SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combine to form a desktop platform aimed squarely at high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the CPU providing top-tier compute strength while the GPU delivers a more modest, mid-range graphics experience. The pair’s combined percentile of 74 places it above most systems, but the distinct performance ceilings of each component create a specific set of usage scenarios. The data shows a processor that ranks in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, paired with a graphics card in the 58th percentile against all GPUs, making the platform’s overall capability heavily dependent on whether the workload is compute-bound or graphics-bound. For users who prioritize processor-intensive tasks or esports titles, this build is highly effective, while for those seeking maximum visual fidelity in AAA titles, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this platform is exceptionally strong. Measured FPS in esports titles like Valorant reaches 447 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 431 FPS at 1920x1080. Even more demanding competitive shooters like Counter-Strike 2 maintain a smooth 195 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 166 FPS. The CPU’s single-core performance, as evidenced by a Geekbench score of 2491, ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in these scenarios, far exceeding the 144Hz refresh rate target.

Streaming and content creation are a mixed bag but generally positive. The CPU’s 20 threads and 14 cores provide ample headroom for encoding and multitasking, as reflected in a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 38682. While the GPU is capable of handling encoding tasks, the processor’s strength means that a software-based streaming approach is viable without significantly impacting gaming performance, especially when compared to the GPU’s more limited compute capabilities.

Video editing workloads will see a split between CPU-heavy and GPU-accelerated tasks. The processor’s Passmark data compression score of 482020 and floating-point math score of 92794 suggest fast timeline scrubbing and export of H.264/H.265 footage using CPU-based encoders. However, for effects-heavy edits that leverage GPU acceleration, the RX 7700’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 10963 will be the bottleneck, making the system more suited for light-to-moderate video work rather than professional-grade post-production.

3D rendering is a clear strength of this configuration, but only on the CPU side. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13709 and R15 multi-core score of 3640 indicate that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray will complete tasks quickly. Conversely, GPU-based rendering using the RX 7700 will be slower, as its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 places it in the 58th percentile, suggesting that GPU-accelerated renders will not match the speed of the CPU’s output.

Software development benefits significantly from the CPU’s architecture. The Passmark extended instructions score of 28546 and data encryption score of 27533 indicate strong performance in compilation tasks and cryptographic operations. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the ability to support up to 20 threads means that parallel builds will be efficient. This is a strong workstation for developers, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU provides a fallback for basic display tasks.

Student and office work is handled with ease, though it is overkill for most tasks. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4270 ensures that word processing, spreadsheet manipulation, and web browsing are instantaneous. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1206 supports smooth 2D rendering and multiple monitor setups, making this a responsive and comfortable system for productivity, even if the hardware is far more capable than required.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks paint a picture of a high-end desktop processor. The Intel Core i5-14600K achieves a Geekbench multi-core score of 16673 and a single-core score of 2491. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24491 multi-core and 2064 single-core. These results place it in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48618. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H with a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD EPYC 4345P with a delta of 0.3%, showing that the i5-14600K is statistically equivalent to server-class processors in multi-threaded workloads.

The GPU benchmarks show a more modest positioning. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 20974 in Passmark G3D and 106028 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2865. This results in a 58th percentile ranking against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X at -0.1% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at -1.7%, indicating that the RX 7700 performs very close to the previous-generation RTX 3060 Ti in aggregate benchmarks.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting above nearly all other processors, while the GPU is a solid mid-range part. The combined percentile for the system is 74, which is pulled down by the GPU’s lower standing. In gaming, the pair achieves an average FPS of 125.9 across all tested games, ranking 1775th out of 3732 pairs, which puts it in the top half of systems but not the top tier. This suggests that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor, while the GPU often is, especially at higher resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is built on the Raptor Lake architecture and features 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that combines 6 performance cores and 8 efficient cores. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the processor is unlocked, allowing for manual overclocking. The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size are indicators of its desktop-class design, and the 24 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial for a mid-range part.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 is near the top of the charts, explaining its strong performance in gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 24491 shows that it can compete with workstation processors, which is confirmed by its nearest rivals being Xeon and EPYC parts. The Passmark physics score of 2473 and integer math score of 125737 further cement its capability for scientific and engineering calculations.

In real workloads, this means the CPU can handle almost any task without being a bottleneck. Video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering in CPU-based engines will all be fast. The 20 threads allow for efficient parallel processing, and the high single-core boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures that legacy software and games that rely on one or two threads will still perform excellently. The presence of ECC memory support is a notable feature for professional workstations, as it allows for error correction in data-critical environments.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking means that in games, the frame rate will almost always be limited by the Radeon RX 7700. This is evident when comparing the FPS scaling across resolutions; for example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the system delivers 58 FPS at 1080p but only 43 FPS at 1440p and 28 FPS at 4K. The CPU is not the limiting factor here, as its single-core performance is more than sufficient to feed the GPU at these frame rates.

Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios, the GPU is not the bottleneck. In esports titles like Valorant, the system achieves 447 FPS at 1080p, which indicates that the GPU is capable of rendering frames far faster than the 165Hz or 240Hz refresh rates of most monitors. Here, the CPU’s single-core speed is the key enabler, as it allows the game logic to be processed quickly enough to generate those high frame rates.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For productivity and compute tasks, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is rarely used. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, and upgrading it would yield the most significant FPS improvements. The data shows that in most AAA games, the GPU is holding back the system; for instance, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 52 FPS at 1080p and 39 FPS at 1440p, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay, despite the CPU being capable of much more.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming in competitive titles. The measured FPS in games like Counter-Strike 2 (195 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (166 FPS) at 1080p shows that this system can easily drive 144Hz monitors in these titles. For those who play a mix of esports and AAA games, the system will require some settings adjustments in the latter, as games like Cyberpunk 2077 (58 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (52 FPS) at 1080p are playable but not at maximum refresh rates.

Content creators who rely primarily on CPU-based rendering and encoding will find this platform highly capable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 means that video exports and 3D renders using CPU engines will be fast. Video editors working with 1080p or light 4K footage will have a smooth experience, provided they do not rely heavily on GPU-accelerated effects, which would be slower on the RX 7700.

Software developers and students in computer science will benefit from the CPU’s compilation speed and multi-threading. The Passmark extended instructions score of 28546 and the high integer math score indicate that code compilation and test runs will be swift. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU also allows for local machine learning model training, even if the compute speed is not top-tier.

Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for tasks like financial modeling, data analysis, or database management will see strong results. The CPU’s ECC memory support and high Passmark data compression score of 482020 make it suitable for such environments, and the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is beneficial for large data visualizations or CAD applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility, though the dual-channel memory bus will work with either type. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for next-generation storage and GPUs, though the current RX 7700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 200 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This leaves minimal headroom for overclocking, as the CPU is unlocked and could draw more power, and the GPU has two 8-pin power connectors. A 550 W power supply is sufficient for stock operation, but a higher-wattage unit would be recommended for a more aggressive overclocking or future upgrades.

The most sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as it is the current bottleneck. Replacing the RX 7700 with a higher-tier card would yield significant FPS gains in AAA titles. The CPU has enough headroom to support a more powerful GPU, as evidenced by its near-parity with Xeon and EPYC processors in multi-threaded benchmarks. However, the platform socket is a potential limitation, as future Intel generations may require a new motherboard, and the DDR4/DDR5 support means that the memory cannot be carried over to a new platform if it is DDR4.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is based on the Navi 32 chip and RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The boost clock is 2459 MHz, with a game clock of 2041 MHz.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that is capable but not exceptional. The Passmark G3D score of 20974 places it in the 58th percentile, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 indicates that it can handle DirectX 12 titles but is not a high-end performer. The FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS is respectable for a mid-range card, and the FP16 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1) is notable for compute tasks that can use reduced precision.

In rendering tasks, the 16 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, as it allows for large textures and complex scenes without running out of memory. The 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the GPU quickly, but the raw compute power is limited. The ray tracing cores are present, but their performance is not top-tier, as evidenced by the GPU’s lower percentile ranking. For gamers, this means that ray tracing effects will require substantial performance sacrifices, and DLSS-like upscaling (FSR) will be necessary to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile against all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K sits in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48618.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: What is the system’s average FPS across all tested games?

A: The pair achieves an average of 125.9 FPS across all games, ranking 1775th out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in gaming?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming, as it ranks in the 58th percentile versus the CPU’s 90th percentile. This is shown by FPS drops at higher resolutions.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600K supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for professional workstations and data-critical applications.

Q: What is the maximum FPS in Valorant at 1080p?

A: The system achieves 447 FPS in Valorant at 1920x1080 resolution.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 550 W, with the CPU TDP at 125 W and GPU TDP at 200 W.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance across a wide range of titles and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and lighter titles: Valorant leads with 447 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS. Minecraft runs at 192 FPS, and To The Core delivers 196 FPS. These numbers indicate that the platform is more than capable of driving high-refresh monitors in competitive scenarios.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but sees a noticeable drop. Valorant still hits 381 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive manages 297 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 148 FPS, while more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 43 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 39 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for the GPU, providing high frame rates in less demanding games and playable performance in AAA titles.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become apparent. Valorant still achieves 305 FPS, but most games fall below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 9 FPS, and The Medium runs at 27 FPS. The 16 GB of VRAM prevents memory-related stutters, but the raw compute power is insufficient for smooth 4K gaming in most modern titles. For 4K, the system is best suited for older or less demanding games like Inside (76 FPS) and Roblox (95 FPS).