SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel’s Core i5-14600KF sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 49394. That places it just 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196), while trailing the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by 0.8% (49796). The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% behind at 48995. This is a desktop-class chip built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R refresh), fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It packs 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The 125 W TDP and unlocked multiplier signal that this is a performance-oriented part for users who want headroom to push clocks higher.

The benchmark scores tell a clear story about real-world workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32544 multi-core and 4594 single-core. The multi-core figure indicates strong parallel throughput for rendering and compilation tasks, while the single-core result supports snappy response in lightly threaded applications. Cinebench R20 shows 13668 multi-core and 1929 single-core, and R15 shows 3280 multi-core and 462 single-core — a consistent scaling pattern across generations of the test. Geekbench results echo this: 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core. In PassMark, the multithread score is 38697, with single-thread at 4273. The integer math score of 125982 and floating-point math of 93048 are both substantial, indicating robust number crunching for scientific or financial workloads. Data compression hits 485140, data encryption 27608, and extended instructions 28785 — the encryption figure is modest relative to the rest, suggesting that cryptographic tasks are not this chip’s primary strength. Physics simulation scores 2449, and finding prime numbers scores 161, which is a niche metric but shows the CPU’s integer throughput in a focused test.

The architecture itself is Raptor Lake, a mature design with a hybrid core layout that Intel has refined over multiple generations. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample data locality for multi-threaded workloads. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility depending on platform cost and performance priorities. ECC memory is supported, which matters for workstation reliability. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build already includes. The launch MSRP is $294.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a stark imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile, while the GPU rests at the 18th percentile. The combined percentile is 54, which reflects the average of these two very different tiers. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, not observed directly.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2893, and its nearest rivals are all within 1%: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907 (-0.5%), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910 (-0.6%), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913 (-0.7%), and the Quadro P600 scores 2923 (-1%). This places the GPU in the company of mid-range and professional cards, but its 18th percentile overall means it is far below the majority of discrete GPUs in the database.

In gaming, the CPU would rarely be the limiting factor. Its single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4594, PassMark single-thread 4273) is strong enough to feed even high-refresh-rate displays in most titles. The bottleneck would be the GPU, which has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. That memory configuration is more typical of entry-level cards than modern gaming GPUs, which often feature 8 GB or more on wider buses. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 2.706 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s further indicate a low-end rasterizer. For 1080p gaming at medium settings, this GPU might suffice, but at higher resolutions or with demanding effects, it will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can deliver.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-core might (32544 in R23 multi-core) dominates the GPU’s compute capability. Video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation are CPU-bound tasks where the GPU’s modest specs have little impact. The GPU’s 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs are sufficient for basic display output and light acceleration, but they will not accelerate heavy compute workloads. The 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores provide some ray tracing and AI acceleration, but their throughput is limited by the low overall shader count. In mixed workloads, the CPU will finish its portion of a task and wait on the GPU, or vice versa, depending on the pipeline stage. The clear verdict is that this pairing is CPU-forward, with the GPU acting as a limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 4594) can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s 18th percentile position and 4 GB VRAM will constrain performance. Estimated FPS at 1080p in competitive games could be playable, but at 1440p or with high settings, the GPU becomes the ceiling. The 96.00 GB/s bandwidth and 64-bit bus further limit texture streaming and high-resolution assets.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 38697 suggests that concurrent game and encode workloads are feasible. However, the GPU lacks dedicated NVENC performance data in the pack, so streaming quality would rely on CPU-based encoding, which this chip can handle given its multi-core scores.

Video editing: Editing timelines and applying effects benefit from the CPU’s 32544 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Export and render tasks are heavily multi-threaded, and the 20 threads will accelerate these operations. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM may limit GPU-accelerated effects or 4K previews, but CPU-based processing will carry the workload.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray, the 14600KF’s 14 cores shine. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and PassMark floating-point math of 93048 indicate strong geometry and ray computation. GPU rendering would be poor due to the 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB memory, but CPU rendering is a viable path.

Software development: Compilation is parallel-friendly, and the 20 threads with 125982 PassMark integer math score will reduce build times. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with code locality. Debugging and IDE responsiveness benefit from the 4594 single-core R23 score. The GPU’s role is minimal here, making this a strong match.

Student and office work: For document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU is massively overqualified. The 4273 PassMark single-thread score ensures zero lag in everyday tasks. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is irrelevant for 2D workloads. Power consumption is a consideration at 125 W TDP, but for a desktop workstation, that is acceptable.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU capability. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations will find the GPU adequate for older or less demanding titles, while the CPU ensures no frame drops from processor limits. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications — video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU renderers, or large data compilation — will benefit from the 90th percentile CPU. Developers compiling large codebases will see reduced build times thanks to the 20 threads and high integer math score (125982). Students and small business users building a general-purpose workstation will find the CPU future-proof for years, even if the GPU is entry-level. The desktop class and single-slot GPU (163 mm length, 69 mm height) make this a compact build suitable for small form factor cases. The 250 W suggested PSU requirement is low, enabling efficient power supplies. For users who expect to upgrade the GPU later, this platform offers a strong foundation — the CPU will not need replacing when a more powerful graphics card is added.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s position relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196), and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995). It trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by 0.8% (49796).

