SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that lands in the 81st combined percentile of all benchmarked CPU-GPU combinations. The processor, built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and 10 nm process, offers a 14-core, 20-thread configuration with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache support a wide range of workloads, while the chip's 125 W TDP suggests it is a mainstream part rather than a power-hungry flagship. The GPU, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and 7 nm process, brings 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, with a 12 GB GDDR6 memory pool on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This combination of a high-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU creates a system that is clearly CPU-forward, a fact that becomes evident in the benchmark and gaming data.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-14600K is a hybrid design in the Raptor Lake family, though the data does not specify performance versus efficiency core counts. With 14 cores and 20 threads, it is built for heavy multi-threading, and its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result; the nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4345P, scores 48470 in average benchmark score, a mere 0.3% behind, while the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 0.2% ahead. The single-core performance is equally telling: the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 and Geekbench single-core result of 2491 indicate excellent responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is the headline figure here, driving high frame rates in games that rely on a few fast cores.

Real-world implications are clear. The Passmark multithread score of 38682 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13709 show that video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be handled with ease. The data encryption score of 27533 and compression score of 482020 further suggest strong performance in data-heavy tasks like archiving and database operations. The floating-point math score of 92794 and integer math score of 125737 reinforce the idea that this is a versatile compute engine, not just a gaming chip. The L3 cache of 24 MB shared across the die helps reduce memory latency, which benefits both gaming and productivity. With ECC memory support and DDR4/DDR5 compatibility, the CPU is flexible for various system builds, though the data does not specify memory bandwidth figures. The 257 mm² die size and 10 nm process node indicate a dense, modern design, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the data does not provide overclocked results.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 48618, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 0.2% ahead, the AMD EPYC 4345P is 0.3% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX is 0.7% behind. This means the i5-14600K is effectively at parity with server-class and newer mobile parts, which is impressive for a desktop mid-range chip. The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 26011, sits in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are curious: the AMD Radeon R9 M395X is 0.5% ahead, the AMD FirePro W7100 is 0.6% ahead, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 1.1% ahead. These are older or mobile parts, suggesting the RX 6750 XT is a solid but not spectacular performer in synthetic tests.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is a top-10% performer, while the GPU is a top-29% performer. The pair's combined percentile of 81 reflects this gap, meaning the CPU is likely to outpace the GPU in most scenarios. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2548, which is a modest result for a 12 GB card. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20700 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 16360 confirm its mid-range status. The average FPS across all tested games is 128, and the pair ranks 1679 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 45% of all pairings. This is a workable gaming system, but the CPU's headroom is not fully utilized in GPU-bound scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the Navi 22 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, using TSMC's 7 nm process. It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth—sufficient for 1440p gaming but not exceptional for 4K. The base clock is 2150 MHz, with a boost clock of 2600 MHz and a game clock of 2495 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. With 40 ray tracing cores, the card has dedicated RT hardware, though the data does not provide tensor cores (this is an AMD card, so those are absent). The FP32 performance is 13.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1), which gives it decent compute power for AI-adjacent tasks, though the lack of tensor cores limits its deep learning acceleration.

For rendering, the pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s indicate that the card can fill frames quickly at lower resolutions. The Passmark G2D score of 972 is low, suggesting 2D desktop performance is not a focus. In DirectX 12, the Passmark score is 80, while DirectX 11 scores 180 and DirectX 9 scores 263—these numbers are difficult to compare across APIs, but they suggest the card is not optimized for legacy APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 is the most modern indicator, and it is below average for a card in the 71st percentile. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 98089 is stronger, indicating good compute performance in Vulkan workloads. The card's 250 W TDP and suggested 600 W PSU means it requires a decent power supply, but the 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin connectors are standard for this class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data strongly indicates a CPU-bound system. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 71st percentile creates a 19-point gap, meaning the processor is capable of feeding the GPU far more data than the GPU can process in many scenarios. This is evident in the gaming FPS scaling: at 1080p, the average FPS across games is 128, but at 1440p, it drops to around 80-90 for many titles, and at 4K, it falls to 40-50. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p is not linear, suggesting the GPU becomes the limiter at higher resolutions. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 197 at 1080p to 130.2 at 1440p, a 34% reduction, while in Cyberpunk 2077, it drops from 59.7 to 41.1, a 31% reduction. This is typical of GPU-bound behavior.

However, in lighter games like Valorant, the CPU dominates: at 1080p, the FPS is 447.3, and at 1440p, it is 380.4, a mere 15% drop, indicating the CPU is still driving the frame rate. The pair's rank of 1679 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 128, shows that this is a mid-pack performer. The bottleneck analysis suggests that for competitive esports titles, the CPU is the star, but for AAA games at 1440p or 4K, the GPU holds the system back. The 12 GB VRAM is ample for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, games like Ark: Survival Ascended (6.7 FPS) and The Medium (27 FPS) show severe limitations, confirming the GPU is the weak link at high resolutions.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings reveals a clear pattern. At 1080p, the system excels in esports and lighter titles: Valorant hits 447.3 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 431.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege manages 232 FPS. These are excellent numbers for high-refresh monitors. Minecraft runs at 192 FPS, and Roblox at 252 FPS, showing strong performance in popular multiplayer games. However, AAA titles at 1080p are more demanding: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 59.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 50.5 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 30.7 FPS. These are playable but not smooth on high-refresh displays.

At 1440p, the picture worsens. Valorant still hits 380.4 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 41.1 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 40.2 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 147.8 FPS, but Control drops to 62 FPS. At 4K, the system struggles: most AAA games fall below 40 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 27.2 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26.2 FPS. The only games that remain playable at 4K are lighter titles like Valorant (303.1 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (70.1 FPS). The data shows that this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with high refresh rates, or 1440p gaming at medium-to-high settings, but 4K gaming is only viable for esports or older titles.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the system is a powerhouse. The 447.3 FPS in Valorant and 431.6 FPS in CS:GO mean that 240 Hz monitors can be fully utilized in competitive shooters. The 197 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 232 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege further confirm this. For streaming, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads handle encoding well, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491, which is 90th percentile, allowing simultaneous gaming and encoding without major frame drops. Video editing is also strong, with the Passmark multithread score of 38682 and data compression score of 482020 supporting fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing.

For 3D rendering, the CPU's performance is excellent, but the GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 is moderate, meaning GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles will be slower than on higher-tier cards. Software development benefits from the CPU's single-core speed (Geekbench single-core 2491) and multi-threading, with the Passmark integer math score of 125737 indicating fast compilation. For student and office work, the system is overkill: the CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 71st percentile provide more than enough power for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the 250 W GPU TDP and 600 W PSU requirement mean it is not an energy-efficient choice for basic tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers at 1080p who prioritize high frame rates over resolution. The 431.6 FPS in CS:GO and 447.3 FPS in Valorant make it ideal for competitive players on 1440p or 1080p high-refresh monitors. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile performance, though the GPU may limit GPU-accelerated rendering. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 125737 integer math score and 24 MB L3 cache. Students and small business users will find the system more than adequate, but the high TDP and PSU requirement make it less suitable for quiet, low-power office builds. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most productivity tasks, but the GPU's 71st percentile rank means it is not a workstation-class card for heavy compute.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-14600K compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 48618, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P, and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX.

Q: Is the RX 6750 XT good for 4K gaming?

A: No. At 4K ultra settings, most AAA games run below 40 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 27.2 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26.2 FPS. Only lighter titles like Valorant (303.1 FPS) remain playable.

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance like?

A: The single-core Cinebench R23 score is 2064, and the Geekbench single-core score is 2491, which is strong for gaming and lightly threaded applications.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 6750 XT has 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, but the data does not provide specific RT benchmark results.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The CPU and GPU together sit in the 81st combined percentile, with a rank of 1679 out of 3732 pairs by FPS.

Q: How much power does the GPU require?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 250 W, and the suggested PSU is 600 W, with power connectors of 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin.

Q: Is the CPU good for video encoding?

A: Yes, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491 and Passmark multithread score of 38682 indicate strong multi-threaded performance for encoding tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is plenty of bandwidth for future GPUs. The 125 W CPU TDP is modest, and the GPU's 250 W TDP with a suggested 600 W PSU leaves headroom for upgrades, though a higher-wattage PSU would be needed for a more powerful GPU. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, but the data does not provide overclocked results. The socket 1700 is the end of the line for Intel's 14th gen, so a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard. However, a sensible next step would be a stronger GPU, such as one with higher FP32 performance, to match the CPU's 90th percentile capability. The system's 12 GB VRAM is adequate now, but future games at 4K may require more.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining Intel's Core i5-14600K with AMD's Radeon RX 6750 XT. The CPU is a top-tier performer in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range part in the 71st percentile. The combined percentile is 81, with an average FPS of 128 across games. The system excels at 1080p gaming and competitive esports, offers strong productivity performance for video editing and software development, but struggles at 4K gaming. The CPU is clearly the dominant component, and the GPU is the limiting factor in high-resolution workloads. This is a balanced system for 1080p or light 1440p gaming, with headroom for CPU-intensive tasks, but it is not a 4K gaming machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600K

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds