SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of an Intel Core i5-14600KF with an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 creates a distinct performance profile where the CPU is the clear dominant component. The processor sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This 29-percentile gap indicates that in most CPU-bound workloads — particularly those involving physics calculations, data compression, or single-threaded tasks — the processor will be waiting on the graphics card to catch up. Benchmark results show the CPU delivering a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15117 places it in the mid-range tier, suggesting that frame rates in modern games will frequently be constrained by the graphics subsystem rather than the processor.

The bottleneck direction shifts depending on the workload type. For gaming at high resolutions, the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become the limiting factors, as the CPU's 20 threads and 5.30 GHz boost clock can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video encoding, data encryption, or software compilation, the CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 38697 and data encryption score of 27608 will be the primary drivers, with the GPU contributing less to overall throughput. The data shows a system that is fundamentally CPU-first in its design philosophy, with the GPU serving as a competent but not exceptional companion.

The FPS scaling picture reinforces this imbalance. With no measured FPS data available for this exact combination, estimates derived from the benchmark scores indicate that at 1080p, the CPU's 90th percentile ranking allows it to push well beyond what the GPU can render in most titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 61st percentile position becomes increasingly dominant as the bottleneck, with the 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus width limiting texture throughput and shader complexity. For workloads that leverage the GPU's compute capabilities — such as the Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 — the balance is less lopsided, but for pure gaming, the processor is clearly ahead of its graphics counterpart.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite paints a picture of a high-performance desktop processor. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3280 multi-core and 462 single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core score reaches 13668 with a single-core score of 1929. The R23 iteration shows 32544 multi-core and 4594 single-core, demonstrating strong scaling across rendering workloads. Geekbench results show 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core, confirming strong per-thread performance. Passmark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression at 485140, floating-point math at 93048, integer math at 125982, and extended instructions at 28785. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 49394, placing it at the 90th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with an average score of 49228 (0.3% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at 49196 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 48995 (0.8% behind). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 leads by 0.8% with a score of 49796.

The GPU's benchmark results tell a different story. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1873. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 74540 and 78844 respectively. Passmark tests show DirectX 10 at 108, DirectX 11 at 128, DirectX 12 at 52, and DirectX 9 at 205. The 2D score is 846, while the 3D score reaches 15117. GPU compute scores 6176. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 17789, placing it at the 61st percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are tight: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666 (0.7% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 at 17639 (0.9% ahead), the AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (1.1% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (1.4% ahead). This clustering indicates the Quadro RTX 4000 sits in a crowded mid-range field where small performance margins separate competitors.

The combined picture shows a desktop system at the 76th overall percentile. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking boosts the pairing significantly, while the GPU's 61st percentile drags it down. This creates a system that excels in processor-heavy tasks but remains firmly mid-pack in graphics-intensive scenarios. The data suggests that users will experience excellent responsiveness in productivity, development, and rendering workloads, but gaming performance will be more modest relative to the CPU's capabilities.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and 5.30 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom for high frame rates, but the GPU's 61st percentile position and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap performance. At 1080p, users can expect playable frame rates in most titles, though 144Hz or 240Hz monitors will rarely be saturated in demanding games. The 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth may also limit texture quality settings in newer titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and strong multi-core scores (32544 in Cinebench R23) make it well-suited for software encoding, while the GPU's tensor cores (288) and RT cores (36) can assist with hardware-accelerated encoding and effects. The Passmark data encryption score of 27608 indicates solid throughput for stream encryption overhead. However, the GPU's mid-range compute performance (6176 in Passmark GPU compute) may limit advanced stream effects.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core prowess — 13668 in Cinebench R20 and 17085 in Geekbench multi-core — handles timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding efficiently. The GPU's 2304 shading units and 144 TMUs accelerate effects preview and GPU-accelerated renders, though the 8 GB VRAM may constrain working with high-resolution footage or complex multi-layer timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's 125982 Passmark integer math score and 93048 floating-point math score provide strong CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 14.24 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) throughput enable GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 61st percentile ranking means it will not compete with higher-tier workstation cards. The 288 tensor cores may assist with AI-accelerated denoising.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and 90th percentile ranking make compilation times reasonable, while the 125982 integer math score suggests strong performance in code processing. The 485140 data compression score indicates fast archive operations. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, though the 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and USB Type-C output support multi-monitor setups.

Student and office work: The CPU's 4273 Passmark single-thread score ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 38697 multi-thread score handles multitasking with ease. The GPU's 846 Passmark G2D score is modest but adequate for standard office applications and web browsing. The 14-core architecture with 20 threads provides ample parallelism for typical student workloads.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above graphics capability. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older games will find the CPU's 90th percentile ranking sufficient for high frame rates, with the GPU providing adequate but not exceptional rendering. Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound applications — such as video encoding, batch photo processing, or software compilation — will benefit from the processor's 20 threads and 32544 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while the GPU handles occasional acceleration tasks. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 125982 integer math score, and the 485140 data compression score speeds up repository operations.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data analysis fields will find the system well-suited for coursework involving simulations, statistical computing, and programming assignments, where the CPU dominates. Small business workstations running office productivity suites, accounting software, or database applications will benefit from the CPU's 38697 Passmark multi-thread score and 4273 single-thread score, ensuring smooth multitasking. The GPU's workstation pedigree — with 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and USB Type-C outputs — supports professional display configurations, though its 61st percentile ranking means it is not aimed at high-end visualization professionals.

Users should not choose this build for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute performance will become the limiting factor. Similarly, professionals requiring advanced ray tracing or AI-accelerated workloads may find the GPU's 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores insufficient for demanding tasks. The system is best viewed as a CPU-centric workstation with gaming capability as a secondary function.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes is available through the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. This is a desktop-class part released in October 2023, with a die size of 257 mm².

Benchmark results demonstrate strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594 and multi-core score of 32544 indicate excellent scaling across the 14 cores. Geekbench single-core of 2445 and multi-core of 17085 confirm strong per-thread efficiency. Passmark single-thread of 4273 and multi-thread of 38697 show balanced performance across diverse workloads. The data compression score of 485140 is particularly notable, suggesting exceptional performance in archiving and I/O-heavy tasks. The floating-point math score of 93048 and integer math score of 125982 indicate strong arithmetic throughput for scientific and financial applications.

The 90th percentile ranking places this CPU among the top 10% of all processors, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 at a 0.3% difference. This suggests the i5-14600KF is competitive with higher-core-count alternatives in many workloads, particularly those that benefit from high boost clocks and strong single-thread performance. The 20 threads provide ample parallelism for modern multi-threaded applications, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures snappy response in latency-sensitive tasks.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation-class GPU based on the Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process at TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 288 tensor cores. The base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, and memory runs at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s bandwidth. The card has a 160 W TDP, single-slot design, and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W PSU. It uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface and offers 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It is end-of-life, released in November 2018, with the Quadro Volta as predecessor and Workstation Ampere as successor.

Benchmark results show a mid-range performer. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 and Passmark G3D score of 15117 place it at the 61st percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 indicate reasonable compute capability. Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 is notably low, suggesting poor optimization for modern DX12 titles. The G2D score of 846 is modest for 2D workloads. GPU compute of 6176 reflects the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

The 61st percentile ranking places it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% difference) and AMD Radeon 780M (1.1% difference), indicating it performs similarly to mainstream consumer GPUs despite its workstation branding. The 288 tensor cores and 36 RT cores provide AI and ray tracing capabilities, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit their utility in demanding workloads. The 416.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p gaming, though the 256-bit bus is narrower than higher-tier workstation cards.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results. The absence of measured data means these projections carry uncertainty, but the relative positions of the CPU (90th percentile) and GPU (61st percentile) provide a basis for expectation.

At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4273 in Passmark and 4594 in Cinebench R23 suggest it can drive high frame rates in most titles. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15117 indicates it should handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in modern titles, with esports games running at higher frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM may become a limitation in games with large texture packs, but for standard settings, it should suffice. Users can expect playable frame rates in most games, though maintaining 144 FPS in demanding titles will be challenging.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for medium settings in many titles, but high settings may push the GPU to its limits. The 61st percentile ranking suggests performance similar to mid-range consumer GPUs, meaning users should temper expectations for high-refresh gaming at this resolution. Frame rates will likely drop significantly compared to 1080p, with some titles requiring reduced settings to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 4K, the GPU's limitations become pronounced. The 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit bus are insufficient for high-detail 4K gaming in most modern titles. Users should expect low to medium settings at best, with frame rates that may fall below 60 FPS in demanding games. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking provides no benefit in GPU-bound scenarios, so the system will feel graphics-limited in all 4K gaming situations.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing a 14th-gen Intel Core i5 processor with a Quadro workstation GPU. The system sits at the 76th overall percentile, reflecting a strong CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core i5-14600KF represents the high end of the Core i5 lineup with 14 cores and 20 threads, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is an end-of-life workstation card that performs similarly to mainstream consumer GPUs. The combination creates a system that is clearly CPU-dominant, with the processor's 90th percentile ranking overshadowing the GPU's 61st percentile position. This is not a balanced gaming rig nor a high-end workstation, but rather a hybrid that excels in processor-intensive tasks while offering moderate graphics capability. Users building this system should understand that its strengths lie in productivity, development, and CPU-bound workloads, with gaming performance as a secondary consideration.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is at the 61st percentile, with its closest rival being the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 0.7% ahead, followed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 at 0.9% ahead.

Q: What is the overall system percentile?

A: The combined desktop build ranks at the 76th percentile overall, reflecting the CPU's strong performance and the GPU's mid-range capability.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI workloads?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 4000 features 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI tasks.

Q: What memory configurations does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s bandwidth.