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest competitors in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2893, which is 0.5% behind the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907), 0.6% behind the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), 0.7% behind the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913), and 1% behind the Quadro P600 (2923).

Q: What memory does the CPU support and is ECC available?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is supported, which is useful for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Core i5-14600KF has no integrated graphics (integratedGraphics is null in the data). A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What are the GPU’s ray tracing and tensor core counts?

A: The GPU has 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, based on the Ampere architecture. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 54, reflecting the CPU’s 90th percentile and the GPU’s 18th percentile. There is no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, so this is a score-based estimate.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is an entry-level GPU in the GeForce 40-series, built on the Ampere architecture with the GA107 chip. It uses an 8 nm process from Samsung, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The GPU’s 18th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it well below the median, and its average benchmark score of 2893 comes from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. That score is nearly identical to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913), and Quadro P600 (2923) — all within 1% — which is surprising given the 4010’s much lower memory and bandwidth. This suggests the Steel Nomad test is not heavily memory-bound, or the 4010’s architecture compensates in specific ways.

The GPU has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. Its base clock is 1417 MHz with a boost clock of 1762 MHz. The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These numbers indicate a low-end rasterizer that is adequate for 1080p gaming at reduced settings but will struggle with modern titles at high detail. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for current games, which often require 6 GB or more at 1080p with high textures. The 64-bit bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth further restrict memory-intensive scenes.

Ray tracing hardware exists (6 RT cores) and tensor cores (24) provide AI acceleration, but the low shader count limits their effectiveness. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring API compatibility with modern software. Display outputs are four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, which is unusual and may require adapters for HDMI monitors. The card is single-slot, 163 mm long and 69 mm high, with no power connectors, drawing just 50 W TDP. The suggested PSU is 250 W, making this an extremely power-efficient card. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which halves the lane count compared to x16 but is unlikely to be a bottleneck given the GPU’s performance tier. For rendering tasks, the GPU’s low FP32 throughput and 4 GB memory cap make it unsuitable for GPU-based rendering. It is best used for display output, basic 2D acceleration, and light 3D workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its key results include Cinebench R23 multi-core 32544 and single-core 4594, Cinebench R20 multi-core 13668 and single-core 1929, and Cinebench R15 multi-core 3280 and single-core 462. Geekbench multi-core is 17085 and single-core is 2445. PassMark tests show multithread 38697, single-thread 4273, integer math 125982, floating-point math 93048, data compression 485140, data encryption 27608, extended instructions 28785, physics 2449, random string sorting 52056, and find prime numbers 161. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 2893, from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 54.

The combined picture is one of extreme CPU strength and GPU weakness. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, this build will perform at a high level, roughly matching the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, and slightly exceeding the Core Ultra 5 245. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated effects, the build will fall to the 18th percentile, meaning most other discrete GPUs will outperform it. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 is on par with the RTX 4060 Ti variants, but those cards typically have 8 GB or 16 GB VRAM, whereas the 4010 has only 4 GB, which will cause issues in texture-heavy scenarios. There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on these scores. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios; the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, a platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. This gives builders the option to reuse older DDR4 memory or invest in newer DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for future GPUs and NVMe drives. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 50 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. This low power requirement means most existing power supplies will have ample headroom, and the system can run on a compact, efficient PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU. The CPU’s 90th percentile performance ensures it will not bottleneck a high-end graphics card for years. The 250 W PSU suggestion would need to be revisited if a more power-hungry GPU is installed, as modern high-end cards often require 650 W or more. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is backward compatible with older slots, but a future GPU might use PCIe 5.0 x16, which the CPU supports. Memory can be upgraded to larger capacities or higher-speed DDR5 kits, as the memory controller supports both types. The platform’s production status is active, and the CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking for additional performance headroom. The launch MSRP is $294, which was the initial price point. For users who want more multi-core performance, a higher-tier 14th Gen CPU on the same socket would be a drop-in upgrade, though the current chip is already in the 90th percentile.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-14600KF, a desktop-class CPU with 14 cores and 20 threads, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, a desktop-class GPU with 4 GB VRAM. The CPU is a top-tier performer in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is an entry-level part in the 18th percentile. The combined percentile is 54, indicating a mid-tier overall system when averaged, but the reality is a lopsided configuration. The CPU is the star, offering strong multi-core and single-core performance for productivity, development, and CPU-based rendering. The GPU is a weak link for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, limited by its 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus. The build class is desktop, and it is suited for users who need CPU horsepower and are willing to accept modest graphics capability. The 250 W PSU requirement makes it easy to power, and the single-slot GPU keeps the footprint small. For users who plan to upgrade the GPU later, this is a solid foundation. As-is, it is a productivity-first machine with gaming as a secondary, low-settings consideration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds