SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Radeon RX 9060 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 71st combined percentile, placing it above the typical mainstream desktop build. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, is a low-power workhorse, while the GPU is a mid-range RDNA 4.0 card. The data shows a system that is better at compute-heavy productivity than at pushing maximum frame rates in demanding titles, making it a practical choice for a specific kind of builder.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using the Navi 44 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It carries 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. For ray tracing, it includes 28 dedicated RT cores, though the data does not list any tensor cores for AI acceleration. The card draws up to 132 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with AMD suggesting a 300 W power supply.

Memory configuration is a 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer on a 128-bit bus, which yields a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory runs at an effective speed of 18 Gbps. The GPU’s clock profile shows a base of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. The theoretical pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching that at a 1:1 ratio. The card supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and offers one HDMI 2.1b port and two DisplayPort 2.1a outputs.

Benchmark results for the RX 9060 show its position in the market. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 indicates that the GPU is a solid 1080p performer. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 and Vulkan score of 39476 show a significant disparity, with OpenCL being much faster; this suggests that compute workloads using OpenCL will perform relatively better than those using Vulkan. Passmark scores reveal the card's strengths and weaknesses: a G3D score of 17631 is respectable, but the DirectX 12 score of 44 is notably low, implying that the card is better suited to DX11 or Vulkan titles than to the latest DX12-heavy engines. The G2D score of 1002 is low, confirming that this is not a card for multi-monitor desktop productivity or 2D work. The GPU compute score of 9919 indicates that the card is capable in general compute tasks, but the data suggests that gaming performance is its primary function.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark data places this CPU and GPU pairing in the 71st percentile of all builds. The CPU holds an 83rd percentile position among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This gap is the first clear sign of the imbalance in this pairing: the processor is a much stronger component relative to its peers than the graphics card is.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32707. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with an average score of 32697 (a 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with a score of 32750 (a -0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 with a score of 32662 (a 0.1% delta). This shows the 14600T is essentially tied with these chips, offering performance within a fraction of a percent of each, despite being a lower-power part. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 16014. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with a score of 16129, which is 0.7% faster. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and the Radeon RX 7700 are nearly identical at 15862 and 15852 scores, respectively, meaning the RX 9060 is about 1% faster than both. The Radeon Pro W5500 trails by 2.1% with a score of 15679.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a high-percentile performer that can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads without breaking a sweat, but the GPU is a mid-pack contender that will hold the system back in graphically intense scenarios. The data shows a build where the processor is waiting on the graphics card in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, a substantial range that allows for low idle power and high single-thread bursts. The TDP is a very low 35 W, which is the defining feature of this chip: it is designed for efficiency, not for all-out performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. It also includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics and supports ECC memory. The launch MSRP was $255.

The benchmark scores tell the story of a CPU that punches above its power class. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22447 multi-core and 3169 single-core. The single-core score of 3169 is strong, indicating that the 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-core score of 22447 is remarkable for a 35 W chip, showing that the 14 cores are efficient and scale well under load. The Geekbench scores are 12840 multi-core and 2559 single-core. Passmark results are also comprehensive: a multi-thread score of 26409, a single-thread score of 3744, and a physics score of 1873. The integer math score of 95112 and floating-point math score of 64726 are high, reflecting strong general-purpose compute. Data compression scores a 301827, while data encryption scores 18226. Extended instructions score 16985, and random string sorting scores 34310. The find prime numbers test scores 121.

Interpreting these numbers: the 14600T is a productivity champion. The 22447 multi-core Cinebench score puts it in the same league as the Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 5 7400F, meaning it can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation at a level that was previously reserved for much higher-wattage chips. The 3169 single-core score ensures that the system feels snappy for everyday use and that games that rely on a single strong core will still perform adequately. The data indicates that this CPU is not a compromise; it is a deliberate choice for builders who prioritize efficiency without sacrificing multi-threaded muscle.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a significant imbalance in this pairing. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 59th percentile. This 24-point gap is the central bottleneck dynamic. In workloads that are primarily CPU-bound, such as software compilation, data compression, or physics calculations, the system will perform at a high level, with the GPU not being a limiting factor. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 1873 and integer math score of 95112 demonstrate its capability in these areas.

However, in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 9060 will be the limiting component. The GPU’s 59th percentile position means that it will not be able to feed frames fast enough to fully utilize the CPU’s potential in many scenarios. For instance, in a game that is graphics-bound at 1080p, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU’s 17631 Passmark G3D score, not the CPU’s 26409 multi-thread score. The CPU will be waiting for the GPU to finish its work, leaving performance on the table.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent since there are no measured FPS rows for this combination, but the percentile data is sufficient. The CPU is capable of supporting a much faster GPU; the RX 9060 is the bottleneck in gaming. Conversely, the GPU is far more capable than the CPU in pure compute tasks like OpenCL, where the GPU’s 88183 score dwarfs any CPU result. Therefore, the balance is workload-dependent: CPU-bound tasks see a high-performance system, while GPU-bound tasks are limited to mid-range frame rates. A builder with this pairing should expect the GPU to be the upgrade path, as swapping in a higher-percentile GPU would unlock more of the CPU’s potential in gaming.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is a compromise. The GPU’s 59th percentile score and 8 GB of VRAM will push high frame rates at 1080p in less demanding titles, but the low DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests that the latest AAA games will be challenging. Expect to lower settings to achieve high refresh rates, as the CPU’s strong single-core score of 3169 will not help if the GPU is maxed out.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads are excellent for encoding video, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 ensuring that x264 encoding will not cripple the system. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for the game, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means that hardware-accelerated AI upscaling is not available, so streamers will rely on CPU encoding, which this chip handles well.

Video editing is a strong suit. The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores (22447 in Cinebench R23, 26409 in Passmark) will speed up timeline rendering and export times. The GPU’s 88183 OpenCL score will accelerate effects and transitions in OpenCL-compatible software. This is a capable system for 1080p editing and light 4K work, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit complex effects.

3D rendering is dominated by the CPU. The 22447 Cinebench R23 score means that CPU-based renderers like V-Ray or Blender’s Cycles (CPU mode) will perform admirably. The GPU’s compute score of 9919 is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than a higher-tier card, but the system is still viable for hobbyist or small-scale production.

Software development is a clear win. The CPU’s 95112 integer math score and 301827 data compression score indicate fast compilation and build times. The multi-threaded nature of modern compilers will fully utilize the 20 threads. The GPU is irrelevant here, meaning the system will not be held back by the graphics card in this workload.

Student and office work is where this pairing shines. The CPU’s low 35 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, and the single-core score of 3169 ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but it does not hurt, and the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback if the discrete card is underutilized. This is an efficient, responsive workstation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the RX 9060 and the CPU’s known capabilities. The GPU’s 59th percentile ranking and its performance relative to the RTX 3060 Ti (-0.7%) suggest it is a solid 1080p card. The low DirectX 12 score of 44 is a warning sign, however, indicating that the card may underperform in games that rely heavily on DX12 features. Expect that in DX11 and Vulkan titles, the card will perform closer to its G3D score of 17631 would suggest. In DX12 titles, the performance may be disappointing.

At 1080p resolution, the system should be able to handle most esports titles and older games at high settings with high refresh rates, given the CPU’s strong single-core performance. For modern AAA games, the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU’s mid-pack position will force a mix of medium and high settings to maintain playable frame rates. At 1440p, the card will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles, and the 8 GB VRAM will be a hard limit for texture quality. At 4K, this is not a viable gaming system; the GPU’s performance is too low and the VRAM is insufficient. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in any of these scenarios; the GPU will be. These are estimates, not measured results, and actual performance will vary by game and driver.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core i5-14600T and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the 14600T scoring 32707 and the 7400F scoring 32750. This is a -0.1% delta, meaning they are effectively tied in overall performance.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129. The RTX 3060 Ti is 0.7% faster, making the two cards essentially equivalent in raw compute performance.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the stronger component in this build?

A: The CPU is significantly stronger. It is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. This means the CPU will outperform its peers more than the GPU will.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 9060?

A: The RX 9060 has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the RX 9060 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 28 dedicated ray tracing cores as part of the RDNA 4.0 architecture.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has a TDP of 35 W, which is very low for a 14-core processor.

Q: Will this system be good for esports gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU’s high single-core score of 3169 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s adequate performance for lighter titles should allow for high frame rates in esports games at 1080p, though the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score may require lower settings in newer titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14600T with the AMD Radeon RX 9060. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The GPU is an RDNA 4.0 card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 1792 shading units. The combined percentile is 71, indicating that this system outperforms 71% of all tracked desktop builds. The CPU is the star, ranking in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part in the 59th percentile. This is a system designed for productivity and efficiency rather than high-end gaming. The low-power CPU and mid-range GPU make it a balanced choice for a work-focused desktop that can also handle casual gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build is for the user who prioritizes CPU performance for work tasks but also wants a discrete GPU for occasional gaming. The target user is a software developer who will benefit from the 95112 Passmark integer math score and 301827 data compression score for fast compilation and build times. It is also well-suited for a video editor working with 1080p or light 4K footage, given the CPU’s 22447 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 88183 OpenCL score for effects acceleration. Students and office workers will appreciate the low 35 W TDP, which means a quiet and cool system, and the 3169 single-core score for responsive daily use. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded productivity suites will also find this a capable pairing. For gamers, this is a 1080p system for esports and older titles, not a high-refresh AAA machine. The 8 GB VRAM and the GPU’s 59th percentile position are the limiting factors. Builders who plan to upgrade the GPU later will find the CPU has ample headroom, as its 83rd percentile ranking will not be a bottleneck for a faster graphics card. This is a smart pairing for a work-first machine with gaming as a secondary concern.