SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650H + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650H

28,815 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-12650H + AMD Radeon RX 7600M: A Mobile Powerhouse Analysis

This mobile pairing combines Intel's 12th-generation Alder Lake-H CPU with AMD's RDNA 3.0-based Navi 33 GPU, targeting the upper echelon of laptop performance. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 89th percentile, producing a combined system percentile of 85. The CPU's average benchmark score of 28,815 places it within 0.5% of several close rivals, while the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 shows it trading blows with desktop-class workstation cards. No measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel's BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable mobile package. This means the CPU is permanently attached to the motherboard, making processor swaps impossible in practical terms. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, giving laptop manufacturers flexibility in balancing cost and performance. The platform does not support ECC memory, which narrows its appeal for mission-critical workstation use cases where error correction is mandatory.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU itself, offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes. This provides ample bandwidth for the discrete GPU, which connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, as well as for high-speed NVMe storage. The GPU's slot width is listed as "IGP," indicating this is an integrated graphics package in terms of physical form factor, despite being a discrete-class solution. Power delivery is straightforward: the CPU carries a 45W TDP while the GPU is rated at 90W, and the GPU requires no external power connectors, drawing all power from the motherboard slot.

The absence of a suggested PSU rating for the GPU reflects its mobile nature — power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power supply and battery management system rather than a user-installed desktop PSU. When considering a sensible next upgrade, users are limited to what the laptop chassis allows: additional or faster DDR4/DDR5 memory within the dual-channel constraint, and Gen 4 NVMe storage expansion within the 20 available CPU lanes. The soldered CPU and the GPU's integrated form factor mean that component-level upgrades are essentially off the table; the realistic upgrade path is the entire laptop platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 12,074 and a single-core score of 1,763, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7,608 multi-core and 1,073 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 1,851.5 multi-core and 250 single-core. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 21,962 and a single-thread score of 3,539, alongside specialized workloads: integer math at 73,641, floating-point math at 54,934, data compression at 250,026, and data encryption at 14,041. The average benchmark score of 28,815 puts the i7-12650H in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals — it trails the Intel Core i5-12600H by 0.2%, matches the Intel Core i9-13900H at a 0.2% deficit, sits 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, and leads the Intel Core i5-13500T by 0.5%. This indicates the CPU is effectively performance-equivalent to a broad range of competing mid-to-high-end chips, with differences that would be imperceptible in real-world use.

The GPU posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, ranking in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a similarly tight grouping: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP trails by 0.1%, the NVIDIA CMP 30HX by 0.1%, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 leads by 0.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 trails by 0.7%. The RX 7600M sits in elite company, performing within a percentage point of cards that historically occupied the high-end desktop and professional workstation segments. The combined picture — an 80th-percentile CPU with an 89th-percentile GPU — yields an 85th-percentile overall system, indicating the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th-percentile standing and the CPU's 80th-percentile position suggest strong 1080p performance, though no measured FPS data exists. The pair should handle esports titles and moderately demanding games at high refresh rates, with the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth providing adequate headroom for modern game assets at 1080p.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 24 MB of shared L3 cache provide solid encoding and multitasking capability. PassMark multi-thread score of 21,962 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads, though the lack of dedicated tensor or encoder hardware in the GPU (it has no tensor cores, and RT cores are for ray tracing) means streaming relies on CPU-based encoding or platform features not listed here.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,074 and PassMark floating-point math score of 54,934 suggest capable 1080p and light 4K editing performance. The GPU's 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance accelerate effects and rendering, while the 8 GB VRAM handles timeline previews without excessive memory pressure.

3D rendering: The GPU's 89th-percentile OpenCL score of 63,775 indicates strong GPU-accelerated rendering performance, rivaling desktop workstation cards. The CPU's multi-core scores contribute to CPU-based rendering, with the R23 multi-core result of 12,074 placing it in the upper tier of mobile processors, though not at the absolute top.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 21,962 and integer math score of 73,641 indicating solid throughput for parallel builds. The 80th-percentile CPU ranking means consistent, predictable compile times across a range of projects.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,539 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1,763 ensure responsive everyday computing. The integrated UHD Graphics provides a fallback for basic display tasks, and the platform's DDR4/DDR5 memory support allows for cost-effective configurations. This pairing is overkill for such tasks but handles them with ease.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets mobile users who need desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates will find the GPU's 89th-percentile performance well-suited to their needs, though the absence of measured FPS data means expectations should be set by the OpenCL score rather than empirical game tests. Content creators working with video and 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's FP32 and FP16 compute capabilities, which outpace many desktop cards of prior generations.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with the integer math score of 73,641 indicating robust parallel processing. Students in STEM fields running simulations or data analysis will find the CPU's 80th-percentile ranking and the GPU's compute power sufficient for coursework. Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for office applications, data processing, or light CAD work are well-served by this pairing, given the CPU's consistency within 0.5% of several rival mid-range and upper-mid-range processors.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, sitting at the 89th percentile versus the CPU's 80th. This suggests the GPU will be the performance ceiling in many gaming scenarios, particularly at 1080p where the CPU's single-thread performance of 3,539 in PassMark is sufficient to keep frame rates high. The CPU's 0.5% lead over the Intel Core i5-13500T and its 0.4% deficit to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT show it is not a bottleneck in multi-threaded workloads either.

However, in GPU-heavy tasks like 3D rendering or OpenCL compute, the RX 7600M's 63,775 score represents the primary throughput engine, and the CPU's role is subordinate. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression (250,026 PassMark score) or encryption (14,041), the i7-12650H is the limiting factor, with the GPU idle. The balanced nature of this pairing means neither component severely bottlenecks the other in mixed workloads, but users targeting GPU-bound applications will find the CPU has little headroom to push beyond the GPU's performance class, and vice versa for CPU-bound tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on the Navi 33 chip using the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), while the GPU core operates between a 1500 MHz base and 2410 MHz boost clock, with a 2070 MHz game clock.

The compute configuration includes 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU supports 28 ray-tracing cores, though no tensor cores are present, meaning AI-accelerated workloads rely on standard compute paths. The pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance at 17.27 TFLOPS and FP16 at 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1). The 90W TDP and lack of power connectors reflect its mobile integration.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 places this GPU in the 89th percentile, performing within 0.1% of the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and NVIDIA CMP 30HX, and within 0.7% of the Radeon Pro WX 9100. This indicates the RX 7600M delivers performance comparable to desktop workstation GPUs that consume significantly more power. For rendering workloads, the FP32 and FP16 throughput, combined with 8 GB VRAM, makes this a capable GPU for 1080p and light 4K rendering tasks, though the 128-bit memory bus may limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenes.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12650H is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, codenamed Alder Lake-H, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 217 mm² die size. The base clock is 2.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, consuming a 45W TDP. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,074 and single-core score of 1,763, with R20 scores of 7,608 and 1,073 respectively. PassMark results demonstrate strength in integer math (73,641) and floating-point math (54,934), with a multi-thread score of 21,962 and single-thread score of 3,539. Data compression performance is notable at 250,026, while data encryption reaches 14,041.

The 80th-percentile ranking places this CPU in a tight cluster with rivals: it trails the i5-12600H and i9-13900H by 0.2% each, sits 0.4% behind the Ryzen 5 5600XT, and leads the i5-13500T by 0.5%. The architecture's hybrid design (implied by Alder Lake's big.LITTLE-style layout, though core types are not specified in the data) provides strong single-thread performance for everyday tasks while the 16 threads handle multi-threaded workloads. The 24 MB L3 cache is substantial for a mobile chip, aiding in workloads with large working sets. The lack of ECC support and soldered socket limit its use in error-critical or upgradeable server environments.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 85, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13900H?

A: The i7-12650H trails the i9-13900H by 0.2% in average benchmark score, making them effectively performance-equivalent.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration; ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's ray-tracing capability?

A: The GPU features 28 ray-tracing cores, though no tensor cores are present.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the CPU uses the soldered BGA 1744 socket.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no frame rate rows for any game or resolution, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores rather than empirical testing. The GPU's 89th-percentile OpenCL score of 63,775 and the CPU's 80th-percentile ranking suggest this is a capable gaming platform, but specific frame rates cannot be stated with certainty.

For 1080p gaming, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are appropriate for modern game assets, while the CPU's single-thread score of 3,539 in PassMark indicates strong per-core performance for game logic. At 1440p, the GPU's 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 throughput would likely sustain playable frame rates in most titles, though the 128-bit memory bus may become a limiting factor in texture-heavy scenes. At 4K, the GPU's memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity would struggle with high-detail settings, and the 90W TDP constrains sustained performance in a mobile chassis.

The absence of measured data means users should interpret any frame rate expectations with caution. The GPU's performance relative to desktop workstation cards like the Radeon Pro WX 9100 (within 0.7%) suggests it can handle competitive gaming at 1080p with high settings, but the exact FPS will vary by title, driver optimization, and laptop cooling solution. The CPU's 80th-percentile position ensures it will not be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, but the overall experience depends heavily on the specific laptop implementation of this component pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650H + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12650H

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds