SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT form a desktop pairing that lands in the 78th combined percentile, with the CPU sitting at the 90th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 65th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a configuration where the processor is the dominant component, delivering top-tier compute performance while the graphics card provides solid, but not exceptional, rasterization power. The data indicates a system built for high-refresh 1080p gaming and demanding productivity tasks, with 4K gaming being a clear limitation.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 23 chip on a 7 nm process from TSMC. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2055 MHz, a game clock of 2410 MHz, and a boost clock of 2635 MHz, with memory running at 2190 MHz or 17.5 Gbps effective. The card contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, producing a pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s. Compute power is rated at 10.79 TFLOPS for FP32 and 21.59 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1).

The GPU includes 32 ray accelerators, which provide hardware support for DirectX Raytracing, but the absence of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated features are not available. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics APIs. The 8 GB VRAM capacity and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p rendering, but the data shows that at 4K resolution, memory capacity and bandwidth constraints become apparent, leading to significant frame rate drops across multiple titles.

Benchmark results place the GPU at the 65th percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 19765. In the PassMark G3D test, it scores 17166, while in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 it scores 1859. The Geekbench Vulkan score is 81306, and the OpenCL score is 10111. Compared to its nearest rivals, the GPU is nearly identical in performance: it trails the NVIDIA Tesla K40m by 0.6% (19885 vs 19765), leads the AMD FirePro D300 by 0.7% (19637), trails the AMD FirePro W7000 by 0.7% (19905), and leads the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 by 0.8% (19602). These deltas are minuscule, indicating that the RX 6650 XT sits in a very competitive performance band with these older workstation cards, though its modern feature set and driver support give it an edge in current titles.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 compute of 10.79 TFLOPS and the 337.3 GTexel/s texture rate are respectable for real-time graphics, but the 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for complex scenes with high-resolution textures. The GPU's PassMark compute score of 7532 suggests moderate compute capability, which is adequate for light 3D rendering but not for professional-grade workloads. The lack of tensor cores also means no dedicated AI upscaling or denoising hardware, which is a consideration for ray-traced rendering.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark results are consistently strong across all tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3640 multi-core and 297 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 13709 multi-core and 1935 single-core. The more demanding Cinebench R23 test yields 24491 multi-core and 2064 single-core. Geekbench results show 16673 multi-core and 2491 single-core. PassMark tests are equally impressive: multithread score is 38682, single-thread is 4270, integer math is 125737, floating-point math is 92794, and extended instructions score 28546. The CPU's average benchmark score is 48618, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals show how tightly contested this performance tier is. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, 0.7% lower, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, 0.8% higher. These tiny deltas mean the i5-14600K is effectively performance-equivalent to those workstation and laptop-class chips in aggregate benchmarks, though its specific strengths in single-threaded tasks (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2064) are notable.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19765, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1859 and a PassMark G3D score of 17166. Its percentile position of 65 is significantly lower than the CPU's 90, which is the central fact of this pairing. The combined percentile is 78, reflecting that the CPU is the performance anchor. The measured FPS data confirms this: across all games tested, the average FPS is 108.3 at ultra settings, ranking 2316 out of 3732 pairs. This means the system delivers playable frame rates at 1080p in most titles, but the GPU holds back the CPU's potential in demanding scenarios.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 65th percentile performance caps the overall experience. In games where the CPU is the bottleneck, the system excels; in GPU-bound titles, the RX 6650 XT becomes the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The system is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming. Measured FPS at 1920x1080 ultra settings shows 370 FPS in Valorant, 355.4 FPS in CS:GO, 209 FPS in Roblox, 193.7 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege X, and 192 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege. These scores are far above the 144 Hz threshold, making this a strong choice for competitive shooters. At 1440p, these titles still deliver 316 FPS in Valorant and 244.5 FPS in CS:GO, indicating headroom for high-refresh 1440p monitors in esports.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 38682, provide ample processing power for software encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 suggests that x264 encoding at medium preset is feasible without significant frame drops. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute are sufficient for rendering the game, but streaming at 1080p60 should be handled by the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance.

Video editing: The CPU's high multi-core scores, particularly the PassMark multithread of 38682 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24491, make this a capable video editing machine. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 168.6 GPixel/s pixel rate can handle 1080p timeline rendering and effects, but 4K editing with heavy color grading will strain the VRAM. The PassMark data compression score of 482020 indicates fast file handling for media assets.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13709, are excellent for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU's 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 337.3 GTexel/s texture rate support GPU-accelerated rendering in real-time viewports, but the 8 GB VRAM limits the size of scenes that can be rendered without tiling.

Software development: The CPU's single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2491 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2064, ensures fast compilation and responsive IDE interaction. The PassMark integer math score of 125737 is particularly relevant for code compilation, and the 24 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is adequate for development, with 918 in PassMark G2D for desktop rendering.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for standard office tasks, but the CPU's 90th percentile performance ensures no lag in any productivity suite. The PassMark single-thread score of 4270 means spreadsheet calculations and document rendering are instantaneous. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is unavailable, though the RX 6650 XT handles all display output duties in normal operation.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer chips. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, though the RX 6650 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is more than sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 176 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves significant headroom for a more powerful GPU, as the total system draw with a high-end card would still be within a 650-750 W PSU range.

The upgrade path is straightforward: the CPU is the strong point, so a GPU upgrade is the most sensible next step. The data shows the GPU is the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, so moving to a higher-tier card would unlock the CPU's full potential. For example, the CPU's 90th percentile performance can drive much higher FPS than the RX 6650 XT provides in GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (48.5 FPS at 1080p) or Red Dead Redemption 2 (45.5 FPS at 1080p). A GPU with more VRAM and higher compute would also enable 1440p high-refresh gaming, which the current card only achieves in less demanding titles.

The socket is at the end of its life for new CPU releases, but the i5-14600K is a top-tier option for this platform. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose based on budget and motherboard selection. The CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache are future-proof for several years of gaming and productivity. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future storage devices and accelerators will have sufficient bandwidth, though the GPU's x8 connection is a minor limitation for very high-end cards.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has a dual-channel memory bus, and includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the launch MSRP is $319.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 and Geekbench single-core of 2491 place it among the fastest consumer CPUs for lightly-threaded tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4270 confirms this. For multi-threaded work, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and PassMark multithread of 38682 show that the 14 cores and 20 threads are effectively utilized. The PassMark integer math score of 125737 and floating-point math of 92794 indicate strong ALU and FPU performance, which translates to fast scientific computing and financial modeling.

The 24 MB of L3 cache is a key advantage for gaming and data-heavy workloads, as it reduces memory latency and improves hit rates. The DDR5 memory support, when paired with high-speed modules, further enhances memory bandwidth, though the dual-channel bus limits the maximum throughput compared to HEDT platforms. The ECC memory support is a rare feature for consumer CPUs, making this chip suitable for entry-level workstations where data integrity is critical.

The data compression score of 482020 and encryption score of 27533 show that the CPU is very fast at file archiving and encryption tasks, making it a good choice for content creators who handle large media files. The extended instructions score of 28546 indicates strong SIMD performance, which benefits video encoding and 3D rendering. The find prime numbers score of 162 is relatively low, but this is a synthetic test that does not reflect typical workloads.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data is measured, and the FPS figures are actual results from the specified game and resolution settings. At 1920x1080 ultra settings, the system delivers high frame rates in esports titles: Valorant at 370 FPS, CS:GO at 355.4 FPS, Rainbow Six Siege X at 193.7 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 161 FPS. Minecraft runs at 159 FPS, and Roblox at 209 FPS. These are well above the 144 Hz refresh rate, making the system ideal for competitive gaming.

For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the performance is playable but not exceptional. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 168.1 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 94.9 FPS, and Control at 68.9 FPS. However, demanding titles show the GPU's limitations: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 48.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 45.5 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 24 FPS. These scores are below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay, indicating that settings must be reduced for a fluid experience.

At 2560x1440 ultra, the frame rates drop significantly. Valorant still manages 316 FPS, CS:GO at 244.5 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X at 126.2 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 150.4 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 34.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 15 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-detail 1440p in modern AAA titles.

At 3840x2160 ultra, the system struggles. Valorant still runs at 252 FPS, and CS:GO at 147.4 FPS, but most games fall below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 24 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 23.3 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 126.9 FPS. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming is not viable at ultra settings for this GPU, and even 1440p requires reduced settings for demanding titles.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system is CPU-bound in most workloads, as evidenced by the CPU's 90th percentile versus the GPU's 65th percentile. This means the i5-14600K has significant headroom that the RX 6650 XT cannot fully utilize. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles at 1080p, the GPU is sufficient to render the frames, and the CPU's high single-core performance ensures high FPS. However, in GPU-bound scenarios, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K confirms this imbalance. For example, in Valorant, the FPS drops from 370 at 1080p to 316 at 1440p to 252 at 4K, showing that the CPU can maintain high frame rates even at 4K, but the GPU's rendering capacity is the constraint. In Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 48.5 at 1080p to 34.3 at 1440p to 24 at 4K, indicating that the GPU is severely limited by its compute and VRAM at higher resolutions.

The PassMark G3D score of 17166 versus the CPU's PassMark multithread of 38682 shows a 2.2x difference in raw performance, which is typical for a mid-range GPU paired with a high-end CPU. This imbalance is not inherently bad; it means the system is future-proof for GPU upgrades. The data shows that upgrading the GPU would yield substantial FPS improvements in GPU-bound titles, while the CPU would not need to be upgraded for several generations.

The pair rank of 2316 out of 3732, with an average FPS of 108.3, indicates that this combination performs better than the median pair, but not by a wide margin. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU, as evidenced by the dramatic FPS drops in demanding titles at 1440p and 4K. For a balanced system, a GPU with a higher percentile (e.g., 75th or above) would better complement the CPU's capabilities.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is 78, placing it in the upper quartile of all desktop system pairings.

Q: How much faster is the RX 6650 XT compared to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla K40m?

A: The RX 6650 XT scores 19765 in average benchmark, which is 0.6% lower than the Tesla K40m's 19885. The difference is negligible, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the maximum FPS recorded in any game at 1080p ultra settings?

A: The highest measured FPS at 1920x1080 ultra is 370 FPS in Valorant, followed by 355.4 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600K supports ECC memory, which is a feature not commonly found on consumer desktop processors.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6650 XT is 450 W, which accounts for the GPU's 176 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP.

Q: How does the CPU perform in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The CPU scores 24491 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a strong result indicating excellent multi-threaded performance for rendering and compilation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's pixel rate in GPixel/s?

A: The RX 6650 XT has a pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s, which helps determine its fill rate capability for high-resolution rendering.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This system is ideal for competitive gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p. The measured FPS in esports titles—370 FPS in Valorant, 355.4 FPS in CS:GO, and 193.7 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege X—makes it a top choice for players with 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors. For gamers who play at 1440p, the system is still viable for esports but requires reduced settings for AAA titles, as shown by the 34.3 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p ultra. 4K gaming is not recommended, as most demanding titles fall below 30 FPS.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 ensures fast exports, and the PassMark data compression score of 482020 speeds up file handling. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing, but 4K projects will require a GPU upgrade.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core of 2491) for fast compilation and the 24 MB L3 cache for large codebases. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity in server-like workloads. The system is also suitable for students and office workers, though it is overkill for basic tasks; the 90th percentile CPU performance ensures no lag in any productivity application.

For small business workstations, this system provides reliable performance for database management, financial modeling, and light CAD work. The CPU's integer math score of 125737 and floating-point math of 92794 are strong indicators of computational capability. The GPU's 65th percentile performance is adequate for 2D design and basic 3D modeling, but specialized workloads may require more VRAM. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, so buyers should consider availability, but the CPU is active and fully supported.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600K

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds