SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pairing represents a balanced desktop build that sits in the 83rd combined percentile, indicating it outperforms the majority of recorded system configurations. The processor, a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part, combines performance cores with efficiency cores, while the graphics card, an Ampere-based GA104 chip, delivers strong 1440p gaming capabilities. The measured data shows this is a versatile system for both high-refresh gaming and content creation workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, utilizing a hybrid design that pairs performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput with power consumption. The base clock runs at 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 5.30 GHz, allowing for strong single-threaded responsiveness when workloads demand it. The 125 W TDP indicates a chip that requires adequate cooling, though it remains within the range of a standard desktop tower cooler.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, which benefits gaming and productivity tasks that exhibit data locality. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and bandwidth depending on their motherboard and memory kit choice. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature that can appeal to workstation users seeking data integrity.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 90th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 48618. In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 24491 highlights strong parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 2064 shows excellent per-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 16673 and single-core score of 2491 corroborate this balance. PassMark results further detail the strengths: integer math scores 125737, floating-point math scores 92794, and multithreaded performance scores 38682. Data compression scores 482020, indicating efficient handling of archiving tasks, while encryption scores 27533 and extended instructions score 28546, showing solid performance in security and SIMD-heavy applications. The physics score of 2473 and single-thread score of 4270 round out a profile that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded scenarios.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600K trades blows with server and workstation chips. It sits 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, and 0.8% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245. This positioning shows that the i5-14600K delivers performance that rivals higher-tier enterprise parts in average benchmark terms, making it a compelling choice for a high-end desktop.

For real workloads, the 14-core/20-thread configuration means video editing software that scales across cores will see strong render times, while the high boost clock ensures snappy UI responsiveness and fast single-threaded application launches. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with gaming performance, where data access patterns often favor larger caches. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output for troubleshooting or non-gaming tasks, though the discrete GPU handles all demanding graphics work.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system performance, as measured by the average benchmark score across CPU and GPU tests, places this build at the 83rd combined percentile. This indicates that the pairing outperforms the majority of recorded desktop configurations, though it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup. The CPU alone scores in the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 75th percentile, showing that the processor has more relative headroom than the graphics card in this pairing.

In gaming workloads, the pair achieves an average FPS of 141.1 across all tested games, ranking 1351st out of 3732 pairs. This places it in the upper third of recorded system combinations, indicating that it delivers smooth frame rates in most titles. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13709 and R15 score of 3640 demonstrate strong all-core performance for productivity tasks, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 and PassMark G3D score of 23356 show solid DirectX 12 and general rasterization performance.

The combined picture shows a system that excels in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or AI inference, but the GPU’s 75th percentile position means that at higher resolutions and in GPU-heavy games, the graphics card becomes the limiting factor. In lighter e-sports titles, the high CPU single-thread score of 2064 in Cinebench R23 and 4270 in PassMark ensure that frame rates are not artificially capped by processor limitations. The GPU’s PassMark compute score of 11601 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718 indicate that compute-heavy tasks like rendering or machine learning will perform adequately, though not at the level of higher-tier GPUs.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using an 8 nm process from Samsung, with a GA104 chip containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6X across a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. This high bandwidth ensures that texture-heavy scenes and large datasets are fed efficiently to the processing units.

The GPU operates with a base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, while the memory runs at an effective speed of 19 Gbps. The shader configuration includes 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. For ray tracing, there are 48 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, 192 tensor cores are present. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 21.75 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1). This compute capability positions it well for both rasterized gaming and DLSS-enhanced workloads.

Benchmark scores show the GPU at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29945. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 reflects modern DirectX 12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 139541 and OpenCL score of 119718 indicate strong cross-API compute capabilities. PassMark results show a G3D score of 23356, with DirectX 11 scoring 192 and DirectX 12 scoring 91, suggesting that the GPU is well-optimized for older APIs but sees more variance in newer ones. The DirectX 9 score of 261 and DirectX 10 score of 155 show compatibility with legacy titles, while the G2D score of 1055 covers 2D desktop tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3070 Ti is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800, 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700. This shows that the card sits in a competitive performance band, offering similar rasterization power to the RX 6800 and surpassing the previous-generation RTX 2080 Ti. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint in very large scenes, but the 608.3 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate this by moving data quickly.

The TDP is rated at 290 W, with a suggested PSU of 600 W, meaning builders need a power supply that can handle this draw alongside the CPU’s 125 W TDP. The card uses a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design, fitting into most standard ATX cases. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting high refresh rate monitors and multi-display setups.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. This gives builders the option to reuse existing DDR4 memory to save on upgrade costs or invest in DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the choice does not affect the CPU’s core performance. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and future graphics cards, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lanes.

The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 290 W TDP together require a power supply with sufficient headroom; the suggested PSU for the GPU is 600 W, which should cover most CPU and GPU combinations in this class. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature more common in workstation platforms, but its presence here means that users building a small server or reliability-focused workstation can benefit from error-correcting memory without switching to a server platform.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 support can be fully utilized by the CPU’s memory controller. If gaming is the priority, the GPU is the more likely bottleneck at higher resolutions, so upgrading to a newer generation GPU would provide the most significant FPS gains. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier also allows for overclocking, though the data shows it already performs near the top of its class, so the gains may be modest. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a future GPU that uses Gen 5 would benefit from the CPU’s lane bandwidth, though the current RTX 3070 Ti uses Gen 4.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the CPU is the stronger half of this pairing, sitting in the 90th percentile while the GPU sits in the 75th percentile. This means that in CPU-bound workloads, such as physics calculations or data compression, the system will perform well above average. However, in GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at 4K resolution or with demanding graphics settings, the graphics card will cap the frame rate.

Evidence from FPS scaling across resolutions supports this: at 1920x1080, the average FPS of 141.1 across games shows that the CPU can drive high frame rates in most titles. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops, and at 3840x2160, it falls further, indicating that the GPU’s workload increases with resolution. In games like "Cyberpunk 2077," the FPS goes from 67.5 at 1080p to 50.5 at 1440p and 33.2 at 4K, showing a clear GPU limitation. In contrast, a CPU-heavy game like "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" maintains 485.4 FPS at 1080p and 332.9 at 1440p, demonstrating that the CPU is not the limiting factor in e-sports titles.

The pair’s rank of 1351 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 141.1, shows that while the system is above average, it is not in the top tier of gaming systems. The bottleneck shifts from CPU at low resolutions to GPU at high resolutions, so users targeting 1080p high-refresh gaming will see balanced performance, while those aiming for 4K should expect the GPU to limit frame rates. For productivity, the CPU’s high multi-threaded scores mean that rendering and compilation tasks will be efficient, but the GPU’s compute score of 11601 in PassMark suggests that GPU-accelerated workloads will be moderate.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p or solid 1440p gaming, as the data shows an average FPS of 141.1 across all games at 1080p. Enthusiasts playing e-sports titles like "Valorant" (502 FPS at 1080p), "Counter-Strike 2" (222.1 FPS), or "Tom Clancy S Rainbow Six Siege" (261 FPS) will see extremely high frame rates. At 1440p, games like "Call of Duty: Warzone" (149.3 FPS) and "Fortnite" (67 FPS) are playable, though more demanding titles like "Red Dead Redemption 2" (44.5 FPS) will require settings adjustments.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491, which shortens render times, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth handle most editing timelines. Software developers compiling code will see strong performance from the PassMark integer math score of 125737 and data encryption score of 27533. Students and small business workstations will find this system overkill for office tasks but capable of handling any academic or professional software, with the CPU’s 90th percentile ensuring responsiveness.

The build is less suited for users targeting 4K gaming at maximum settings, as the GPU’s 75th percentile and 8 GB VRAM limit performance in the most demanding titles, with "Cyberpunk 2077" averaging 33.2 FPS at 4K. It is also not ideal for heavy machine learning training, as the 8 GB VRAM constrains model sizes, though the tensor cores provide some acceleration for inference tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600K compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 48618, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, and 0.8% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect gaming?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s across a 256-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory. This high bandwidth helps maintain consistent frame rates in texture-heavy scenes, as seen in games like "Control" (91 FPS at 1080p) and "Microsoft Flight Simulator" (81.1 FPS at 1080p).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, indicating that this system outperforms 83% of recorded desktop configurations in benchmark tests. The CPU alone sits in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is in the 75th percentile.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this build?

A: The pair achieves an average FPS of 141.1 across all tested games, ranking 1351st out of 3732 pairs. This places it in the upper third of all recorded system combinations.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking and what memory types are compatible?

A: The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support also available.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3070 Ti is 600 W, which accounts for the GPU’s 290 W TDP and provides headroom for the CPU’s 125 W TDP and other components.

Q: How does the GPU perform in DirectX 12 benchmarks compared to its rivals?

A: The GPU scores 3478 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it 0.1% ahead of the RTX 5070 Mobile, 0.5% behind the RX 6800, 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, and 1.6% behind the RX 6700 in average benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 125 W TDP, while the GPU is an 8 GB Ampere card with a 290 W TDP. The combined system sits at the 83rd percentile overall, with the CPU in the 90th percentile and the GPU in the 75th percentile. The pair achieves an average FPS of 141.1 across games, ranking 1351st out of 3732 pairs, indicating a solid mid-to-high-tier desktop configuration.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build excels at 1080p, with e-sports titles like "Valorant" (502 FPS) and "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" (485.4 FPS) delivering extremely smooth gameplay. At 1440p, the average FPS of 141.1 across games supports high-refresh monitors in most titles. Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 14 cores, which handle encoding without compromising gaming frame rates, as seen in "Call of Duty: Warzone" (168.6 FPS at 1080p). Video editing is accelerated by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491, reducing export times, while the GPU’s 608.3 GB/s bandwidth aids in real-time previews. 3D rendering sees strong performance from the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 38682, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity. Software development benefits from the high integer math score of 125737, speeding up compilation, and the data encryption score of 27533 for secure workloads. Student and office work is easily handled, with the CPU’s single-thread score of 4270 ensuring fast application launches and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 providing a backup display option.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows this system delivers high frame rates at 1080p in most games, with an average of 141.1 FPS across all titles. At 1920x1080, competitive shooters perform exceptionally well: "Valorant" reaches 502 FPS, "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" hits 485.4 FPS, and "Tom Clancy S Rainbow Six Siege" achieves 261 FPS. Heavier titles like "Cyberpunk 2077" run at 67.5 FPS, "Red Dead Redemption 2" at 58.5 FPS, and "Ark: Survival Ascended" at 33.8 FPS, showing that demanding games require settings adjustments for smooth play.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops, but many games remain playable: "Call of Duty: Warzone" runs at 149.3 FPS, "Counter-Strike 2" at 145.7 FPS, and "Fortnite" at 67 FPS. More demanding titles like "Cyberpunk 2077" (50.5 FPS) and "Red Dead Redemption 2" (44.5 FPS) are borderline, while "Ark: Survival Ascended" (22.8 FPS) becomes difficult. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with most games falling below 60 FPS: "Call of Duty: Warzone" runs at 123.3 FPS, "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" at 199.9 FPS, but "Cyberpunk 2077" drops to 33.2 FPS and "Red Dead Redemption 2" to 26.4 FPS. These figures are measured, not estimates, providing a reliable picture of the system’s gaming capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds