SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop build that lands in the 77th combined percentile of all tracked configurations. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is more modest, holding the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. This pairing creates a significant performance gap that defines the system's capabilities and limitations.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The GPU packs 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. These specifications place the card firmly in the mainstream segment, with enough VRAM for 1080p gaming but potential limitations at higher resolutions with demanding textures.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also features 28 ray tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. The clock speeds are respectable for the class, with a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. The pixel rate is 159.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 279.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 8.928 TFLOPS for FP32 and 17.86 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

In terms of API support, the card is DirectX 12 Ultimate compliant (12_2), supports OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern game engines and graphics features. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is adequate for this performance class. Power requirements are modest at 132 W TDP with a suggested 300 W power supply, and the card uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Benchmark results for the GPU show a mixed picture across different tests. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1492, positioning it as a capable entry-level DX12 performer. Geekbench scores are more varied: Metal scores 88398, OpenCL scores 28850, and Vulkan scores 67623. PassMark results show a G3D score of 15096, with specific DirectX tests scoring 95 (DX10), 152 (DX11), 51 (DX12), and 197 (DX9). The G2D score is 889, and GPU compute scores 6554.

The average benchmark score for the RX 6600 is 19036, placing it at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19030 (0% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 19049 (-0.1%), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19089 (-0.3%), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954 (0.4%). This data indicates the RX 6600 sits in a narrow performance band where small differences separate competitors.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i5-14600KF delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 3280 in R15 multi-core, 462 in R15 single-core, 13668 in R20 multi-core, 1929 in R20 single-core, 32544 in R23 multi-core, and 4594 in R23 single-core. Geekbench results show 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression scores 485140, data encryption scores 27608, extended instructions score 28785, floating point math scores 93048, integer math scores 125982, multithread scores 38697, physics scores 2449, random string sorting scores 52056, and single-thread scores 4273. The average benchmark score is 49394, placing the CPU in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals demonstrate how competitive this processor is. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228 (0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196 (0.4%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995 (0.8%), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796 (-0.8%). These deltas are remarkably small, with all rivals within 0.8% of the i5-14600KF. This indicates the CPU is at parity with several strong competitors, making it a versatile choice for various workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 19036 places it at the 63rd percentile. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The 90th percentile CPU paired with a 63rd percentile GPU means the processor has significant headroom that the graphics card cannot fully utilize in GPU-bound scenarios. The combined percentile for the build is 77, reflecting the overall balance of the system.

In gaming workloads, the pair ranks 2912 out of 3732 tracked pairs, with an average FPS of 94.2 across all games tested. This ranking places the combination in the lower-middle range of all CPU-GPU pairings, despite the strong CPU showing. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU, which limits frame rates in most gaming scenarios.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data shows measured FPS figures across a wide range of games at three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. These are actual measured results, not estimates, providing a reliable picture of real-world gaming performance.

At 1080p, the system delivers smooth frame rates in esports and lighter titles. Valorant hits 326.4 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 314 FPS, and Roblox achieves 184 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 169 FPS, with the Siege X variant at 173 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone performs well at 166 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 142 FPS. Minecraft reaches 140 FPS, and Barony hits 118.1 FPS. Dave The Diver and Inside both run at 118-122 FPS, with Ready Or Not at 112.9 FPS and Doom at 106 FPS.

More demanding titles at 1080p show the GPU's limits. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 42.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 38 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 22.6 FPS. The Medium drops to 30 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 51 FPS. Control achieves 59.7 FPS, and High On Life runs at 59.8 FPS, both hovering near the 60 FPS threshold. Hitman 2 runs at 55 FPS, and The Flame In The Flood at 60 FPS.

At 1440p, frame rates drop noticeably. Valorant still performs well at 277.8 FPS, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 216 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 147 FPS. Roblox hits 123 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 111 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 94 FPS, and Dave The Diver runs at 89 FPS. Inside and Minecraft both hit 88 FPS, with Barony at 76.5 FPS and Ready Or Not at 70.7 FPS.

However, demanding games struggle at 1440p. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 10.7 FPS. Control runs at 46.5 FPS, Microsoft Flight Simulator at 41 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 147 FPS. The Medium drops to 25 FPS, and The Long Drive runs at 37 FPS.

At 4K (3840x2160), the system is generally not suitable for demanding titles. Valorant still achieves 220.5 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 125 FPS. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 128 FPS, with Roblox at 69 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 61 FPS. However, most games fall below playable thresholds: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 19 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 5.9 FPS. Control runs at 31.6 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 31 FPS.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-14600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which may appeal to workstation users. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, though the RX 6600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward compatible but limits bandwidth compared to a Gen 5 GPU.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 132 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 300 W, which leaves significant headroom when combined with the CPU's power draw. A quality 500-600 W power supply would comfortably handle this configuration, allowing for potential future upgrades without needing a new PSU.

The platform's memory flexibility is a notable advantage. Users can choose between DDR4 and DDR5, allowing for cost savings with DDR4 or higher bandwidth with DDR5. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and the CPU's memory controller should handle both memory types effectively.

The most sensible next upgrade path would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The i5-14600KF's 90th percentile performance means it can drive significantly faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. Upgrading to a GPU with higher performance would immediately improve gaming frame rates, especially at 1440p and 4K resolutions where the current GPU struggles. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the RX 6600 means a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 x16 support would also benefit from additional bandwidth.

The CPU itself has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking to extract additional performance. This could extend the platform's lifespan before a full system upgrade becomes necessary. However, the Socket 1700 platform is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600KF features 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. This is a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.50 GHz, boosting up to 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 indicates the CPU handles heavily threaded workloads like video rendering and 3D modeling with ease. The single-core score of 4594 in R23 shows excellent per-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and lightly threaded applications.

Geekbench scores of 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core reinforce the CPU's balanced capabilities. The PassMark tests provide deeper insights into specific workloads. Data compression scores 485140, indicating strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption scores 27608, showing capable cryptographic throughput. Extended instructions score 28785, reflecting the CPU's ability to handle SIMD workloads like multimedia processing.

Floating point math scores 93048, which is particularly relevant for scientific computing and physics simulations. Integer math scores 125982, demonstrating robust performance in general-purpose computing tasks. The multithread score of 38697 and single-thread score of 4273 both indicate well-rounded performance across different thread counts. Random string sorting scores 52056, showing efficiency in data organization tasks.

The CPU's nearest rivals show that it is at parity with several strong competitors. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is only 0.3% faster, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.8% faster. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% slower. These small deltas mean the i5-14600KF is a highly competitive processor regardless of the specific workload.

For real-world workloads, this CPU excels in video editing, 3D rendering, software compilation, and multitasking scenarios. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallelism for demanding applications, while the high boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks. The lack of integrated graphics (the "F" designation) means a discrete GPU is mandatory, but this also reduces power consumption slightly.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks but are content with mainstream GPU performance for gaming. The measured data shows that the system is well-suited for 1080p gaming across a wide range of titles, with playable frame rates in most games at medium-to-high settings.

Gamers at 1080p will find this system adequate for competitive titles like Valorant (326.4 FPS), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (314 FPS), and Call of Duty: Warzone (166 FPS). These games run at high frame rates, providing a smooth competitive experience. For single-player titles, the system achieves 60+ FPS in many games like Control (59.7 FPS), High On Life (59.8 FPS), and The Flame In The Flood (60 FPS), though some demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (42.3 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (38 FPS) fall below 60 FPS.

Content creators and developers will benefit significantly from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17085 indicate efficient video rendering, 3D modeling, and code compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 485140 and integer math score of 125982 show strong performance in data-heavy workflows.

Students and small business users will find this build suitable for general productivity, office applications, and light content creation. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594) ensures snappy application loading and responsive multitasking. The GPU handles everyday graphics tasks and light gaming adequately.

For 1440p gaming, the system is marginal in demanding titles. While esports games run well (Valorant at 277.8 FPS, Warzone at 147 FPS), modern AAA games struggle to maintain 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 29.3 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS. Users targeting 1440p should consider a more powerful GPU.

At 4K, the system is only suitable for esports titles or older games. Most demanding games run below 30 FPS, making 4K gaming impractical. This build is not recommended for 4K gaming unless the user is willing to significantly lower settings.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile and average score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 6600 has an average score of 19036, essentially tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19049), and NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089), while being 0.4% faster than the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954).

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: What memory types does the build support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The RX 6600 has a 132 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 300 W, with a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the CPU perform in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 32544 in multi-core and 4594 in single-core in Cinebench R23, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14600KF with the AMD Radeon RX 6600. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 card from the Radeon RX 6000 series, based on RDNA 2.0 architecture.

The combined percentile for this build is 77, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all tracked configurations. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 63rd percentile, indicating a CPU-heavy imbalance. The system ranks 2912 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS of 94.2 across all games.

This pairing is best characterized as a productivity-first system with gaming capabilities. The CPU can handle demanding professional workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development with ease, while the GPU provides entry-to-mid-level gaming performance, primarily suited for 1080p gaming.

The build class is desktop, indicating it is intended for stationary use with standard desktop components. The CPU's launch MSRP was $294, and the GPU's launch MSRP was 329 USD, though these figures are historical and do not reflect current market prices.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance data clearly shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 63rd percentile creates a significant performance gap. In gaming workloads, this imbalance manifests as the GPU limiting frame rates in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions.

Evidence from the FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. At 1080p, the system achieves an average of 94.2 FPS across all games, but this drops dramatically at higher resolutions. For example, Valorant runs at 326.4 FPS at 1080p, 277.8 FPS at 1440p, and 220.5 FPS at 4K. While these are still high frame rates, the scaling shows the GPU's limitations becoming more apparent as resolution increases.

More demanding titles show even more dramatic scaling. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 42.3 FPS at 1080p, 29.3 FPS at 1440p, and 19.7 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 follows a similar pattern: 38 FPS at 1080p, 28 FPS at 1440p, and 19 FPS at 4K. This scaling indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in these games, as the CPU has sufficient headroom to handle higher frame rates if the GPU could deliver them.

In CPU-bound workloads, the system excels. The CPU's benchmark scores in Cinebench R23 (32544 multi-core) and Geekbench (17085 multi-core) place it at the 90th percentile, meaning it can handle demanding productivity tasks without bottlenecking. The GPU is not a factor in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or data processing.

The pair rank of 2912 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 94.2, further confirms the GPU bottleneck. This ranking places the system in the lower-middle range of all CPU-GPU pairings, despite the CPU's exceptional performance. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming but become limiting factors at higher resolutions and with demanding textures.

For users seeking better gaming performance, upgrading the GPU would provide the most significant improvement. The CPU has enough headroom to support a much more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Conversely, users focused on productivity workloads will find the system well-balanced, with the CPU providing excellent performance and the GPU handling graphics acceleration adequately.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds