SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7600 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 74th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU combinations. The processor is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-R part on Intel Socket 1700, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel, carries a 125 W TDP, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support. The GPU is a Navi 33 chip on TSMC’s 6 nm node, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This analysis draws exclusively on the provided benchmark data to interpret what these numbers mean for real workloads, gaming at multiple resolutions, and platform longevity.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-14600KF is a high-end desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. Its 14 cores are split between performance and efficiency types, with 20 threads available for parallel workloads. The 3.50 GHz base clock and 5.30 GHz boost clock indicate strong single-thread capability, which is confirmed by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594 and Geekbench single-core score of 2445. These scores place the CPU in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, meaning it outpaces the vast majority of processors in the database for both lightly threaded and heavily threaded tasks.

In multi-threaded scenarios, the 14600KF shows exceptional scaling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 is nearly seven times the single-core score, demonstrating that the 20 threads are well utilized. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17085 and PassMark multithread score of 38697 reinforce this pattern. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with considerable headroom. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared, with 2 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core, which helps maintain high hit rates in data-intensive applications. The die size is 257 mm², and the part is built on Intel’s 10 nm process, balancing transistor density with thermal characteristics.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in the database are all close in average score: the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is 0.3% ahead, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% ahead, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.8% behind. This puts the 14600KF in a tightly contested performance band where differences are within noise. The PassMark integer math score of 125982 and floating-point math score of 93048 indicate strong general-purpose compute, while the data encryption score of 27608 and data compression score of 485140 show efficient handling of security and archival tasks. The extended instructions score of 28785 suggests good SIMD performance for multimedia code. The find prime numbers score of 161 is lower in absolute terms but reflects a specific workload that is not representative of typical desktop use.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 74, which reflects the CPU being significantly stronger than the GPU in raw compute terms. The pair’s rank by FPS across a wide game library is 2470 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 105.3 across all measured games at ultra settings.

The CPU benchmarks show a clear hierarchy: Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 3280, single-core 462; R20 multi-core scores 13668, single-core 1929; R23 multi-core scores 32544, single-core 4594. These results indicate that the 14600KF is a top-tier multi-threaded performer while also excelling in single-threaded tasks. The Geekbench scores of 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core corroborate this. The GPU benchmarks show a more modest standing: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 2310, Geekbench OpenCL scores 88051, and Vulkan scores 34401. PassMark G3D scores 16634, with G2D at 984 and GPU compute at 8790. DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores are 226, 84, 172, and 58 respectively.

The GPU’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (0.2% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro 560X (0.6% behind), AMD Radeon 680M (0.7% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (0.7% behind). This places the RX 7600 in a mid-range tier where it trades blows with older and integrated parts. The combined picture is a CPU that can drive demanding simulations and production workloads without bottlenecking, but a GPU that limits the system to 1080p and light 1440p gaming at high settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The Core i5-14600KF is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest GPU rival?

A: The RX 7600 is 0.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, with an average score of 15171 versus 15199.

Q: What memory types does the 14600KF support?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support also listed.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and bus width?

A: The RX 7600 has 288.0 GB/s bandwidth over a 128-bit bus, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the build’s combined percentile and average FPS?

A: The combined percentile is 74, and the average FPS across all measured games is 105.3.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 5.30 GHz and the TDP is 125 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 has an average score of 49228, which is 0.3% higher than the 14600KF’s 49394.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU sits at the 90th percentile while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile. This means the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than the GPU can render in most scenarios. In CPU-bound games like Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 156.1 FPS at 1080p and 102.5 FPS at 1440p, indicating the GPU is still the limiting factor at lower resolutions. In contrast, GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 45.6 FPS at 1080p and 34.3 FPS at 1440p, showing that the GPU cannot maintain high frame rates despite the CPU’s headroom.

The average FPS of 105.3 across all games is heavily influenced by lighter eSports titles, where the CPU can push the GPU to its limits. In heavier AAA titles, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as seen in Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43.3 FPS (1080p) and 29.1 FPS (1440p). The CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient to avoid stutter in most games, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus of the GPU limit texture quality and resolution scaling. At 4K, almost every game drops below 60 FPS, with only lightweight titles like Valorant (243 FPS) and Roblox (76 FPS) remaining playable.

The practical bottleneck is the GPU in virtually all gaming workloads. The CPU’s 20 threads and 5.30 GHz boost clock mean it can handle background tasks, streaming, and game logic simultaneously without impacting FPS. For productivity, the CPU is the star, but for gaming, the RX 7600 holds the system back from high-refresh 1440p or any 4K gaming beyond competitive titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The 14600KF uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility to reuse older DDR4 kits or invest in newer DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, enabling fast NVMe drives or future GPU upgrades that can use the full bandwidth. The RX 7600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is adequate for its performance but means a newer GPU with PCIe 5.0 would not be fully utilized on this CPU if the motherboard only provides Gen 5 lanes to the first slot.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 165 W with a single 8-pin connector. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, so a combined system draw is well within a 450 W PSU’s capacity, leaving headroom for drives and fans. The motherboard socket is active in production, meaning replacement parts are available. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, such as one with more VRAM, because the CPU has substantial headroom—its 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 57th percentile suggests the CPU could support a GPU that performs 30-40% better before becoming a limiting factor. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the platform can be built to a budget or for performance depending on the rest of the system.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh play and are willing to accept medium-to-high settings in modern AAA titles. The CPU’s 90th percentile and the GPU’s 57th percentile mean that for eSports games like Valorant (357 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (348.9 FPS), the system delivers exceptional performance. For demanding single-player games, it is a 1080p/60 FPS machine with occasional dips below that threshold.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded power—Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32544 and PassMark multithread of 38697 indicate fast export and render times. However, the GPU’s compute score of 8790 in PassMark GPU compute means GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than a higher-end card. Developers compiling code will see strong performance from the integer math score of 125982. Students and small business users will find this overkill for office work, but the headroom means it will handle future software demands without upgrades.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system exceeds 144 FPS in Valorant (357), CS:GO (348.9), and Rainbow Six Siege (185), ensuring smooth competitive play. At 1440p, these titles still hit 305, 239, and 121 FPS respectively, making it viable for high-refresh monitors in lighter games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and 5.30 GHz boost clock can encode video and run a game simultaneously, as evidenced by the strong multi-core scores. The GPU’s relatively low compute score means using the CPU for streaming is preferable to GPU encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench and Geekbench multi-core scores (32544 and 17085) indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times in software that uses CPU rendering. The GPU can accelerate effects but will be a secondary contributor.

3D rendering: The R23 multi-core score of 32544 places this CPU in the top 10% for render workloads, making it suitable for Blender or similar CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance can assist in viewport rendering but is not a primary render engine.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 125982 and data compression score of 485140 show fast compilation and archive extraction, reducing build times for large projects.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core performance (4594 in R23) ensures snappy application launches, while the multithreaded power handles simultaneous office suites, browsers, and virtual machines without slowdown. The GPU is unnecessary for most office tasks but supports dual-display setups with its three DisplayPort 2.1 and one HDMI 2.1a output.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing a high-end 14th Gen Intel Core i5 processor with a mid-range AMD Radeon RX 7000 series GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread part from the Raptor Lake refresh, built on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a 125 W TDP. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 part with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, a 128-bit bus, and 2048 shading units. The combined percentile of 74 places this build in the upper-middle tier of all systems, with the CPU significantly outperforming the GPU. The pair ranks 2470 out of 3732 in FPS across games, with an average of 105.3 FPS at ultra settings.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS at ultra settings shows a system that excels at 1080p and is adequate at 1440p, while struggling at 4K. At 1920x1080, the top performers are Valorant (357 FPS), CS:GO (348.9 FPS), and Roblox (201 FPS), indicating strong performance for competitive titles. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 166 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege hits 185 FPS. Heavier titles drop significantly: Cyberpunk 2077 at 45.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 20.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, most games fall below 100 FPS, with Valorant (305) and CS:GO (239) being exceptions. The 4K results are mostly unplayable, with only Valorant (243), Warzone (125), and CS:GO (143.6) exceeding 60 FPS. These figures are measured, not estimated, and the data shows a clear resolution ceiling for the GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a mid-range GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1720 MHz, with a boost clock of 2655 MHz and a game clock of 2250 MHz, while memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The chip has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray-tracing cores. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS.

The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 57th percentile, with an average score of 15171. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 indicates modest DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 and Vulkan score of 34401 show compute capability that is adequate for entry-level GPU tasks. The PassMark G3D score of 16634 is within 0.2% of the RTX 3050 OEM, confirming its competitive position. The ray-tracing hardware (32 cores) is present but the low overall GPU score suggests RT performance will be limited, likely resulting in significant frame drops when enabled in games like Cyberpunk 2077. The 8 GB VRAM is a constraint at 4K, where texture-heavy scenes will exceed capacity, causing stutters or reduced quality settings. For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS each enables basic GPU acceleration, but the 128-bit memory bus will bottleneck large dataset transfers.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds