SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 form a high-performance desktop pairing that sits at the 86th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations. The data indicates a system engineered for high-refresh gaming and demanding productivity, with measured frame rates across dozens of titles confirming its capabilities. This analysis examines the components individually and as a combined platform, drawing exclusively on the benchmark data provided.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz. Memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This memory subsystem is a defining characteristic, offering substantial throughput for texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering.

The compute configuration is substantial: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. For accelerated workloads, the chip includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is rated at 30.87 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at an identical 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), suggesting strong compute density for both gaming and professional applications. Pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 482.3 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40377. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5077. Geekbench results show 172660 in OpenCL and 178923 in Vulkan. The PassMark suite yields a G3D score of 29137 and a GPU compute score of 15787. DirectX 12 performance in PassMark is 108, while DirectX 11 scores 277, DirectX 10 scores 180, and DirectX 9 scores 320. The G2D score is 1305.

The nearest rivals show a tight competitive cluster. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 has an average score of 40318, a 0.1% delta from the RTX 5070. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, a 0.8% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, a -1.2% delta. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, a 2% delta. These margins illustrate that the RTX 5070 sits in a performance band where small percentage differences separate it from competitors, though its 82nd percentile ranking confirms it outperforms the majority of installed GPUs.

For rendering, the combination of 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores provides hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting and AI-driven upscaling. The 12 GB GDDR7 frame buffer, while not the largest available, is sufficient for high-detail textures at 1440p and many 4K scenarios, as evidenced by the measured FPS data across games. The FP32 and FP16 throughput figures indicate robust performance for compute shaders and general-purpose GPU workloads.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data set includes measured FPS at ultra settings for a broad range of games across three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. The average FPS across all tested games is 175.1, with this pairing ranking 659th out of 3732 pairs by FPS. This indicates a top-tier gaming configuration.

At 1080p, the system excels in esports and competitive titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive delivers 605.5 FPS, Valorant hits 536.4 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 reaches 275.2 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 323 FPS. Roblox runs at 353.5 FPS, and Minecraft: Java Edition at 271.6 FPS. These numbers demonstrate the CPU+GPU combination can drive high-refresh monitors (240Hz and above) in lighter titles.

For AAA single-player games at 1080p, performance remains strong. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 167.6 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 161 FPS, Thief at 150.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy S Rainbow Six Siege at 323 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077, a notoriously demanding title, achieves 81 FPS at 1080p with ultra settings. Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 73 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator hits 99.6 FPS.

At 1440p, the resolution many consider the sweet spot for high-refresh gaming, performance scales well. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive delivers 417.4 FPS, Valorant 508 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 181.1 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 146.1 FPS, and Assetto Corsa 112 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 61.8 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 53.9 FPS. This shows that 1440p remains viable for high-refresh gaming in most titles, though the most demanding games may require settings adjustments to exceed 60 FPS consistently.

At 4K (3840x2160), performance becomes more variable. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 127.9 FPS, and Valorant at 422.5 FPS. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 246.2 FPS. However, demanding titles see significant drops. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 38.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36.4 FPS, and The Medium at 38 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly heavy, at 11.7 FPS. For 4K gaming, the data suggests that competitive and optimized titles run smoothly, but ultra-settings in the heaviest AAA games will fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and uses a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.50 GHz, boosting up to 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 125 W. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The launch MSRP is $294.

Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache structure is designed to feed the 14 cores efficiently, with a mix of performance and efficiency cores contributing to the 20 threads.

Benchmark results show the CPU at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. Cinebench R23 scores are 32544 multi-core and 4594 single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 13668 multi-core and 1929 single-core. Cinebench R15 scores are 3280 multi-core and 462 single-core. Geekbench scores are 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core.

PassMark results provide insight into specific workload characteristics. Integer math scores 125982, floating point math scores 93048, and extended instructions score 28785. Data compression scores 485140, while data encryption scores 27608. Physics scores 2449, and find prime numbers scores 161. Random string sorting scores 52056. The multithread score is 38697, and single-thread score is 4273.

The nearest rivals illustrate the competitive position. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has an average score of 49228, a 0.3% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, a 0.4% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, a 0.8% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, a -0.8% delta. This indicates the i5-14600KF is essentially performance-matched with these alternatives, with all deltas under 1%.

For real workloads, the high multi-core scores suggest strong performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 4594 in Cinebench R23 supports excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks. The high data compression score of 485140 indicates strong performance in file archiving and transfer workloads. The floating-point math score of 93048 suggests robust performance in scientific and engineering computations.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF ranks at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 90% of processors in the benchmark database. This places it in a high-performance tier suitable for demanding workloads.

Q: What is the GPU percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, indicating it is faster than 82% of graphics cards. This places it in the upper tier of gaming and rendering performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228. The delta is 0.3%, meaning the i5-14600KF is 0.3% faster on average, a negligible difference in real-world performance.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon Pro 580?

A: The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377, while the AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318. The delta is 0.1%, indicating the RTX 5070 is marginally faster, with virtually identical average performance.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, meaning this build performs better than 86% of all CPU+GPU pairs in the database. This reflects a well-balanced, high-performing combination.

Q: What frame rates can be expected in Counter-Strike 2?

A: Measured FPS at ultra settings are 275.2 at 1920x1080, 181.1 at 2560x1440, and 99.7 at 3840x2160. This indicates excellent performance for competitive play at all resolutions.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 has a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s, provided by 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus. This bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and high frame rates.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 49394, placing it at the 90th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 40377, placing it at the 82nd percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 86, indicating a system that is stronger than the sum of its parts might suggest, with the CPU and GPU complementing each other well.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32544 multi-core and 4594 single-core. These scores show a balanced processor capable of both heavy multi-threaded rendering and responsive single-threaded tasks. The Geekbench scores of 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core corroborate this balanced profile.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 provides a synthetic measure of DX12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172660 and Vulkan score of 178923 indicate strong compute performance across different APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 29137 is the primary gaming performance metric, while the GPU compute score of 15787 shows the card's throughput for non-graphics workloads.

The nearest rivals for both components demonstrate that this build is competitively positioned. The CPU is within 0.8% of its closest competitors, and the GPU is within 2% of its closest competitors. This means the system is not a outlier in either direction, but rather a solid, mid-to-high-tier performer.

The combined picture is of a system that excels in gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with playable performance at 4K in many titles. The CPU's high single-thread performance supports high frame rates in esports titles, while its multi-core strength handles streaming and content creation simultaneously. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and high bandwidth ensure texture-rich games run smoothly.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh experiences. At 1920x1080, the system delivers over 240 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (605.5 FPS), Valorant (536.4 FPS), and Roblox (353.5 FPS), making it ideal for competitive esports players with 240Hz or 360Hz monitors. At 2560x1440, it maintains over 140 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone (146.1 FPS) and over 180 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 (181.1 FPS), suitable for high-refresh 1440p displays.

For gamers at 4K, the system provides playable performance in many titles, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 127.9 FPS and Valorant at 422.5 FPS. However, the most demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (38.6 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (36.4 FPS) will require reduced settings for smooth gameplay.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544, which supports video editing and 3D rendering. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 30.87 TFLOPS and compute score of 15787 in PassMark indicate strong acceleration for rendering tasks. The 12 GB VRAM accommodates large textures and complex scenes.

Software developers compiling code will find the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 125982 and data compression score of 485140 useful for build times and data handling. Students and small business workstations benefit from the system's responsiveness, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2445 ensuring snappy application launches.

The build is less suited for users requiring massive amounts of GPU memory for machine learning or very large 3D scenes, as the 12 GB VRAM may be limiting.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. This platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the fastest NVMe storage and modern GPUs.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU has a TDP of 250 W, and the suggested PSU is 600 W. The CPU TDP is 125 W, resulting in a combined TDP of 375 W for the core components. A 600 W PSU provides 225 W of headroom for other components, which is adequate for a typical system with drives and fans.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory capacity or speed, particularly if using DDR4, as moving to DDR5 could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The storage subsystem can be expanded with PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives to take advantage of the CPU's lane support. The GPU could be upgraded to a higher-tier model if 4K ultra-settings become a priority, but the current RTX 5070 is well-matched to the CPU's performance.

The platform is mature, with the CPU and GPU both in Active production status. This suggests long-term availability of parts and drivers.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The CPU, with 14 cores and 20 threads, ranks at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, with 6144 shading units and 12 GB GDDR7, ranks at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 86, placing this build in the top 14% of all configurations in the benchmark database.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 49394 and the GPU's average score of 40377 combine to create a system that is greater than the sum of its parts in gaming workloads. The average FPS across all tested games is 175.1, with the pair ranking 659th out of 3732 pairs, further confirming its high-performance tier.

This is not an entry-level or budget configuration. It represents a serious investment in performance, suitable for enthusiasts and professionals who need both strong gaming and productivity capabilities. The build is well-balanced, with the CPU and GPU operating in a performance range where neither component significantly bottlenecks the other in most workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between CPU and GPU is evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 4594) enables very high frame rates in esports titles, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 605.5 FPS and Valorant at 536.4 FPS. This suggests the GPU is not the primary limiter at 1080p in these light titles, as the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them.

As resolution increases to 1440p, FPS drops in many titles, indicating the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor. In Cyberpunk 2077, FPS drops from 81 at 1080p to 61.8 at 1440p, a 23.7% reduction. In Red Dead Redemption 2, it drops from 73 to 53.9, a 26.2% reduction. This scaling is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios where the rendering load increases with pixel count.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck for demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 38.6 FPS, a 37.5% reduction from 1440p. Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 36.4 FPS, a 32.5% reduction. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 11.7 FPS, a 48.7% reduction from 1440p. These steep drops indicate the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and bandwidth are insufficient for the highest settings at 4K in the most demanding games.

However, in CPU-bound scenarios like esports, the GPU is not the limiter, and the CPU's performance ceiling is the primary factor. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking ensures it can handle high frame rates in these titles, but the GPU's 82nd percentile ranking means it will be the limiting factor in most graphically intensive games at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The system delivers over 240 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (605.5 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (536.4 FPS at 1080p), making it ideal for 240Hz and 360Hz monitors. At 1440p, it maintains over 180 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 (181.1 FPS) and over 500 FPS in Valorant (508 FPS), supporting high-refresh 1440p displays.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544, provide sufficient headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC encoder, while not benchmarked separately, is supported by the FP32 throughput of 30.87 TFLOPS. The system can handle game capture and encoding without significantly impacting frame rates in most titles.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 125982 and floating point score of 93048 support timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU's compute score of 15787 in PassMark provides acceleration for effects and color grading. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video editing timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 handles CPU-based rendering workloads efficiently. The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, with an FP32 throughput of 30.87 TFLOPS. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 indicates strong performance in render engines that leverage GPU acceleration.

Software development: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2445 ensures fast compilation of single-threaded code, while the multi-core score of 17085 accelerates parallel builds. The data compression score of 485140 in PassMark speeds up package management and version control operations. The system can handle virtual machines and containers with 20 threads.

Student and office work: The CPU's high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594) ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking. The GPU's G2D score of 1305 in PassMark supports 2D desktop acceleration. The system is overkill for basic office tasks, but provides headroom for data analysis and visualization workloads.