SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE represents a compelling desktop combination that targets high-refresh 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, as well as mixed productivity workloads. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake part with 20 threads, delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance for its class, while the GPU offers solid rasterization performance with modern feature support. This analysis examines the benchmark data for both components, their relative standing against rivals, and the practical implications for system builders. It is important to note that no measured frame rate data exists for this exact pairing; all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores and their respective percentile rankings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. This is a 14-core processor configured with 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, enabling 20 threads via Hyper-Threading on the performance cores. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a maximum boost clock of 5.30 GHz, providing substantial single-thread headroom for latency-sensitive workloads. The processor features a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache, which helps feed the high core count.

Benchmark results place this chip in the 90th percentile of all CPUs tested, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 24491 in multi-core and 2064 in single-core. The multi-core score is the standout figure, indicating exceptional sustained throughput for rendering and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 2064 is also strong, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on a few fast threads. In Geekbench, the scores are 16673 multi-core and 2491 single-core, confirming the same pattern of excellent multi-threaded performance with robust single-thread capability.

The PassMark suite provides further granularity on specialized workloads. The multi-thread score is 38682, with integer math at 125737 and floating-point math at 92794. The data compression score is 482020, while encryption is 27533. These figures suggest the CPU is particularly well-suited for data-heavy tasks like archiving and database operations, though the encryption score is relatively lower, indicating it is not a primary strength. The extended instructions score of 28546 and random string sorting at 51949 point to solid performance in AVX-heavy and sorting algorithms. The physics score of 2473 is low in isolation but is a PassMark subtest that is often not representative of real-world gaming physics. The average benchmark score of 48618 places it in a tight competitive group: it trails the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by just 0.2%, and beats the AMD EPYC 4345P by 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX by 0.7%. This indicates that the i5-14600K is a class-leading mainstream desktop chip, trading blows with server-class and newer mobile/desktop hybrid architectures.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this desktop build is strong, with the pairing achieving an overall combined percentile of 87. This indicates that the system as a whole outperforms 87% of all tested desktop configurations in the database. The CPU is the primary driver of this high percentile, with its 90th percentile ranking versus all CPUs. The GPU, while also strong, sits at the 83rd percentile versus all GPUs.

The GPU's benchmark results are limited to two specific tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2336, which is a demanding modern rasterization test. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 83109, which is a compute-focused test that measures raw throughput for general-purpose GPU tasks. These scores, combined with the GPU's average benchmark score of 42723, place it in the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are all very close: it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2%, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 1.2%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by 1.3%. This is a tightly packed group, meaning the RX 7650 GRE is operating at the very edge of its performance tier, essentially matching the previous generation's high-end cards in aggregate score. The CPU's dominance in its own percentile ranking gives the system a balanced but CPU-heavy profile; the CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its own market segment.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and is part of the Radeon RX 7000 series. It utilizes the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1720 MHz, with a game clock of 2350 MHz and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, effective 18 Gbps.

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. The GPU also features 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) for dedicated ray tracing hardware, although it lacks dedicated tensor cores for AI acceleration, relying on standard shader-based compute. The peak theoretical performance includes a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s, and 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, with FP16 running at the same 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

In terms of rendering workloads, the 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 is a significant number, allowing for fast processing of complex shaders and compute effects in 3D rendering software. The 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p textures but may become a limiting factor at higher resolutions with high-detail texture packs. The 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for heavy content creation; it is sufficient for most current games at 1080p, but large 3D scenes or 4K video editing timelines may exceed this capacity. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 indicates strong rasterization performance, placing it in the 83rd percentile, which is notably high for a GPU in this class. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 shows solid compute capability for non-gaming tasks like rendering or machine learning inference, though the lack of tensor cores means AI workloads will rely on the general-purpose shaders.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700 interface, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for builders to choose between cheaper DDR4 memory or faster DDR5 memory. ECC memory is supported, which is a boon for small workstation builds where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, offering high bandwidth for the fastest SSDs and future GPUs, while the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 170 W. The suggested power supply for this GPU is 450 W, which is a modest requirement for the combined load of this system. A quality 550 W to 650 W PSU would provide ample headroom for overclocking (the CPU multiplier is unlocked) and additional peripherals. The GPU is a dual-slot card that is 204 mm long and 115 mm high, requiring a single 8-pin power connector, making it compatible with most mid-tower cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is the most likely bottleneck in modern titles. A future upgrade to a GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would be the most impactful change for gaming at higher resolutions or with higher texture quality settings. The CPU, on the other hand, has significant headroom; its 90th percentile performance means it will not be a limiting factor for several generations. The platform itself is at the end of its socket life, so a future CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change, but the current CPU is so strong that a platform swap is not immediately necessary.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for a desktop user who demands high performance in both gaming and productivity without stepping into the high-cost enthusiast tier. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores make it a prime candidate for content creators, specifically video editors working with high-bitrate footage, and 3D modelers who will see significant reductions in render times compared to lower-tier CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 is a strong indicator for such workloads.

For gamers, the pairing is well-balanced for 1080p high-refresh-rate gaming and capable of 1440p gaming at high settings. The GPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures smooth frame rates in most titles. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 20 threads and high integer math score of 125737. Students and small business workstations will find the system far more capable than needed for office tasks, but the ECC memory support and strong data compression score of 482020 make it a viable option for database management and scientific computing on a budget. The system is not targeted at 4K gaming or heavy AI development, where the 8 GB VRAM and lack of tensor cores would be limiting.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 87, indicating it outperforms 87% of all tested desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 48618. It is 0.2% slower than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, 0.3% faster than the AMD EPYC 4345P, and 0.7% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) for dedicated ray tracing hardware, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores for AI acceleration.

Q: What kind of power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested power supply for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is 450 W.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-14600K is $319.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Gaming Performance

No measured frame rate data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database. The following performance expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and percentile rankings of the components.

Based on the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336, this system is expected to deliver excellent performance at 1080p resolution with ultra settings in most modern games. The CPU's high single-core score of 2064 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it can feed the GPU adequately, minimizing bottlenecks in CPU-bound scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU will still provide high frame rates, but the 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint in the most demanding titles with high-resolution texture packs, potentially requiring a reduction in texture quality to avoid stuttering.

The GPU's performance relative to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a useful reference point; being only 1.2% slower in average benchmark score suggests that in rasterized games, the RX 7650 GRE should perform within a few percentage points of that card. Ray tracing performance will be a weaker point due to the 32 RT cores, so users should expect lower frame rates in titles with heavy ray tracing effects. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the high CPU clock speed of 5.30 GHz and strong single-thread performance will allow for frame rates well beyond 144 Hz at 1080p, making this an excellent system for competitive gaming.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class configuration pairing the Intel Core i5-14600K with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is a RDNA 3.0-based card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking of 87 places this system in the upper echelon of desktop builds, indicating it is a high-performance machine suitable for demanding applications. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile versus all GPUs, showing a slight imbalance favoring the CPU.

The system is best described as a high-end mainstream desktop focused on delivering strong performance across a wide range of tasks. It is not an extreme enthusiast or workstation-class system, but it operates at the top of the mainstream segment, offering performance that often rivals more expensive components. The average benchmark scores confirm this: the CPU's average score of 48618 is competitive with server processors, and the GPU's average score of 42723 places it alongside high-end cards from the previous generation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the CPU and GPU is slightly tipped towards the CPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 83rd percentile, indicating that the CPU is the stronger component relative to their respective markets. In practical terms, this means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming workloads; it has the headroom to drive the GPU to its maximum potential in most scenarios.

The primary bottleneck in this system will be the GPU, specifically its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus. While the GPU's raw compute performance is high, the memory subsystem can limit performance in games that require large amounts of video memory at high resolutions or with high-detail textures. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as simulation games or high-physics titles, the CPU will still perform admirably, but the GPU will be the first component to reach its limits when settings are maxed out. The data indicates that for a balanced upgrade, replacing the GPU with a model with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would yield the most significant performance gains, whereas the CPU has enough headroom to support such an upgrade without becoming a new bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is excellent for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-core performance will drive high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures high settings are viable in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads are more than sufficient for encoding a stream via x264 while gaming, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 shows substantial headroom for simultaneous tasks. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, offering an alternative that offloads the work entirely from the CPU.

Video Editing: The CPU is a powerhouse for video editing. The high multi-core score accelerates rendering and export times, while the GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides acceleration for effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and light 4K work but may be a limitation for complex 4K or 8K timelines.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based renderers, this system will shine. The 24491 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates rapid render times. The GPU can also accelerate rendering in GPU-accelerated engines, but its 8 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Software Development: Compilation and code analysis will benefit from the 20 threads and high integer math score of 125737, making builds faster. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running server or data-processing tasks.

Student and Office Work: For standard office tasks, web browsing, and coding assignments, this system is vastly overqualified. The performance is effectively instantaneous for these workloads, providing a very smooth and responsive user experience.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600K

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds