SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i5-14600K and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT represents a high-performance desktop configuration aimed at delivering strong 1440p and capable 4K gaming experiences. The data positions this combination in the 88th percentile overall, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of other CPU-GPU pairings in the database. With a measured average of 151.9 FPS across a broad range of titles at various settings, this build demonstrates a clear focus on high-refresh-rate gaming while retaining enough compute power for demanding productivity tasks. The following analysis breaks down the specific strengths, potential bottlenecks, and ideal use cases for this hardware combination, based strictly on the benchmark data available.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. Its configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The CPU also features an integrated UHD Graphics 770 unit, which provides a fallback display output, though the presence of a discrete GPU makes this largely redundant in this build.

Benchmark results for the i5-14600K show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 2064 points in single-core and 24491 points in multi-core tests. The single-core score is particularly strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that rely on a few fast cores. The multi-core score of 24491 is substantial, suggesting that the 20 threads are effectively utilized in heavily threaded applications. This is reinforced by a Geekbench multi-core score of 16673 and a single-core score of 2491.

Further analysis of the Passmark suite reveals specific strengths. The processor achieves a high floating-point math score of 92794 and an integer math score of 125737, indicating robust number-crunching capability. Data encryption scores are also notable at 27533, and extended instruction scores reach 28546. The multi-threaded Passmark score of 38682 confirms that the CPU is a capable workhorse for parallel tasks. The processor holds a 90th percentile rank among all CPUs, placing it in the top tier of available processors. When compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600K is virtually neck-and-neck with the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, which has an average score of 48698, a marginal 0.2% difference. It also edges out the AMD EPYC 4345P by 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX by 0.7%, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.8%. This places the i5-14600K in a highly competitive performance bracket, where its architectural efficiency and high clock speeds give it an edge in latency-sensitive tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this build is one of high capability across both CPU and GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's average benchmark score is 48618, while the GPU's average is 48477. The processor sits in the 90th percentile, while the graphics card sits in the 85th percentile. This close alignment in average scores suggests a well-matched pair where neither component is dramatically outclassing the other, though the CPU holds a slight percentile advantage. The build's combined percentile is 88, reflecting that this pairing is stronger than 88% of all recorded system configurations.

Looking at specific GPU benchmarks, the Radeon RX 6800 XT shows its DirectX 12 performance with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689. Its compute capabilities are highlighted by a Geekbench OpenCL score of 171304 and a Vulkan score of 136875. The GPU also achieves a significant Passmark G3D score of 24980. In terms of its competitive positioning, the RX 6800 XT is 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile but 2.5% behind the Intel Arc A550M. More notably, it is 3% behind both the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 in average score, indicating that while it is a strong performer, there are newer or differently-tuned cards that edge it out in synthetic tests.

The CPU and GPU scores together paint a picture of a system that is balanced for high-end gaming. The CPU's strong single-threaded performance ensures that game logic and physics are handled efficiently, while its multi-threaded capabilities allow for smooth background tasks like streaming or recording. The GPU's substantial compute resources ensure that visual fidelity and resolution scaling are not compromised. The result is a system that can handle the most demanding modern titles at high settings without a significant performance deficit in either processing or rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a generally well-balanced system, but workload-dependent bottlenecks are apparent. In CPU-intensive scenarios, the i5-14600K's 90th percentile ranking means it is less likely to be the limiting factor for most users. However, the GPU's 85th percentile is slightly lower, implying that at lower resolutions, the graphics card may become the primary constraint in achieving extremely high frame rates. For example, in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p, the system achieves 236 FPS, but at 1440p this drops to 156 FPS, and at 4K to 87 FPS. This scaling shows that as resolution increases, the GPU's workload grows, and the CPU's performance headroom becomes less relevant.

Conversely, in games that are heavily single-threaded or have poor multi-core optimization, the CPU could become a bottleneck. The i5-14600K's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2064 is excellent, but the data from games like Red Dead Redemption 2 shows a significant drop from 61.1 FPS at 1080p to 34 FPS at 4K. This indicates that while the CPU is powerful, the GPU is being pushed to its limits at higher resolutions. The pair's rank of 1140 out of 3732 pairs for average FPS across games, with an average of 151.9 FPS, places it in the top 30% of all recorded pairings, confirming that neither component is severely holding back the other in most scenarios.

The FPS scaling across resolutions provides the clearest evidence of balance. At 1080p, the system often delivers frame rates well above 144 Hz for competitive titles, such as 535 FPS in Valorant and 519.6 FPS in CS:GO. At 1440p, these numbers remain high, with Valorant at 462 FPS and CS:GO at 357 FPS. The drop to 4K is more pronounced, but many games still remain playable, such as Call of Duty: Warzone at 125 FPS. The pattern indicates a system that is slightly more CPU-bound at 1080p, where the GPU has spare capacity, and becomes more GPU-bound at higher resolutions. For a user aiming for maximum refresh rates at 1080p, the GPU is the limiting factor. For a user targeting 4K, the GPU will determine the playable settings.

Who Should Build It

This system is an excellent fit for a desktop user who prioritizes high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and wants to retain the ability to play at 4K with adjusted settings. The measured FPS data for 1440p shows that most modern titles run at frame rates exceeding 60 FPS, with many competitive titles exceeding 144 FPS. For esports players, the 1080p and 1440p performance in titles like Valorant, Counter-Strike 2, and Rainbow Six Siege is exceptional, with frame rates of 535, 236, and 281 at 1080p respectively. This makes the build ideal for gamers who demand smooth, responsive gameplay.

Content creators and software developers will also find this build compelling. The CPU's 20 threads and high multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (24491) and Geekbench (16673) make it suitable for video editing, 3D rendering, and compiling code. The GPU's compute performance, as shown by its OpenCL score of 171304, can accelerate rendering tasks in applications that support GPU acceleration. For a small business workstation, the combination of a fast CPU and a powerful GPU allows for efficient multitasking and handling of complex datasets. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a notable feature for such a workstation, providing a level of data integrity that is not commonly found in consumer desktop processors.

Students and general office users would find this build to be overkill for basic tasks like word processing or web browsing, but it provides a future-proof platform for more demanding applications, such as simulation software or data analysis tools. The system's strong performance in data compression (Passmark score of 482020) and encryption (27533) makes it suitable for roles that involve handling large files or secure data transfers. Ultimately, this build is for users who want a single system that can excel in both gaming and professional productivity without compromise.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For competitive and fast-paced games, this pairing delivers exceptional performance. At 1080p, titles like Valorant (535 FPS) and CS:GO (519.6 FPS) run at frame rates that far exceed the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. Even at 1440p, these games maintain over 300 FPS, ensuring a significant competitive advantage.

Streaming: The i5-14600K's 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding a stream while gaming. The high multi-core scores (24491 in Cinebench R23) allow for simultaneous game execution and software encoding without a major performance hit. The GPU's compute capability can also be used for hardware encoding, offloading the work from the CPU.

Video Editing: The combination of a strong CPU and GPU is ideal for video editing workloads. The CPU's multi-threaded performance handles timeline scrubbing and effects processing, while the GPU accelerates rendering and export times. The system's ability to maintain high FPS in games is indicative of its capacity to handle the real-time preview of high-resolution video.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the i5-14600K's 20 threads will be fully utilized, as evidenced by its high Cinebench scores. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 6800 XT's 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16 GB of VRAM allow for handling complex scenes. The Passmark GPU compute score of 13245 confirms its ability to handle parallel processing tasks.

Software Development: Compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's multi-core performance. The high integer math score (125737) indicates strong processing capability for logical operations. The system's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU ensures fast data transfer to compatible storage devices.

Student and Office Work: While this is a high-end system, it handles standard office tasks with ease. The single-core performance (2491 in Geekbench) ensures snappy application loading and responsiveness. The integrated GPU provides a backup for basic display tasks, though the discrete GPU will handle any graphical acceleration required by presentation or spreadsheet software.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this build, which is based on real-world testing, shows a strong performer across a wide variety of genres. At 1920x1080, the system frequently delivers high frame rates. Esports titles are particularly impressive, with Valorant hitting 535 FPS, CS:GO at 519.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 281 FPS. Even more demanding games like Call of Duty: Warzone run well at 166 FPS, and Control manages 101.1 FPS. The 1080p performance is clearly geared towards high-refresh-rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable. Valorant still achieves 462 FPS, and CS:GO drops to 357 FPS. Warzone maintains a smooth 148 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 156 FPS. More graphically intensive titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 drop to 47 FPS, indicating that for this game, high settings at 1440p will require some adjustments to achieve 60 FPS. The Medium also runs at 42 FPS at this resolution, showing that some AAA titles will stress the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the system's performance is more variable. Competitive titles remain playable, with Valorant at 369 FPS and CS:GO at 213.6 FPS. Warzone still delivers a very playable 125 FPS. However, many AAA titles drop below 60 FPS. For example, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 34 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended at 11 FPS, and The Medium at 33 FPS. This indicates that 4K gaming is possible, but it will require lower settings for the most demanding titles. Games like Doom (58.4 FPS) and Assetto Corsa (59 FPS) are right at the edge of playability at 4K with ultra settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The build is in the 88th percentile, meaning it outperforms 88% of all recorded system configurations in the database.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score, and how does it compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 48618. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P.

Q: How much VRAM does the Radeon RX 6800 XT have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the measured average FPS for this pair across all tested games?

A: The pair has a measured average of 151.9 FPS across the tested games, and it ranks 1140th out of 3732 pairs for average FPS.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this system?

A: The data specifies a suggested PSU of 700 W for the power supply.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all other GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is in the 85th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600K supports ECC memory, a feature often used in workstations for data integrity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build centered on the Intel Core i5-14600K processor and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread part from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is from the Radeon RX 6000 series, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture. Together, they form a high-performance pairing that is in the 88th percentile overall. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 85th percentile ranking show a slight edge toward the processor in terms of raw capability. This is a system designed for high-end gaming and demanding productivity tasks, with a clear emphasis on delivering high frame rates at 1440p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides flexibility in platform choice, allowing builders to use either older, more affordable DDR4 memory or newer, faster DDR5 modules. The CPU also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is the latest standard for connecting GPUs and NVMe storage. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 300 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W to handle the combined load.

As a potential upgrade path, the data indicates that the CPU is already near the top of its performance class, matching or slightly beating rivals like the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and AMD EPYC 4345P. A sensible next upgrade would be to focus on the GPU, as the RX 6800 XT is in the 85th percentile and is outperformed by cards like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 in average score. However, the platform itself is mature, and the primary upgrade would be to the graphics card. The CPU's support for ECC memory and its strong multi-threaded performance suggest it can remain relevant for several years.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is a high-end graphics card based on the Navi 21 chip and RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 4608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, and 128 ROPs. The card is equipped with 72 ray tracing cores, providing dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing effects. It has a base clock of 1825 MHz, a game clock of 2015 MHz, and a boost clock of 2250 MHz. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at an effective speed of 16 Gbps across a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

In terms of compute performance, the GPU delivers 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 41.47 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. Its pixel rate is 288.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 648.0 GTexel/s. Benchmark scores confirm its capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3689 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 171304 and Vulkan score of 136875 show its compute and API efficiency. The Passmark G3D score of 24980 places it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is 1.5% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile but 3% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. For rendering tasks, the combination of 16 GB of VRAM and high compute throughput makes it suitable for handling large textures and complex scenes, though the RTX 5070 Ti's higher average score suggests it may be more efficient in some modern workloads.