SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 in a desktop build that sits at the 54th percentile overall. This combination represents a high-performing CPU paired with a modest GPU, creating a system where processing power dramatically outpaces graphics capability. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on a 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache, and offers 2 MB of L2 cache per core alongside 80 KB of L1 cache per core. ECC memory support is enabled, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results place the i5-14600K in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48618. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 24491 in multi-core and 2064 in single-core tests. The R20 results show 13709 multi-core and 1935 single-core, while R15 scores reach 3640 multi-core and 297 single-core. Geekbench scores are 16673 for multi-core and 2491 for single-core. PassMark tests reveal strong throughput: 125737 in integer math, 92794 in floating-point math, 38682 in multithreaded workloads, and 4270 in single-thread tests. Data compression scores hit 482020, data encryption reaches 27533, and extended instructions score 28546.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600K trades blows within a narrow band. It sits 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, which averages 48698, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P at 48470. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX trails by 0.7%, scoring 48287, while the Core Ultra 5 245 leads by 0.8% with 48995. These deltas are minuscule, meaning the i5-14600K performs essentially on par with enterprise and newer ultra-class chips in aggregate benchmarks.

For real workloads, the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 24491 indicates strong parallel processing capability, suitable for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 2064 reflects agile per-thread performance, which benefits daily desktop responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark integer and floating-point scores suggest robust arithmetic throughput, while the physics score of 2473 hints at solid simulation performance in CPU-bound scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48618.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H?

A: The i5-14600K scores 48618 on average, which is 0.2% lower than the Xeon Gold 5318H’s 48698.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 scores 2893 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which is its only listed benchmark.

Q: Does the RTX 4010 outperform the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?

A: No, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 4010’s 2893.

Q: What memory types does the i5-14600K support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4010 have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The desktop pairing of the i5-14600K and RTX 4010 achieves a combined percentile of 54.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is limited by the RTX 4010’s modest graphics throughput. The GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will constrain frame rates at higher resolutions, even if the CPU’s single-core score of 2064 in Cinebench R23 can feed frames quickly. At 1080p with lower settings, the i5-14600K’s strong single-thread performance may allow for respectable frame rates, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it will be the limiting factor for high-refresh monitors.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 provides ample headroom for encoding video while running a game, and the PassMark multithread score of 38682 supports simultaneous capture, encoding, and broadcast tasks. The GPU’s 24 tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding features, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous workloads.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve leans heavily on both components. The CPU’s multi-core scores, including 13709 in Cinebench R20 and 16673 in Geekbench multi-core, handle timeline scrubbing, effect stacking, and export encoding efficiently. The GPU’s 768 shading units and 6 RT cores provide acceleration for effects and color grading, though the 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will cap complex timelines with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering demands massive parallel throughput, where the CPU excels and the GPU struggles. The i5-14600K’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 is strong for CPU-based renderers, but the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 24 texture mapping units are far below what modern GPU renderers expect. The GPU’s 18th percentile ranking means it will lag severely in GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane.

Software development tasks such as compilation, testing, and running containers benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache. The PassMark integer math score of 125737 indicates rapid code compilation, while the data encryption score of 27533 supports secure build pipelines. The GPU’s limited compute capabilities are less relevant for most development tasks, though the 4 GB VRAM may suffice for light GPU debugging or shader compilation.

Student and office workloads are easily handled by this combination. The CPU’s single-core score of 2064 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application launches and document editing, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can output to displays without the discrete GPU. The PassMark single-thread score of 4270 covers typical productivity software, and the 14 cores provide headroom for multitasking across browsers, spreadsheets, and communication tools.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p with medium to low settings will find the RTX 4010 sufficient for older or less demanding titles, and the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking ensures no processing bottleneck at those resolutions. However, the GPU’s 18th percentile position means 1440p or 4K gaming will require significant setting reductions, and the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in modern games.

Content creators focused on CPU-heavy workflows, such as video encoding, batch photo processing, or software rendering, will benefit from the i5-14600K’s multi-core muscle. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and PassMark multithread score of 38682 handle demanding render tasks, while the GPU can assist with light effects or preview acceleration.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and high integer math score of 125737. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking supports parallel builds, test suites, and container orchestration, making this a productive workstation for code-heavy roles.

Students in engineering, data science, or computer science programs will find the CPU capable of running simulations, compiling projects, and multitasking between research and coursework. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, and the CPU’s performance ensures smooth operation for academic software.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and light content creation will see strong CPU performance with the 14 cores and 20 threads. The PassMark data compression score of 482020 aids in file archiving and database operations, while the GPU offers basic acceleration for presentation graphics or light video editing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The i5-14600K and RTX 4010 present a severe imbalance, with the CPU ranking in the 90th percentile while the GPU sits in the 18th percentile. This means the GPU is the dominant bottleneck for any graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance is more than sufficient to feed frames, but the GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can support.

For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or data processing, the balance shifts. The PassMark integer math score of 125737 and multithread score of 38682 indicate the CPU can process data far faster than the GPU can render or accelerate it. In such workloads, the GPU’s limited compute resources are largely idle, and the CPU becomes the primary driver of performance.

The memory subsystem further highlights the imbalance. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel bandwidth, while the GPU has only 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth across a 64-bit bus. This means the GPU will struggle with texture streaming and large data sets, while the CPU can access system memory at much higher rates.

The 4 GB VRAM on the RTX 4010 is another bottleneck for modern games and rendering tasks. As scenes exceed 4 GB of textures and geometry, the GPU must swap data through the 96.00 GB/s interface, causing stutters and reduced frame rates. The CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache cannot compensate for this GPU-side limitation.

In mixed workloads like live streaming while gaming, the CPU can handle encoding with its 20 threads, but the GPU may still bottleneck the game rendering. The data suggests that for any workload involving both CPU and GPU, the RTX 4010 will limit overall system performance, while the i5-14600K operates well below its potential.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RTX 4010’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 places it in the 18th percentile among all GPUs, indicating entry-level performance. The CPU’s single-core score of 2064 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle game logic and physics calculations efficiently.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing will deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games will likely require medium to low settings to maintain smooth performance. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will cause texture pop-in and reduced detail levels in games that exceed that capacity. The 768 shading units and 16 ROPs limit pixel throughput, capping fill-rate-heavy scenes.

At 1440p, the RTX 4010 will struggle significantly. The 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth is insufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput cannot sustain high frame rates. The CPU’s performance will be largely irrelevant at this resolution, as the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant may still run acceptably, but visually demanding games will be unplayable at high settings.

At 4K, the RTX 4010 is not viable for gaming. The 4 GB VRAM is far below what 4K textures require, and the 64-bit memory bus severely limits bandwidth. The GPU’s 18th percentile ranking confirms it is positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming or basic desktop use, not high-resolution gaming. The i5-14600K’s strong single-core performance cannot overcome the GPU’s hardware limitations.

Frame time consistency will be poor in demanding scenes due to VRAM overflow and limited bandwidth. The CPU’s 20 threads can maintain high frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios, but GPU-side stutters will dominate the experience. For competitive gaming at low settings, the system may deliver acceptable results, but for immersive single-player titles, the GPU will be a significant drawback.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 48618, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, scores 48698, a 0.2% difference. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, 0.3% behind the i5-14600K. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, trailing by 0.7%, while the Core Ultra 5 245 leads with 48995, 0.8% ahead.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU posts 24491 multi-core and 2064 single-core. The R20 scores are 13709 multi-core and 1935 single-core, while R15 shows 3640 multi-core and 297 single-core. Geekbench results include 16673 multi-core and 2491 single-core. PassMark tests reveal 482020 in data compression, 27533 in data encryption, 28546 in extended instructions, 162 in prime number finding, 92794 in floating-point math, 125737 in integer math, 38682 in multithreaded performance, 2473 in physics, 51949 in random string sorting, and 4270 in single-thread tests.

The GPU scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, scores 2907, a 0.5% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910, 0.6% ahead, while the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, 0.7% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 scores 2923, 1% ahead of the RTX 4010.

The combined picture shows a CPU far above average and a GPU far below average. The i5-14600K’s 90th percentile ranking indicates top-tier processing capability, while the RTX 4010’s 18th percentile ranking reflects entry-level graphics. The build’s combined percentile of 54 confirms this split, with CPU performance pulling the system to the middle of the pack despite the weak GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process. The GPU is a GeForce 40-series card using the GA107 chip with Ampere architecture, built on an 8 nm process by Samsung.

The combined percentile of 54 places this system in the middle of all desktop builds, though the component split is stark. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking makes it a top-tier processor, while the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking puts it near the bottom of graphics cards. This is a CPU-first build where the processor delivers high-end performance, but the GPU limits the system to entry-level graphics tasks.

The i5-14600K supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The RTX 4010 features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. The GPU has a 50 W TDP, single-slot design, and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier reflects a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but falls short in GPU-accelerated workloads. Users who prioritize processing power over graphics performance will find this pairing appropriate, but gamers and GPU-focused creators will be constrained by the RTX 4010’s limitations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is based on the GA107 chip with Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, with a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores.

Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1417 MHz, with a boost clock of 1762 MHz. Memory runs at 1500 MHz, achieving 12 Gbps effective speed. The GPU’s pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, scores 2907, a 0.5% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910, 0.6% ahead, and the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, 0.7% ahead. The Quadro P600 scores 2923, 1% ahead.

For rendering workloads, the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, but their low count compared to higher-tier GPUs means ray-traced effects will be slow. The 24 tensor cores offer some AI acceleration, useful for DLSS or light machine learning tasks, but limited by the low memory capacity.

The 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth is a critical constraint for any rendering task. Texture-heavy scenes, high-resolution buffers, and large data sets will exceed the available bandwidth, causing performance drops. The 64-bit bus is narrow, and the 4 GB VRAM fills quickly under modern workloads. The GPU’s 18th percentile ranking confirms it is positioned for entry-level use, far below the performance needed for serious GPU rendering or high-end gaming.