SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000: Database Analysis

This pairing combines a 14th-generation Intel desktop processor with a professional-grade NVIDIA workstation GPU, yielding a system that sits at the 75th percentile among all tracked CPU-GPU combinations. The Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 65W TDP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 is a Turing-architecture workstation card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The data indicates a configuration geared toward professional workloads rather than pure gaming, though the CPU's strong single-thread performance provides headroom in several scenarios. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rates discussed in the Gaming Performance section are estimated from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Core i5-14600 delivers a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2424, placing it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs. This level of single-thread performance is typically sufficient for high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions where CPU throughput matters most, as the processor can feed frames quickly. However, the Quadro RTX 4000's 61st percentile GPU ranking and its PassMark G3D score of 15117 suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, frame rates would likely fall short of the 144Hz-plus territory, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor.

Streaming: The combination of 14 cores and 20 threads gives the i5-14600 substantial multitasking headroom, evidenced by a PassMark multithread score of 35848 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464. This allows simultaneous game encoding and streaming without severe performance degradation, though the Quadro RTX 4000's lack of modern NVENC capabilities (it predates the 40-series architecture despite its series listing) means software encoding on the CPU would be the primary option — the processor's strong multi-thread scores support this approach.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 117078 and floating-point math score of 85759 indicate robust processing power for timeline scrubbing, effects, and export tasks. The Quadro RTX 4000's 8 GB of VRAM and 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth support GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, while its Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 shows competent compute performance. For 1080p and some 1440p editing workflows, this pairing should handle multi-track timelines with moderate effects without stuttering.

3D rendering: The i5-14600's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12794 and R15 multi-core score of 3070 demonstrate strong CPU-based rendering throughput. The Quadro RTX 4000, with 2304 shading units, 36 RT cores, and 288 tensor cores, offers hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI denoising, though its 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance places it below many contemporary consumer GPUs. The GPU's PassMark compute score of 6176 suggests it can accelerate render passes, but heavy production renders would rely more heavily on the CPU's 20 threads.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 434620 and data encryption score of 25082 indicate fast compilation and code-signing operations, while the 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code segments. The 20 threads allow parallel builds and test execution, and the support for ECC memory (true) adds reliability for long-running build servers. The GPU's role in development is minimal, but its DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with graphics debugging tools.

Student and office work: The i5-14600's PassMark single-thread score of 4167 and the system's overall responsiveness make everyday productivity tasks like document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing feel instantaneous. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, while the Quadro RTX 4000's 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support multi-monitor setups for research and data analysis. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power consumption modest for dorm rooms or small offices, and the GPU's single-slot design fits compact workstation cases.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum supported speeds. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), enabling future high-bandwidth storage devices or a more powerful GPU. The 65W TDP and the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W TDP together suggest a total system draw that a 450W suggested PSU can handle, leaving headroom for additional drives and peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Quadro RTX 4000 with a more modern GPU, as the CPU's 89th percentile ranking indicates it can drive substantially faster graphics cards without bottlenecking. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU ensures forward compatibility with next-generation GPUs, while the 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache provide enough processing power for several more years of software. The motherboard's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means a platform change is not required to adopt newer memory technology, though the socket is likely at the end of its generation with Intel's subsequent platforms.

The CPU's production status is listed as Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, so the upgrade path centers on the graphics card. Users could move to a GeForce 40-series card for better gaming performance, as the CPU would likely pair well with such a GPU given its percentile standing. The 450W suggested PSU would need evaluation when upgrading to a higher-TDP GPU, but the current configuration sits comfortably within that power budget.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The system ranks in the 75th percentile among all tracked CPU-GPU combinations, indicating it outperforms three-quarters of tested configurations while trailing the top quarter.

Q: How does the Core i5-14600 compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, placing it 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-12900KS (45094) and AMD EPYC 4344P (45122), while leading the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573) by 0.7% and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466) by 1%.

Q: What memory types does the Core i5-14600 support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology based on platform and budget considerations.

Q: Does the Quadro RTX 4000 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU features 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads and AI-based features, despite its Turing architecture being a generation older than the listed 40-series designation.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to rivals?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 17789, placing it 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666) and 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17639), while leading the AMD Radeon 780M (17588) by 1.1% and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551) by 1.4%.

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics usable alongside the discrete GPU?

A: The Core i5-14600 includes UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output or for troubleshooting, while the Quadro RTX 4000 handles primary graphics duties.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has a launch MSRP of $255, and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has a launch MSRP of 899 USD.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p with moderate settings would find this pairing workable, as the CPU's single-core strength supports high frame rates but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking limits ultra settings. Content creators working in video editing or 2D graphics would benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM, which handles 4K timelines with effects reasonably well. Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the CPU's data compression score of 434620 and encryption score of 25082, making build times shorter and code signing faster.

Students in engineering or computer science programs would find the system capable for coursework, including CAD work where the Quadro RTX 4000's workstation drivers provide stability. Small business workstations running virtual machines or database servers would leverage the 14 cores and ECC memory support (true) for data integrity. The GPU's professional Quadro lineage, despite its Turing architecture, offers certified drivers for ISV applications, making this a sensible choice for office environments running specialized software.

The 65W CPU TDP and single-slot GPU make this a compact, power-efficient build suitable for desks with limited space. The 89th percentile CPU ranking means this processor will not become a bottleneck for several years, so users who plan to upgrade the GPU later can keep the rest of the system intact.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44889 places it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, a strong result that rivals the Core i9-12900KS (45094, 0.5% faster) and EPYC 4344P (45122, 0.5% faster) while edging out the Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573, 0.7% slower) and Core Ultra X9 388H (44466, 1% slower). Specific CPU scores show a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 30464 and single-core of 4300, with Geekbench multi-core at 14680 and single-core at 2424. PassMark tests reveal strengths in integer math (117078), floating-point math (85759), and multithreading (35848), alongside a data compression score of 434620 and encryption score of 25082.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17789 places it in the 61st percentile, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873. Geekbench results show OpenCL at 74540 and Vulkan at 78844, indicating solid compute capabilities. PassMark scores include G3D at 15117, GPU compute at 6176, and DirectX 11 at 128 — the latter being notably low and suggesting poor legacy DirectX performance. The GPU trails the GeForce RTX 4060 (17639) by just 0.9% in average score, showing it is competitive with a modern consumer card despite its age.

Combined, the CPU's top-tier performance and the GPU's mid-range showing create a system where the processor clearly outpaces the graphics card. The combined percentile of 75 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU's 89th percentile pulling the average up from the GPU's 61st. The data shows a configuration that excels in CPU-intensive workloads while the GPU handles moderate graphics demands.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so frame rates are estimated from benchmark scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and PassMark single-thread score of 4167 indicate strong per-core performance, which typically translates to high frame rates in games that rely on single-threaded physics and game logic. In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU would likely push 200+ FPS at 1080p, though the GPU's 61st percentile ranking suggests it may cap frame rates in more demanding scenes.

For AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 4000's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 suggest playable but not exceptional performance. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p textures, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits heavy effects. Estimated frame rates in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2 would likely range from 40-60 FPS at 1080p ultra, dropping to 30-45 FPS at 1440p ultra. The 36 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the Turing generation's RT performance is modest.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with estimated frame rates dropping 20-30% below 1080p results. The CPU's performance headroom means lowering graphics settings would yield better frame rates, but the GPU's texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s place hard limits on fill-rate-heavy scenes. For competitive gaming at lower settings, the system could achieve 144+ FPS in lighter titles, but this is not a high-refresh gaming build by design.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using Intel's 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65W TDP making it power-efficient for a desktop part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support (true) for workstation reliability.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464, R20 multi-core of 12794, and R15 multi-core of 3070. The Geekbench multi-core score of 14680 and PassMark multithread score of 35848 reinforce this strength. Single-thread performance is equally impressive, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 4300, R20 single-core at 1806, R15 single-core at 433, and Geekbench single-core at 2424, placing the CPU in the 89th percentile overall.

For real workloads, the 20 threads handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, as indicated by the PassMark integer math score of 117078 and floating-point score of 85759. The data encryption score of 25082 and extended instructions score of 25674 show competence in cryptography and SIMD-heavy tasks. The find prime numbers score of 155 is modest, but this is a synthetic test that does not reflect typical usage. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Core i9-12900KS and EPYC 4344P, both within 0.5% in average score, showing that the i5-14600 punches above its class.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600 with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, creating a system that targets professional workloads with some gaming capability. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 61st percentile ranking combine for a 75th percentile overall system score, indicating a configuration that is above average but not top-tier. The CPU is a current-generation Active product, while the GPU is End-of-life, creating a temporal mismatch where the processor has years of life left but the graphics card is nearing obsolescence.

The build class is desktop, with the CPU's Intel Socket 1700, PCIe Gen 5 support, and dual-channel memory. The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it limits bandwidth compared to newer GPUs. The total TDP of 225W (65W CPU + 160W GPU) is modest, and the suggested PSU of 450W provides comfortable headroom. This is a single-slot GPU, making it suitable for compact cases or multi-GPU workstation setups.

The overall tier from the percentiles is mid-to-upper range: the CPU is a top-11% performer, while the GPU sits in the top 39%. This places the system in the 75th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms most pre-built office PCs and entry-level gaming rigs but falls short of high-end gaming or workstation configurations. The pairing makes more sense for a professional user who needs CPU horsepower for compute tasks and GPU acceleration for specific ISV applications, rather than a gamer seeking maximum frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The i5-14600's 89th percentile ranking versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 61st percentile creates a CPU-bound system in most workloads, meaning the processor has more capability than the graphics card can utilize. In CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the system performs at a high level, with the GPU only assisting in specific compute operations. In gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the Quadro RTX 4000 becomes the limiting factor, capping performance well below what the CPU could drive.

Evidence from benchmark scores supports this assessment: the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 is exceptional for its class, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 is modest. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is particularly low, indicating that modern gaming APIs would struggle. In contrast, the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 35848 shows it can handle demanding compute loads without breaking a sweat. The FPS scaling, though estimated, would show the GPU limiting frame rates in any GPU-bound scenario, while the CPU would remain underutilized.

This imbalance suggests that the Quadro RTX 4000 is the component to upgrade first. Replacing it with a more modern GPU would allow the CPU to stretch its legs in gaming and GPU-compute workloads, while the current GPU holds back the system's overall potential. For professional users, the balance is less problematic because many workstation apps leverage CPU cores heavily, but for any graphics-intensive task, the GPU is the clear bottleneck.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process, with a die size of 545 mm² and 13,600 million transistors. It features 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are 1005 MHz base and 1545 MHz boost, with memory at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The card is single-slot, 241 mm long, and requires one 8-pin power connector, with a 160W TDP and 450W suggested PSU.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs in the 61st percentile with an average score of 17789. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 indicates modern DirectX 12 performance is adequate, while Geekbench OpenCL (74540) and Vulkan (78844) scores show solid compute throughput. PassMark G3D score of 15117 and GPU compute of 6176 confirm mid-range capability. However, the PassMark DirectX 9 (205), DirectX 10 (108), DirectX 11 (128), and DirectX 12 (52) scores are notably low, suggesting poor legacy API performance that could affect older games or applications.

For rendering workloads, the 36 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 288 tensor cores enable AI-based denoising and DLSS-like features, though the Turing generation's RT performance is not as strong as newer architectures. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures but may limit 4K workloads. The GPU's nearest rivals include the GeForce RTX 4060 (17639, 0.9% slower) and Radeon 780M (17588, 1.1% slower), showing it remains competitive with modern mid-range options despite being End-of-life.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds