SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650HX

31,290 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on the Alder Lake-HX architecture, Intel's 10 nm process node. The core configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 4700 MHz. The CPU is unlocked, allowing multiplier adjustments for enthusiasts who want to push beyond stock frequencies. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and per-core L2 cache of 1.25 MB provide ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data, while the 80 KB L1 cache per core handles low-latency operations.

Benchmark results place this chip at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19043 demonstrates strong sustained multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 2688 shows respectable per-thread capability. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern, with a multicore score of 7998 and single-core score of 1128. The older Cinebench R15 test yields 1919 in multicore and 270 in single-core workloads.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths. The multithread score of 22573 confirms the CPU's ability to handle parallel workloads efficiently. Integer math performance is particularly strong at 81810, while floating-point math reaches 58426. Data compression scores of 266700 suggest excellent throughput for archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption at 15325 indicates hardware-accelerated cryptographic operations are reasonably fast. Extended instruction set performance of 15856 shows the CPU handles SIMD workloads competently. The random string sorting score of 29692 reflects good memory access patterns and cache efficiency. Physics calculations score 1152, and prime number finding lags at 74, which is typical for this type of workload on hybrid architectures.

The single-thread PassMark score of 3637 demonstrates the boost clock's effectiveness for lightly-threaded applications. This places the i7-12650HX in a competitive position against its nearest rivals. The Intel Core 9 273PTE averages 31143, just 0.5% below this chip's 31290 average. The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 and Intel Core 7 240H both average around 31473-31483, trailing by 0.6%. The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX at 31495 also sits 0.6% behind. These tiny margins mean the i7-12650HX trades blows with these competitors within a narrow performance band, and real-world differences would be imperceptible in most applications.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19043 suggests this CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation tasks with solid efficiency. The 20 threads provide ample parallelism for modern productivity applications. The single-core performance of 2688 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive day-to-day operation in web browsing, office applications, and light coding tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 266700 indicates fast file archiving, while the encryption score of 15325 supports secure communication protocols without significant overhead.

The 55 W TDP classifies this as a high-performance mobile processor, suitable for laptops with adequate cooling solutions. The Intel BGA 1964 socket means it is soldered to the motherboard, so upgrades are not possible without replacing the entire system. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, giving laptop manufacturers flexibility in design choices. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern SSDs and discrete GPUs.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12650HX compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark scores?

A: The i7-12650HX has an average benchmark score of 31290. The Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 31143, which is 0.5% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 and Intel Core 7 240H both score around 31473-31483, about 0.6% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31495, also 0.6% higher. These differences are minimal, placing all five processors in the same performance tier.

Q: What does the 82nd percentile ranking mean for this CPU?

A: The 82nd percentile indicates that this processor outperforms approximately 82% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. This places it in the upper echelon of available processors, suitable for demanding workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking, though it is not at the absolute top tier.

Q: Is the integrated GPU sufficient for gaming?

A: The CPU includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, but the system pairs it with an AMD Radeon 740M discrete GPU. The Radeon 740M sits at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, meaning it is roughly average. It can handle esports titles and older games at moderate settings, but for demanding AAA games at high resolutions, a more powerful GPU would be needed.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-12650HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the actual memory bandwidth is system dependent. Laptop manufacturers can choose either memory type based on cost and performance targets.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU itself. This allows for high-speed NVMe SSDs and discrete GPUs to connect at modern bandwidths. The Radeon 740M GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it does not take full advantage of Gen 5 bandwidth.

Q: What is the production status and release date of this processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-12650HX is currently listed as Active in production status. It was released on May 9, 2022, making it a relatively mature product in the mobile processor market. The launch MSRP is not available in the database.

Q: How does the CPU perform in encryption and compression workloads?

A: PassMark scores show data encryption at 15325 and data compression at 266700. These scores indicate strong performance for tasks like file compression, VPN encryption, and secure data transfer. The CPU handles these workloads efficiently, making it suitable for users who frequently work with large archives or require secure communications.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12650HX achieves an average benchmark score of 31290, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The AMD Radeon 740M GPU reaches an average benchmark score of 12870, sitting at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 68, indicating that this pairing performs better than 68% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19043 demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability, while the single-core score of 2688 shows competent per-thread performance. The PassMark multithread score of 22573 and single-thread score of 3637 reinforce this picture. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568 indicate moderate compute performance for an integrated-class graphics solution.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals, the differences are remarkably small. The Intel Core 9 273PTE is 0.5% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 205, Intel Core 7 240H, and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX are all 0.6% behind the i7-12650HX. This tight grouping means that in practical terms, these processors are interchangeable for most workloads. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 at 0.2% ahead, the AMD Radeon Pro 455 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 both at 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 580 at 0.4% behind. These are older discrete GPUs, which puts the Radeon 740M's performance into context as roughly comparable to a mid-range discrete GPU from several generations ago.

The combined picture shows a system that is CPU-heavy in terms of relative performance. The processor sits well above average, while the GPU is only slightly above the median. This imbalance suggests the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most workloads, and the GPU will determine gaming and graphics performance. For productivity tasks like video editing, software development, and office work, the CPU's strong scores will drive smooth operation. For gaming, the GPU's modest scores will cap frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and quality settings.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination means all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The CPU's high percentile ranking and the GPU's mid-range percentile suggest that gaming performance will be adequate for casual play but not competitive at high settings in demanding titles.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU performance in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU rests at the 53rd percentile. This 29-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming scenarios, the Radeon 740M will limit frame rates before the i7-12650HX reaches its processing limits.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19043 and PassMark multithread score of 22573 show it can handle substantial parallel processing. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568 are moderate for graphics compute. When running games, the GPU's shading units, TMUs, and ROPs will determine performance. With 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, the Radeon 740M has limited pixel throughput of 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s. These figures suggest the GPU will struggle with high-resolution textures and complex lighting effects.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the processor will perform admirably without GPU interference. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample compute resources. The PassMark integer math score of 81810 and floating-point math score of 58426 indicate strong arithmetic capability for scientific and engineering applications.

In mixed workloads like game streaming, the CPU can handle encoding while the GPU renders frames. The CPU's data compression score of 266700 suggests it can manage real-time video encoding without significant frame drops. However, the GPU's moderate performance will still cap the gaming experience. At lower resolutions and reduced quality settings, the GPU may keep up with the CPU, but at higher settings, the GPU will bottleneck.

The combined system percentile of 68 reflects this imbalance. The system performs better than 68% of all CPU-GPU combinations, but the GPU drags down the overall score from what the CPU alone could achieve. For users who prioritize gaming, this pairing may disappoint. For users who prioritize productivity and occasional light gaming, the balance is acceptable.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the database. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The CPU's strong performance at the 82nd percentile will not be the limiting factor in most games. The GPU's performance at the 53rd percentile will determine achievable frame rates.

The Radeon 740M's specifications suggest it can handle esports titles and older games at moderate settings. With a boost clock of 2800 MHz and 256 shading units, the GPU delivers 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. This is sufficient for games like Counter-Strike, League of Legends, and Rocket League at 1080p with medium to high settings. The 4 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the modest compute power means ray tracing effects will need to be disabled or set to low for playable frame rates.

For AAA games released in recent years, the GPU will struggle at higher resolutions. At 1080p with low to medium settings, some titles may achieve playable frame rates above 30 FPS. Games with heavy graphics demands like Cyberpunk 2077, Red Dead Redemption 2, or Microsoft Flight Simulator will likely require significant settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. The system-shared memory for the GPU means bandwidth is system dependent, which can impact performance in memory-intensive scenes.

The CPU's high single-core performance of 2688 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic, physics calculations, and AI processing will not bottleneck the GPU. The PassMark physics score of 1152 confirms the CPU can handle physics simulations in games. For CPU-bound games like strategy titles or simulation games, the processor will shine, potentially delivering higher frame rates than the GPU could achieve in graphics-bound scenarios.

At 720p resolution, the GPU may deliver playable performance in many titles. At 1080p, users should expect to adjust settings to achieve smooth gameplay. At 1440p or higher, the GPU will likely be overwhelmed, and users should consider this pairing unsuitable for high-resolution gaming. The estimated FPS figures suggest a system that is adequate for casual gaming but not for competitive or high-fidelity experiences.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 53rd percentile ranking and 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will struggle to push frame rates above 60 FPS in most modern titles at 1080p. Esports games may reach higher frame rates, but the GPU will likely cap performance below the 120-144 Hz range that high-refresh monitors support.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 22573, make this system capable of handling game streaming. The CPU can encode video using software encoding while the GPU renders frames. The data compression score of 266700 suggests efficient encoding performance. However, the GPU's moderate gaming performance will limit the quality of the streamed game itself.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19043 and PassMark multithread score of 22573 indicate strong performance for video editing tasks. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export encoding will benefit from the 20 threads. The GPU's moderate compute performance can assist with GPU-accelerated effects in compatible software, but the CPU will carry most of the workload.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multicore performance is well-suited for 3D rendering workloads. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19043 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7998 demonstrate strong rendering capability. The GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS can provide some acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse. This system can handle professional 3D rendering tasks, though rendering times will be longer than with higher-end processors.

Software Development: The CPU's strong single-core performance of 3637 in PassMark and 2688 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compilation times for small to medium projects. The 20 threads accelerate parallel builds. The PassMark integer math score of 81810 supports efficient code execution. This system is well-suited for developers who need a capable mobile workstation for coding, testing, and running virtual machines.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's performance is overkill for typical student and office tasks. Web browsing, document editing, spreadsheets, and presentations will run smoothly. The GPU's moderate performance is sufficient for basic graphics tasks like presentations and light photo editing. The 55 W TDP means this system will require a laptop with adequate cooling, which may be heavier and have shorter battery life than ultra-portable alternatives.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU-GPU pairing targets users who need strong processor performance for productivity tasks but do not prioritize gaming. Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings may find this system acceptable for casual play, but those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming should look elsewhere. The GPU's 53rd percentile ranking indicates it is not a gaming-focused component.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit most from this system. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and strong multicore scores provide the compute power needed for these workloads. The GPU can assist with accelerated effects and previews, but the CPU carries the primary load.

Developers will appreciate the 20 threads and high single-core performance for compilation, testing, and running multiple virtual machines. The PCIe Gen 5 support allows for fast NVMe storage, reducing build and load times. The dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility in system configuration.

Students and office workers will find this system more powerful than needed for their tasks. The performance headroom ensures smooth multitasking and future-proofing, but the 55 W TDP means the laptop will be less portable than lower-power alternatives. Small business workstations that handle data processing, accounting, or light CAD work will perform well with this processor.

The system's combined percentile of 68 indicates it outperforms 68% of all CPU-GPU combinations. This places it in the upper-middle tier of available systems. Users who need a balanced system for productivity and occasional gaming will find this pairing adequate, while those with specific performance requirements should focus on either the CPU or GPU depending on their primary workloads.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing the Intel Core i7-12650HX processor with the AMD Radeon 740M integrated GPU. The build class is laptop, meaning both components are designed for mobile platforms with power and thermal constraints. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, while the GPU has a 45 W TDP, together requiring a cooling solution capable of dissipating around 100 W of heat.

The combined system percentile of 68 places this pairing above 68% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 53rd percentile create a system that is stronger in processing than in graphics. This tier places the system in the upper-middle range of laptop performance, suitable for demanding productivity tasks but not for high-end gaming.

The CPU's Alder Lake-HX architecture with 14 cores and 20 threads provides substantial processing power for a mobile platform. The 24 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 ensure efficient data access. The GPU's RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC delivers moderate graphics performance with 256 shading units and 4 RT cores.

This system is best described as a productivity-focused laptop configuration. The processor is the star of the show, delivering desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor. The GPU provides adequate graphics capability for everyday tasks and light gaming, but it is not designed for graphics-intensive workloads. Users who need a powerful processor for work and occasional entertainment will find this pairing well-suited to their needs.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated GPU built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Phoenix2 chip manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The GPU contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 152.6 million per square millimeter. This high density reflects the advanced manufacturing process used for this component.

The GPU operates with a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning the GPU uses the system's main RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. The memory bus and bandwidth are also system dependent, which means performance can vary significantly based on the laptop's memory configuration. Users with DDR5 memory will likely see better GPU performance than those with DDR4 due to higher bandwidth.

Compute resources include 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 render output units. The pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. The GPU delivers 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 2.867 TFLOPS of FP16 compute at a 1:1 ratio. The 4 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, though the modest compute power limits ray tracing performance.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 15568. The average benchmark score of 12870 places this GPU at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs. This is a middle-of-the-road position, indicating the GPU performs better than 53% of GPUs in the database but worse than 47%. The nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 at 0.2% ahead, the AMD Radeon Pro 455 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 both at 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 580 at 0.4% behind. These are older discrete GPUs, which contextualizes the Radeon 740M's performance as roughly equivalent to a mid-range discrete GPU from several years ago.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern games and graphics APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's compute requirements. Display outputs are motherboard dependent, meaning laptop manufacturers determine the available ports. The GPU's TDP is 45 W, which is modest for a discrete-class GPU.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can accelerate tasks like video encoding, image processing, and GPU-accelerated effects in creative software. The 4 RT cores enable basic ray tracing in supported applications, but performance will be limited. The system-shared memory means the GPU competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which can impact performance in memory-intensive workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a ball-grid array design soldered directly to the motherboard. This means the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. The production status is Active, so replacement parts are available, but users cannot swap in a newer processor.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. This gives laptop manufacturers flexibility in design, but users are limited to the memory type chosen by the manufacturer. The memory bandwidth is system dependent, so users should check their specific laptop model for memory specifications. Upgrading memory capacity is possible if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots, but some designs may have soldered memory.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. This enables high-bandwidth connections for NVMe SSDs and discrete GPUs. The Radeon 740M GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a lower bandwidth interface. This means the GPU does not take full advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. Users could theoretically install a discrete GPU in a laptop with an appropriate external GPU enclosure, but this is not a typical upgrade path.

The CPU has a 55 W TDP, and the GPU has a 45 W TDP. The suggested PSU is not specified in the database, so power supply requirements are system dependent. Laptop power adapters must provide sufficient wattage for both components plus the rest of the system. Users should ensure their laptop's power adapter meets the manufacturer's specifications.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to increase memory capacity and speed, as the GPU's performance is system dependent on memory bandwidth. Upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 is not possible without a motherboard change, but increasing capacity or speed within the supported memory type can improve overall performance. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSDs would take advantage of the CPU's high-bandwidth PCIe interface.

For users seeking better gaming performance, an external GPU enclosure connected via Thunderbolt or other high-bandwidth interfaces could provide a significant upgrade. However, this is not a typical laptop upgrade path and requires specific hardware support. The CPU's strong performance means it would not bottleneck a more powerful external GPU, making this a viable option for users who occasionally need desktop-class graphics performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12650HX

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds