SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs Intel’s Core i5-14600KF with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4090, creating a desktop configuration where a 14-core Raptor Lake processor drives the flagship Ada Lovelace GPU. Benchmark data places the combination in the 89th percentile of all tested pairs, with an average FPS of 221.2 across the measured game suite. The GPU holds the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in the aggregate data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The RTX 4090 is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, packing 76,300 million transistors into a 609 mm² die. The memory subsystem is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). This configuration allows the GPU to handle large textures and high-resolution assets without capacity bottlenecks, which is reflected in the measured 4K performance figures across demanding titles.

The compute configuration is equally robust. The GPU features 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 128 dedicated RT cores, while 512 tensor cores accelerate AI and DLSS workloads. The raw compute throughput is 82.58 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), with a pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s. These specifications translate into benchmark scores that dominate the chart: the GPU scores 9,223 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 255,416 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 271,631 in Geekbench Vulkan. Passmark results show 38,194 in G3D and 26,613 in GPU compute, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs.

The nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Arc Pro A60 with an average score of 60,326 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 at 60,140 (+0.3%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657 (+2.9%). The RTX 4090’s average benchmark score of 60,347 sits just above the Arc Pro A60, but the delta is negligible. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896, which is 2.5% higher, showing that in synthetic aggregate terms, the 4090 is not universally ahead of all workstation-class GPUs. However, the gaming-specific metrics tell a different story, as the measured FPS data indicates.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores means ray-traced scenes and AI-accelerated denoising are handled natively. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that geometry and texture streaming do not starve the compute units, which is critical for 4K rendering viewports. The 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides the raw math capability for complex shading and simulation tasks, while the 24 GB frame buffer allows for large scenes or multiple high-resolution outputs simultaneously.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data is measured, not estimated, and it shows an exceptionally strong gaming profile. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across the tested games is 221.2, which places this pair at rank 89 out of 3,732 pairs in the database. The performance scales predictably with resolution, but the 4K numbers remain playable in nearly all titles.

At 1080p, esports and older titles reach extreme refresh rates. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 795.1 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 manages 358.2 FPS. Valorant reaches 535.3 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege posts 427 FPS. Roblox and Minecraft: Java Edition deliver 465.8 and 356.5 FPS respectively. These figures far exceed the refresh rate capabilities of any modern monitor, indicating that the CPU-GPU pair is not the limiting factor in these scenarios.

At 1440p, the performance remains high for competitive titles, with Valorant at 508 FPS and CS:GO at 547.8 FPS. Heavier titles show expected scaling: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 78.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 71 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator to 105 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 146.3 FPS, making it suitable for high-refresh 1440p monitors. The 4K results are where the 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth prove their worth. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 51.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 45.8 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 77 FPS. More optimized titles like Call of Duty: Warzone hit 125 FPS, and Valorant maintains 467.6 FPS even at 4K.

Some titles show steep 4K penalties. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 14.7 FPS at 4K, and The Medium falls to 50 FPS. These numbers suggest that even the flagship GPU cannot brute-force every unoptimized title at ultra settings in 4K. The data also shows that some games are CPU-bound at lower resolutions; for instance, Allods Online goes from 155 FPS at 1080p to 51 FPS at 4K, a drop of over 67%, which indicates a mix of GPU and CPU load shifting. Overall, the measured FPS data confirms that this pair is capable of high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being viable for most titles but requiring settings adjustments for the heaviest loads.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The chip is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Benchmark results show strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. The CPU scores 4,594 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 32,544 in multi-core. Cinebench R20 results are 1,929 single-core and 13,668 multi-core, while R15 shows 462 and 3,280 respectively. Geekbench scores are 2,445 single-core and 17,085 multi-core. Passmark results are comprehensive: multi-thread score of 38,697, single-thread score of 4,273, integer math at 125,982, floating-point math at 93,048, extended instructions at 28,785, data encryption at 27,608, data compression at 485,140, physics at 2,449, and random string sorting at 52,056. The average benchmark score is 49,394, placing the CPU in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals show how competitive this chip is. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has an average score of 49,228, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49,196 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48,995 (0.8% lower). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is the only rival ahead, with a score of 49,796, which is 0.8% higher. This means the i5-14600KF is essentially tied with the Ryzen 9 7900 in aggregate benchmarks, despite the latter having more cores. The 5.30 GHz boost clock and the 24 MB L3 cache contribute to the strong single-thread performance, which is critical for gaming and lightly-threaded applications.

For real workloads, the 20 threads handle modern multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and compilation efficiently. The Passmark data compression score of 485,140 suggests strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. The floating-point math score of 93,048 indicates capability in scientific and engineering simulations. The data encryption score of 27,608 shows that the AES-NI instructions are effective for security-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 28,785 reflects the AVX-512 or similar capabilities, which benefit certain professional applications.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile of 89, with the CPU at 90 and GPU at 88, indicates a well-matched pair in aggregate terms. However, the measured FPS data reveals where each component takes the lead. At 1080p, the average FPS of 221.2 suggests that the GPU is often not the limiting factor, as many titles exceed even the highest refresh rates. For example, CS:GO at 795.1 FPS and Valorant at 535.3 FPS at 1080p are likely CPU-bound scenarios, where the GPU has headroom but the CPU’s single-thread performance caps the frame rate. The i5-14600KF’s 5.30 GHz boost clock and 90th percentile single-thread score support this interpretation.

As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows significant drops in most titles. Cyberpunk 2077 goes from 105.2 FPS at 1080p to 51.3 FPS at 4K, a 51% reduction. Red Dead Redemption 2 drops from 97.9 to 45.8 FPS, a 53% reduction. This pattern indicates that the RTX 4090 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s performance headroom is sufficient to feed the GPU at these settings. The 4K results for Ark: Survival Ascended (14.7 FPS) and The Medium (50 FPS) are examples where the GPU’s raw compute is overwhelmed, not the CPU.

The data also shows that some games are more CPU-intensive even at higher resolutions. Microsoft Flight Simulator, for instance, goes from 130 FPS at 1080p to 77 FPS at 4K, a 41% drop, which is less severe than other titles, indicating that the CPU still plays a significant role in simulation logic. The pair’s rank of 89 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 221.2, places it in the top 2.4% of all tested configurations. This suggests that for the vast majority of workloads, neither component is a severe bottleneck, and the balance is optimal for high-refresh gaming rather than pure compute or extreme 4K rasterization.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The measured data shows this pair excels at 1080p and 1440p with refresh rates exceeding 144 Hz. Counter-Strike 2 hits 358.2 FPS at 1080p, and Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 167.7 FPS. At 1440p, Valorant manages 508 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 still holds 78.5 FPS. The 221.2 average FPS across all games confirms this is a top-tier high-refresh setup.

Streaming: The 20 threads of the i5-14600KF, combined with the RTX 4090’s 512 tensor cores, provide ample headroom for encoding and playing simultaneously. The Passmark multi-thread score of 38,697 and data compression score of 485,140 indicate that background streaming software will not degrade gaming performance noticeably. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM also allows for high-bitrate encoding without impacting the frame buffer.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,085 provide strong rendering times for timeline previews and exports. The GPU’s 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 82.58 TFLOPS FP16 accelerate effects and color grading. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures smooth scrubbing of 4K and 8K footage, and the 24 GB VRAM handles large project files without swapping.

3D rendering: The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced renders and AI denoising. The Passmark GPU compute score of 26,613, while not the highest, is supported by the CPU’s floating-point math score of 93,048 for physics simulations. The 24 GB frame buffer allows for complex scenes that would exceed the capacity of lesser GPUs.

Software development: The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently. The Passmark integer math score of 125,982 and random string sorting score of 52,056 are relevant for code processing and data manipulation. The single-thread score of 4,273 ensures fast response for IDE operations and build script execution.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,445 ensures snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets and word processors. However, the 125W TDP and requirement for an 850W PSU make it an inefficient choice for basic office work, where the power draw is disproportionate to the workload requirements.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets gamers who demand maximum frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, as evidenced by the 221.2 average FPS. Esports players will benefit from the 535.3 FPS in Valorant and 427 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, which exceed the capabilities of even the fastest 500Hz monitors. Competitive gamers at 1440p will see 508 FPS in Valorant and 280 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, ensuring no frame drops below refresh rate thresholds.

Content creators who work with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will find the 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth essential. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 32,544 in Cinebench R23 supports fast video exports, while the GPU’s 82.58 TFLOPS FP16 accelerates AI-driven effects. The combination is suited for freelance video editors, small animation studios, and architectural visualization professionals who need real-time ray tracing.

Software developers building large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads for parallel compilation, with the Passmark integer math score of 125,982 indicating strong performance in build tools. Data scientists working with large datasets will benefit from the 24 GB VRAM for GPU-accelerated machine learning, as the tensor cores are designed for such workloads. However, the 125W CPU TDP and 450W GPU TDP mean this is not a workstation for battery or power-constrained environments; it is strictly for desktop use with adequate cooling and power delivery.

Students and office workers should avoid this build unless they have specific gaming or rendering needs. The performance is far beyond what is required for documents, web browsing, or email, and the power consumption makes it inefficient for such tasks. Small business workstations that need occasional 3D rendering or simulation would be better served by a more modest GPU, as the RTX 4090’s capabilities are excessive for standard office applications.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49,394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, scores 49,228, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49,796, which is 0.8% higher, making it the only direct competitor ahead in aggregate terms. The CPU’s strongest results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544, a Geekbench multi-core score of 17,085, and a Passmark multi-thread score of 38,697. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4,594 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,273.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60,347, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60, scores 60,326, a 0% delta, meaning the two are statistically tied in aggregate. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896, which is 2.5% higher, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, which is 2.9% lower. The GPU’s key results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 255,416, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 271,631. Passmark shows a G3D score of 38,194 and a GPU compute score of 26,613.

The combined picture shows a system that is top-tier in both components. The CPU’s 90th percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile result in a combined percentile of 89, suggesting a well-optimized pairing. The pair’s average FPS of 221.2 across all games places it at rank 89 out of 3,732 pairs, meaning it outperforms 97.6% of all tested configurations. This is a high-end system that excels in gaming and professional workloads, with the CPU slightly outperforming the GPU in percentile terms, indicating that the GPU is the more likely upgrade target if future performance demands increase.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 slots, though it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The CPU’s TDP is 125W, while the GPU’s TDP is 450W, with a suggested PSU of 850W. This leaves no headroom for significant overclocking without upgrading the PSU.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. However, the CPU’s memory bandwidth is not listed in the data, so the performance impact of DDR5 versus DDR4 is not quantified here. The ECC memory support is a plus for workstation use, as it allows for error correction in critical compute tasks.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the CPU with a higher-core-count Socket 1700 processor, as the motherboard and PSU would likely support it. However, the data shows that the i5-14600KF is already tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 in aggregate performance, so the gains from a CPU upgrade would be marginal. The GPU, on the other hand, is already at the top of its class in the 88th percentile, and the next upgrade would be to a future generation (the successor is listed as GeForce 50). Given the current GPU’s end-of-life status, users waiting for the next generation would see the most benefit, but the current 4K performance is already strong for most titles.

The 850W PSU recommendation provides enough power for the 450W GPU and 125W CPU under load. Overclocking the CPU (unlocked multiplier) or GPU would require additional power headroom, so users should factor that into their PSU choice. The triple-slot GPU design requires a case with sufficient length clearance (304 mm), and the 1x 16-pin power connector is standard for modern high-end GPUs. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple high-refresh monitors.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The measured average FPS across all games in the dataset is 221.2, which places this pair at rank 89 out of 3,732 tested pairs.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 in aggregate benchmark scores?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,394, while the Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228, making the Intel chip 0.3% faster.

Q: What is the RTX 4090’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 4090 features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming at ultra settings?

A: Yes, for most titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 51.3 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 125 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 77 FPS in 4K. However, Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 14.7 FPS, indicating some games require settings adjustments.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 89, with the CPU at 90 and the GPU at 88.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 850W, given the CPU’s 125W TDP and the GPU’s 450W TDP.

Q: Does the i5-14600KF support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 types in a dual-channel configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Minecraft

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds