SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6800 form a desktop pairing that targets the upper-midrange segment of the performance spectrum. The combination of a 14-core Raptor Lake processor and a 16 GB RDNA 2 graphics card places this build at the 83rd percentile overall, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the majority of currently tracked configurations. The data shows a strong alignment between CPU and GPU capabilities, though the distinct architectural strengths of each component make the system versatile across a wide range of workloads, from high-refresh gaming to content creation and software compilation.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 21 chip fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. With 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, the GPU offers a substantial hardware foundation. The memory subsystem is a standout feature: 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This large frame buffer is significant for modern rendering workloads, as it allows for high-resolution textures and complex scenes without hitting capacity limits, a clear advantage in both gaming and 3D rendering scenarios.

Clock speeds are robust, with a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 1815 MHz, and a boost clock of 2105 MHz. The memory operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The GPU contains 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, the RX 6800 includes 60 dedicated ray accelerators, though it lacks the dedicated tensor cores found in rival architectures; this means AI-accelerated features rely on compute shaders rather than specialized hardware. The raw compute throughput is considerable, with FP32 performance rated at 16.17 TFLOPS and FP16 at 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1).

Benchmark scores for the GPU reflect its position in the market. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 is a strong indicator of DirectX 12 gaming performance. In compute-oriented tests, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 24508 and Vulkan score of 115107 show solid parallel processing capability, while the Metal score of 153635 suggests good performance in macOS environments, though this is a Windows-oriented desktop build. The PassMark G3D score of 22067 and GPU compute score of 10864 corroborate the overall performance level.

The RX 6800 holds the 75th percentile among all tracked GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database show how tight the competition is at this tier. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has an average score of 29945, putting the RX 6800 slightly ahead at 30095, a delta of 0.5%. Similarly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (29928) is 0.6% behind, and the RTX 2080 Ti (29783) trails by 1%. On the other side, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (30433) is 1.1% ahead. This data indicates that the RX 6800 sits in a performance cluster where differences between competing cards are marginal, and the choice between them often comes down to features or driver preferences rather than raw speed.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The benchmark data for this build shows a CPU that punches well above its weight class and a GPU that holds a solid, if less spectacular, position. The Intel Core i5-14600KF achieves an average benchmark score of 49394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is a high ranking, reflecting the processor's strength in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32544 in multi-core and 4594 in single-core tests. The multi-core result is particularly impressive for a 14-core chip, while the single-core score demonstrates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming and lightly threaded applications.

The GPU, as noted, scores 30095 on average, holding the 75th percentile. The disparity between the CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 75th percentile is the defining characteristic of this build. The combined system percentile is 83rd, which is a weighted average that reflects the strong CPU contributing more to the overall capability than the relatively weaker GPU.

Looking at CPU rivalry data, the i5-14600KF is remarkably close to much more expensive processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has an average score of 49228, which is just 0.3% behind the i5. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196) is 0.4% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995) is 0.8% behind. Only the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (49796) manages to edge ahead, by 0.8%. This clustering suggests that the i5-14600KF effectively trades blows with higher-tier chips, making it an exceptionally strong performer in its class.

The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU is the star performer, capable of handling the most demanding computational tasks without breaking a sweat, while the GPU provides a solid foundation for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 38697 and single-thread score of 4273 reinforce the processor's dominance. For real-world use, this means the system will rarely feel CPU-bound in tasks like video editing or software compilation, while the GPU will be the limiting factor in high-resolution gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6800’s 75th percentile GPU ranking and 16 GB of VRAM make it well-suited for 1440p high-refresh gaming. With a boost clock of 2105 MHz and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the card can maintain high frame rates in most titles, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means some AI-driven upscaling features are less effective. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594 ensure that even the fastest frames are not bottlenecked by the processor.

Streaming: The i5-14600KF’s 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU can handle x264 encoding without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU’s 60 ray accelerators are not relevant here, but its 16.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can assist with encoding tasks where applicable, making this a capable single-PC streaming setup.

Video editing: The combination of a powerful CPU and a GPU with 16 GB of VRAM is ideal for video editing. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 485140 indicates fast handling of file archives, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 24508 accelerates effects rendering and timeline scrubbing. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that high-resolution video data moves quickly between the GPU and its frame buffer.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the i5-14600KF’s multi-core performance is exceptional, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 17085 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13668. For GPU-based rendering, the RX 6800’s 16.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 32.33 TFLOPS of FP16 compute provide substantial acceleration. The 16 GB frame buffer is particularly useful for rendering large scenes that exceed the memory capacity of 8 GB or 12 GB cards.

Software development: The CPU’s high integer performance, evidenced by a PassMark integer math score of 125982, makes this build excellent for code compilation. The 14 cores and 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 24 MB of shared L3 cache reduces latency when accessing frequently used data. The ECC memory support is a bonus for workstations where data integrity is critical.

Student and office work: This build is massive overkill for typical student and office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4273 in PassMark means applications like spreadsheets and web browsers will run flawlessly, while the GPU’s 990 PassMark G2D score ensures smooth 2D desktop rendering. However, the 250 W TDP of the GPU and 125 W TDP of the CPU mean this system is not an energy-efficient choice for basic productivity, making it better suited for users who also game or create content.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 83rd, indicating that this build outperforms the majority of tracked configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228. This puts the i5 0.3% ahead of the Ryzen 9.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD Radeon RX 6800?

A: The RX 6800 has a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, achieved with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the RX 6800 have dedicated tensor cores?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists tensor cores as null for the RX 6800. It does have 60 dedicated ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14600KF is $294.

Q: How does the RX 6800's average benchmark score compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RX 6800 has an average score of 30095, which is 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti's score of 29945.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for the AMD Radeon RX 6800's chip?

A: The RX 6800 uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture on a 7 nm process, fabricated by TSMC.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is squarely aimed at users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads without neglecting gaming. The 90th percentile CPU ranking makes this an ideal choice for professionals in software development, where the PassMark integer math score of 125982 and multi-thread score of 38697 indicate rapid code compilation. Video editors will benefit from the combination of a powerful CPU and a GPU with 16 GB of VRAM, which handles high-resolution timelines effectively. 3D artists working with CPU-based renderers will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 exceptionally useful, while those using GPU renderers can leverage the 16.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

For gamers, this system is best suited for 1440p resolution, where the RX 6800’s performance tier can deliver high frame rates in most titles. The 75th percentile GPU ranking means it is not the top choice for 4K gaming, but it remains more than capable for competitive and AAA gaming at lower resolutions. The 16 GB VRAM future-proofs the system against upcoming titles with high texture requirements.

Small business workstations that run complex simulations or data analysis will benefit from the CPU’s 14 cores and ECC memory support, which adds stability. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, is only 0.3% ahead, making this a cost-effective alternative for workstation tasks. However, users who require maximum GPU compute for machine learning or CUDA-accelerated workloads should look elsewhere, as the RX 6800 lacks the tensor cores found in NVIDIA counterparts.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains an empty object for `measuredFpsUltraByGame`, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is set to false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions for this build are estimates based on the benchmark scores and the known performance characteristics of the components.

Using the benchmark data as a guide, the RX 6800’s 75th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests that it delivers strong performance at 1440p ultra settings in most modern games. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, which is the foundation for most AAA titles. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are ample for high-resolution textures, and the 2105 MHz boost clock ensures high sustained frame rates.

For esports titles like Fortnite or Valorant, the CPU’s single-thread performance, highlighted by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594, will prevent any CPU bottlenecks, allowing the GPU to push very high frame rates. For more demanding AAA titles at 1440p, the system should comfortably exceed 60 FPS at ultra settings, with the potential for higher frame rates in less demanding scenes. At 4K, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, and users may need to adjust settings to maintain playable frame rates. These are estimates, not measured data, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration, while not explicitly broken down in the FACT PACK, is typical of the Raptor Lake design, combining performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, indicating high single-thread potential. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and it has ECC memory support. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 is exceptional for a 14-core chip, placing it in the same league as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores 49228 on average and is only 0.3% behind. The single-core score of 4594 is equally impressive, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and high frame rates in games. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17085 and single-core score of 2445 corroborate these findings.

In real-world workloads, the CPU’s 20 threads allow for fast video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark data encryption score of 27608 and extended instructions score of 28785 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, which is useful for security-related tasks and scientific computing. The floating-point math score of 93048 shows robust numerical processing, while the find prime numbers score of 161 is a measure of raw integer performance. The PassMark physics score of 2449 is relevant for gaming physics simulations, and the random string sorting score of 52056 indicates fast data manipulation.

The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant asset, as it reduces memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The 2 MB per-core L2 cache and 80 KB per-core L1 cache are also generous. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it is a top-tier processor, and the fact that its nearest rivals are higher-tier chips like the Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 underscores its exceptional value in the performance hierarchy.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build that combines an Intel Core i5-14600KF processor with an AMD Radeon RX 6800 graphics card. The pairing represents a high-performance system designed for users who need significant CPU power. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking is the standout feature, placing it among the top 10% of all processors tracked. The GPU’s 75th percentile ranking is also solid, though it is a notch below the CPU in relative terms.

The combined system percentile is 83rd, which places this build in the upper tier of desktop configurations. This is not a budget system, nor is it an extreme enthusiast rig; it sits firmly in the high-end mainstream segment. The CPU’s Raptor Lake architecture with a 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures it will remain relevant for years, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM provides a degree of future-proofing against increasing memory demands in games and creative applications.

The build class is explicitly listed as "desktop," meaning it is intended for a stationary workstation or gaming tower. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 250 W, requiring a power supply rated for 600 W. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, with a 40 mm width, and requires two 8-pin power connectors. The system supports PCIe 4.0 x16 for the GPU, and the CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 lanes for other expansion cards. This is a well-rounded, powerful desktop configuration that will handle demanding workloads with ease, though its performance is more heavily weighted toward CPU-bound tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i5-14600KF and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 is characterized by a significant mismatch in relative performance tiers. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking is substantially higher than the GPU’s 75th percentile. This means that in most workloads, the GPU is the limiting factor, or bottleneck, in the system.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by a PassMark single-thread score of 4273, ensures that it can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can render frames. As a result, the RX 6800 will be the component that determines the achievable frame rate, particularly at higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, where the GPU’s rendering load increases. The CPU will only become a bottleneck in extremely CPU-intensive games or at very low resolutions and settings, where the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can process game logic.

In compute workloads, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data compression (PassMark data compression score of 485140), or single-threaded applications, the i5-14600KF is the star performer, and the GPU is idle. For GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering in a GPU-accelerated renderer, the RX 6800’s 16.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is the limiting factor, despite its solid performance.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that the system is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, where the GPU’s 75th percentile performance is sufficient to pair with the CPU’s 90th percentile strength. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the CPU’s extra headroom goes unused. Conversely, in CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding or physics simulations, the GPU is not a factor, and the CPU’s performance is the sole determinant of system speed. Overall, this is a CPU-heavy build, and users who primarily game at 4K or require maximum GPU compute should consider a more powerful graphics card to better match the CPU’s capabilities.