SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650HX

31,290 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12650HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile represents a high-end laptop configuration built around Intel’s Alder Lake-HX architecture and NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a 2.00 GHz base clock and a 4.70 GHz boost clock, while the GPU features 7,424 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The combined benchmark percentile places this pairing at 82, meaning it outperforms the majority of systems in the database, yet the data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Intel’s 10 nm Alder Lake-HX architecture. This hybrid design combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The base clock of 2000.00 MHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz indicate a chip capable of substantial single-thread bursts, which is reflected in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2688. Multi-threaded workloads benefit from the 24 MB shared L3 cache and the dual-channel memory controller supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 modules.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded productivity. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19043 is strong for a mobile part, while the R20 multi-core result of 7998 and R15 multi-core of 1919 follow a similar pattern. The PassMark multithread score of 22573 reinforces this positioning. In single-threaded tasks, the PassMark single-thread score of 3637 and R20 single-core of 1128 demonstrate respectable performance, though the chip trails dedicated desktop parts in this metric.

The CPU’s percentile of 82 versus all CPUs means it sits above the majority of processors in the database. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster: the Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 31,143 (0.5% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 scores 31,473 (0.6% lower), the Intel Core 7 240H scores 31,483 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31,495 (0.6% lower). The i7-12650HX’s average benchmark score of 31,290 places it within 1% of all these alternatives, meaning real-world differences in CPU-bound tasks will be negligible.

In practical terms, the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 266,700 and integer math score of 81,810 suggest strong performance in file archiving, spreadsheet calculations, and database operations. The floating-point math score of 58,426 indicates capable scientific and engineering computation, while the extended instructions score of 15,856 supports modern SIMD workloads like video encoding and cryptography. The physics score of 1,152 is modest, but this is a mobile chip with a 55 W TDP, so thermal constraints are expected.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on synthetic benchmark scores. The data is clear on this point: no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows exist, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, the following analysis uses the GPU’s benchmark results to infer capability, not direct gameplay metrics.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile delivers a PassMark G3D score of 24,926, which places it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 159,575 and Vulkan score of 145,807 show strong compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 244 and DirectX 12 score of 96 indicate that modern APIs are well-supported, though the DirectX 9 score of 286 and DirectX 10 score of 157 suggest older titles run without issue.

For 1080p high-refresh gaming, this GPU should handle most titles at ultra settings with frame rates well above 60 FPS, based on the G3D score relative to other mobile GPUs. At 1440p, the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient headroom for high-texture games, but the lack of measured data means exact frame rates cannot be stated. At 4K, the GPU’s 80 ROPs and 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate will struggle with the most demanding titles at ultra settings, though lighter esports titles may still achieve playable rates.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a tight performance cluster. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38,299 on average (0.4% lower), the RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38,349 (0.6% lower), the RTX 4070 scores 37,648 (1.3% higher), and the Tesla P4 scores 37,628 (1.3% higher). The RTX 4080 Mobile’s average benchmark score of 38,135 places it within 1.5% of all these cards, meaning the mobile 4080 is essentially performance-equivalent to a desktop RTX 4070 in synthetic tests.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 81st percentile are nearly identical, indicating that both components operate in the same performance tier. This alignment means the CPU will not starve the GPU in most gaming scenarios, and the GPU will not be held back by a weak processor in CPU-bound titles.

In CPU-intensive workloads like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 1,152 is the weakest CPU metric relative to the GPU’s compute strength. This suggests that games with heavy physics calculations may see the CPU as a limiting factor, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity. Conversely, the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 11,191 indicates that compute-heavy tasks like rendering or machine learning inference will be GPU-bound.

The memory bandwidth situation is worth noting. The GPU has 432.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth, while the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not list a specific bandwidth figure. For gaming, this is unlikely to be a bottleneck at 1080p or 1440p, but at 4K with ultra textures, the 12 GB VRAM could be a limiting factor in some titles.

The FPS scaling from synthetic scores suggests that at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 3,637) will drive frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU’s G3D score will dominate at higher resolutions. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary determinant of frame rates, and the CPU’s multi-thread advantage becomes less relevant. This is a classic balanced laptop configuration for high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gaming.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers and professionals who need a single laptop for both demanding games and productivity tasks. Gamers playing at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will find the combination well-suited, as the GPU’s G3D score of 24,926 and CPU’s single-thread score of 3,637 suggest high frame rates in most titles. For 1440p gaming, the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough headroom for ultra settings in current games, though future titles may require settings adjustments.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or photo manipulation will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 19,043) and the GPU’s compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute 11,191). Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 14 cores and 20 threads, while the PassMark data encryption score of 15,325 supports secure development workflows. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and light multitasking will find this configuration overkill, but it will handle these tasks with ease.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP indicate this is a performance laptop, not an ultraportable. Users who prioritize battery life over performance should look elsewhere, but those who need a desktop-class experience in a mobile form factor will find this pairing appropriate.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is soldered, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded independently. The GPU is also integrated into the laptop chassis, so neither component can be swapped. This is a sealed platform, and the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, so users can upgrade from slower to faster RAM or increase capacity, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum supported capacity. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, which supports fast NVMe SSDs, though the GPU itself runs on PCIe 4.0 x16. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is not in use.

The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, so PSU headroom cannot be quantified. The GPU has a 110 W TDP and uses no external power connectors, meaning it draws power from the laptop’s internal supply. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding more RAM or replacing the storage with a faster Gen 4 or Gen 5 NVMe drive, though the FACT PACK does not specify the number of M.2 slots or supported NVMe versions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and CPU’s single-thread score of 3,637 should deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS in esports titles and above 60 FPS in AAA games at ultra settings, based on synthetic estimates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for game capture and encoding while gaming, and the GPU’s NVENC encoder (implied by Ada Lovelace architecture) offloads video encoding from the CPU, though the FACT PACK does not list encoder specifications.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,043 indicates strong render performance in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 159,575 accelerates effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 22,573 and GPU’s compute score of 11,191 suggest capable Blender or Maya performance, though the 12 GB VRAM may limit very large scenes.

Software development: The 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache handle parallel compilation efficiently, and the PassMark integer math score of 81,810 supports heavy code processing.

Student and office work: This configuration far exceeds the requirements for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, with the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,637 ensuring snappy response.

FAQ

Q: Does this laptop support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, though the FACT PACK does not specify which type is installed in a given system.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded to a newer processor?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-12650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard, meaning the CPU cannot be replaced.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX?

A: The i7-12650HX has an average benchmark score of 31,290, while the Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31,495, a difference of 0.6% in favor of the AMD chip.

Q: Is this GPU faster than the desktop RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38,135, while the desktop RTX 4070 scores 37,648, meaning the mobile chip is 1.3% faster in synthetic tests.

Q: What is the CPU’s integrated graphics solution?

A: The CPU includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, which can be used for display output and light tasks when the discrete GPU is disabled.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining an Intel Core i7-12650HX processor with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 82 indicates that this pairing outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 81st percentile are closely matched, suggesting a balanced configuration with no single component dominating the other.

This is not a budget system; it is a high-performance mobile workstation or gaming laptop. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-HX part with a 4.70 GHz boost, and the GPU is a 5 nm Ada Lovelace chip with 7,424 shading units and 12 GB GDDR6. The 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP mean this system requires adequate cooling and a substantial power supply, though the suggested PSU is not listed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31,290, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 38,135, placing it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 82, meaning this pairing sits in the top quintile of all systems.

In CPU benchmarks, the strongest results are the PassMark data compression score of 266,700 and integer math score of 81,810, indicating excellent throughput for data-heavy tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,043 and single-core of 2,688 show balanced performance across both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The weakest CPU metric is PassMark find prime numbers at 74, which is a synthetic test with limited real-world impact.

For the GPU, the PassMark G3D score of 24,926 is the primary gaming indicator, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 159,575 and Vulkan score of 145,807 demonstrate strong compute performance. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 96 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 244, which may reflect driver optimization rather than hardware capability. The GPU compute score of 11,191 indicates solid performance for non-graphics workloads like machine learning inference.

The combined picture is a laptop that handles both gaming and productivity with high proficiency. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 22,573 in PassMark and the GPU’s G3D score of 24,926 place this system in the upper echelon of mobile hardware. While no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, the synthetic benchmarks suggest that 1080p gaming at ultra settings will be smooth, and 1440p gaming will be playable in most titles. The tight clustering of rivals (all within 1.3% of the GPU’s score) means that other high-end laptops will offer similar performance, but this configuration stands as a capable, well-rounded choice.