SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, produced on a 10 nm process. It combines 6 performance cores and 8 efficient cores, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The CPU features 24 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. This configuration places the chip in the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the benchmark database, indicating it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors tracked.

Benchmark results show substantial multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 points reflects strong sustained throughput for heavily parallel workloads. In Cinebench R20, the CPU scores 13709 multi-core and 1935 single-core; in Cinebench R15, it reaches 3640 multi-core and 297 single-core. Geekbench results show 16673 multi-core and 2491 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38682, combined with a single-thread score of 4270, underscores a balanced design that excels in both lightly threaded and fully saturated scenarios.

The data reveals specific strengths in computational tasks. PassMark integer math scores 125737, floating-point math scores 92794, and extended instructions score 28546. Data encryption reaches 27533, while data compression hits 482020. Random string sorting achieves 51949, and find prime numbers scores 162. These figures indicate strong general-purpose computing performance, with particularly impressive results in compression and sorting workloads that benefit from the hybrid core layout.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, just 0.2% above the i5-14600K's average benchmark score of 48618. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, 0.3% below. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, 0.7% lower, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, 0.8% higher. This tight cluster shows the i5-14600K sits squarely in a competitive performance band, trading blows with server-class and newer-generation parts within a single percentage point.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory capability. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, offering a fallback display output. The 125 W TDP indicates a mid-range power envelope for a desktop part of this capability. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. Release date was October 16, 2023, and the launch MSRP is $319.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a strong single-core score of 4270 in PassMark and 2064 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggests the i5-14600K can feed modern GPUs with high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The 90th percentile overall CPU standing means it ranks among the top 10% of processors, which typically correlates with consistent high-refresh performance. However, the associated GPU in this pairing is a limiting factor, as detailed in later sections.

Streaming: The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. A PassMark multi-thread score of 38682 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous encoding and gameplay without overwhelming all available threads. The data compression score of 482020 further supports efficient handling of stream data. Users can allocate a few threads to encoding while maintaining gameplay responsiveness.

Video editing: Multi-core scores of 24491 in Cinebench R23 and 16673 in Geekbench multi-core suggest strong rendering performance in video editing applications that leverage many cores. The floating-point math score of 92794 indicates solid processing of transforms and effects. Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering benefit from the balanced single-thread score of 4270. Export times in 4K projects should be competitive with other processors in the 90th percentile.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 is a direct indicator of CPU-based render performance in applications like Blender or V-Ray. This places the CPU within 0.8% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and 0.2% of the Xeon Gold 5318H, meaning render times will be nearly identical to those parts. The 20 threads allow for efficient bucket rendering across scenes. For GPU-based rendering, the paired GPU's compute score becomes relevant, as discussed later.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from high multi-thread scores. The PassMark integer math score of 125737 and data encryption score of 27533 indicate fast handling of code compilation, linking, and cryptographic operations. The single-thread score of 4270 ensures responsive IDE interactions and quick incremental builds. The 90th percentile ranking means developers working with large codebases will see shorter build times than most other systems.

Student and office work: Productivity applications such as spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers are primarily single-threaded. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 and PassMark single-thread score of 4270 place this CPU firmly in high-performance territory for these tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a display solution without a discrete GPU, though this build includes one. For multitasking across many browser tabs and office documents, the 20 threads ensure smooth operation.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory type based on platform cost and performance goals. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for consumer desktop platforms. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for current and next-generation GPUs and NVMe storage.

The CPU's 125 W TDP, paired with the GPU's 43 W TDP, results in a combined thermal profile that is modest by desktop standards. The GPU's suggested PSU is 200 W, which indicates the entire system can run on a modest power supply. This leaves substantial headroom for overclocking the CPU, given its unlocked multiplier, or for adding additional storage drives and peripherals without requiring a PSU upgrade.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the bottleneck. If the user finds gaming performance limited by the GPU, upgrading to a higher-tier Radeon RX 7000 series card would be straightforward, given the PCIe Gen 5 slot. If CPU-bound workloads become limiting, the Socket 1700 platform supports other 14th-generation parts, though the i5-14600K already sits in the 90th percentile. Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5, or higher-speed DDR5 kits, could improve memory-sensitive workloads. The ECC memory support is an unusual feature for a consumer chip and may appeal to users running memory-intensive computations.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a desktop builder seeking strong CPU performance with a modest GPU. The i5-14600K's 90th percentile CPU standing makes it suitable for professionals and enthusiasts who prioritize processor-heavy tasks. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will find the multi-core scores compelling, though they should note the GPU's limited compute capability of 5152 in PassMark GPU compute may bottleneck GPU-accelerated effects.

Gamers at 1080p with competitive or less demanding titles may find this sufficient, but the GPU's 17th percentile standing among all GPUs means it will struggle with modern AAA games at high settings. Students and office workers building a general-purpose desktop will experience excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks, with the CPU delivering single-thread performance in the top decile. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and light server duties will benefit from the ECC memory support and the high data compression score of 482020.

The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for entry-level gaming at 1080p with reduced settings. Users who play older or indie titles, or who use the system primarily for CPU-heavy workloads, will find the pairing balanced. Those expecting high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look at a stronger GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 54, placing it in the middle of all tracked desktop configurations. This reflects a substantial imbalance: the CPU sits in the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 17th percentile. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 48618, with nearest rivals within a 1% band. The GPU's average benchmark score is 2467, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon 8040S at 2440 (1.1% lower), NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 2433 (1.4% lower), Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2425 (1.8% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M at 2422 (1.9% lower).

The GPU's benchmark scores show a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1103. PassMark DirectX tests show 176 in DirectX 9, 97 in DirectX 11, 59 in DirectX 10, and 44 in DirectX 12. The PassMark G3D score is 11897, while G2D is 1209. GPU compute scores 5152. These numbers indicate the GPU is positioned near entry-level integrated graphics in terms of raw performance, despite being a discrete card.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores suggest it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU's low percentile ranking means frame rates will be constrained by the graphics card.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K sits in the 90th percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database, meaning it outperforms approximately 90% of processors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 48618 is 0.2% below the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698), 0.3% above the AMD EPYC 4345P (48470), 0.7% above the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287), and 0.8% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 sits in the 17th percentile among all GPUs, placing it near the bottom of the performance distribution.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600K supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop processors and useful for data integrity in workstation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the total system power requirement?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 200 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 125 W, indicating a modest overall system power draw suitable for a mid-range power supply.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a stark imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking places it among the top 10% of all processors, while the GPU's 17th percentile ranking places it among the bottom 17% of all graphics cards. This creates a situation where the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost every graphics-intensive workload.

In gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4270 in PassMark ensures it can process game logic and physics without bottlenecking. However, the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 44 in PassMark and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 indicate it will struggle to render frames at high settings in modern titles. The GPU is the clear bottleneck for gaming performance.

In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the balance reverses. The GPU's compute score of 5152 in PassMark is low, but many rendering and encoding tasks rely primarily on the CPU. The CPU's multi-core scores of 24491 in Cinebench R23 and 38682 in PassMark multi-thread will drive performance in these scenarios. Here, the CPU is the strength, and the GPU contributes little.

For hybrid workloads like video editing with GPU-accelerated effects, the GPU's low compute performance will bottleneck certain operations. The CPU can handle timeline processing and encoding, but GPU-accelerated filters, color grading, and rendering effects will be slow. Users should expect significant slowdowns in GPU-accelerated tasks compared to systems with higher-tier GPUs.

The combined percentile of 54 reflects this imbalance—the system performs well in CPU-heavy tasks but poorly in GPU-heavy tasks. The FPS scaling, if measured, would likely show frame rates consistent with the GPU's 17th percentile standing, meaning low-to-midrange performance at best in gaming.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600K with the AMD Radeon RX 7400. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread part from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process. The GPU is from AMD's Radeon RX 7000 series, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 6 nm process. The combined percentile of 54 places this system in the middle of all tracked desktop configurations.

The CPU is a high-performance part, sitting in the 90th percentile with an average benchmark score of 48618. It competes within 1% of server-class Xeon and EPYC processors, making it a strong choice for CPU-intensive work. The GPU, in contrast, sits in the 17th percentile with an average benchmark score of 2467, placing it near the lowest-performing discrete GPUs in the database.

This pairing is unusual in its extremes. The CPU represents top-tier performance for its generation, while the GPU represents entry-level capability. The result is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but underperforms in graphics-intensive applications. For users whose primary workloads are CPU-heavy—such as software development, data processing, or CPU-based rendering—this build offers strong value in the processor. For gamers or GPU-accelerated workloads, the GPU will be a significant limitation.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a discrete graphics card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 6 nm process. It uses the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not specified.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU operates at a base clock of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. Pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio).

The GPU's benchmark scores indicate entry-level performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 is low, and PassMark DirectX scores range from 176 in DirectX 9 down to 44 in DirectX 12. The PassMark G3D score of 11897 and GPU compute score of 5152 confirm limited compute capability. The GPU sits in the 17th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon 8040S, NVIDIA GeForce 710M, Intel HD Graphics 610, and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M—all within 1.9% of its average score.

The power draw is notably low at 43 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. The card uses a single 6-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

For rendering workloads, the low FP32 throughput of 16.49 TFLOPS and limited 8 GB memory cap the card's ability to handle complex scenes. The ray tracing cores offer some hardware acceleration, but the low overall score suggests limited RT capability. The GPU is better suited for basic display output, light gaming at lower resolutions and settings, and compute tasks that are not performance-critical.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, meaning all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU individually. Users should treat these as rough expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 17th percentile standing and low DirectX benchmark scores, gaming performance will be limited. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 and DirectX 11 score of 97 suggest the card can handle older titles and esports games at 1080p with medium to low settings. The 8 GB memory capacity is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the low bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s may cause stuttering in memory-intensive scenes.

For modern AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, frame rates will likely be low, possibly in the 20-40 FPS range depending on the title. The GPU's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly comparable to entry-level cards from previous generations, placing it below the requirements for smooth high-refresh gaming. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle significantly, with frame rates dropping below playable levels in most demanding titles.

The CPU will not be the bottleneck in gaming. Its 90th percentile ranking and strong single-thread score of 4270 ensure it can feed frames to the GPU without holding back performance. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as games with heavy physics or AI calculations, the i5-14600K will provide ample headroom. However, the GPU's low performance means the system will be GPU-limited in virtually all modern games.

For less demanding titles—indie games, older games, or competitive esports like CS:GO or League of Legends—the GPU may deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings. The CPU's high single-thread performance will help maintain high minimum frame rates in these scenarios. Users should expect a playable but not impressive gaming experience, with the GPU being the primary constraint.