SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets a specific niche: high-efficiency workstation performance in a small form factor. The CPU is a 14-core Raptor Lake Refresh part, while the GPU is a 70W professional card with 20GB of memory. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical results.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate expectations below are estimates inferred from the CPU's and GPU's benchmark scores and their percentile positions, not from direct testing.

At 1080p, this pairing should handle esports titles well. The CPU's single-core performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2424. These figures indicate high per-thread throughput, which is critical for frame pacing in competitive games. The GPU, while not a gaming-first card, still sits in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, suggesting it can push respectable frame rates at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a FP32 throughput of 19.17 TFLOPS, which is modest compared to desktop gaming GPUs. The 20GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 280.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample for texture-heavy scenes, but the raw compute power may hold back frame rates in demanding AAA titles. Expect medium-to-high settings at this resolution to be the sweet spot.

At 4K, the story shifts further toward the GPU as the bottleneck. The 6144 shading units and 64 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s, which is workable but not exceptional for 4K gaming. The CPU's multi-core muscle, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464, will not compensate for GPU limitations at this resolution. High-refresh 4K gaming is unrealistic; 60 FPS on medium settings is a more plausible estimate for less demanding games.

The GPU's architecture is Ada Lovelace, which supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This means modern rendering features like ray tracing and mesh shaders are available. However, with only 48 RT cores, ray-traced performance will be moderate. The 192 tensor cores can enable DLSS, which could boost frame rates in supported titles, but the card is designed for professional workloads, not gaming.

Overall, this is not a high-refresh gaming rig. It is a workstation that can play games acceptably at 1080p and 1440p, but gamers seeking maximum FPS should look elsewhere. The estimates suggest a capable 1080p machine and a decent 1440p machine, with 4K reserved for less demanding or older titles.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. This provides flexibility for builders to choose based on platform cost and performance preferences.

Q: What is the TDP of the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, and what PSU is recommended?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 70 W and the suggested PSU is 250 W. This low power draw is unusual for a GPU and makes it ideal for compact systems with limited power delivery.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900KS?

A: The Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, which is only 0.5% lower than the Core i9-12900KS's score of 45094. The two processors are effectively performance equals in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is substantial for professional applications like large dataset processing and AI inference.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 includes UHD Graphics 770. This can be useful for troubleshooting or for systems that do not require a discrete GPU for basic display output.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This supports modern high-bandwidth expansion cards, including the GPU which uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon PRO W7700?

A: The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has an average score of 117088, which is 1.6% lower than the Radeon PRO W7700's score of 118976. The two workstation GPUs are very close in aggregate performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 sits on the LGA 1700 socket, which is a mature platform. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders the choice between older, cheaper memory and newer, faster modules. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class of processor. PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes means the platform is ready for high-bandwidth storage and future expansion cards, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a low-power card with a 70 W TDP and no external power connectors. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is very low for a system with this level of performance. This makes the pairing highly efficient and suitable for small form factor cases with limited cooling and power budgets. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 168 mm in length and 69 mm in height, so it will fit in most compact chassis.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be more memory, especially if the build uses DDR4. The CPU's multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 30464, benefits from larger memory capacity in multitasking scenarios. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU support the fastest NVMe drives available, which can reduce load times in applications that read large files.

The GPU's low power draw means the PSU has headroom for other components. A 250 W PSU is sufficient, but upgrading to a slightly larger unit, such as a 350 W or 400 W model, would allow for additional drives or fans without strain. The platform does not support CPU overclocking, as the multiplier is locked, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high.

For a future GPU upgrade, the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is compatible with most modern cards, but the system's power delivery would need to be increased significantly for a higher-TDP GPU. The current setup is optimized for efficiency, so a substantial upgrade would require a new PSU and potentially a larger case. The CPU, however, has enough performance headroom to drive a faster GPU in gaming, as its 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs suggests.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU in this pairing is tilted toward the CPU for gaming workloads. The Core i5-14600 ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. This suggests the GPU is the stronger component on a relative basis. However, the GPU's design goals are professional rendering and compute, not gaming FPS.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as simulation games or physics-heavy titles, the i5-14600 excels. Its PassMark physics score of 2330 and integer math score of 117078 indicate strong computational throughput. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle background tasks and game logic well. The GPU will not be a bottleneck in these situations.

In GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's modest FP32 performance of 19.17 TFLOPS becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 70 W TDP and low clock speeds (base 720 MHz, boost 1560 MHz) are designed for efficiency, not raw gaming power. The 6144 shading units are numerous, but they run at lower clocks than gaming GPUs, reducing effective throughput.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this imbalance. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300) can feed the GPU adequately. At 4K, the GPU's pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.5 GTexel/s are insufficient for high frame rates, making the GPU the clear bottleneck.

For professional workloads, the balance is more even. The CPU's multi-core score of 30464 in Cinebench R23 handles rendering and compilation tasks, while the GPU's 20GB memory and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth are suited for large datasets. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364 indicate strong compute performance, which complements the CPU's capabilities.

The data suggests that for gaming, the CPU has headroom to spare, and the GPU limits performance. For workstation tasks, the two components are better matched, with the GPU's compute features and the CPU's multi-threading working in tandem.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.70 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is efficient for a desktop CPU with this core count.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache helps with data locality in workloads that benefit from fast access to frequently used data. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a plus for workstation reliability, and it includes UHD Graphics 770 for basic display output.

Benchmark scores confirm the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 30464 multi-core and 4300 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 35848, with a single-thread score of 4167. These numbers place the CPU in the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals illustrate the competitive landscape. The Intel Core i9-12900KS scores 45094, a mere 0.5% higher, meaning the i5-14600 offers nearly identical aggregate performance to an older flagship. The AMD EPYC 4344P is also 0.5% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.7% lower. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is 1% lower. This shows the i5-14600 is positioned at parity with high-end parts from just a generation ago.

For real workloads, the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark data encryption score of 25082 and data compression score of 434620 indicate strong performance in security and archival tasks. The floating point math score of 85759 and integer math score of 117078 show balanced arithmetic capability.

The CPU is not unlocked for overclocking, so the 5.20 GHz boost clock is the maximum out of the box. This is fine for most users, as the stock performance is already high. The 65 W TDP means cooling is straightforward, and the CPU can be paired with a capable air cooler without issue.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is designed for professionals who need workstation-grade performance in a compact, power-efficient system. The GPU's 20GB of memory and 70 W TDP make it ideal for small form factor workstation builds. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures it can handle demanding compute tasks without bottlenecking the GPU.

Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU's multi-core prowess. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 handles 4K video timelines, and the GPU's 20GB memory supports large preview buffers. The combination is well-suited for editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compilation speed. The PassMark multithread score of 35848 indicates fast build times for large codebases. The GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate machine learning inference or data processing tasks, with its Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812.

Students in engineering or data science programs can use this system for coursework. The CPU's 14 cores handle parallel computations, and the GPU's 20GB memory is enough for moderate-sized datasets. The low 250 W PSU requirement means the system is quiet and economical to run.

Small business workstations for CAD, 3D modeling, or financial analysis will find this pairing capable. The GPU's workstation-class drivers and 20GB memory are suited for professional applications. The CPU's ECC memory support adds stability for long-running tasks.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who also do productive work will find this system acceptable, but it is not optimized for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking suggests it is a powerful card, but its architecture prioritizes compute over rasterization. This is a specialized build, not a general-purpose gaming machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not the primary use case. The CPU's single-core score of 4300 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for high frame rates, but the GPU's FP32 performance of 19.17 TFLOPS limits output. Expect smooth gameplay at 1080p in esports titles, but 1440p will struggle to maintain 144 FPS in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads can handle encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 35848 indicates enough headroom for x264 encoding at moderate presets. The GPU's NVENC support, implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture, can offload encoding, though the card's low power draw may limit sustained encode performance.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 for rendering and export. The GPU's 20GB memory is ideal for scrubbing through high-resolution timelines. The 280.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 4K footage, and the 12-bit color support from the display outputs (4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a) is a plus for color-critical work.

3D rendering: The GPU's 6144 shading units and 48 RT cores provide solid performance in GPU-accelerated renderers. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 shows strong compute throughput. The CPU's multi-core score handles CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software, making this a versatile rendering machine.

Software development: Compilation times will be short, thanks to the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 117078 and multithread score of 35848. The GPU can accelerate testing or simulation workloads. The 20GB memory allows for large virtual machines or containers.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic tasks, but it handles them effortlessly. The CPU's single-thread score of 4167 in PassMark ensures snappy application response. The low 70 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP keep power consumption and heat low, making it a quiet and efficient workstation for a dorm room or small office.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14600 with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. The CPU is a mainstream 14-core processor, while the GPU is a professional workstation card with a 70 W TDP. The pairing is unusual, prioritizing efficiency and compute capability over gaming performance.

The combined percentile ranking is 92, indicating this system outperforms the vast majority of builds in the database. The CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile are both high, but the GPU is the standout component. The GPU's 20GB memory and low power draw are its defining features, making it a unique choice for SFF builds.

The system is best described as a compact workstation. It is not a gaming rig, nor is it a high-end server. It sits in the middle, offering strong multi-threaded CPU performance and professional-grade GPU compute in a package that fits in small cases. The total power requirement is low, with a suggested PSU of 250 W, which is remarkable for this level of performance.

For builders seeking a powerful, efficient, and compact system, this pairing is coherent. It sacrifices gaming FPS for workstation features like ECC memory support, 20GB VRAM, and low power consumption. The result is a balanced, specialized tool for professional workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-12900KS, which scores 45094, a delta of -0.5%, meaning the i5-14600 is nearly identical in performance. The AMD EPYC 4344P scores 45122, also -0.5% relative, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.7% lower at 44573. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is 1% lower at 44466.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 117088, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GB10, which scores 117393, a delta of -0.3%. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 scores 118976, which is 1.6% higher. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114395, which is 2.4% lower, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113944, which is 2.8% lower.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. The GPU's 95th percentile versus the CPU's 89th percentile means the GPU is a more exceptional component in its class. The combined percentile of 92 reflects a high-performing build overall.

For the CPU, the key scores are Cinebench R23 multi-core at 30464 and single-core at 4300, Geekbench multi-core at 14680 and single-core at 2424, and PassMark multithread at 35848. For the GPU, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 124812 and the Vulkan score is 109364. These figures, combined with the percentile rankings, indicate a system that excels in multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads, with the GPU providing substantial professional-grade performance.