SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, housed in the Intel Socket 1700. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support extends to both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, and the processor supports ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770. The processor has a TDP of 35 W and was released on January 7, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $255.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong overall performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 22,447, while the single-core score is 3,169. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score reaches 9,427 and single-core 1,330. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multicore score of 2,262 and single-core 319. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 12,840 and a single-core score of 2,559. PassMark tests reveal a multithread score of 26,409 and a single-thread score of 3,744. The average benchmark score is 32,707.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Core i5-14600T is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, which scores 32,697, a delta of 0%. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32,750) and 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662). Against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, the i5-14600T trails by 0.3% (32,812). These near-identical scores suggest that the i5-14600T delivers performance parity with a range of recent mid-to-high-end processors, both mobile and desktop variants.

The 35 W TDP is notable. This low power envelope, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, indicates a processor designed for efficiency without sacrificing peak performance. In real workloads, the multicore scores suggest strong throughput for threaded tasks like compiling code, running virtual machines, or batch processing. The single-core scores point to snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and light gaming. The PassMark integer math score of 95,112 and floating-point math score of 64,726 further substantiate the CPU's capability in general-purpose and scientific computing tasks. Data compression performance is robust at 301,827, while encryption hits 18,226, showing adequate security processing. Extended instructions score 16,985, and prime number finding is relatively modest at 121, indicating that the CPU's strength lies more in parallel throughput than in specialized mathematical primitives.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2,559 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,744, is sufficient to feed a high-end GPU in most gaming scenarios. However, the lack of measured FPS data for this specific combination means exact frame rates at 144 Hz or 240 Hz cannot be quantified. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking suggests it will not be the primary bottleneck in most gaming workloads.

Streaming: The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,447 indicates that software encoding at reasonable presets is feasible without significant frame drops. The CPU's efficiency at 35 W TDP also means lower thermal output during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks benefit from multicore performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 12,840 and Cinebench R15 multicore of 2,262 suggest smooth playback of high-resolution footage and faster-than-real-time exports for moderate projects. The PassMark multithread score of 26,409 reinforces this capability.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,447 is a strong indicator of CPU-based rendering performance. For applications like Blender or V-Ray, this processor can handle complex scenes, though dedicated GPU rendering with the RTX 4000 SFF will be significantly faster. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with scene data locality.

Software development: Compilation tasks, which are highly parallel, will see substantial benefit from the 20 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 95,112 and data compression score of 301,827 support fast builds and repository operations. The 35 W TDP allows for sustained all-core loads in compact chassis without thermal throttling.

Student and office work: The processor's 83rd percentile ranking ensures that document processing, spreadsheet calculations, web browsing, and video conferencing are handled effortlessly. The low TDP means quiet operation in standard office desktops, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output without a discrete GPU, reducing system cost and complexity.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The chip, designated AD104, contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU features 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 48 dedicated RT cores, while 192 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The base clock runs at 720 MHz with a boost clock of 1,560 MHz. Memory configuration consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 280.0 GB/s at 14 Gbps effective speed. The pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 19.17 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU's TDP is 70 W, powered entirely through the PCIe slot with no additional power connectors, requiring a suggested PSU of 250 W. It occupies a dual-slot form factor, measuring 168 mm in length, and offers four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU was released on March 20, 2023, and is the successor to Workstation Ampere, with Blackwell PRO W as its successor.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 95th percentile among all GPUs, a very strong showing. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 124,812, and the Vulkan score is 109,364. The average benchmark score is 117,088. Compared to nearest rivals, the RTX 4000 SFF is 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GB10 (117,393), 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (118,976), 2.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114,395), and 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (113,944). These deltas indicate that the RTX 4000 SFF competes at the top tier of workstation GPUs, trading blows with the latest mobile and single-slot professional offerings.

For rendering workloads, the 20 GB VRAM is a decisive advantage, allowing large scenes, textures, and AI models to reside entirely in GPU memory. The 280.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data transfers do not bottleneck compute. The 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 192 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI denoising. The FP32 performance of 19.17 TFLOPS is substantial for simulation and scientific computing. The low 70 W TDP makes this card suitable for small form factor workstations where power and thermal constraints are paramount.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing of the Core i5-14600T and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation targets professionals and enthusiasts who require high computational throughput in a compact, power-efficient desktop. The 89th combined percentile indicates a system that outperforms the vast majority of existing builds.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's 95th percentile ranking, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact expectations must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 83rd percentile ensures minimal bottlenecking at higher resolutions.

Content creators working with video, 3D, and graphics will find the 20 GB VRAM essential for large projects. The GPU's Vulkan score of 109,364 suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based renderers. The CPU's multicore scores support background tasks like asset encoding while the GPU handles main rendering.

Developers building AI applications will leverage the 192 tensor cores for model inference and training. The 20 GB VRAM accommodates large batch sizes. The CPU's encryption score of 18,226 supports secure data handling.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can run CAD, simulation, and compilation workloads effectively. The 35 W CPU and 70 W GPU keep electricity costs low in dormitories.

Small business workstations requiring reliability and quiet operation will appreciate the low power draw and dual-slot form factor. The four mini-DisplayPort outputs support multi-monitor setups for financial trading or data analysis.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the GPU significantly outranks the CPU. The RTX 4000 SFF sits in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, while the Core i5-14600T is in the 83rd percentile. This 12-point gap indicates that in GPU-intensive workloads, the CPU may become the limiting factor. However, the CPU's performance is still high enough that the bottleneck will only manifest in specific scenarios, such as very high frame rate gaming at low resolutions or physics-heavy simulations.

In gaming, the CPU's single-core performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3,744, is adequate for most titles. The FPS scaling would be constrained by the CPU at 1080p, where frame rates are CPU-bound, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, and the RTX 4000 SFF's 95th percentile ranking would dominate. The absence of measured FPS data precludes exact quantification, but the percentile gap suggests a well-balanced system for high-resolution gaming.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,447 is strong but not top-tier, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 124,812 is exceptional. In tasks that utilize GPU acceleration, such as rendering or AI inference, the GPU will clearly outpace the CPU. In CPU-only tasks like code compilation or spreadsheet analysis, the CPU operates independently, and the GPU's power is irrelevant.

The 35 W TDP of the CPU and 70 W TDP of the GPU together draw a maximum of 105 W, which is remarkably low. This means that cooling requirements are minimal, and the system can run in small form factor cases without thermal throttling. The bottleneck in such a system is more likely to be memory bandwidth or storage speed, rather than compute capacity.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-14600T and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the system would deliver high frame rates in most titles, though the CPU's single-core performance would be the limiting factor in CPU-bound games. At 1440p ultra, the GPU would become the primary driver, with the 20 GB VRAM ensuring no texture memory overflow. At 4K ultra, the RTX 4000 SFF's 280.0 GB/s bandwidth might constrain performance in bandwidth-heavy scenes, but the 48 RT cores would handle ray tracing effects competently. The Vulkan score of 109,364 indicates strong performance in Vulkan-based titles, while the OpenCL score of 124,812 suggests good compute utilization in games that use it. These estimates should be treated as directional rather than definitive, given the absence of measured data.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, indicating that this system outperforms 89% of all tracked configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H?

A: The Core i5-14600T has an average benchmark score of 32,707, while the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697, a delta of 0%, meaning they are statistically tied.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4000 SFF has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 280.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600T supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and power connector requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 70 W and requires no external power connectors, drawing power solely from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W.

Q: Which GPU rival is the RTX 4000 SFF closest to in performance?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 is the closest rival, with the RTX 4000 SFF trailing by 0.3% (117,088 vs. 117,393).

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.10 GHz, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core i5-14600T processor paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread part from the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, with a 35 W TDP and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The GPU is a workstation-focused card based on Ada Lovelace, with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores, all within a 70 W TDP envelope. The combined percentile ranking is 89, placing this system in the top tier of desktop configurations. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 95th percentile indicate a high-performance pairing with a slight imbalance favoring the GPU. This system is designed for professionals who need workstation-grade GPU compute in a compact, power-efficient desktop, without sacrificing CPU performance for everyday tasks.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14600T achieves an average benchmark score of 32,707, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Key scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore of 22,447 and single-core of 3,169, a Geekbench multicore of 12,840 and single-core of 2,559, and a PassMark multithread of 26,409 with a single-thread of 3,744. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, scores 32,697 (0% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750 (-0.1% delta).

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation achieves an average benchmark score of 117,088, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 124,812, and the Vulkan score is 109,364. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GB10, scores 117,393 (-0.3% delta), while the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 scores 118,976 (-1.6% delta).

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the dominant component, ranking 12 percentile points higher than the CPU. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it suitable for demanding workstation tasks, while the CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache provide solid support. The 89th combined percentile confirms that this pairing is well above average, though the CPU may limit the GPU in some scenarios. The absence of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores suggest strong 1440p and 4K capability.