SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650HX

31,290 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12650HX paired with the AMD Radeon 860M is a laptop-class combination that lands in the 77th percentile overall, signaling a capable mid-range mobile platform. The CPU is a strong performer, sitting in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the integrated GPU holds the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This pairing is not about extreme gaming or rendering, but about delivering a well-rounded, efficient experience for everyday tasks, content creation, and light-to-moderate gaming at portable resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel's Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-HX variant, and fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel. It features a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU alone.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 19043 points in the multicore test, which is notably strong for a mobile chip. The single-core score of 2688 in the same test is respectable, indicating solid per-thread performance. The Passmark suite reinforces this picture: the multithread score is 22573, while the single-thread score is 3637. Data compression and encryption tasks yield scores of 266700 and 15325, respectively, suggesting the CPU handles these compute-heavy tasks efficiently.

The nearest rivals provide context for these numbers. The Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 31143 on average, which is just 0.5% ahead of the i7-12650HX's average benchmark score of 31290. The Intel Core Ultra 3 205, Intel Core 7 240H, and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX all score within 0.6% of this processor, with average scores of 31473, 31483, and 31495, respectively. This places the i7-12650HX in a tight competitive cluster, meaning that in real-world tasks, differences between these CPUs are negligible—often less than 1% in aggregate benchmarks.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7998 indicates that the CPU can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, though it is not a top-tier workstation part. The R20 single-core score of 1128 is adequate for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark physics score of 1152 and floating-point math score of 58426 suggest decent computational throughput for scientific and engineering tasks, while the integer math score of 81810 and random string sorting score of 29692 point to solid general-purpose performance.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is defined by the CPU's strength and the GPU's moderate capability. The CPU's average benchmark score is 31290, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401, which places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the pair is 77, indicating that this system outperforms a majority of laptops but is not in the top tier.

The AMD Radeon 860M, based on RDNA 3.5 architecture and fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043. These scores are competitive with the GPU's nearest rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 on average, a mere 0.1% higher than the 860M. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 26331, which is 0.3% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 is 1.1% ahead with an average score of 26683. This means the 860M is effectively on par with a discrete entry-level GPU like the MX550, which is impressive for an integrated solution.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is clearly the dominant component in terms of percentile ranking. For tasks that rely heavily on the CPU, such as video encoding, code compilation, or multitasking, this laptop will perform well above average. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the 860M will be the limiting factor, as its performance is closer to entry-level discrete GPUs rather than mid-range or high-end parts.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12650HX compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The i7-12650HX has an average benchmark score of 31290. The Intel Core 9 273PTE is 0.5% ahead, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 205, Intel Core 7 240H, and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX are all 0.6% behind. These differences are negligible in real-world use.

Q: What is the GPU performance level of the AMD Radeon 860M?

A: The 860M scores 22759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30043 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 26401. This places it in the 72nd percentile, close to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is only 0.1% faster on average.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i7-12650HX support?

A: The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is not specified, but the memory bus is dual-channel.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-12650HX have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770 as its integrated graphics. However, this system pairs it with the discrete-class AMD Radeon 860M, which is a separate IGP chip.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The Intel Core i7-12650HX has a TDP of 55 W, while the AMD Radeon 860M has a TDP of 15 W. The GPU does not require any power connectors and has no suggested PSU, indicating it is a low-power integrated solution.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, meaning the processor can be overclocked if the laptop's BIOS and cooling allow for it. However, in a mobile form factor, this is often limited by thermal constraints.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU only. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is best suited for 1080p or lower resolutions with moderate settings. The GPU's average benchmark score is in the 72nd percentile, which is comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce MX550. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3637 in Passmark and 2688 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU will limit frame rates in demanding titles.

Streaming is a viable use case due to the CPU's robust multi-threading capabilities. With a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19043 and a Passmark multithread score of 22573, the i7-12650HX can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The GPU's Vulkan score of 30043 suggests it can also assist with some encoding tasks, though the CPU is the primary workhorse here.

Video editing is a strong suit for this build. The CPU's high multicore performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R20 score of 7998, allows for smooth timeline scrubbing and faster export times in applications like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's OpenCL score of 22759 provides some acceleration for effects and rendering, but the CPU will carry most of the load.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will be CPU-bound. The i7-12650HX's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1919, deliver respectable render times. The GPU's 512 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can handle viewport rendering, but final frame renders will rely on the CPU.

Software development benefits from the CPU's balanced performance. The Passmark data compression score of 266700 and integer math score of 81810 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The single-thread score of 3637 ensures quick IDE responses and build times, while the 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

For student and office work, this build is more than sufficient. The CPU's single-core performance is adequate for everyday applications like web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets. The GPU, while not powerful, is enough for light photo editing and casual video playback. The low TDP of the GPU (15 W) suggests good battery life potential, though the CPU's 55 W TDP is higher and will influence overall power draw.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The system is designed as a complete laptop, so any upgrade would involve replacing the entire machine. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the memory bus is dual-channel, indicating that the laptop's RAM is likely the primary upgradeable component, provided the manufacturer allows it.

The GPU is an integrated part (IGP) with a 15 W TDP, and it uses the PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Since it is integrated, there is no upgrade path for the GPU itself. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, but in a laptop, these are typically routed to fixed components like the GPU and NVMe storage.

The TDP figures suggest a power-efficient platform. The CPU's 55 W TDP is moderate for a high-core-count mobile processor, while the GPU's 15 W TDP is minimal. There is no suggested PSU for the GPU, and it has no power connectors, confirming that it draws power from the system's main power delivery. A sensible next upgrade for users of this platform would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the GPU uses "System Shared" memory, meaning more RAM can directly improve graphics performance. Additionally, upgrading to faster DDR5 memory (if not already used) could improve both CPU and GPU performance, as the GPU's bandwidth is "System Dependent."

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 860M, with an average benchmark score of 26401, is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is an entry-level discrete GPU. This suggests that in modern games at 1080p with ultra settings, frame rates would likely be in the 30-45 FPS range for less demanding titles, and lower for AAA games.

At 720p, the GPU's performance would be more comfortable, potentially delivering 60 FPS or higher in many games, given its 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3637 in Passmark) ensures that frame times are consistent, reducing stutter in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's Vulkan score of 30043 is notably higher than its OpenCL score, suggesting that games using Vulkan may perform better than those using DirectX, though the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are less demanding, the 860M could potentially push 60-100 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. For more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed, players would need to reduce settings to medium or low at 1080p to achieve playable frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU would likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern games, making it unsuitable for high-resolution gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the CPU is clearly the stronger component, ranking in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 72nd percentile. This imbalance means that in GPU-intensive workloads like gaming at high resolutions or rendering complex 3D scenes, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. The CPU has enough headroom to support a more powerful GPU, but it is paired with the 860M, which limits overall system performance in graphics-heavy tasks.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or data analysis, the CPU will be the limiting factor, but only because it is not a top-tier workstation chip. The GPU's role in these tasks is minimal, so the CPU's performance dictates the outcome. The Passmark multithread score of 22573 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19043 show that the CPU can handle these tasks well above average, but the GPU cannot accelerate them significantly.

The FPS scaling, estimated from the GPU's benchmark scores, shows that performance will drop significantly as resolution increases. At 720p, the GPU's 48 GPixel/s pixel rate can keep up with moderate demands, but at 1080p and above, the 16 ROPs and 512 shading units become limiting. The CPU's high single-thread score ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in gaming, allowing the GPU to be the sole determinant of frame rates.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system combining the Intel Core i7-12650HX with the AMD Radeon 860M. The CPU is a high-performance mobile processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, while the GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.5 part with 512 shading units. The combined percentile rank is 77, indicating that this system outperforms roughly three-quarters of all laptop configurations in the database.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it a standout component, suitable for demanding productivity tasks. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking is respectable for an integrated solution, placing it on par with entry-level discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce MX550. This pairing is best described as a "productivity-first" laptop with decent gaming capabilities at lower resolutions.

The system's overall tier is mid-range. It cannot compete with high-end gaming laptops that feature discrete GPUs like the RTX 5060, which is only 0.3% faster than the 860M in this dataset, but it offers a balanced experience for users who need CPU power for work and GPU capability for occasional gaming or creative tasks. The 77th combined percentile confirms that this is a capable, but not exceptional, mobile platform.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers who primarily play at 720p or 1080p with moderate settings. The GPU's performance, comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, means that esports titles and older games will run smoothly, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3637 in Passmark) ensures a responsive gaming experience without stutter.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU's high multicore scores (Cinebench R23: 19043). The GPU can assist with effects and viewport rendering, but the CPU will handle the heavy lifting, making this a viable entry-level content creation machine.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's balanced performance, with strong integer math (81810) and data compression (266700) scores that speed up compilation and testing. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing wait times.

Students and office workers will find this build more than adequate for their needs. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures fast application launches and smooth multitasking, while the GPU can handle light photo editing or casual video streaming. The low GPU TDP of 15 W suggests good battery efficiency for all-day use.

Small business workstations that require multitasking, data processing, and occasional graphics work would also benefit from this pairing. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures that productivity applications run smoothly, while the GPU's 72nd percentile provides enough power for presentations, light design work, and video conferencing.