SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pairing represents a desktop configuration that combines a highly efficient 14-core processor with a capable Ampere-architecture GPU. The benchmark data shows a CPU that sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors and a GPU at the 75th percentile among all graphics cards, placing this build in the upper-midrange tier. The processor’s 35W TDP belies its performance potential, while the graphics card offers substantial compute resources. Notably, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-14600T compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Core i5-14600T has an average benchmark score of 32707. This puts it virtually identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0% delta), slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.1% delta), and marginally behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32750, -0.1% delta) and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, -0.3% delta). The performance differences are within a fraction of a percent, making them effectively equivalent in synthetic tests.

Q: What is the performance tier of the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti sits at the 75th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 29945. It performs nearly identically to the RTX 5070 Mobile (29928, 0.1% delta) and the RTX 2080 Ti (29783, 0.5% delta). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30095, -0.5% delta) and RX 6700 (30433, -1.6% delta) by small margins.

Q: What kind of memory does this CPU support?

A: The i5-14600T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically associated with workstation or server-class builds, making this CPU flexible for various system memory choices.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked. The i5-14600T is a locked processor, meaning users are limited to the stock boost behavior and cannot manually adjust the multiplier for overclocking. The base clock is 1.80 GHz, and the maximum boost clock is 5.10 GHz.

Q: What are the key specifications of the RTX 3070 Ti's memory subsystem?

A: The GPU comes equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the GPU support modern API features?

A: Yes, the RTX 3070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS.

Q: What is the physical size of the graphics card?

A: The card is a dual-slot design measuring 267 mm (10.5 inches) in length and 112 mm (4.4 inches) in height. It requires a single 12-pin power connector and has a suggested power supply rating of 600 W.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070 Ti’s FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS and 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth provide the raw power needed for demanding titles. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3169 and Geekbench single-core score of 2559 indicate strong per-thread performance that can keep up with the GPU at high frame rates, though the exact FPS depends on the game and resolution.

Streaming: The GPU includes 192 tensor cores that can accelerate encoding and AI workloads, while the CPU’s 20 threads (from 14 cores) handle the encoding and streaming overhead. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 26409 shows it can manage concurrent gaming and streaming tasks without becoming the primary bottleneck.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU’s 14 cores and the GPU’s CUDA compute resources is well-suited for timeline editing and rendering. The GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 11601 and the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 301827 indicate strong performance in tasks like video encoding and file processing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 demonstrates robust multi-threaded rendering performance, while the GPU’s 6144 shading units provide substantial parallel processing capability for GPU-accelerated renderers. The RT cores also assist in ray-traced rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark extended instructions score of 16985 and integer math score of 95112 suggest strong performance in compilation and code execution. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the dual-channel memory support allows for flexible system configuration.

Student and office work: The 35W TDP of the CPU makes this an energy-efficient option for daily use, while the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3744 ensures responsive application performance for spreadsheets, browsers, and document editing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, which breaks down into a hybrid configuration of performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 1.80 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz, allowing the chip to scale from low-power idle states to high-performance bursts. The 35W TDP is notably low for a desktop processor with this core count, making it an interesting choice for compact or thermally constrained systems.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This large shared cache helps with multi-threaded workloads where data is shared across cores. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing between cost-effective or higher-bandwidth memory. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for this segment and suggests suitability for data-integrity-focused tasks.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 12840. The Passmark multi-thread score of 26409 reinforces this picture. Single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3169 and Passmark single-thread at 3744. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32707 places it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 83% of processors in the database.

The closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, has a nearly identical average score of 32697. This suggests that in synthetic workloads, these two chips are interchangeable. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is marginally ahead at 32750, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is slightly behind at 32812, but these differences are negligible in real-world terms. The 14-core configuration with 20 threads gives this CPU ample parallel processing capability for content creation and multi-tasking, while the high boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-14600T and RTX 3070 Ti is dictated by their respective percentile rankings. The CPU at the 83rd percentile is higher-ranked than the GPU at the 75th percentile, which indicates that the processor has more relative headroom compared to the graphics card. In gaming scenarios, the RTX 3070 Ti is likely to be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3169, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The Passmark physics score of 1873 and integer math score of 95112 further support the notion that the CPU can handle game logic and physics calculations without bottlenecking. However, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s and 8 GB of VRAM could become constraints in texture-heavy or high-resolution workloads.

In compute-heavy tasks like 3D rendering, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 and the GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 11601 mean that the choice of renderer determines which component is the bottleneck. CPU-based renderers will be limited by the 14-core processor, while GPU-based renderers will be limited by the RTX 3070 Ti’s compute throughput.

The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means that precise bottleneck analysis is not possible. However, based on the percentile difference of 8 points (83rd vs 75th), the GPU is the more likely constraint in graphics-bound workloads. The CPU’s low 35W TDP also suggests that thermal throttling is unlikely to be a factor, allowing the processor to maintain its boost clocks under sustained loads. For users targeting high-refresh gaming, the GPU will be the primary upgrade consideration, while the CPU has more headroom for future graphics card upgrades.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is based on the GA104 chip using the Ampere architecture, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. The chip contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². The GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, providing a balanced configuration for traditional rasterization.

Clock speeds are moderate, with a base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. The memory subsystem is a highlight, featuring 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. Memory bandwidth is rated at 608.3 GB/s, which is substantial for this class of GPU. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate performance.

Compute capabilities are robust, with FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS and FP16 performance at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features such as DLSS. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 139541 demonstrate solid API-level performance.

The RTX 3070 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 29945, placing it at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. This performance is nearly identical to the RTX 5070 Mobile, which scores 29928 (0.1% delta), and the RTX 2080 Ti, which scores 29783 (0.5% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30095, putting it 0.5% ahead, while the RX 6700 scores 30433, 1.6% ahead. These differences are small, meaning the RTX 3070 Ti competes directly with these cards.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 23356 and DirectX 12 score of 91 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant for modern gaming titles. The power draw is rated at 290W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 600W. The card is end-of-life in production status, having been succeeded by the GeForce 40-series. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may be a limiting factor at 4K with high-resolution textures.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p high-refresh displays will find this build appropriate. The RTX 3070 Ti’s 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most titles at these resolutions, while the CPU’s single-core score of 3169 in Cinebench R23 prevents CPU-bound frame rate drops. The GPU’s 75th percentile ranking means it outperforms most graphics cards in the database.

Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 14 cores and the GPU’s 6144 shading units. The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 301827 and the GPU’s compute score of 11601 support workloads like video encoding and GPU-accelerated effects. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds reliability for long render sessions.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 95112 and extended instructions score of 16985, which are relevant for compilation and code execution. The dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for flexible system configuration based on budget and performance needs. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking ensures strong overall system responsiveness.

Students and office workers who need a capable but energy-efficient system will find the 35W TDP CPU appealing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the Passmark single-thread score of 3744 ensures smooth application performance. Small business workstations that require ECC memory support and moderate multi-threaded performance for databases or spreadsheets can also leverage this CPU’s capabilities, though the discrete GPU may be unnecessary for such tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-14600T demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9427. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12840 and Passmark multi-thread score of 26409 corroborate these results. Single-threaded performance is equally solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3169, Geekbench single-core at 2559, and Passmark single-thread at 3744.

The RTX 3070 Ti shows competitive performance in graphics benchmarks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3478, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 119718 and 139541, respectively. The Passmark G3D score of 23356 and GPU compute score of 11601 provide additional context. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 29945 places it at the 75th percentile.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 79, indicating that the build outperforms 79% of all configurations in the database. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32707 is slightly higher than the GPU’s 29945, reflecting the CPU’s higher relative standing. This difference suggests that in balanced workloads, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor.

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data. All frame rate expectations must be inferred from the individual component scores. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 75th percentile ranking together suggest that this build is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and capable of handling 4K gaming at lower settings or with upscaling technologies.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-14600T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The CPU is part of the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture, and is designed for the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The GPU is from the GeForce 30-series, based on the Ampere architecture, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

The combined percentile of 79 places this build in the upper-midrange tier of the database. The CPU’s 83rd percentile is higher than the GPU’s 75th percentile, making the graphics card the weaker link in the pairing. This is a desktop-class configuration, as indicated by the buildClass field.

The CPU’s 35W TDP is exceptionally low for a 14-core desktop processor, which could enable quiet or compact system designs. The GPU’s 290W TDP is typical for a high-performance graphics card, requiring adequate cooling and a power supply rated for 600W or more. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $255, and the GPU had a launch MSRP of 599 USD, though current market pricing may vary.

This build is suitable for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for content creation or productivity tasks, combined with solid GPU performance for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. The combination is balanced enough to handle a wide range of tasks without a severe bottleneck in either direction.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for the graphics card and NVMe storage. The CPU also includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics as a fallback display output.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The card’s power requirements include a single 12-pin connector, and the suggested PSU is 600W. The CPU’s 35W TDP leaves significant power headroom within the suggested PSU rating, allowing for potential upgrades to higher-power components.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve replacing the GPU with a more powerful model, as the CPU’s higher percentile ranking means it has more performance headroom. The CPU’s 83rd percentile suggests it can handle a faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. However, the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 75th percentile ranking mean that an upgrade to a card with more VRAM or higher compute throughput would be the most impactful change.

The motherboard platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so users can choose based on their existing memory or desired performance. The CPU’s ECC memory support is an additional consideration for those who prioritize data integrity. The socket is shared with other 14th Gen processors, providing a range of upgrade options within the same platform. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures that future high-bandwidth devices will be supported.