SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

27,425 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT pairing?

A: The combined build sits at the 81st percentile among all CPU+GPU pairs benchmarked. It ranks 1912th out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games, with an average of 122.2 FPS at ultra settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14600KF scores 49,394 on average benchmark score, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.8% ahead of it.

Q: What is the GPU’s standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The RX 6700 XT achieves a 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 27,425 places it essentially level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (0% delta), while the RTX 3090 is 0.5% ahead and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 is 1.5% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell trails by 1.1%.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support, and does it support ECC?

A: The i5-14600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds.

Q: Is the GPU’s frame rate data measured or estimated?

A: The frame rate data is measured. The `dataIsMeasured` field confirms this, so the FPS figures across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions represent actual benchmark results rather than projections.

Q: What is the GPU’s power connector requirement and suggested PSU wattage?

A: The RX 6700 XT requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The suggested power supply for this GPU is 550 W.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 22 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.3 million per square millimeter. This GPU is now end-of-life, having been released in March 2021, with the Navi III listed as its successor.

Memory configuration is substantial for a mid-range card: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivers 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This capacity and bandwidth combination supports high-resolution textures and modern game assets without immediate VRAM pressure at 1440p and even 4K in many titles.

The GPU’s clock speeds are aggressive. Base clock sits at 2321 MHz, game clock at 2424 MHz, and boost clock reaches 2581 MHz. Compute resources include 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The 40 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support, though the RDNA 2.0 implementation is not as robust as newer architectures. Pixel rate reaches 165.2 GPixel/s, texture rate hits 413.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is rated at 13.21 TFLOPS. FP16 performance doubles to 26.43 TFLOPS via the 2:1 ratio.

Benchmark data shows the GPU’s strengths in DirectX 12 workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2435 and PassMark DirectX 12 score of 77 indicate solid modern API performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 93,500 demonstrates strong compute and graphics throughput under Vulkan, while the OpenCL score of 44,152 and Metal score of 130,896 provide additional cross-API context. PassMark G3D score of 19,786 and GPU compute score of 9,336 round out the compute picture.

The GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking places it above the majority of graphics cards, yet its nearest rivals show how tight the competition is. The RTX 4070 Mobile matches it exactly at 0% delta, while the RTX 3090 leads by only 0.5%. This suggests the RX 6700 XT delivers RTX 3090-class average performance in aggregate benchmarks, which is remarkable for a card with less VRAM and a narrower memory bus. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell trails by 1.1%, and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 leads by 1.5%.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 13.21 TFLOPS handles traditional rasterization efficiently. The 40 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though performance in RT-heavy scenes will be more modest than dedicated RT flagship cards. The 12 GB VRAM is a practical asset for 3D rendering, video editing, and GPU-accelerated compute tasks where memory capacity directly impacts scene complexity and texture fidelity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the foundation for 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors. This CPU is from the Raptor Lake-R generation, part of the Core 14th Gen series, and represents the mature stage of this socket’s lifespan. The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size are fixed attributes of the chip itself.

Memory support is dual-channel for both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility based on motherboard choice and budget. The inclusion of ECC memory support is a distinguishing feature for users who require data integrity in compute workloads. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the latest storage devices and graphics cards, though the RX 6700 XT itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, which provides headroom over the card’s 230 W TDP. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, meaning a combined system draw of roughly 355 W across both primary components leaves room for motherboard, storage, fans, and peripherals within the 550 W recommendation. Builders with higher-quality power supplies have additional overhead for overclocking, since the CPU has an unlocked multiplier.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the bottleneck. If gaming at higher resolutions becomes the priority, a GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would complement the CPU’s strong multi-core performance. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking suggests it has headroom to pair with a faster GPU without becoming the limiting factor in most scenarios. Conversely, if productivity workloads expand, the platform supports higher-core-count CPUs within the same socket, though the 14-core configuration here is already robust.

The RX 6700 XT is end-of-life, so its upgrade path involves moving to a newer generation GPU rather than a same-generation refresh. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface remains compatible with current and next-generation cards, and the 550 W PSU recommendation may need revision depending on the replacement GPU’s power draw.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets gamers who play at 1080p and 1440p with high refresh rates. The measured FPS data shows strong performance in competitive titles: Counter-Strike 2 hits 187.6 FPS at 1080p and 123.2 FPS at 1440p, Valorant reaches 426 FPS at 1080p, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X delivers 222.7 FPS at 1080p. These numbers indicate a system that can drive 144Hz and even 240Hz monitors in esports scenarios.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,085 place this chip in the top 10% of all CPUs, making it capable for rendering tasks that scale across cores. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently.

Developers compiling large codebases will see solid performance from the PassMark integer math score of 125,982 and floating-point math score of 93,048. Data compression workloads score 485,140 in PassMark, and encryption tasks hit 27,608. These figures indicate responsive build times and efficient data processing.

Students and small business users building a single workstation for mixed use will find the combination versatile. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM supports CUDA-independent workloads like OpenCL compute, scoring 44,152 in Geekbench OpenCL. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,445 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,273, ensures snappy application responsiveness.

Gamers targeting 4K should note the performance drop-off at 3840x2160 across many titles. While some games remain playable, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 27 FPS at 4K ultra, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 23.5 FPS. This system is best suited to 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for less demanding or older titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-14600KF and RX 6700 XT favors CPU-heavy workloads. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile while the GPU sits at the 72nd, indicating the processor has more relative headroom than the graphics card. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and ultra settings.

Evidence from the FPS scaling supports this. At 1080p, many titles show CPU-driven performance ceilings. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 187.6 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 123.2 FPS at 1440p and 69.4 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is a 43.7% drop, while the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is 34.3%. This pattern indicates the GPU becomes increasingly constrained as resolution increases.

Call of Duty: Warzone shows a different pattern: 166 FPS at 1080p, 147 FPS at 1440p, and 125 FPS at 4K. The modest scaling suggests this title is more CPU-bound across all resolutions, with the GPU having enough headroom to maintain high frame rates even at 4K.

The CPU’s multi-core advantage is clear in productivity. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544 versus single-core score of 4,594 shows a 7.1x scaling factor, indicating excellent parallel efficiency. The PassMark multithread score of 38,697 versus single-thread of 4,273 reinforces this. For gaming, the single-core performance matters more, and the 4,594 Cinebench R23 single-core score is competitive.

In balanced workloads like video editing that use both CPU and GPU, the system leverages the CPU’s 14 cores for encoding and the GPU’s 13.21 TFLOPS for effects and rendering. The PassMark physics score of 2,449 and find prime numbers score of 161 indicate the CPU handles physics simulation and mathematical workloads without bottlenecking the GPU.

The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU could become a limiting factor in future titles with larger texture requirements, but current data shows it handles the tested games without VRAM-related stutter. The 384.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate throughput for the memory capacity.

Gaming Performance

All frame rate data is measured at ultra settings. The RX 6700 XT delivers exceptional performance in esports and competitive titles. Valorant leads with 426 FPS at 1080p, 364 FPS at 1440p, and 291 FPS at 4K. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 411 FPS at 1080p, while Counter-Strike 2 achieves 187.6 FPS at 1080p. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege produces 221 FPS at 1080p, and its X variant reaches 222.7 FPS.

Battle royale performance is strong. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 166 FPS at 1080p, 147 FPS at 1440p, and 125 FPS at 4K, making it one of the few demanding titles that remains above 100 FPS at 4K ultra. Fortnite hits 89 FPS at 1080p but drops to 30 FPS at 4K.

Open-world and story-driven titles show playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. Grand Theft Auto V runs at 85 FPS at 1080p and 57 FPS at 1440p. Red Dead Redemption 2 is more demanding at 52 FPS at 1080p and 34.9 FPS at 1440p. Cyberpunk 2077 manages 55 FPS at 1080p and 41 FPS at 1440p, but drops to 27 FPS at 4K.

Simulation and strategy games benefit from the CPU’s strength. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 67.4 FPS at 1080p and 55.8 FPS at 1440p. Minecraft achieves 183 FPS at 1080p and 116 FPS at 1440p. Rust runs at 70.4 FPS at 1080p.

The average FPS across all tested games is 122.2 at the system’s rank of 1912 out of 3732 pairs. This average is skewed upward by esports titles; the median experience across heavier games is lower. At 4K, many titles fall below 30 FPS, including Ark: Survival Ascended at 7.5 FPS, The Medium at 26 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 27 FPS. For 4K gaming, this GPU is only suitable for less demanding or older titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock runs at 3.50 GHz, boosting to 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 125 W, and the CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides low-latency access to frequently used data and supports the high clock speeds. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC capability for error-checking in compute environments.

Benchmark scores place this CPU at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 49,394 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores 49,228 (0.3% behind). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49,196 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48,995 (0.8% behind). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 leads by 0.8% at 49,796.

Cinebench results show strong multi-core performance. The R15 multi-core score is 3,280, R20 multi-core is 13,668, and R23 multi-core reaches 32,544. Single-core scores are equally competitive: R15 at 462, R20 at 1,929, and R23 at 4,594. Geekbench confirms this with a multi-core score of 17,085 and single-core of 2,445.

PassMark results break down the CPU’s workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 125,982, floating-point math scores 93,048, and extended instructions score 28,785. Data compression hits 485,140, data encryption scores 27,608, and random string sorting reaches 52,056. The multithread score is 38,697, physics scores 2,449, and single-thread performance is 4,273.

For real-world workloads, these numbers translate to fast compilation, smooth video encoding, and responsive multitasking. The 14 cores handle parallel tasks efficiently, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures single-threaded applications run at high speed. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking means it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in aggregate benchmarks. Its nearest rivals are all high-end processors, and the small delta percentages indicate this CPU competes at the top tier despite being a mid-range i5 designation.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14600KF with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. The CPU is from the Core 14th Gen series, part of the Raptor Lake refresh, and the GPU is from the Radeon RX 6000 series based on RDNA 2.0. Together, they form a system targeting the upper-midrange performance tier.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 81, indicating it outperforms 81% of all tested pairings. The average FPS across games is 122.2, with a rank of 1912 out of 3732 pairs. This places the build in the top half of all configurations, with a bias toward high frame rates in less demanding titles.

The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. At the 90th percentile, it outperforms the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking. This asymmetry means the system is GPU-limited in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions and ultra settings. In productivity workloads, the CPU’s multi-core strength drives performance, and the GPU provides compute acceleration.

The build’s overall tier is solidly mid-to-upper range for 1080p and 1440p gaming. It excels in esports and competitive titles, where frame rates exceed 200 FPS in several cases. For AAA single-player games, it delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with high settings. At 4K, performance drops significantly, making this resolution suitable only for less demanding titles.

The desktop form factor allows for upgrades and customization. The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports memory flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 options. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 267 mm length fit in most mid-tower cases. The 550 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for additional components.

This pairing represents a balanced system for users who prioritize gaming performance at mainstream resolutions while also needing CPU power for productivity tasks. It is not an enthusiast-tier build, but it delivers strong performance across a wide range of workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49,394, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27,425, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 81, reflecting the CPU’s stronger relative position.

Detailed CPU benchmark scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 32,544 and single-core at 4,594. Geekbench multi-core reaches 17,085 and single-core 2,445. PassMark multithread scores 38,697, single-thread 4,273, integer math 125,982, floating-point math 93,048, and extended instructions 28,785. Data compression hits 485,140, encryption 27,608, and random string sorting 52,056.

GPU benchmark scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2,435, Geekbench OpenCL at 44,152, Vulkan at 93,500, and Metal at 130,896. PassMark G3D scores 19,786, GPU compute 9,336, DirectX 11 173, DirectX 12 77, DirectX 10 124, DirectX 9 242, and G2D 951.

The CPU’s nearest rival comparison shows tight competition at the top. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 trails by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G by 0.4%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.8%. Only the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 leads, by 0.8%. This indicates the i5-14600KF performs at the level of processors with higher model numbers.

The GPU’s nearest rival comparison shows similar clustering. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile matches exactly at 0% delta, the RTX 3090 leads by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 leads by 1.5%. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell trails by 1.1%. The RX 6700 XT thus performs within 1.5% of several high-end cards across aggregate benchmarks.

The combined picture shows a CPU that punches above its i5 designation, competing with Ryzen 9 and Core Ultra processors, paired with a GPU that matches RTX 3090-class average performance. The system’s 81st combined percentile reflects this synergy. In gaming, the pair ranks 1912th out of 3732 by FPS, with an average of 122.2 FPS across all measured titles. This rank places it in the top 49% of all pairs, with the CPU’s strength compensating for the GPU’s more moderate position.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds