SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Platform Analysis: Intel Core i5-14600 with NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a desktop-class CPU built on the Raptor Lake architecture, using the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It pairs with a 14-core, 20-thread configuration that includes a 2.70 GHz base clock and a 5.20 GHz boost clock, all within a 65 W TDP. The GPU is an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a Turing-architecture workstation card that is now end-of-life, originally released in 2018. This combination sits at the 78th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU pairings in the database, indicating a solid mid-to-upper tier desktop setup, though it is not a flagship pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform is the foundation here. The Core i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for workstation reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU bandwidth, though the Quadro RTX 5000 itself uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU will not fully utilize the newer PCIe generation, but it will operate without issue in the slot.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 14-core part. The Quadro RTX 5000, by comparison, has a 230 W TDP. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 550 W, which is the figure to reference for power supply headroom. With the CPU's 65 W draw and the GPU's 230 W draw, a 550 W PSU leaves comfortable margin for the rest of the system, including drives, fans, and motherboard. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, so the PSU must have those connectors available.

The integrated graphics on the CPU, UHD Graphics 770, provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. This is a practical safety net for troubleshooting. A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be a higher-core-count Raptor Lake CPU that fits Socket 1700, since the 14-core i5-14600 already sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The motherboard and memory would carry over, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would benefit a newer GPU that uses that interface. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the platform is flexible, but the user must match the motherboard's memory type.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-14600 delivers strong CPU benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 30464 in multi-core and 4300 in single-core. The multi-core result places it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44889 and a percentile of 89 against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900KS (avg score 45094, delta -0.5%), the AMD EPYC 4344P (avg score 45122, delta -0.5%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (avg score 44573, delta +0.7%), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (avg score 44466, delta +1%). The data shows the i5-14600 is essentially on par with the i9-12900KS, within 0.5% of its average score, which is remarkable for a lower-tier SKU. It is slightly ahead of the Ryzen 5 7500X3D by 0.7%.

In Geekbench, the CPU scores 14680 in multi-core and 2424 in single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 35848, a single-thread score of 4167, and strong compute workloads: integer math at 117078, floating-point math at 85759, and extended instructions at 25674. Data compression scores 434620, and data encryption scores 25082. These numbers indicate a CPU that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy tasks efficiently.

The Quadro RTX 5000 GPU, in contrast, shows its age. Its average benchmark score is 21629, placing it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. In Geekbench, it scores 78999 in OpenCL and 92309 in Vulkan. PassMark results are mixed: G3D scores 15616, G2D scores 709, and GPU compute scores 6525. The DirectX tests show 113 in DirectX 10, 140 in DirectX 11, 59 in DirectX 12, and 195 in DirectX 9. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (avg score 21856, delta -1%), the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (avg score 21379, delta +1.2%), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (avg score 21237, delta +1.8%), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (avg score 21153, delta +2.3%). The Quadro RTX 5000 is effectively tied with a GTX 1060 6 GB, which is a mid-range consumer card from years prior. This is a significant performance gap relative to the CPU's position.

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The combined picture is a CPU at the 89th percentile and a GPU at the 67th percentile, yielding an overall pairing percentile of 78. The CPU is the stronger half of this pairing by a wide margin.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-core performance is excellent, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4167, which supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. However, the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 140 and DirectX 12 score of 59 indicate limited graphics headroom. At 1080p with competitive settings, estimated FPS would be moderate, but at higher resolutions or with demanding effects, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The percentile gap between CPU (89th) and GPU (67th) suggests that high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or above is only achievable in less demanding esports titles, not in AAA games at high detail.

Streaming: The CPU has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 35848. This is more than sufficient for software encoding while gaming. The GPU also has 384 tensor cores, which can assist with AI-based encoding tasks, though the older Turing architecture's NVENC is less capable than newer generations. The CPU's headroom means x264 encoding at medium preset is viable without significant frame drops, but the GPU's overall low percentile will cap game FPS, making the stream quality dependent on the game's graphics settings.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and PassMark integer math score of 117078 are strong indicators for video encoding and timeline rendering. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is ample for 4K timelines and effects, but its compute performance, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 6525, is modest. The data suggests that proxy editing and CPU-based rendering will be smooth, while GPU-accelerated effects will be slow. The Turing architecture supports hardware ray tracing and DLSS, but with only 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, these features will not deliver modern performance.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, this CPU excels. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 3070, and R20 multi-core is 12794, indicating strong multi-threaded throughput. The GPU's FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, which is respectable for its era, but the DirectX 12 score of 59 shows poor API efficiency. For renderers that use CUDA or OptiX, the GPU will work, but its performance is near that of a GTX 1060 6 GB (delta -1%), so render times will be long compared to modern workstation GPUs. The 16 GB VRAM is the main advantage for large scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's 20 threads and strong single-core score (Geekbench 2424) handle compilation and code analysis well. The PassMark data compression score of 434620 and encryption score of 25082 show fast file operations, which is useful for large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant for standard development tasks, and its driver stability for compute is a plus, but the 67th percentile means it is not a bottleneck for coding workloads.

Student and Office Work: For office applications, this is overkill. The CPU's single-core performance ensures snappy UI and spreadsheet calculations, and the 65 W TDP means low power draw when idle. The GPU's capabilities are wasted in this scenario, and the 230 W TDP increases system heat. A system with integrated graphics only would suffice, but the presence of the Quadro RTX 5000 does not harm office productivity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the CPU is the dominant component. The i5-14600's 89th percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile creates a significant imbalance. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, video encoding, 3D scene setup — the CPU will run at near-full utilization while the GPU waits. In GPU-bound workloads — high-resolution gaming, GPU rendering, machine learning inference — the GPU will be pegged at 100% while the CPU loafs.

The estimated FPS scaling, based on benchmark scores, indicates that at 1080p, the GPU will limit frame rates in most games, because its DirectX 11 score of 140 is low relative to the CPU's single-thread strength. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's bottleneck becomes even more pronounced. The GPU's nearest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, is a card known for 1080p medium settings in modern games, and this Quadro is within 1% of that performance. Conversely, the CPU's nearest rival is the i9-12900KS, a flagship from a previous generation, meaning the CPU has headroom to drive much faster GPUs.

The practical bottleneck analysis is this: for gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor in almost all scenarios. For productivity, the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU is only used for specific compute tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is a help, but raw GPU throughput is the constraint. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this mixed profile — strong CPU, weak GPU — and suggests that users should prioritize CPU-heavy tasks with this build.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on a 12 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 545 mm² and 13,600 million transistors. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective. The GPU's base clock is 1620 MHz, and the boost clock is 1815 MHz.

The shading units number 3072, with 192 TMUs and 64 ROPs. It has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which provide hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration, respectively. The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores tell a mixed story. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 is strong, suggesting good compute utilization in modern APIs. The passmark G3D score of 15616 is the primary gaming metric, and it places the GPU at the 67th percentile. The DirectX 12 score of 59 is particularly low, indicating poor performance in modern DirectX 12 titles. The DirectX 11 score of 140 is better but still low. The GPU compute score of 6525 is modest.

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is a genuine asset for large scenes and high-resolution textures. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 4K texture streaming but not exceptional. The FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS is adequate for older render engines, but the low DirectX 12 score suggests that newer GPU-accelerated renderers will underperform. The RT and tensor cores enable ray-traced effects and DLSS, but with only 48 RT cores, ray tracing performance will be slow by modern standards. The GPU's end-of-life status and its performance parity with a GTX 1060 6 GB (delta -1%) indicate that this is a legacy card that is best suited for tasks requiring large VRAM rather than raw speed.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and large GPU memory, but who do not require top-tier GPU throughput. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the CPU capable of high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU will limit AAA game performance. Content creators working in video editing or 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM for previewing large projects, but should expect slow GPU rendering times. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compilation speed and the GPU's compute capabilities for local testing of CUDA code, though the older architecture limits modern frameworks.

Students and office workers will find this system massively overpowered for their needs, but the 65 W CPU TDP means it is not a power hog. Small business workstations that rely on CPU-intensive applications — such as financial modeling, data analysis, or engineering simulations — will benefit from the CPU's 89th percentile performance. The GPU's ECC memory support (via the CPU's ECC capability) and 16 GB VRAM are useful for professional visualization tasks, but the low DirectX 12 score means newer software will run poorly. The build is best suited for users who value CPU performance and VRAM capacity over raw GPU speed.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-14600 use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform for Raptor Lake processors.

Q: How much VRAM does the Quadro RTX 5000 have, and what type?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Core i5-14600 scores 30464 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is the GPU's performance closer to a modern or older card?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000's average benchmark score places it within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, indicating it performs like a mid-range card from several years ago.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, with a GPU TDP of 230 W and a CPU TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i5-14600 supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms.

Q: What PCIe generation does the GPU use?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600 (a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake CPU) with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (a Turing-architecture workstation GPU). The CPU is an active production part released in 2024, while the GPU is end-of-life, released in 2018. The combined percentile of 78 places this pairing in the upper-middle tier of the database, with the CPU at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile. The CPU's launch MSRP is $255, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 2,299 USD, though the GPU is no longer sold new. This is a lopsided build: the CPU is a modern, high-performance part, while the GPU is a legacy workstation card with large memory but limited speed. The overall tier is best described as a work-in-progress — a strong CPU foundation with a GPU that is holding back the system's full potential.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.70 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770. The TDP is 65 W.

The benchmark results are consistently strong. Cinebench R15 scores are 3070 multi-core and 433 single-core; R20 scores are 12794 multi-core and 1806 single-core; R23 scores are 30464 multi-core and 4300 single-core. Geekbench scores are 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 35848, a single-thread score of 4167, integer math at 117078, floating-point math at 85759, extended instructions at 25674, data compression at 434620, data encryption at 25082, and physics at 2330.

The 89th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms 89% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900KS, has an average score only 0.5% higher, showing that the i5-14600 offers flagship-level performance from a previous generation at a lower tier. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.7% behind, meaning this Intel chip edges out a modern AMD gaming CPU. For real workloads, this translates to fast compilation times, smooth video encoding, and responsive single-threaded applications. The 65 W TDP is notable because it achieves this performance without the power draw of higher-tier parts, making it a practical choice for systems where cooling and power efficiency matter. The CPU is the clear highlight of this pairing, and it is capable of driving a much faster GPU than the Quadro RTX 5000.