SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600T and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop build that ranks at the 89th combined percentile in the database. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, a 5.10 GHz boost, and an 83rd CPU percentile. The GPU is a 20 GB Ada Lovelace workstation card with a 95th GPU percentile. This is a GPU-forward pairing: the processor provides strong multi-threaded throughput, while the graphics card carries the highest performance ranking of the two components.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die built at TSMC 5 nm, with a transistor density of 121.8M / mm². The card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, plus 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The base clock is 1500 MHz and the boost clock is 2175 MHz, while memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective throughput.

Memory capacity is 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering workloads, that combination matters: 20 GB is a large working set for complex scenes and high-resolution textures, and 360.0 GB/s is enough to feed heavy shader and texture traffic. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray traversal, while the 192 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated compute. FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 26.73 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, so compute-heavy passes can run at full rate without a half-rate fallback. Pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 146593, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 123842. Its average benchmark score is 135218, placing it at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: NVIDIA A10M scores 135230 with a delta of 0, AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396 with a delta of -0.1, AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774 with a delta of -0.4, and AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136472 with a delta of -0.9. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is effectively a member of a dense workstation-GPU performance cluster rather than a category leader separated from the group.

The card is also practical for a workstation chassis: it is single-slot, 245 mm long and 112 mm tall, with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and a single 16-pin power connector. Its API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The data lists the predecessor as Workstation Ampere and the successor as Blackwell PRO W, which gives a clear generational context for the Ada workstation line.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, dataIsMeasured is false, and pairRankByFps is null. Consequently, all frame-rate discussion in this section is an estimate from benchmark scores, not a measured result, and no per-game FPS values can be quoted.

With that limitation stated, the benchmark data shows a strong gaming foundation. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 123842 and OpenCL score of 146593 place it at the 95th GPU percentile. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 and single-core score of 3169, along with Geekbench multi-core 12840 and single-core 2559, give the build a capable base for feeding frames. At ultra-quality settings, this pairing should handle demanding rendering loads smoothly, though exact frame rates are not available.

Because the GPU holds a higher percentile than the CPU, it is the component most likely to determine overall gaming throughput in graphics-heavy scenes. For CPU-heavy scenes, the processor still has 14 cores, 20 threads, a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, so it is not a low-end part. The absence of measured FPS rows means these expectations remain qualitative estimates from the benchmark data, not verified gaming results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which anchors the build to that platform. It is a desktop-market part from Core 14th Gen with the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake-R codename. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported. This gives builders flexibility between two memory generations, with ECC available for data-integrity-focused workloads.

The CPU’s PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, CPU only. The GPU runs on PCIe 4.0 x16, so the graphics card fits the platform without requiring a newer bus. The multiplier is locked, meaning CPU overclocking is not an available performance lever; a platform upgrade would come from replacing the processor rather than increasing its clock multiplier. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $255.

Power figures are moderate. The CPU has a 35 W TDP, the GPU has a 130 W TDP, and the GPU’s suggested PSU is 300 W. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector and is single-slot, which keeps the physical and electrical footprint manageable. A sensible next upgrade on the same platform is another Socket 1700 processor from the same Raptor Lake/Core 14th Gen family. On the graphics side, the listed successor for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is Blackwell PRO W, making that the natural future GPU step.

FAQ

Q: What are the CPU core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz, a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What GPU memory configuration does this build use?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth and an 18 Gbps effective memory clock.

Q: Does this platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The CPU’s memory support lists DDR4 and DDR5, and the ECC memory field is true.

Q: What PCIe interfaces are present?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, dataIsMeasured is false, and pairRankByFps is null, so all frame-rate expectations are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What power supply is suggested?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 300 W, the CPU TDP is 35 W, and the GPU TDP is 130 W.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile is 89, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 95th percentile.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32707, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 135218, placing it at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the pairing is 89.

Exact CPU benchmark scores from the data:

| Test | Score |

|---|---|

| Cinebench R15 multi-core | 2262 |

| Cinebench R15 single-core | 319 |

| Cinebench R20 multi-core | 9427 |

| Cinebench R20 single-core | 1330 |

| Cinebench R23 multi-core | 22447 |

| Cinebench R23 single-core | 3169 |

| Geekbench multi-core | 12840 |

| Geekbench single-core | 2559 |

| Passmark data compression | 301827 |

| Passmark data encryption | 18226 |

| Passmark extended instructions | 16985 |

| Passmark find prime numbers | 121 |

| Passmark floating point math | 64726 |

| Passmark integer math | 95112 |

| Passmark multithread | 26409 |

| Passmark physics | 1873 |

| Passmark random string sorting | 34310 |

| Passmark single-thread | 3744 |

Exact GPU benchmark scores from the data:

| Test | Score |

|---|---|

| Geekbench OpenCL | 146593 |

| Geekbench Vulkan | 123842 |

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all close. Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 with a delta of 0, AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 with a delta of -0.1, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 with a delta of 0.1, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 with a delta of -0.3. The i5-14600T is not an outlier; it sits inside a tightly grouped set of processors separated by fractional delta values.

The GPU’s nearest rivals are similarly clustered. NVIDIA A10M scores 135230 with a delta of 0, AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396 with a delta of -0.1, AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774 with a delta of -0.4, and AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136472 with a delta of -0.9. This reinforces the picture of a high-tier GPU surrounded by comparable workstation products.

Taken together, the CPU and GPU produce an 89th combined percentile. The GPU’s 95th percentile is the stronger ranking, while the CPU’s 83rd percentile is still above the large majority of CPUs in the database. The combined score reflects a pairing where the GPU does most of the heavy lifting in visual workloads, with a solid multi-threaded CPU underneath it.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited to users who need a strong GPU for graphics-intensive work and a capable CPU for multi-threaded tasks. The GPU’s 20 GB frame buffer, 192 tensor cores, 48 RT cores, and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32/FP16 throughput make it relevant for rendering, AI-accelerated compute, and professional visualization workloads. The CPU’s 14 cores, 20 threads, and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 support heavy parallel processing, while its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3169 keeps single-threaded responsiveness strong.

Gamers who prioritize ultra-quality graphic settings are a clear target, since the GPU sits at the 95th percentile and the pair ranks at the 89th combined percentile. However, the lack of measured FPS rows means gaming expectations should be treated as estimates. Content creators and developers benefit from the API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, alongside ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 flexibility. Students and small business workstation builders can also consider it because the CPU TDP is only 35 W, the GPU TDP is 130 W, the suggested PSU is 300 W, and both components are listed as active production parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck picture is defined by the percentile difference between the two components. The CPU is at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 95th percentile. For graphics-heavy tasks, the GPU is the dominant engine and the higher-ranked component. For CPU-bound workloads, the processor’s 14 cores, 20 threads, and 5.10 GHz boost clock set the ceiling.

No pair rank by FPS is provided, so there is no frame-scaling evidence to quantify how one component limits the other in games. The available evidence is the percentile spread and the benchmark scores. The CPU is strong in multi-threaded work, with a Passmark multithread score of 26409 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447. It is also capable in single-thread tasks, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3744 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3169. The GPU is the more exceptional half of the pairing, so in workloads that stress both simultaneously, the CPU is the more likely limiting component.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14600T with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 14th Gen Raptor Lake processor on Intel Socket 1700, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace workstation card with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. The pair’s combined percentile is 89, placing it in the upper tier of the database.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 95th percentile combine to make a system that is stronger on the graphics side than on the processor side. It is not an entry-level pairing, nor is it at the absolute top of the database. It sits comfortably in the upper performance band, with the GPU as the standout element and the CPU as a strong supporting component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T belongs to Core 14th Gen with a Raptor Lake Refresh generation label. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU is a desktop-market part with an active production status and a locked multiplier. It has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is 35 W.

Cache is organized as 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus, with ECC enabled. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, CPU only, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. Its socket is Intel Socket 1700.

The benchmark results show a processor that performs well in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22447, and the single-core score is 3169. Geekbench multi-core is 12840, with a single-core score of 2559. Passmark multithread is 26409, and Passmark single-thread is 3744. Other Passmark results include integer math at 95112, floating point math at 64726, data compression at 301827, data encryption at 18226, extended instructions at 16985, physics at 1873, random string sorting at 34310, and find prime numbers at 121.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32707, which places it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are separated by only fractional deltas, meaning the i5-14600T sits in a competitive group rather than standing above or below its peers by a wide margin. For real workloads, the 14-core/20-thread configuration provides strong parallel throughput, while the 5.10 GHz boost clock and competitive single-core scores give it responsive performance in tasks that depend on fewer threads. The low 35 W TDP is a defining trait: this is a comparatively efficient desktop processor with a high boost ceiling.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds