SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-14600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 pairing presents an interesting balance-of-power question, and the benchmark data offers a clear answer. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 59th percentile among all graphics cards. This gap in relative standing suggests that the processor is the stronger component on a percentile basis, yet the combined build still achieves a 74th percentile overall. The data indicates that neither component is dramatically holding back the other in a universal sense, but the workloads will dictate where the bottleneck appears.

For CPU-intensive tasks, the i5-14600 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464 and a single-core score of 4,300. These numbers place it within 0.5 percent of the Intel Core i9-12900KS and AMD EPYC 4344P, while running 0.7 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D. The multi-threaded performance is substantial for a 65-watt part, meaning that rendering, compilation, and data processing workloads will be well-served. The PassMark multi-thread score of 35,848 and integer math score of 117,078 reinforce this capability, indicating that the CPU can feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios without becoming the limiting factor at standard resolutions.

The GPU, meanwhile, posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504, which puts it in a virtual tie with the NVIDIA T400 (0 percent delta), while running 0.5 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and 0.6 percent ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT trails by 0.9 percent. This score is respectable but not class-leading in the database's percentile ranking. For gaming at higher resolutions, the GPU's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth will be the dominant factor, and the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads will remain largely underutilized while the graphics card works to fill frames.

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores. The bottleneck profile, therefore, must be inferred from the component-level benchmarks rather than direct gameplay telemetry. The data shows a system where the CPU is the more highly-ranked component relative to its peers, while the GPU, despite its impressive specifications on paper, benchmarks in a mid-pack position among all GPUs. This suggests that for frame-rate-limited scenarios, the GPU will likely be the constraint, while for physics, simulation, and background tasks, the CPU's 89th percentile standing gives it considerable headroom.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this build is derived from separate CPU and GPU tests, as there are no combined measured FPS results. The Intel Core i5-14600 produces an average benchmark score of 44,889, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. This score sits just 0.5 percent below the Intel Core i9-12900KS (45,094) and the AMD EPYC 4344P (45,122), while running 0.7 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44,573) and 1.0 percent ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44,466). These deltas are tight, indicating that the i5-14600 trades blows with some of the most capable processors in the database.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the i5-14600 shows strength across the board. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464 and single-core score of 4,300 demonstrate balanced performance for both threaded and lightly-threaded workloads. Geekbench results of 14,680 multi-core and 2,424 single-core reinforce this profile. PassMark tests reveal specialized capabilities: data compression scores 434,620, floating-point math hits 85,759, and integer math reaches 117,078. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,167 confirms that legacy or lightly-threaded applications will not suffer. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide the raw throughput needed for demanding productivity tasks.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 is its sole benchmark entry, landing at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This places it in a tight cluster with the NVIDIA T400 (16,508, 0 percent delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415, 0.5 percent ahead), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, 0.6 percent ahead), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, 0.9 percent ahead). The performance is competitive with that group, though the 59th percentile indicates that many GPUs in the database score higher. For a card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 384-bit bus, the result suggests that the benchmark score does not fully capture the card's memory advantages.

The combined picture, with a CPU at the 89th percentile and a GPU at the 59th percentile, yields an overall build percentile of 74. This indicates a system where the processor is the standout component, while the graphics card, despite its formidable specifications, benchmarks closer to the median. For users prioritizing CPU-heavy workloads, this pairing delivers top-tier performance. For GPU-bound tasks, the card will still handle demanding resolutions and memory-intensive applications, but its benchmark position suggests it is not the absolute fastest in the database.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, all within a 65-watt TDP. The chip is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are handled by UHD Graphics 770, and the chip is not multiplier-unlocked.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs well above its modest power envelope. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464 is particularly strong for a 65-watt part, indicating that the 14 cores and 20 threads are efficiently utilized. The single-core score of 4,300 confirms that the 5.20 GHz boost clock delivers competitive lightly-threaded performance. Geekbench scores of 14,680 multi-core and 2,424 single-core align with these results, placing the chip in the upper echelon of desktop processors.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into real-world workloads. Data compression scores 434,620, which is a strong result for archival and file-handling tasks. Data encryption hits 25,082, and extended instructions score 25,674, indicating solid performance for cryptographic and SIMD-heavy workloads. Floating-point math reaches 85,759, while integer math posts 117,078 — both strong numbers that suggest the CPU can handle scientific calculations and general productivity without slowdowns. The find prime numbers score of 155 is a more specialized metric, but the physics score of 2,330 indicates acceptable performance for simulation tasks.

The percentile ranking of 89 puts this CPU ahead of 89 percent of all processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900KS and AMD EPYC 4344P, both within 0.5 percent, which underscores how competitive the mid-range i5-14600 is against higher-tier parts. The 0.7 percent lead over the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and 1.0 percent lead over the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H further solidify its position. For real workloads, this means the CPU will handle multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks with ease, while single-threaded applications like office suites and web browsers will respond snappily. The 65-watt TDP is notable for system builders who want strong performance without requiring a massive cooler or power supply.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this Intel Core i5-14600 and RTX 5090 D V2 build is someone who needs a desktop system with a strong balance of CPU and GPU capabilities, though the data suggests the CPU is the more compelling reason to choose this pairing. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find that the CPU's 89th percentile ranking and strong single-core performance at 4,300 in Cinebench R23 ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 24 GB of memory provides ample VRAM for modern game assets. At 4K, the GPU will become the primary factor, and its 59th percentile score indicates it will perform adequately but not at the top tier.

Content creators who rely on multi-threaded workloads will benefit most from this build. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464 and PassMark multi-thread score of 35,848 indicate that video editing, 3D rendering, and batch processing tasks will complete efficiently. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide enough parallelism for most creative applications, and the 65-watt TDP means the system can run in compact workstations without excessive thermal requirements. The GPU's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth also help with GPU-accelerated rendering and large texture sets.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's balanced performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 14,680 and single-core score of 2,424 indicate strong compilation speeds and responsive IDE performance. Data compression at 434,620 and encryption at 25,082 are useful for build pipelines and secure coding tasks. Students and small business workstations will find that the CPU's efficiency at 65 watts makes this a practical choice for daily office work, spreadsheet analysis, and web development, while the GPU offers headroom for occasional graphics tasks or CUDA-accelerated workloads. The overall build percentile of 74 indicates a system that outperforms most general-purpose desktops, making it suitable for users who want a single machine that handles both productivity and graphics without compromise.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB202 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The GPU contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². Clock speeds are set at 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz or 28 Gbps effective. Memory configuration includes 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth — a substantial amount for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The shading array consists of 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation processors. Ray tracing is handled by 170 dedicated RT cores, while 680 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both rated at 104.8 TFLOPS. The card uses a dual-slot design, measures 304 mm in length, and requires a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested power supply is 950 watts, with the card's TDP at 575 watts. It interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16 and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 places this GPU at the 59th percentile, which is a modest position given its specifications. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 (0 percent delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415 (0.5 percent behind), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16,408 (0.6 percent behind), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16,361 (0.9 percent behind). This clustering suggests that in this specific benchmark, the card performs similarly to those products, despite having more memory and newer architecture. The 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are the standout features, making this GPU well-suited for rendering large scenes, AI inference, and professional visualization work where memory capacity matters more than raw rasterization speed.

For gaming, the GPU will handle high-resolution textures and ray-traced effects thanks to the 170 RT cores. The 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides solid compute capability for physics simulations and GPU-accelerated effects. The tensor cores at 680 units enable DLSS and other AI-based upscaling features, which can improve frame rates in supported titles. The 59th percentile rank indicates that while this is not the fastest GPU in the database, it is a capable performer with unique memory advantages that suit specific workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on their needs and budget. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a benefit for workstation users who require data integrity. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the latest storage devices and expansion cards, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

The CPU's 65-watt TDP is modest, leaving significant thermal and power headroom in most systems. The GPU's TDP is 575 watts, and the suggested power supply is 950 watts, which means the system requires a robust PSU but not an excessive one. The CPU's low power draw means that a capable air cooler is sufficient, and the overall system power requirements are driven primarily by the GPU. This balance allows for a wide range of case and cooling options.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary candidate for replacement if the user wants higher frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and close proximity to the Intel Core i9-12900KS (within 0.5 percent) suggest that the processor will remain relevant for several years. The Socket 1700 platform does not offer a clear upgrade path beyond the current generation, so users looking for more CPU performance may need to change platforms eventually. However, the current CPU's strong benchmark scores mean that such an upgrade is not urgent. Memory can be expanded or upgraded to higher-speed DDR5 modules, and storage can be added via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes or standard SATA connections. The 950-watt suggested PSU provides enough headroom for most future GPU upgrades within the same power class.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,300 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,167 ensure that game logic and draw calls are processed quickly, which is essential for high-refresh-rate monitors. The GPU's 24 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth prevent texture streaming bottlenecks, and the 170 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable settings. Estimated frame rates, based on the benchmark scores, indicate that this system is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The 14 cores and 20 threads of the CPU provide enough headroom to encode video while gaming, as demonstrated by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464. The PassMark data compression score of 434,620 suggests efficient handling of stream encoding workloads. The GPU's NVENC-capable tensor cores at 680 units can offload encoding tasks, further reducing the CPU load. This setup can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming without significant frame rate drops.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 35,848 and Geekbench multi-core score of 14,680, accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 24 GB of VRAM allows for large preview buffers and GPU-accelerated effects. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports real-time color grading and effects processing. This system is well-matched for 4K video editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464 provides solid CPU-based rendering performance for scenes that rely on ray tracing. The GPU's 170 RT cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate GPU-rendered frames, while the 24 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes. The 59th percentile GPU rank means render times will be competitive but not top-tier, making this a good choice for hobbyists and independent creators.

Software Development: The CPU's balanced performance, with Geekbench scores of 14,680 multi-core and 2,424 single-core, ensures fast compilation and responsive tooling. The data encryption score of 25,082 and extended instructions score of 25,674 support secure coding and SIMD-optimized algorithms. The 65-watt TDP keeps power consumption low during long coding sessions. The GPU is largely unnecessary for most development tasks but provides acceleration for CUDA-based compute workloads.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,167, ensures snappy response in office applications and web browsers. The 14 cores handle multitasking with many open applications, and the 65-watt TDP keeps electricity costs low. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. This system is overkill for basic office tasks but offers headroom for future needs.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-14600, a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, a 24 GB GDDR7 graphics card from the GeForce 50-series. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile ranking is 74, indicating that this system outperforms 74 percent of all builds in the database. The CPU is the standout component at the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile, creating an imbalance where the processor is relatively more powerful than the graphics card.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464 and single-core score of 4,300 make it a strong performer for both threaded and lightly-threaded workloads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504 places it in a competitive but not leading position among GPUs. The combination yields a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks while providing adequate, though not top-tier, graphics performance. The 65-watt TDP of the CPU and 575-watt TDP of the GPU require a 950-watt power supply, and the Socket 1700 platform offers DDR4 and DDR5 memory support.

Overall, this is a desktop build that prioritizes processor performance while still delivering a capable graphics solution. The 74th percentile overall ranking reflects a system that is well above average, but the gap between the CPU and GPU percentile positions means that users who primarily game may want to consider a more balanced GPU option, while users who render or compile will find exceptional value in the CPU's performance.

# FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 74, meaning it outperforms 74 percent of all builds in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900KS?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44,889, which is 0.5 percent lower than the Intel Core i9-12900KS at 45,094.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score and percentile?

A: The GPU scores 16,504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count, and what are its clock speeds?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this build?

A: The suggested power supply is 950 watts, based on the GPU's 575-watt TDP and the CPU's 65-watt TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory and what memory types are compatible?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds