frames, so in a 1080p or 1440p gaming session, the GPU will likely hit its limits before the CPU does. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 24,176 is only 19.7% of the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 30,273, and while these are different benchmarks, the relative gap suggests that the CPU has significant spare capacity. FPS scaling is not directly measured, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 1,012 in 3DMark and 3,864 in Passmark indicate it can maintain high frame pacing, while the GPU’s 51st percentile rank means it will likely cap frame rates below what the CPU can deliver. For CPU-bound workloads like data compression (Passmark score of 375,950) or encryption (20,143), the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU dominates, but for graphics-bound tasks, the GPU’s mid-pack performance becomes the ceiling. The 16-thread 3DMark score of 8,764 versus the 2-thread score of 1,987 shows the CPU scales well with multi-threading, so it will not bottleneck in multi-core workloads, but the GPU’s lack of comparable scaling means it will limit overall system performance in gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 24,176 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,157 suggest it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but the 51st percentile rank indicates it is not a top-tier card for 4K ultra settings. The CPU’s single-thread 3DMark score of 1,012 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,864 are strong enough to avoid bottlenecking in most titles, so frame rates will be GPU-limited. At 1080p, the GPU’s performance should deliver smooth frame rates in esports and mid-range AAA titles, but at 1440p, the 16 GB of memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth will help maintain stability, though the GPU’s mid-pack rank means settings may need adjustment for demanding games. At 4K, the GPU’s 51st percentile rank suggests frame rates will drop significantly, and the CPU’s headroom will not compensate for the GPU’s limits. The CPU’s 20 threads and 4.90 GHz boost clock provide a solid foundation for gaming, but the GPU is the deciding factor, and its average benchmark score of 11,627 versus the CPU’s 32,942 means the graphics card will cap performance in most scenarios. These figures are estimates because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so treat them as indicative rather than precise.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p or 1440p high-refresh-rate play, where the CPU’s 83rd percentile rank ensures consistent frame delivery and the GPU’s 51st percentile rank is sufficient for most titles at those resolutions. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,751 and Passmark multithread score of 30,273, which handle rendering tasks efficiently, while the GPU’s 16 GB of memory supports GPU-accelerated effects without exhausting VRAM. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the CPU’s 12 cores and 20 threads, with a Passmark integer math score of 106,554 indicating fast integer operations. Students and small business workstations running office applications, web browsing, and light multitasking will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,864 more than adequate, though the GPU is overkill for such tasks — the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could suffice, but the discrete card adds headroom for occasional graphics work. The build class is desktop, so it suits stationary setups where power draw and space are less constrained, and the GPU’s dual-slot design with a 267 mm length fits standard ATX cases. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 263 W TDP suggest a system that is not power-hungry, but the GPU’s suggested PSU of 600 W indicates a mid-range power supply is needed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology — the CPU’s dual-channel memory bus works with either type, though the FACT PACK does not specify bandwidth for either. The CPU also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for future storage and GPU upgrades, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it is fully compatible with the CPU’s lanes but does not utilize the Gen 5 bandwidth. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low, and the GPU’s 263 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 600 W leaves headroom for additional components like storage drives or fans, but a larger PSU would be needed for a more powerful GPU upgrade. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 83rd percentile rank indicates it has headroom to support a faster graphics card, while the GPU’s 51st percentile rank is the current bottleneck. The CPU’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can keep existing DDR4 modules or move to DDR5 when upgrading the platform, and the 25 MB of shared L3 cache is ample for most workloads. The socket 1700 platform is not the latest, but the CPU’s active production status and strong benchmark scores make it a viable foundation for a mid-cycle upgrade, with the GPU being the first component to swap.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,012 in 3DMark and 3,864 in Passmark ensures it can keep up with high frame rates, while the GPU’s 51st percentile rank will deliver solid performance at 1080p and 1440p, though not at the top tier for 4K. The 16 GB of VRAM helps with texture-heavy titles, but the GPU’s mid-pack rank caps maximum frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 20 threads, with a max-thread 3DMark score of 9,446, provide enough multi-threading to encode video while gaming, and the Passmark data compression score of 375,950 shows fast processing for stream overlays and chat. The GPU’s mid-pack rank means game capture will be fine, but the CPU will handle most of the encoding load.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,751 and Passmark multithread score of 30,273 accelerate rendering and export times, while the GPU’s 16 GB of memory supports large timelines and effects, though its 51st percentile rank means GPU-accelerated effects will not be as fast as a higher-tier card.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 81,191 and integer math score of 106,554 drive complex calculations, and the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10,639 indicates strong CPU rendering, while the GPU’s compute score of 13,473 in Passmark can assist with GPU-based renderers, but the CPU is the primary workhorse.

Software development: The CPU’s 20 threads and Passmark integer math score of 106,554 speed up compilation and testing, and the single-thread score of 3,864 handles interactive IDEs smoothly, while the GPU is not heavily utilized unless developing graphics applications, where its mid-pack rank is adequate.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than enough for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output, but the discrete GPU adds unnecessary power for these tasks, making this a workstation that is over-specified for typical office use.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700 has 12 cores and 20 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus width.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700 has an average benchmark score of 32,942, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D’s score of 33,079.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested power supply?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 263 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the CPU has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), so it is not unlocked for overclocking.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of an Intel Core i7-12700 and an AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, with a combined percentile rank of 67, placing it above most systems. The CPU is a high-tier processor at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is a mid-tier graphics card at the 51st percentile, creating a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and is competent but not exceptional in graphics-bound tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32,942 is nearly triple the GPU’s average score of 11,627, so the overall tier is defined by the CPU’s strength rather than the GPU’s, making this a processor-first build where the graphics card is a secondary consideration. The pairing is suitable for users who need strong multi-threaded compute performance and moderate gaming capability, rather than a system optimized for maximum frame rates or GPU-accelerated workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700 is built on the Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry, with a die size of 215 mm² and 12 cores, 20 threads. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W, and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU’s benchmark scores show a strong scaling from 2 threads (3DMark score of 1,987) to max threads (9,446), with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,751 being a standout result for multi-threaded workloads. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,864 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1,012 indicate solid per-core performance, which is critical for games and lightly-threaded applications, while the multithread score of 30,273 shows the CPU can handle heavy parallel workloads like video rendering or compile jobs. The CPU’s 83rd percentile rank and average benchmark score of 32,942 place it in a tight competitive cluster with the Intel Core 5 213PTE (32,924, 0.1% ahead) and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32,812, 0.4% ahead), while slightly trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33,089, -0.4%) and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33,079, -0.4%). The 20 threads and high boost clock make it a versatile processor for both gaming and productivity, though the locked multiplier limits overclocking potential, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output for systems without a discrete GPU. Overall, the CPU is the stronger half of this pairing, with benchmark results that support demanding compute tasks and a platform that offers memory flexibility and modern PCIe support.