SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, while also providing substantial multi-threaded compute headroom. The CPU, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process, combines 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This configuration includes a 24 MB shared L3 cache and per-core L2 cache of 2 MB, which directly supports its strong single-threaded performance. The GPU, using the RDNA 3.0 architecture and Navi 32 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, totaling 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The measured data, with a combined percentile of 79 across all components, indicates a balanced system that sits above the median for both CPU and GPU performance, but with distinct strengths in CPU-bound scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-14600KF delivers benchmark results that place it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. Its multi-threaded performance is particularly notable: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17085 indicate a processor capable of handling heavily parallel workloads, from video encoding to software compilation. The single-core scores are equally compelling, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 4594 and Geekbench single-core at 2445, which translates to responsive everyday use and strong gaming performance where single-thread speed is often the limiting factor.

The 14-core, 20-thread layout uses a hybrid design typical of Raptor Lake, with performance cores handling latency-sensitive tasks and efficiency cores managing background workloads. The 125 W TDP suggests that sustained all-core loads will require robust cooling, though the unlocked multiplier allows for tuning if the user’s cooling solution permits. The L3 cache at 24 MB shared is ample for gaming and productivity, reducing the frequency of memory accesses. In Passmark tests, the CPU shows strong integer math at 125982 and floating-point math at 93048, which are indicative of compute-heavy tasks like physics simulations and scientific calculations. The data compression score of 485140 and encryption score of 27608 further demonstrate proficiency in file archiving and security-related workloads, respectively.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600KF sits within a tight performance band. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (avg score 49228), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196), and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995). Conversely, it trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by 0.8% (49796). These deltas are marginal, meaning that for most users, the choice between these CPUs will come down to platform features rather than raw performance differences. The single-thread Passmark score of 4273 reinforces its gaming pedigree, while the multi-thread score of 38697 confirms it is not a slouch in content creation either. The architecture’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in build planning, allowing users to choose between cost-effective older memory or higher-bandwidth newer modules.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance is the primary driver. Measured FPS in titles like Counter-Strike 2 at 211.8 FPS and Valorant at 490 FPS on ultra settings shows that the i5-14600KF can push frame rates well beyond typical 144 Hz monitors, ensuring the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Streaming and gaming simultaneously benefits from the 20 threads, which handle encoding and game logic without overtaxing the CPU. The multi-thread score of 32544 in Cinebench R23 suggests that background streaming software can run alongside a demanding game with minimal impact on frame rates, as the CPU has ample headroom for both tasks.

Video editing workloads, such as rendering timelines in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, rely heavily on multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and Passmark multi-thread score of 38697 indicate that 4K video exports and effects-heavy projects will process efficiently, although not at the speed of higher-core-count workstation chips.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D is similarly well-served by the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads. The Passmark integer math score of 125982 and floating-point math score of 93048 show that complex scene calculations and ray tracing preparation tasks will complete in reasonable time, making this a viable budget rendering station.

Software development benefits from fast compilation times, which are heavily dependent on multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13668 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17085 suggest that building large codebases will be quicker than on lower-core-count CPUs, while the strong single-core score ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

For student and office work, the CPU’s single-core performance provides fluid interaction with spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers. The Geekbench single-core score of 2445 means that even complex documents with embedded objects will scroll and render without stutter. The data encryption score of 27608 also ensures that VPN connections and file encryption tasks are handled without noticeable delay.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 49394 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rival deltas of less than 1% in either direction, indicating a highly competitive mid-to-high-end desktop processor. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 22549, sitting in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435, 0.5% faster) and the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729, 0.8% slower). This puts the RX 7700 XT in the upper-midrange tier, capable of 1440p gaming but not at the top tier of 4K performance.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, which reflects a system that outperforms the majority of builds but is not at the extreme high end. The measured FPS data across 53 games shows an average of 141 FPS at various resolutions, with a pair rank of 1355 out of 3732 pairs. This rank indicates that the combination delivers above-average frame rates compared to other CPU-GPU pairs, though it is not in the top tier for 4K ultra gaming.

In specific benchmarks, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 and Passmark G3D score of 22547 show solid DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383 and Vulkan score of 46443 illustrate strong compute capabilities, which benefit non-gaming applications like machine learning inference or video encoding. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 2449 and find prime numbers score of 161 indicate moderate performance in specialized workloads, which is expected for a mainstream desktop chip.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms—90th percentile versus 67th percentile—meaning that the i5-14600KF has headroom to support a more powerful GPU in the future without becoming a bottleneck. The measured FPS data confirms this, as the system’s average FPS of 141 across games is driven more by the GPU’s limits than the CPU’s in most titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh monitors, where the measured FPS in esports titles like Valorant (490 FPS) and CS:GO (469.4 FPS) far exceeds any monitor’s refresh rate, and even demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 hit 63.4 FPS at 1080p ultra, which is playable with adaptive sync. For 1440p gamers, the system remains capable, with Warzone at 148.2 FPS and Fortnite at 66.8 FPS on ultra, though 4K ultra gaming is not recommended for the most demanding titles.

Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance sufficient for moderate projects, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p and 1440p timelines smoothly. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 20 threads, and the fast single-core speed ensures that day-to-day coding tasks feel responsive.

Students and office workers building a single system for both productivity and occasional gaming will find this pairing overkill for word processing but perfectly suited for multitasking with multiple applications open. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for several years, while the GPU’s 67th percentile ensures it can handle modern game releases at medium-to-high settings.

Small business workstations handling data analysis, financial modeling, or CAD software will appreciate the CPU’s integer math performance and the GPU’s compute capabilities, though professional workloads may require more VRAM or ECC memory support, which the CPU does offer (ECC memory is supported).

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is empirically collected, shows this system’s gaming capabilities across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in competitive shooters, with Valorant at 490 FPS and CS:GO at 469.4 FPS, while also handling more demanding titles like Call of Duty: Warzone at 167 FPS and Control at 89.5 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077, a heavy ray-tracing title, runs at 63.4 FPS, which is playable but not high-refresh territory.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Warzone drops to 148.2 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 runs at 140.7 FPS. The more demanding games show their strain: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 44.6 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 41.5 FPS, making 1440p ultra settings borderline for AAA titles without upscaling.

At 3840x2160, the system is only suitable for lighter or older titles. Valorant runs at 334 FPS, and CS:GO at 192.1 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 28.3 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28.1 FPS, indicating that 4K gaming is not viable at ultra settings for modern AAA games. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, but at 4K, some titles may exceed this capacity, causing stuttering.

The average FPS across all measured games is 141, with the best performance in esports titles at 1080p and the worst in heavy AAA games at 4K. This data supports the conclusion that the system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming and acceptable 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for less demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all other CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RX 7700 XT has an average score of 22549, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX 5060 Mobile (22435) and 0.8% higher than the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729).

Q: What is the maximum measured FPS in any game at 1080p?

A: Valorant achieves 490 FPS at 1920x1080, which is the highest measured frame rate in the dataset.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600KF supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 7700 XT has 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing has a combined percentile of 79, indicating it outperforms 79% of all tested configurations.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games for this system?

A: The average FPS across all games is 141, with a pair rank of 1355 out of 3732 pairs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals an imbalance where the CPU’s 90th percentile performance outpaces the GPU’s 67th percentile. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios—such as low-resolution gaming at 1080p or esports titles with high frame rates—the CPU has significant headroom, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor. For example, in Valorant at 1080p, the system hits 490 FPS, but this is likely capped by the GPU’s ability to render frames, not the CPU’s ability to calculate game logic.

Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming, the CPU’s performance is largely irrelevant, as the GPU is overwhelmed. Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K runs at 28.3 FPS, which is a GPU limitation, not a CPU one. The CPU is likely idling while the GPU works at maximum capacity. This is a classic example of a system where the CPU can support a more powerful GPU without bottlenecking, should the user choose to upgrade later.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a typical pattern: in Warzone, FPS drops from 167 to 148.2 (11% decrease), while in Cyberpunk, it drops from 63.4 to 44.6 (30% decrease). This indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint in heavy games, while the CPU can maintain higher frame rates in lighter titles. The 12 GB VRAM may also become a bottleneck in some 1440p games with high-resolution textures, as memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s, which is sufficient but not top-tier.

The overall balance favors the CPU, meaning that for users who prioritize gaming, the GPU will be the component that limits performance in most scenarios. For productivity workloads like video editing, the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is the driving factor, and the GPU’s compute capabilities (FP32 of 35.17 TFLOPS) provide acceleration for effects and rendering.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14600KF, a 14-core/20-thread CPU from the Core 14th Gen series, with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, a 12 GB GPU from the RX 7000 series. The CPU is built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process, while the GPU uses RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm process. The system’s combined percentile of 79 places it in the upper-midrange tier of all tested configurations, outperforming most builds but not reaching the top-tier enthusiast level.

The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking makes it a strong foundation for any desktop build, and the GPU’s 67th percentile provides solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming performance. The pair’s average FPS of 141 across games indicates that, on average, this system delivers smooth frame rates for most titles at common resolutions. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $294, and for the GPU is 449 USD. The system is best characterized as a balanced mid-range performer with a CPU that has more headroom than the GPU, making it suitable for users who want strong productivity performance and good gaming at mainstream resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Navi 32 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with 28,100 million transistors. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations pipelines, along with 54 ray tracing cores. Its boost clock is 2544 MHz, with a game clock of 2171 MHz and a base clock of 1435 MHz.

The GPU’s benchmark scores show a mixed picture. Its Passmark G3D score of 22547 places it in the 67th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 22549. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383 shows excellent compute throughput for non-gaming tasks. The Vulkan score of 46443 is also solid, indicating good compatibility with modern APIs.

In terms of rendering, the GPU’s FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS is substantial, allowing for fast processing of 3D scenes and video effects. The texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s ensure that high-resolution textures and effects are applied efficiently. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in most titles. The ray tracing cores (54) are present, but the GPU’s performance in ray-traced games like Cyberpunk 2077 at 63.4 FPS (1080p) suggests that full ray tracing at high settings will require lower resolutions or upscaling.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the RTX 5060 Mobile (0.5% faster) and RTX 4060 Mobile (0.8% slower), which are mobile parts, indicating that the RX 7700 XT competes well with laptop GPUs but is positioned lower than desktop 70-class cards. The GPU’s TDP of 245 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W, requires a decent power supply but is manageable in most mid-range builds.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe SSDs and future GPUs. The socket is shared with other 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Intel processors, meaning that users could upgrade to a higher-core-count CPU in the same generation without changing the motherboard, provided the BIOS is updated.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, and the card’s 267 mm length and dual-slot design fit in most mid-tower cases. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, and the CPU’s 125 W TDP, combined with the GPU’s 245 W TDP, suggests a 550 W PSU is sufficient, which is the suggested PSU rating. This leaves headroom for overclocking the CPU (which has an unlocked multiplier) or adding additional drives.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier card, as the CPU’s 90th percentile performance would not bottleneck a GPU that is significantly faster than the RX 7700 XT. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs using this interface will run at full bandwidth. Alternatively, users could upgrade to a CPU with more cores, such as a Core i7 or i9 from the same socket, to improve multi-threaded workloads. Memory upgrades to DDR5-6000 or higher would also benefit the CPU’s performance, given its support for the newer memory standard. The platform’s longevity is decent, but future Intel generations are expected to move to a new socket, so the upgrade path is limited to the current generation.