SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i5-14600K

The Intel Core i5-14600K sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs tracked, placing it firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors. Its 14 cores and 20 threads represent a hybrid configuration typical of Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The chip runs at a 3.50 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.30 GHz, which explains its strong single-threaded results across multiple benchmark suites.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 allocation helps with workloads that exhibit data locality, such as code compilation and database queries. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel controller, and it includes ECC memory support — a feature often reserved for workstation-class parts, making this chip unusually versatile for a mainstream desktop offering.

Benchmark data confirms the CPU's balanced character. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14600K scores 24491 in multi-core and 2064 in single-core. The multi-core figure is roughly 12 times the single-core score, which indicates excellent scaling across its 14 cores. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern: 16673 multi-core and 2491 single-core. PassMark's multithread test shows 38682, while the single-thread score is 4270. These numbers suggest the chip handles both heavily threaded rendering tasks and lightly threaded interactive workloads without significant compromise.

The avgBenchmarkScore of 48618 places the i5-14600K in direct competition with server and workstation processors. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (avgScore 48698, deltaPct -0.2), meaning the i5-14600K is essentially equivalent to that Xeon in aggregate performance. Against the AMD EPYC 4345P (avgScore 48470, deltaPct 0.3), the Intel chip leads by a slim margin. The Core Ultra 5 245HX (avgScore 48287, deltaPct 0.7) trails slightly, while the Core Ultra 5 245 (avgScore 48995, deltaPct -0.8) edges ahead by less than one percent. These deltaPct values — all within one percent — show that the i5-14600K sits in a dense performance cluster where architectural differences are minor in aggregate terms.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R15 scores (3640 multi-core, 297 single-core) indicate strong short-duration burst performance, which matters for interactive rendering previews and everyday application responsiveness. PassMark's floating-point math score of 92794 and integer math score of 125737 highlight the CPU's arithmetic throughput, relevant for scientific simulations and financial modeling. Data compression (482020) and encryption (27533) scores suggest the chip handles archival tasks and secure communications efficiently. The extended instructions score of 28546 shows AVX-512-class or similar vector workloads are processed competently.

The 125 W TDP is modest for the performance on offer, keeping thermal management straightforward for most mid-tower cases. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a basic display output and hardware decode, which is a useful fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, ensuring modern storage and GPU connectivity. The multiplier is unlocked, so the data suggests headroom for overclocking, though the benchmark results reflect stock operation.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 94, meaning it outperforms 94 percent of all tracked desktop configurations. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 98th percentile ranking together create a system that is near the top of the performance distribution, but with the GPU clearly being the stronger component relative to its peers.

Focusing on the CPU alone, the i5-14600K's avgBenchmarkScore of 48618 places it slightly below the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.2 percent, but ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P by 0.3 percent and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX by 0.7 percent. The Core Ultra 5 245 leads by 0.8 percent. These margins are statistically negligible, meaning the i5-14600K is interchangeable with these rivals in most compute tasks.

The GPU's benchmark results are more decisive. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 175286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194041 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its avgBenchmarkScore of 184664 ranks it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Against its nearest rivals, it leads the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5 percent (avgScore 183725) and trails the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3 percent (avgScore 187147). The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is behind by 1.4 percent (avgScore 182109), and the GeForce RTX 4090 D trails by 3.7 percent (avgScore 178050). This places the RTX 5000 Ada Generation in the same performance class as data-center accelerators, which is remarkable for a workstation card.

The combined picture is one of exceptional balance at the high end. The CPU provides a solid foundation that does not bottleneck the GPU in most workloads, given that the CPU's percentile (90) is high but still below the GPU's (98). The gap of 8 percentile points suggests that in GPU-bound tasks — such as ray tracing or large-batch rendering — the GPU will be the limiting factor, while in CPU-bound tasks — such as physics simulation or code compilation — the CPU will set the pace. The data indicates that neither component is a weak link, but the GPU is the more exceptional part of this pairing.

It is important to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD102 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die is 609 mm² and contains 76,300 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². This is a large, complex chip that delivers substantial compute throughput.

Memory configuration is a standout feature: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This capacity is double what most consumer graphics cards offer, making the card suitable for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-application GPU compute workflows that exceed VRAM limits of smaller cards.

The GPU has 12800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. It also includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, respectively. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 65.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio), which is a high figure for a workstation card and indicates strong performance in scientific computing, deep learning inference, and rendering.

The boost clock of 2550 MHz is high for a GPU with this many cores, and the base clock of 1155 MHz provides a solid floor. The card's TDP is 250 W, which is modest given its compute capabilities, and it requires a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 600 W, leaving headroom for a high-end CPU and other components. The card is dual-slot, 267 mm long, and 112 mm tall, fitting into most mid-tower cases. Display outputs are four DisplayPort 1.4a connections, which support multiple high-resolution monitors.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's benchmark scores confirm its position. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 are among the highest recorded for workstation GPUs. The 98th percentile ranking across all GPUs means it outperforms nearly every other graphics card in the database. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, is a data-center accelerator with a different form factor and power profile, yet the RTX 5000 Ada Generation nearly matches it (0.5 percent behind) in average benchmark score.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 32 GB VRAM, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 100 RT cores means the GPU can handle complex scenes with ray-traced lighting, large texture sets, and high-resolution outputs without swapping to system memory. The 400 tensor cores accelerate denoising and AI-based upscaling, which are common in modern render pipelines. The FP32 and FP16 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS supports real-time preview and final-frame rendering in GPU-accelerated engines.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professionals and power users who need both strong CPU compute and exceptional GPU throughput. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 98th percentile ranking make this a top-tier workstation for rendering, simulation, and content creation.

Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's high percentile and large VRAM, as modern titles at ultra settings with ray tracing can exceed 16 GB of VRAM at that resolution. The CPU's single-thread score of 4270 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound game logic. However, this pairing is overkill for pure gaming; the GPU's workstation features and memory capacity are not fully utilized by games.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and animators — will find the combination ideal. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 handles video encoding and timeline scrubbing, while the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects rendering and GPU-accelerated exports. The PassMark data encryption score of 27533 also supports secure media workflows.

Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache, which speed up compilation. The GPU's Vulkan score of 194041 suggests strong performance for graphics programming and game engine development. Scientists and engineers running simulations will benefit from the GPU's FP64-class compute (via FP32/FP16) and the CPU's floating-point math score of 92794.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can use this system for coursework, but the high performance is more than needed for most academic tasks. Small business workstations handling CAD, architectural visualization, or data analysis will see immediate throughput gains. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds reliability for long-running compute jobs.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear hierarchy: the GPU is the more powerful component relative to its peers, with a 98th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 90th percentile. This means that in workloads where the GPU is the primary compute engine — such as ray tracing, deep learning inference, or GPU rendering — the GPU will be the limiting factor in terms of absolute frame time or render time, because it is the component doing the heavy lifting. The CPU will keep up, but its lower percentile means it is closer to the average in its class.

In CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulation, data compression (PassMark score 482020), or single-threaded legacy applications — the CPU will be the bottleneck. The GPU will sit partially idle, waiting for the CPU to feed it data. The PassMark single-thread score of 4270 is strong, but it is not in the top echelon of CPUs, so heavily single-threaded tasks will not fully utilize the GPU's capabilities.

The FPS scaling picture, while estimated, follows this logic. In GPU-bound games at 4K ultra settings, the GPU's high percentile (98) will deliver high frame rates, and the CPU's 90th percentile will be sufficient to avoid major frame drops. At 1080p, where CPU overhead is more significant, the CPU may become the limiting factor, capping FPS below what the GPU could theoretically deliver. The deltaPct values for CPU rivals (all within ±1 percent) suggest that upgrading the CPU to a slightly faster model would yield marginal gains, while upgrading the GPU would require moving to a data-center class card like the A100 SXM4 40 GB (which is 1.3 percent faster) — a lateral move at best.

The 250 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP together suggest a system draw that is well within the 600 W suggested PSU, providing headroom for overclocking the CPU (since the multiplier is unlocked) or adding peripherals.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility: they can reuse existing DDR4 modules or invest in faster DDR5 for improved memory bandwidth. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and ECC support is a differentiator for reliability-sensitive workloads.

PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes means the platform can handle the fastest NVMe SSDs and future GPU upgrades without bandwidth limitations. The GPU in this configuration uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible and does not bottleneck the GPU's performance, as the 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is far below the PCIe 4.0 x16 theoretical limit.

The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's is 250 W. The suggested PSU of 600 W provides 225 W of headroom beyond the combined component TDP, accounting for motherboard, storage, and cooling. This headroom allows for a CPU overclock (given the unlocked multiplier) or a more power-hungry GPU in the future, though the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is already near the top of the performance ladder.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and the cache hierarchy (24 MB L3) benefits from faster memory. Alternatively, adding a second GPU for multi-GPU rendering is possible, but the 600 W PSU would likely need an upgrade. The platform is mature, meaning BIOS updates are stable and component compatibility is well documented. The production status is "Active" for both CPU and GPU, ensuring continued availability and driver support.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and the CPU's 90th percentile ranking suggest that this system will deliver high frame rates at most resolutions and settings.

At 4K ultra settings, the GPU's 32 GB VRAM (well above the 16 GB typically required for 4K textures) and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will prevent texture loading stutters. The 100 RT cores support ray-traced effects, and the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides raw fill rate for high-resolution rendering. Estimated frame rates in demanding titles at 4K ultra would be in the 60-100 FPS range, depending on the game's optimization.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU is likely underutilized, and the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4270) becomes more important. Estimated frame rates would rise to 100-144 FPS, with the CPU occasionally capping performance in CPU-heavy scenes. At 1080p ultra, the CPU is likely the primary limiter, and frame rates may plateau around 144-200 FPS, as the GPU has ample headroom but the CPU cannot feed it faster.

The GPU's Vulkan score of 194041 suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based titles, while the OpenCL score of 175286 indicates good compute performance for games that use GPU physics. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 supports smooth background tasks, such as streaming or recording, while gaming. However, these are estimates; actual FPS will vary by game, driver version, and system configuration.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 94, meaning it outperforms 94 percent of all tracked desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H?

A: The i5-14600K has an avgBenchmarkScore of 48618, which is 0.2 percent lower than the Xeon Gold 5318H's 48698, making them essentially equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600K supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop processor and adds reliability for compute workloads.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this configuration?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, based on the GPU's 250 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this exact combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an avgBenchmarkScore of 184664, which is 0.5 percent higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's 183725, making it slightly faster in aggregate benchmarks.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile ranking (avgBenchmarkScore 184664) supports high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU's 90th percentile (avgBenchmarkScore 48618) prevents major CPU bottlenecks at lower resolutions. The 32 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for high-resolution textures.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 handle encoding and streaming overhead concurrently with gaming, while the GPU's 400 tensor cores could accelerate AI-based encoding features.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 125737 and the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerate export and effects rendering. The 32 GB VRAM allows for large timelines and multi-layer compositing without memory pressure.

3D rendering: The GPU's 100 RT cores and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth handle ray-traced scenes, while the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 14 cores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 24491) support CPU-based rendering engines. The 32 GB VRAM fits large scenes and high-resolution outputs.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache speed up compilation, and the PassMark data encryption score of 27533 supports secure coding workflows. The GPU's Vulkan score of 194041 aids graphics debugging and GPU compute development.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4270) ensures responsive daily use, while the UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output. The system is overkill for basic tasks but offers headroom for advanced coursework or small business data analysis.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600K

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds