SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that lands in the 81st combined percentile, indicating a system that comfortably outperforms the majority of installed configurations. The data presents a CPU that is a multi-threaded powerhouse relative to its class, paired with a GPU that offers strong, though not class-leading, rasterization performance. This combination produces a distinct profile: one where the processor's capability frequently outstrips what the graphics card can feed it, particularly at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data across numerous titles confirms a system built for fluid 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, with 4K gaming often falling below the 60 FPS threshold.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 22 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is substantial for its class, featuring 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory operates at an effective speed of 18 Gbps.

In terms of processing resources, the GPU is equipped with 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also includes 40 ray accelerators for dedicated ray tracing hardware. The core clocks are listed with a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The theoretical peak performance is rated at 13.31 TFLOPS for FP32 and 26.62 TFLOPS for FP16.

The GPU's benchmark scores provide a concrete measure of its capabilities. It achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 and a Passmark G3D score of 20700. In compute-oriented tests, it scores 95 for Passmark GPU compute and 16,360 in Geekbench OpenCL. The GPU sits in the 71st percentile of all GPUs, a strong position, but its overall average benchmark score of 26,011 places it in close competition with several other cards. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (0.5% ahead), AMD FirePro W7100 (0.6% ahead), AMD FirePro D700 (0.7% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (1.1% ahead). These deltaPct values are remarkably small, indicating that the RX 6750 XT's aggregate performance is virtually identical to this cluster of competitors. This suggests that the GPU's performance tier is well-established, and the 71st percentile placement reflects a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range standing.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this system is one of a significant disparity between CPU and GPU performance. The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores exceptionally well, sitting in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The processor's average benchmark score is 49,394, which is in a near-tie with several high-end rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is 0.3% ahead of the i5, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% ahead, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% ahead. The only rival where it performs better is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, which is 0.8% behind. These narrow deltaPct values highlight just how competitive this CPU is, placing it in the upper echelon of processors.

In contrast, the Radeon RX 6750 XT sits in the 71st percentile. The pairing of a 90th-percentile CPU with a 71st-percentile GPU in the 81st combined percentile suggests a build where the CPU is the more dominant component. For rendering tasks, the CPU's multi-core strength will be the primary driver, while the GPU handles the graphics-specific workloads. The data from the measured FPS shows an average of 126 FPS across games, which is a very playable number, and the pair ranks 1,770th out of 3,732 pairs, putting it in the top half of all tested pairings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is significant, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which provides flexibility in platform choices. The CPU also supports ECC memory.

Its benchmark results are particularly strong. In multi-threaded tests, it scores 32,544 in Cinebench R23, 13,668 in Cinebench R20, and 3,280 in Cinebench R15. In single-threaded tests, it achieves 4,594 in Cinebench R23, 1,929 in Cinebench R20, and 462 in Cinebench R15. Geekbench scores are 17,085 and 2,445 for multi-core and single-core, respectively. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 38,697 and a single-thread score of 4,273. These scores indicate a processor that is exceptionally strong in both single- and multi-threaded workloads.

The data implies that for real workloads, this CPU is capable of handling heavy multi-threaded tasks like video rendering or software compilation with significant headroom, while its single-thread performance ensures snappy and responsive feel for everyday tasks and games that are not heavily multi-threaded. The 90th percentile CPU status confirms that this is a top-tier processor that is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any workload.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU holds a 90th percentile ranking, while the GPU is at the 71st percentile. This creates a scenario where the CPU is the more capable component in the pairing. In gaming, this means the GPU will be the primary limiting factor for frame rates, especially at higher resolutions. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p, the system produces 58.8 FPS, but at 1440p this drops to 40.4 FPS, and at 4K it falls to 29.5 FPS. This drop-off is typical of a GPU-induced bottleneck, as the resolution increases. The CPU's high single-thread score of 2,445 in Geekbench should be more than enough to keep up with the GPU's output, so the bottleneck is clearly on the graphics side.

The 126 average FPS across all games and the pair rank of 1,770 out of 3,732 pairs further supports this. The high average FPS shows that the GPU is still capable of high frame rates in many titles, but the scaling from 1080p to 1440p and 4K shows its limits. For instance, a game like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive shows 428.7 FPS at 1080p, 298.3 FPS at 1440p, and 172.9 FPS at 4K. The GPU is clearly the limiting factor at 4K in this pairing, as the CPU's performance headroom cannot be fully utilized when the GPU reaches its limit.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and offers PCIe Gen 5 in 16 Lanes for the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU's TDP of 125 W is the primary power draw, and the suggested PSU for the system is 600 W. This suggests that the platform has some headroom for future upgrades. The GPU's TDP is 250 W, and it requires a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector.

The data indicates that a sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU. Since the CPU is already in the 90th percentile, it can handle a GPU upgrade without becoming a bottleneck. The 600 W PSU may be sufficient for a mid-range GPU, but a stronger GPU might require a PSU upgrade. The CPU's support for ECC memory and its dual-channel memory controller mean it is a solid foundation for a high-performance workstation. The 16 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU are enough for a high-bandwidth GPU or NVMe storage, but the GPU itself is only PCIe 4.0. The platform is not dead-end, and the CPU can serve as a solid base for several years.

Who Should Build It

This build is well-suited for the gamer who wants a high-FPS 1080p experience and is willing to drop settings slightly for 1440p. The data shows high frame rates in many esports titles, such as 232 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege and 443.6 FPS in Valorant at 1080p. A content creator who works with video editing will benefit from the CPU's extensive multi-threading, as its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544 is exceptional. The 12 GB VRAM is also a strong asset for 1080p and 1440p texture-heavy workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compile times due to the CPU's high multi-threaded performance, and the single-thread speed ensures smooth and responsive IDE. Students and small business workstations will find this build to be highly capable for productivity tasks, with the CPU's performance in Passmark's data encryption (27,608) and integer math (125,982) ensuring quick processing of typical workloads. The 12 GB of VRAM also provides enough memory for moderate GPU-accelerated tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,394.

Q: How does the Radeon RX 6750 XT compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile?

A: The Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average score of 26,011, which is 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81.

Q: What is the L3 cache size on the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: The L3 cache is 24 MB shared.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Radeon RX 6750 XT?

A: The memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: The launch MSRP is $294.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: The boost clock is 5.30 GHz.

Build Overview

This build combines an Intel Core i5-14600KF with an AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. It is a desktop-class configuration, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a high-end processor, sitting in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a solid mid-to-high-end card in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 81, which places it well above average. The pairing results in a balanced system where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, making it a strong 1080p and capable 1440p gaming machine. The measured FPS data confirms this, with an average of 126 FPS across all tested games.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is based on ultra settings and the data is marked as measured. This system is a strong performer at 1080p, consistently delivering high frame rates in most titles. In esports and competitive games, the performance is exceptional. For instance, Valorant runs at 443.6 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 428.7 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS at 1080p. Even at 1440p, these titles remain very playable, with Valorant at 381.7 FPS and CS:GO at 298.3 FPS. At 4K, the performance drops but is still playable in some titles.

For more demanding AAA games, the performance is still good at 1080p. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 58.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 116 FPS at 1080p. However, at 1440p, these games require lower settings to achieve high frame rates, as Cyberpunk drops to 40.4 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS. At 4K, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates in these demanding titles, with Cyberpunk at 29.5 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS. The data indicates that 1080p is the sweet spot for this build, with 1440p being a viable option for less demanding games or with adjusted settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system is excellent for high-refresh gaming at 1080p. The measured FPS in CS:GO (428.7) and Valorant (443.6) are far beyond the requirements of any high-refresh monitor. The 126 average FPS across all games confirms that the system can push high frame rates in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide the performance needed to encode and stream without impacting game performance. The high multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32,544) ensure the system can handle the encoding load while maintaining high FPS.

Video Editing: The CPU is a powerhouse for video editing, with high multi-core and single-core performance. The 4K video editing is feasible, and the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for effects and rendering.

3D Rendering: The CPU's performance in Cinebench R23 (32,544) makes it an excellent choice for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS will also handle GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender, though its ray-tracing performance is not as strong as the CPU's.

Software Development: The CPU's high single-thread score (4,594 in Cinebench R23) ensures a responsive IDE. The multi-core performance also speeds up compilation times, making it a great choice for developers.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for basic office tasks, but its performance is a smooth experience in spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsing. The fast single-thread speed ensures no lag in typical office software.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds