SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 81st percentile overall, with measured frame rates available across a broad library of games at three resolutions. The CPU holds a 90th percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile, creating a configuration that favors high-refresh 1080p gaming and capable 1440p performance, with 4K remaining a stretch target for less demanding titles.

Gaming Performance

Measured data at ultra settings shows this pairing is built for 1080p dominance. In esports titles, the numbers are exceptional: Counter-Strike 2 hits 196 FPS at 1920x1080, while CS:GO reaches 434 FPS and Valorant posts 443.2 FPS at the same resolution. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 234 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone delivers 166 FPS. At 2560x1440, these titles remain highly playable—Valorant stays at 380.9 FPS, CS:GO at 299 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 153 FPS—though Counter-Strike 2 drops to 130 FPS.

At 1080p, demanding AAA titles still clear the 60 FPS threshold. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 61 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52.7 FPS, and Control at 80 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator manages 68.5 FPS, while Ark: Survival Ascended struggles at 25.4 FPS, representing the low end of the tested library. Moving to 2560x1440, AAA performance tightens: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 43.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 37.5 FPS, and Control to 64.9 FPS. At 3840x2160, only lighter titles remain fluid—Valorant hits 304.9 FPS, CS:GO 176 FPS, and Minecraft 64 FPS—while Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended to 11.6 FPS.

The average frame rate across all tested games is 129.7 FPS, placing this pair at rank 1641 out of 3732 pairs. The 1080p results show a clear sweet spot: most titles exceed 85 FPS, with a significant cluster in the 100-200 FPS range. At 1440p, the experience is best described as solid but variable, with esports titles remaining competitive and AAA games requiring settings adjustments. The 4K data suggests this configuration is not intended for native ultra 4K gaming, as the majority of tested titles fall below 50 FPS at that resolution.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491 and single-core score of 2064 place it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Geekbench results show 16673 multicore and 2491 single-core. The average benchmark score of 48618 puts it in close competition with its nearest rivals: the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698 (0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470 (0.3% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287 (0.7% lower). This indicates the i5-14600K is statistically tied with these server and mobile-class processors in aggregate compute performance.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and Passmark G3D score of 20891 place it in the 72nd percentile. Its average benchmark score of 26331 sits within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011) and 0.8% above the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553). Interestingly, the RTX 5060 also matches the integrated AMD Radeon 860M (26401) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421) within 0.3%, though those comparisons are likely driven by specific compute workloads rather than gaming performance.

Combined, the CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 72nd percentile yield an 81st percentile overall pairing. The CPU is clearly the stronger component in relative terms, which shapes the bottleneck characteristics discussed later. Passmark multithread performance of 38682 and single-thread of 4270 reinforce the CPU's strength in both parallel and lightly-threaded tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this pairing delivers over 140 FPS in most competitive titles—CS:GO at 434 FPS, Valorant at 443.2 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 234 FPS—making it well-suited for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, esports titles remain above 130 FPS, though AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 at 43.5 FPS require reduced settings for competitive play.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding. The 90th percentile CPU performance ensures that streaming overhead won't starve the GPU, while the GPU's 120 tensor cores can handle AI-accelerated encoding tasks if the software supports them.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491 and Passmark floating-point math score of 92794 indicate strong rendering performance for timeline previews and exports. The 8 GB GDDR7 VRAM with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth aids in scrubbing and effects processing, though complex 4K projects may exceed the VRAM capacity.

3D rendering: The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 38682 and the GPU's passmark GPU compute score of 10899 provide a balanced platform for CPU-based and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 30 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but the 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests this is an entry-level rendering node rather than a production powerhouse.

Software development: The 14 cores and 20 threads handle compilation and virtual machine workloads effectively. Passmark data compression score of 482020 and encryption score of 27533 show strong throughput for build pipelines and data processing tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 2491 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output. The 125W TDP and 145W GPU TDP make this a manageable build for a dorm room or small office, though the dual-slot GPU requires case clearance.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest frame rate this pairing achieves at 1080p?

A: Valorant leads at 443.2 FPS, followed by CS:GO at 434 FPS, with Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 234 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 196 FPS.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at ultra settings?

A: Yes, at 1920x1080 it achieves 61 FPS, but at 2560x1440 it drops to 43.5 FPS and at 3840x2160 to 29 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?

A: The RTX 5060's average benchmark score of 26331 is 1.2% higher than the RX 6750 XT's 26011.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48618.

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 5060 includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5060?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX?

A: The i5-14600K scores 48618 on average, which is 0.7% higher than the Core Ultra 5 245HX's 48287.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 uses the GB206 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 21,900 million transistors into a 181 mm² die. The 8 GB GDDR7 memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a compact dual-slot card at 241 mm length, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a 300 W suggested PSU.

Architecturally, the GPU features 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and AI workloads. Clock speeds are 2280 MHz base and 2497 MHz boost, producing 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 19.18 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate is 299.6 GTexel/s.

Benchmark data shows the GPU at the 72nd percentile overall. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and Passmark G3D score of 20891 are competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (1.2% higher average score). However, the Passmark DirectX 11 score of 200 and DirectX 12 score of 77 are notably lower, suggesting a driver or workload-specific weakness in legacy APIs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787 and Vulkan score of 113321 indicate strong compute performance in modern APIs.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is the primary constraint in rendering scenarios. At 4K ultra settings, multiple games show sub-30 FPS results—Cyberpunk 2077 at 29 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11.6 FPS—likely impacted by both memory capacity and bandwidth limitations. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a bottleneck at higher resolutions where texture data exceeds the VRAM buffer.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh play. The measured data shows 85 FPS or higher in nearly every tested title at 1920x1080, with esports titles exceeding 150 FPS. Competitive gamers will find the 443.2 FPS Valorant and 434 FPS CS:GO results compelling for 240Hz displays. At 1440p, the system remains viable for esports (above 130 FPS) but requires settings tuning for AAA games.

Content creators working with 1080p or light 1440p footage will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile performance. The 14 cores handle video encoding and multi-tasking, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM supports moderate effects work. 3D artists doing entry-level rendering can leverage both the CPU's 24491 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's 10899 Passmark compute score.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and Passmark data compression score of 482020. Students and office workers get a responsive system for productivity, with the CPU's single-core Geekbench 2491 ensuring snappy application launches. Small business workstations running data analysis or financial modeling will find the CPU's encryption score of 27533 and integer math score of 125737 sufficient.

This is not a 4K gaming build. The 4K data shows most AAA titles below 40 FPS, and even mid-range titles like Fortnite at 32 FPS struggle. Builders targeting 4K should look at higher-tier GPUs or be prepared for significant settings reductions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 125W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC support available.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking is supported by strong benchmark scores across diverse workloads. Cinebench R23 multicore at 24491 and single-core at 2064 show balanced performance. Geekbench multicore of 16673 and single-core of 2491 confirm this. Passmark results reveal specific strengths: multithread at 38682, floating-point math at 92794, and integer math at 125737. The single-thread Passmark score of 4270 indicates excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks.

The nearest rival comparisons show the i5-14600K is statistically equivalent to the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (-0.2% delta) and AMD EPYC 4345P (+0.3% delta), both server-class processors. This demonstrates that the consumer i5 holds its own in aggregate compute against enterprise silicon. The comparison to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (+0.7% delta) shows it edges out a newer mobile chip.

For real workloads, the 14-core configuration with 20 threads handles parallel tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering efficiently, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score. The 5.30 GHz boost clock and 2064 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensure strong performance in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office software. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and data-intensive tasks, while the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking within the 125W TDP envelope.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14600K (Raptor Lake, Socket 1700) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (Blackwell 2.0). The CPU was released in October 2023 with a launch MSRP of $319, while the GPU launched in May 2025 with a launch MSRP of 299 USD. Both components are currently in active production.

The pairing achieves an 81st combined percentile, reflecting a strong CPU (90th percentile) paired with a mid-range GPU (72nd percentile). The CPU's average benchmark score of 48618 places it among top-tier consumer and entry-level server processors, while the GPU's 26331 average score puts it in the upper-mid range of the GPU hierarchy. The pair ranks 1641 out of 3732 tested pairs by FPS, with an average of 129.7 FPS across all games.

This configuration represents a balanced 1080p gaming machine with 1440p capability in less demanding titles. The CPU has significant headroom for future GPU upgrades, as its 90th percentile performance exceeds what the RTX 5060 can fully utilize in most scenarios. The GPU's 72nd percentile is the limiting factor for high-resolution gaming, but the CPU ensures no bottleneck in CPU-bound titles like Valorant or CS:GO.

The build class is desktop, meaning it requires a full tower case, motherboard with Socket 1700, and dedicated power supply. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. The 125W CPU TDP and 145W GPU TDP mean a 300W suggested PSU is sufficient for the GPU alone, though a quality 500-600W unit is practical for the full system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear CPU-favored balance. The i5-14600K's 90th percentile ranking versus the RTX 5060's 72nd percentile creates a configuration where the CPU can drive frame rates higher than the GPU can render in most scenarios. This is evident in the FPS scaling: esports titles like Valorant at 443.2 FPS (1080p) show the CPU's capability, while the GPU becomes the constraint in AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 61 FPS (1080p).

At 1080p, the CPU bottleneck manifests in games with high physics or simulation demands. The 90th percentile CPU ensures that even at high frame rates, the processor can feed the GPU adequately. However, titles like Ark: Survival Ascended at 25.4 FPS (1080p) suggest the GPU is the limiting factor due to its 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth being overwhelmed by the game's demands.

At 1440p, the bottleneck shifts more toward the GPU. The average frame rate drops from 129.7 FPS (across all resolutions) to sub-60 FPS in most AAA titles. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 61 FPS (1080p) to 43.5 FPS (1440p), a 28.7% decrease, indicating the GPU's rendering capacity is the constraint. The CPU still has headroom, as evidenced by esports titles maintaining above 130 FPS at 1440p.

At 4K, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. Frame rates drop below 30 FPS in most tested titles, and the 8 GB VRAM likely causes texture thrashing. The CPU's performance is largely irrelevant at this resolution because the GPU cannot generate frames fast enough to utilize the CPU's capabilities. This is the classic GPU-bound scenario.

The pair's rank of 1641 out of 3732 by FPS, with an average of 129.7 FPS, indicates this is a mid-tier performer overall. For users seeking to eliminate the GPU bottleneck, upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would be the logical step. Conversely, the CPU's 90th percentile ensures it will not need upgrading for several generations, making this a solid foundation for future GPU upgrades.