SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This Intel Core i5-14600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D pairing combines a 35 W Raptor Lake processor with a 575 W Blackwell flagship GPU. The build reaches the 88th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 92nd among all GPUs. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $255 and the GPU a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination in the database; all FPS discussion in this analysis is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct measurement.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5090 D is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, producing a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. Its base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost of 2407 MHz, while the memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU packs 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs, alongside 170 ray-tracing cores and 680 tensor cores. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS. The memory capacity and bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures and large 3D scenes, while the tensor cores and RT cores provide dedicated hardware for AI-accelerated workloads and real-time ray tracing.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 14,326 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 310,674 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 376,915 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark reports a G3D score of 44,065 and a GPU compute score of 28,396. These numbers place the GPU in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77,712. The Vulkan score exceeds the OpenCL score, indicating strong performance under modern graphics APIs. For rendering, the high shading rate and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth allow for rapid texture streaming and complex geometry processing. The 170 ray-tracing cores and 680 tensor cores make the GPU well-suited for real-time ray tracing and machine learning inference in render pipelines.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5090 D's average score is 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT and 1.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT. It also trails the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB by 2.1% and the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB by 2.4%. This places the GPU in a cluster of high-end parts, rather than at the absolute top of the database, despite its flagship specifications. The 3DMark DX12 score of 14,326 suggests strong performance in modern DirectX 12 titles, while the Vulkan score of 376,915 indicates compatibility with Vulkan-based engines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447 and a single-core score of 3,169. In Geekbench, it achieves 12,840 multi-core and 2,559 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 26,409 and a single-thread score of 3,744. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,707, placing it in the 83rd percentile. The GPU, with an average score of 77,712, sits in the 92nd percentile. The combined system percentile is 88, meaning the pairing outperforms 88% of all recorded desktop builds.

The CPU's average score is statistically tied with several rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32,697, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32,750, -0.1%), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662, +0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32,812, -0.3%). These deltas are within 0.3%, so the i5-14600T offers performance essentially identical to those parts in aggregate benchmarks. The GPU, meanwhile, is 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT and 1.6% behind the RX 6850M XT, with a 2.1% deficit against the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB and 2.4% against the 16 GB variant.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is substantially stronger relative to its market than the CPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile is solid but not elite, while the GPU's 92nd percentile is near the top of its category. This asymmetry suggests that for workloads that are highly parallel and GPU-intensive, the system will perform exceptionally well, but for CPU-bound tasks, the processor may become the limiting factor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock is 1.80 GHz, and it boosts to 5.10 GHz. The thermal design power is 35 W, making it an energy-efficient part despite its high boost frequency. The CPU includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC enabled, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770.

In benchmark tests, the CPU achieves 22,447 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,169 in single-core. Geekbench multi-core is 12,840, single-core 2,559. PassMark multithread score is 26,409, and single-thread is 3,744. These results place the CPU in the 83rd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 32,707. The 14-core/20-thread configuration offers strong multi-threaded performance for content creation and compilation tasks, while the 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers high single-thread speed for legacy or lightly threaded applications.

The CPU's performance is nearly identical to that of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (delta -0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (delta -0.1%). This indicates that the i5-14600T competes effectively with both mobile and desktop processors in the same performance tier. The 35 W TDP makes it a low-power option, which can be an advantage in compact or always-on builds, but the processor still delivers 83rd-percentile performance. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks, though the RTX 5090 D will handle all heavy graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU occupy different percentile positions: 83rd for the CPU and 92nd for the GPU. This difference suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will have more headroom than the CPU. For tasks that are heavily parallel and GPU-accelerated, such as high-resolution rendering or machine learning, the GPU will be the dominant component, and the CPU will likely not be the limiting factor. Conversely, for workloads that are largely serial or rely on single-thread performance, the CPU may become the bottleneck, especially if the GPU is not fully utilized.

The CPU's single-core score of 3,169 in Cinebench R23 is strong, which helps avoid a bottleneck in games that are lightly threaded. However, the 35 W TDP and base clock of 1.80 GHz suggest that under sustained all-core loads, the CPU may not maintain high frequencies, potentially limiting performance in heavily threaded applications. The GPU's 575 W TDP and 32 GB VRAM indicate that it is designed for high-end workloads, and the CPU's 35 W TDP is a stark contrast. This imbalance means that the system's overall performance is more likely to be constrained by the CPU in multi-threaded scenarios, while the GPU can handle the most demanding graphics tasks without issue.

The combined percentile of 88 reflects a system that is overall above average, but the gap between the two components suggests that the CPU is the weaker link. For users who prioritize GPU-bound tasks, this pairing works well. For those who need CPU-heavy multi-threaded performance, the CPU may limit the system's full potential.

Who Should Build It

This system is suited for users who prioritize GPU-intensive work and are willing to accept a lower-power CPU. The GPU's 92nd percentile and 32 GB VRAM make it an excellent choice for high-resolution gaming and ray tracing, where the GPU is the primary driver. The CPU's 83rd percentile is still sufficient for most games, but it may not fully saturate the GPU at lower resolutions. For content creators who work with 3D rendering or video editing, the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's compute power are a balanced match, though the CPU may limit the most complex multi-threaded scenes.

The CPU's ECC support and low TDP make it a good candidate for small business workstations that require reliability and energy efficiency. Students and office workers who need a capable desktop for everyday tasks, office applications, and light coding will benefit from the CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's compute abilities when needed. The 35 W CPU also allows for compact or low-noise builds, provided the GPU's 575 W TDP is accommodated by a sufficient power supply and cooling.

The system is not ideal for users who need maximum multi-threaded CPU performance, as the 83rd percentile is good but not class-leading. However, for those who spend most time in GPU-bound workloads—such as game development, visual effects, or scientific simulations—the pairing offers a strong balance of GPU power and reasonable CPU capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 3DMark DX12 score of 14,326 and 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle high frame rates in modern titles. The CPU's single-core score of 3,169 provides enough speed for most games, but the 35 W TDP may limit sustained all-core loads. Without measured FPS data, the expectation is that the system is capable of high-refresh gaming, but the CPU could become a bottleneck in very CPU-intensive titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's tensor cores (680) provide ample resources for encoding and decoding video streams. The 92nd-percentile GPU can handle rendering while the CPU manages stream overhead. The 35 W CPU is efficient enough for prolonged streaming sessions, though the GPU will draw most of the power.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447 and the GPU's compute score of 28,396 indicate that the system can handle timeline rendering and effects. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM is beneficial for large video projects, and the CPU's 20 threads assist in export and encoding tasks. The CPU's 83rd percentile is adequate for 4K video, but the GPU will be the workhorse for effects.

3D rendering: The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 92nd percentile make it a powerful rendering engine, especially with ray tracing. The CPU's multi-thread score of 22,447 supports the simulation and physics calculations, but the GPU will dominate the final render. The CPU may be the bottleneck for complex scenes that rely heavily on CPU-based physics or geometry.

Software development: The CPU's single-core score of 3,169 and multi-core score of 22,447 are solid for compiling and running development tools. The GPU's compute capability can accelerate machine learning tasks, but for typical code development, the CPU is the primary component. The 35 W TDP makes the system efficient for long build sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's 35 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide a low-power base for office tasks, while the GPU is overkill for most student needs. The CPU's single-core performance is sufficient for web browsing, document editing, and light programming, but the GPU is not fully utilized in these scenarios. The system is best used when the GPU is occasionally needed for heavier workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. Consequently, all gaming performance expectations are derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct measurement. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 and Vulkan score of 376,915 suggest strong performance in modern DirectX and Vulkan titles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,169 and multi-core score of 22,447 indicate that it can feed the GPU in most games.

Given the GPU's 92nd percentile, the system is expected to deliver high frame rates at high resolutions and with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's 83rd percentile should be sufficient for most games, but in CPU-bound scenarios, the processor may limit the GPU's potential. The 35 W TDP may also cause power throttling under sustained loads, potentially affecting long gaming sessions. Without measured FPS, we cannot provide specific frame rates, but the benchmark scores suggest a system capable of high-end gaming, particularly in GPU-bound titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the 14th Generation Core series. The motherboard can use DDR4 or DDR5 memory, with dual-channel support and ECC. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-side lanes, which matches the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and has a TDP of 575 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 950 W. The CPU's 35 W TDP is negligible in comparison, so the PSU headroom is primarily determined by the GPU.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the CPU with a higher-core-count 14th Generation part, but the database does not list alternative CPUs. The memory can be expanded or upgraded to DDR5 for better performance, though the current dual-channel support is already in place. The GPU is a current flagship, so no immediate upgrade path is needed there; the next generation would be a successor, but no data is provided. The platform overall is modern, with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 support, providing a good base for future upgrades.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, dual-channel, with ECC enabled.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 950 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 575 W.

Q: What is the GPU's ray-tracing hardware?

A: The GPU has 170 ray-tracing cores and 680 tensor cores.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The CPU boosts up to 5.10 GHz from a base of 1.80 GHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile is 88, with the CPU at 83 and the GPU at 92.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a low-power 35 W Intel Core i5-14600T with a high-performance 575 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. The system ranks in the 88th percentile overall, with the CPU in the 83rd and the GPU in the 92nd. The CPU offers 14 cores and 20 threads with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the GPU provides 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 170 ray-tracing cores. The imbalance between CPU and GPU percentiles indicates a build that is GPU-dominated, excelling in graphics-heavy workloads while the CPU provides adequate but not top-tier multi-threaded performance. This pairing is best suited for users who need maximum GPU power for gaming, rendering, or AI workloads, and are willing to accept a mid-range CPU as the supporting component.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds