SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets a specific intersection of high-frequency CPU work and professional-grade GPU compute. The processor, built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process, offers 14 cores and 20 threads, while the GPU, based on Ada Lovelace at 5 nm, provides 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. This combination lands at the 93rd percentile overall among all CPU and GPU pairings in the database, indicating a system that sits near the top tier of measured configurations. The data presented here is derived from aggregate benchmark scores, as no direct frame-rate measurements exist for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, code-named Raptor Lake-R. Its hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The base clock runs at 3.50 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.30 GHz, and the processor features an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the high single-threaded throughput that this chip is known for.

In multi-threaded workloads, the i5-14600K delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,491 points and a Geekbench multi-core score of 16,673 points. These figures place the CPU at the 90th percentile among all processors in the database, with an average benchmark score of 48,618. The nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, which scores 48,698 on average — a negligible 0.2% difference — and the AMD EPYC 4345P at 48,470, which is 0.3% slower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX trails by 0.7%, while the Core Ultra 5 245 leads by 0.8%. This clustering indicates that the i5-14600K sits in a highly competitive performance band where architectural differences translate to less than a single percentage point in aggregate scores.

Single-threaded performance is a standout characteristic. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,064 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,491 reflect the high boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,270 further corroborates this strength. For real-world workloads, this means rapid responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in applications that rely on a single primary thread, such as many legacy productivity tools or certain simulation software. The Passmark data shows a floating-point math score of 92,794 and an integer math score of 125,737, indicating balanced arithmetic throughput across different data types. Data compression scores of 482,020 in Passmark suggest robust performance for archiving and file management tasks, while the encryption score of 27,533 points to capable security-related processing.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support listed as available. It connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output or for quick-sync video encoding tasks. The TDP is rated at 125 W, and the die size measures 257 mm². The launch MSRP is $319, but this figure is noted only for reference and does not factor into the analysis.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU each bring distinct benchmark profiles to this pairing. The i5-14600K achieves an average benchmark score of 48,618, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation GPU reaches an average benchmark score of 135,218, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. When combined, the system sits at the 93rd percentile overall, which indicates that the graphics card is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the processor still performs in the top decile.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 146,593, and its Vulkan score is 123,842. These figures show significant compute capability, particularly in OpenCL workloads that are common in professional rendering and scientific applications. The nearest GPU rivals include the NVIDIA A10M, which scores 135,230 (a 0% difference), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135,396 (0.1% slower). The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo trails by 0.4%, and the Radeon PRO V620 is 0.9% slower. This tight grouping means the RTX 4000 Ada is essentially performance-equivalent to its closest competitors in aggregate terms, though architectural differences will manifest in specific workloads.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 3,640 multi-core and 297 single-core, while in Cinebench R20, it scores 13,709 multi-core and 1,935 single-core. These benchmark results indicate scaling efficiency as thread counts increase, with the multi-core scores roughly 12 times higher than single-core scores across the Cinebench suite. The Passmark multi-thread score of 38,682 and the Passmark physics score of 2,473 provide additional context for simulation and physics-based workloads. The random string sorting score of 51,949 suggests strong performance in data organization tasks, which is relevant for database operations and certain types of server workloads.

The combined picture is one of a high-end desktop system where the GPU outperforms the CPU in relative terms. The 95th percentile GPU versus the 90th percentile CPU means that in GPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform exceptionally well, while CPU-bound scenarios will still be strong but slightly less dominant relative to the best available parts. The data suggests that users seeking maximum graphical fidelity and compute throughput will find the RTX 4000 Ada to be the primary driver of system performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 48,618, placing it 0.2% below the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698) and 0.3% above the AMD EPYC 4345P (48,470). It is also 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX and 0.8% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support listed as available.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the GPU perform in compute benchmarks?

A: The GPU scores 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123,842 in Geekbench Vulkan, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the system’s overall performance percentile?

A: The combined CPU and GPU pairing is at the 93rd percentile among all system configurations in the database.

Q: Does this system have any direct FPS measurements?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured frame-rate data for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2,491 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,270, suggests it can keep up with fast-paced titles. The GPU’s 95th percentile standing indicates it can drive high frame rates at demanding settings, though exact FPS figures are not available.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,491 supporting simultaneous encoding and gameplay. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can also assist with video encoding tasks, though the discrete GPU is the primary workhorse.

Video editing workloads leverage both components. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 125,737 and floating-point score of 92,794 handle codec processing and timeline operations, while the GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth manage large frame buffers and effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 indicates strong GPU acceleration for rendering effects.

3D rendering is a primary strength of this pairing. The RTX 4000 Ada’s 6,144 shading units and 48 RT cores, combined with its 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance, provide substantial compute power. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,640 supports scene preparation and physics calculations, making this a balanced system for render farms or individual workstations.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high single-core boost clock of 5.30 GHz for compilation tasks that are often single-threaded, while the Passmark data compression score of 482,020 helps with build artifact management. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, as indicated by the Passmark multi-thread score of 38,682.

Student and office work is well-served by this system, though it is overqualified for basic tasks. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking ensures snappy responsiveness in document editing and web browsing, while the GPU’s capabilities are largely idle in such workloads. The system would handle any academic software, including CAD or data analysis tools, without difficulty.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance delta between the CPU and GPU is notable. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile with an average score of 48,618, while the GPU sits at the 95th percentile with a score of 135,218. In GPU-intensive workloads such as rendering or high-resolution gaming, the RTX 4000 Ada will be the limiting factor in terms of absolute performance, but it is also the stronger component relative to its peers. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulations or certain productivity tasks, the i5-14600K will define the performance ceiling.

The pairRankByFps field is null, and no measured FPS data exists, so bottleneck analysis must rely on benchmark proportions. The GPU’s average benchmark score is roughly 2.8 times higher than the CPU’s, which is typical for systems where the graphics card dominates total compute throughput. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes more critical, and the 90th percentile ranking suggests it can handle most titles without holding back the GPU. At 4K resolution, the GPU’s workload increases, and the 95th percentile GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates.

The memory subsystem presents a potential balance point. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the GPU uses 20 GB of GDDR6 with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth. If the system is configured with slower DDR4 memory, the CPU’s performance could be constrained, particularly in memory-sensitive workloads. The GPU’s bandwidth is sufficient for its class, but it is not exceptional, which could limit performance in textures-heavy scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need professional-grade GPU compute without sacrificing CPU responsiveness. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU’s 95th percentile standing, which suggests it can handle demanding titles at high settings, though exact FPS figures are not available. The CPU’s high single-core scores ensure that even at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher, the system maintains smooth performance.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or motion graphics will find the 20 GB of VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance suitable for large projects. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallel processing for rendering tasks, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,491. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 5.30 GHz boost clock and the Passmark integer math score of 125,737, which indicate fast compilation times.

Students in engineering, architecture, or data science programs can leverage the GPU’s compute capabilities for CAD or simulation software, while the CPU handles general coursework efficiently. Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for database operations or financial modeling will find the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 482,020 and encryption score of 27,533 useful. The system is also suitable for professionals who need a single machine for both development and occasional rendering tasks, as the balance between CPU and GPU performance is well-matched for mixed workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth peripherals such as next-generation SSDs or GPUs. The socket is shared with other 14th Gen processors, so a future upgrade could involve moving to a higher-tier chip within the same generation, though specific alternatives are not listed in the FACT PACK.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU’s TDP is 130 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, which leaves significant headroom for additional components. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, so the combined power draw is manageable for a standard ATX power supply. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, and its single-slot design with 245 mm length makes it suitable for compact builds.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported by the motherboard, as the dual-channel configuration benefits from matched DIMMs. Alternatively, adding a high-speed NVMe SSD via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would reduce storage bottlenecks, particularly given the CPU’s strong data compression score of 482,020. For users seeking more GPU compute, the platform can accommodate a larger card, though the 300 W PSU suggestion would need to be revisited if the GPU were replaced with a higher-power model.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system pairing the Intel Core i5-14600K with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is from the Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, though it is marketed as a workstation part. The combined percentile is 93, placing this system in the top 7% of all configurations in the database. The CPU’s 90th percentile and GPU’s 95th percentile indicate a performance tier that is well above average, with the GPU being the standout component.

The system is designed for users who need professional GPU features, such as the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, without compromising on CPU performance for everyday tasks. The 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth support large datasets and high-resolution textures, while the CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures low latency in interactive applications. This is a balanced build that leans slightly toward GPU-heavy workloads, making it suitable for a range of professional and enthusiast use cases.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-14600K and RTX 4000 Ada Generation combination. The FACT PACK contains no game-specific frame rate measurements, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance, indicated by a Geekbench single-core score of 2,491 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,270, suggests strong per-core performance that is critical for gaming. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842 and OpenCL score of 146,593 indicate robust graphics compute capability.

For esports titles that rely heavily on CPU performance, the i5-14600K’s high boost clock and 90th percentile ranking should provide high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 Hz at 1080p. For AAA games at 1440p or 4K, the RTX 4000 Ada’s 95th percentile standing suggests it can handle ultra settings, though the 160-bit memory bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth might limit performance in texture-heavy scenes compared to wider-bus GPUs. The 20 GB of VRAM provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and future game releases.

Ray tracing performance is supported by the 48 RT cores, and the 192 tensor cores enable DLSS-style upscaling, though specific game-by-game performance cannot be quantified. The GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicates strong rasterization capabilities, while the 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 417.6 GTexel/s texture rate support high-resolution rendering. Overall, this system is estimated to provide a high-refresh gaming experience at 1440p and a solid 4K experience, with the CPU being sufficient for most gaming workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is based on the AD104 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It features 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 192 tensor cores for AI acceleration.

The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. The GPU’s base clock is 1500 MHz, boosting to 2175 MHz. This configuration delivers 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 26.73 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123,842 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 135,218. This places it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, with its nearest rivals being the NVIDIA A10M (0% difference), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (0.1% slower), Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (0.4% slower), and Radeon PRO V620 (0.9% slower). The TDP is 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W and a single 16-pin power connector. The card is single-slot, measuring 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it suitable for modern rendering APIs. The 20 GB VRAM is particularly beneficial for rendering large scenes, AI training, and other memory-intensive professional workloads, where the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient throughput for most applications.