SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing is a desktop build that lands in the 75th combined percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations tracked in this database. This is a configuration where a high-end 14-core processor meets a mid-range graphics card from the previous generation, creating a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound productivity tasks and competitive gaming at high frame rates. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile against all processors, while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile, indicating a significant performance delta between the two components that shapes the entire character of this build.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It packs 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that uses the hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the chip includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache, with 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 per core. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode and has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The 125W TDP reflects its unlocked multiplier, making it a chip that benefits from robust cooling, though the data does not specify cooler requirements beyond what the TDP implies.

Benchmark results show this CPU is a multi-threaded powerhouse for its class. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24491 in multi-core and 2064 in single-core. The multi-core score positions it to handle heavily threaded workloads like video rendering and compilation, while the single-core score of 2064 ensures strong responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming. The Geekbench scores follow suit: 16673 multi-core and 2491 single-core. PassMark results reinforce this, with a multithread score of 38682 and a single-thread score of 4270. The data compression score of 482020 and encryption score of 27533 are notable, indicating strong throughput for file archiving and secure data operations. Floating-point math scores 92794, while integer math reaches 125737, showing balanced arithmetic capability across different workload types.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking against all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in this database. Its average benchmark score of 48618 puts it in direct competition with server and workstation chips. The nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H with an average score of 48698, a delta of -0.2 percent, and the AMD EPYC 4345P with a score of 48470, a delta of 0.3 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, which is 0.7 percent lower, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, which is 0.8 percent higher. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 14600K trades blow-for-blow with enterprise-level silicon in aggregate score, despite being a consumer desktop part. For real workloads, this means a developer can expect compile times on par with dual-socket server setups, and a content creator can render frames nearly as fast as with workstation-class hardware, all within a standard desktop platform.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses the GA104 chip on the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It features 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation processors. The RT and tensor core counts are 38 and 152, respectively, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 1410 MHz, boosting to 1665 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. Pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 16.20 TFLOPS, a 1:1 ratio that indicates the compute units are fully utilized in both modes.

The GPU's benchmark scores reveal a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2626. Geekbench OpenCL scores 78927, while Vulkan scores 47784. PassMark G3D shows a score of 20349, with GPU compute at 10006. The DirectX 12 score of 78 is low, but the DirectX 11 score of 163 is higher, suggesting the card performs better in legacy APIs. The G2D score of 989 reflects decent 2D performance for desktop workloads. The 59th percentile ranking against all GPUs places it below the midpoint of the current landscape, which is expected for a card from the GeForce 30-series that is now marked as end-of-life. Its average benchmark score of 16129 puts it near the AMD Radeon RX 9060, which scores 16014 and is 0.7 percent lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16351, which is 1.4 percent higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, also 1.4 percent higher, while the AMD Radeon R9 370X trails at 15862, 1.7 percent lower.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient throughput for 1080p and 1440p textures. The tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-based features, while the RT cores handle ray tracing effects, though the performance in ray-traced titles will be constrained by the GPU's overall compute power. The 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable for a mid-range card, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or Premiere Pro, but the 8 GB memory will cap scene complexity.

Benchmark Performance

The combined measured performance across games shows an average FPS of 117.7 at 1080p ultra settings, which places this pair at rank 2038 out of 3732 tracked pairs. This is a strong result for competitive and esports titles. The CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile combine to a 75th percentile overall, which confirms that the processor is doing the heavy lifting in most scenarios.

Specific game data at 1920x1080 ultra shows the strengths and weaknesses. In Counter-Strike 2, the pair hits 192.7 FPS, and in Valorant it reaches 351.9 FPS, making it exceptional for high-refresh competitive play. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 227 FPS, and the newer Siege X variant hits 230 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 166.6 FPS, and Minecraft: Java Edition at 189.4 FPS. These numbers indicate that for esports and light-load titles, the system easily exceeds 144Hz and even approaches 240Hz in some cases.

However, the GPU becomes the bottleneck in graphically demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 45.1 FPS at 1080p ultra, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 48.4 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly punishing at 22.6 FPS, and The Medium runs at 40 FPS. At 2560x1440, the numbers scale down: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 34.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 40.4 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 14.3 FPS. At 3840x2160, these titles become unplayable, with Cyberpunk at 22.9 FPS and Ark at 8.9 FPS. The data shows a clear pattern: the CPU sustains high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and Ampere compute limits raw rasterization in heavy AAA titles.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU throughput over GPU rasterization. The 90th percentile CPU means professionals in software development, data analysis, and scientific computing will see excellent performance in multi-threaded code. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and PassMark multithread score of 38682 indicate strong rendering and compilation capabilities. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the 14 cores for simulation workloads, and the single-core score of 2064 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast code compilation and IDE responsiveness.

Small business workstations can leverage the CPU's data compression score of 482020 for database operations and the encryption score of 27533 for secure transactions. The 20 threads handle virtualization and concurrent office applications easily. Gamers at 1080p will find the sweet spot: the GPU's 59th percentile is enough for esports at high refresh rates, and the CPU prevents any bottleneck in those scenarios. For 1440p gaming, the system is viable in less demanding titles, with games like Call of Duty: Warzone at 147.6 FPS and Assetto Corsa at 79.3 FPS, but users should avoid 4K gaming with this GPU.

Content creators who work with video editing will see strong performance in encoding and effects that use the CPU, but GPU-accelerated renders will be limited by the 8 GB VRAM. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626 and Geekbench OpenCL of 78927 provide baseline GPU compute, but the 16.20 TFLOPS is not sufficient for heavy 3D scene rendering at high resolutions. Developers working on game engines that rely on both CPU and GPU will appreciate the balance, but the GPU will be the first component to show its age.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows an unbalanced pairing where the CPU significantly outclasses the GPU. The 90th vs 59th percentile gap means the GPU is the bottleneck in nearly all GPU-bound workloads. Evidence from the game benchmarks confirms this. In CPU-bound titles like Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 192.7 FPS at 1080p, but in GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077, it drops to 45.1 FPS. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows the GPU's limitations clearly. For example, in Fortnite, the frame rate drops from 76.3 FPS at 1080p to 47.5 FPS at 1440p, a 37.7 percent decrease, and then to 28.2 FPS at 4K, another 40.6 percent drop from 1440p. This steep scaling is typical of a GPU with limited VRAM and bandwidth.

In contrast, CPU-bound games like Valorant show less dramatic scaling: 351.9 FPS at 1080p, 300.2 FPS at 1440p, and 239.1 FPS at 4K. The 4K score still exceeds 240Hz, indicating the GPU is not the limiting factor there. The bottleneck shifts based on resolution and game engine. At 1080p in light games, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU keeps up. At 1080p in heavy games, the GPU struggles. At 1440p, the GPU is almost always the limiting factor, and at 4K, the GPU is severely constrained. The pair rank of 2038 out of 3732 suggests that while the average FPS is high, the variance between CPU-bound and GPU-bound workloads is extreme.

The CPU's nearest rivals include server chips like the Xeon Gold 5318H, which reinforces that the processor is not the weak link. The GPU's nearest rivals include the Radeon RX 5700 XT, a card from the same era, indicating the RTX 3060 Ti is firmly mid-range. For a balanced system, this pairing would benefit from a GPU upgrade to match the CPU's capability, but the data shows that for the intended use case of high-refresh 1080p gaming and productivity, the balance is acceptable.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking against all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K is in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48618.

Q: How does the RTX 3060 Ti compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16129, which is 1.4 percent lower than the RX 5700 XT's 16361 score.

Q: What is the measured FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1920x1080 ultra settings?

A: The system achieves 45.1 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1920x1080 ultra settings.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600K supports ECC memory, which is listed in its specifications.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75th, with an average FPS across games of 117.7 at 1080p ultra.

Q: How many RT and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build excels in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 192.7 FPS, Valorant at 351.9 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 227 FPS, all exceeding 144Hz refresh rates. The CPU's 90th percentile single-core performance ensures frame pacing remains stable, making it a reliable choice for competitive play.

Streaming while gaming is viable, as the 14 cores and 20 threads handle encoding overlays without compromising game performance. The PassMark multithread score of 38682 provides headroom for OBS encoding, and the GPU's NVENC capabilities, implied by the 152 tensor cores, offload encoding from the CPU. However, streaming at 1440p or higher may strain the GPU, as it drops to 147.6 FPS in Warzone at that resolution.

Video editing in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491, which accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS handles effects and color grading, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit the use of high-resolution textures and heavy GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya will see strong CPU performance for physics and simulation, with the PassMark floating-point math score of 92794 supporting complex calculations. The GPU's compute score of 10006 in PassMark is adequate for basic rendering, but users should expect longer render times compared to higher-end GPUs.

Software development is a primary strength. The 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache provide fast compilation times, and the Geekbench single-core score of 2491 ensures quick IDE responsiveness. The data compression score of 482020 helps with build artifact management and version control operations.

Student and office work is handled with extreme ease. The CPU's single-thread score of 4270 in PassMark makes spreadsheet calculations and document processing instantaneous. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, but the discrete GPU handles any light graphics work, with the G2D score of 989 indicating solid 2D performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600K uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The platform provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth storage or future GPU upgrades. The CPU's 125W TDP requires a capable cooler, but the data does not specify a required cooler size, indicating a standard tower air cooler or 240mm liquid cooler is sufficient, though no specific numbers are provided for cooler compatibility.

The RTX 3060 Ti has a 200W TDP and requires a 550W suggested PSU. The GPU uses a 1x 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height. The power connector is unusual, requiring an adapter for most PSUs, but this is a minor installation consideration.

The first sensible upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking leaves significant headroom, and replacing the RTX 3060 Ti with a newer, higher-performing GPU would bring the system closer to balance. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will have full bandwidth. The socket 1700 platform is at its end of life with the 14th Gen, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard. For memory, the dual-channel support for DDR4 and DDR5 means users can keep their existing RAM if on the same platform, but moving to a new socket would require new memory. The 550W PSU is sufficient for the current GPU, but a higher-power GPU would necessitate a PSU upgrade, as no wattage figures for higher-end cards are provided in the data.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake refresh part with a 90th percentile ranking, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 8 GB VRAM and a 59th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 75th, indicating a system that is above average in the database but with a clear imbalance favoring the CPU. The average FPS across all tracked games is 117.7 at 1080p ultra, with a pair rank of 2038 out of 3732. This pairing is best understood as a productivity-first system with gaming capability, where the CPU handles demanding compute tasks and the GPU provides adequate 1080p gaming performance. The raw data indicates the RTX 3060 Ti holds the system back in heavy AAA titles, but the CPU ensures the system remains responsive and capable in all workloads. For a builder seeking a workstation that can also play esports at high refresh rates, this configuration offers a strong foundation, with the GPU as the primary upgrade path.