SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

49,957 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits at the 88th percentile overall, a strong indicator of high-end capability. The CPU, a Raptor Lake-R refresh part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, combines 14 cores and 20 threads with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This configuration is built on a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The GPU, meanwhile, is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture part from the GeForce 50-series, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with a massive 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The data for this combination is estimated, not measured; there are no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing in the benchmark database, so all performance discussions regarding frame rates are projections based on the individual component scores.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-14600 is a hybrid architecture processor, though the fact pack does not specify the exact performance/efficiency core split, it does list 14 cores and 20 threads, which indicates a mix of core types typical of the Raptor Lake generation. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core, provides a substantial amount of fast memory for workloads to draw from. This is a desktop-class chip with a 65 W TDP, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support as a feature. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, but with a discrete GPU in this build, it is largely a fallback option.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that is exceptionally strong in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 30464 in multi-core and 4300 in single-core. The single-core score is particularly high, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score, while not class-leading, is more than sufficient for heavy productivity. The Geekbench scores of 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core corroborate this balanced performance profile. The PassMark suite further details the strengths: an impressive 117078 in integer math, 85759 in floating-point math, and a very high 434620 in data compression, the latter suggesting strong performance in archiving and file management tasks. The data encryption score of 25082 and extended instructions score of 25674 show solid capability in security and modern instruction set workloads.

In terms of relative standing, the i5-14600 sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i9-12900KS and the AMD EPYC 4344P, with the i5-14600 trailing them by a negligible 0.5% in average score. It is also closely matched with the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, which it leads by 0.7%, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, which it leads by 1%. This places the i5-14600 in a performance tier where it competes directly with previous-generation flagship parts, making it a very capable choice for a high-end build.

Balance and Bottleneck

For this pairing, the balance is skewed towards the GPU in gaming scenarios, but the CPU is far from a weak link. The CPU's single-thread performance is excellent, as evidenced by the 4300 score in Cinebench R23 single-core, which prevents it from bottlenecking the GPU in most gaming workloads that rely on strong per-core performance. The high data compression score of 434620 in PassMark also suggests the CPU can handle the background tasks and asset streaming required by modern games without causing hitches.

However, in heavily multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be the limiting factor compared to the GPU. The GPU's compute performance, indicated by a PassMark GPU compute score of 20203 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 212363, is in a different league than the CPU's multi-threaded throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 is respectable, but the GPU's raw parallel processing power will dominate tasks that can be offloaded to it. Therefore, the balance is workload-dependent: the CPU is more than adequate to feed the GPU in gaming, but the GPU is the clear performance driver in compute-heavy rendering tasks.

The lack of measured FPS data means we must rely on the component percentiles to estimate gaming balance. The CPU's 89th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile are close enough that neither component is a glaring outlier. This suggests a well-matched pairing where, in most games, the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates at high resolutions, while the CPU will hold up its end at lower resolutions and high refresh rates. The combined 88th percentile for the build further reinforces that this is a coherent, high-performance system.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a powerful graphics card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a key specification for high-resolution textures and memory-intensive workloads. The GPU is equipped with 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, which are the building blocks for its rendering performance. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features, respectively.

The clock speeds are listed at a base of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2452 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). These specs translate into a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s, which are high figures indicating strong fill-rate capabilities. The FP32 performance is rated at 43.94 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1), showing that the card can handle both standard and half-precision compute tasks at the same speed.

In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), which is a modern, demanding test. Its scores in Geekbench are 212363 in OpenCL and 225122 in Vulkan, showing strong compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark G3D score is 32974, with a G2D score of 1332. These numbers place the GPU at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which it trails by 0.1%, and the Intel Arc A550M, which it leads by 0.4%. More notably, it is 2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and 3.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT. This places the 5070 Ti in the upper echelon of graphics cards, capable of handling demanding rendering tasks and high-end gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who want a high-performance desktop that can handle both demanding gaming and serious productivity work without compromise. The CPU's strong single-thread performance at the 89th percentile makes it ideal for gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, where per-core speed is critical. The GPU's 86th percentile and 16 GB of VRAM make it suitable for 4K gaming and for content creators who work with large textures and complex 3D scenes.

For content creators and developers, the CPU's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the 30464 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, is sufficient for compiling code and running virtual machines. The GPU's compute capabilities, with 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, accelerate video rendering and 3D modeling tasks significantly. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the dual-channel DDR5 (or DDR4) memory support and ECC capability useful for data integrity in long-running simulations. Small business workstations that need to handle video editing, graphic design, and occasional 3D rendering will find this pairing to be a powerful and responsive workhorse. It is not a budget build; it is a high-tier investment for users who require top-tier performance.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark performance of this build is strong, but it is important to reiterate that these are estimated figures derived from component benchmarks, not measured FPS data. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44889, placing it at the 89th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 49957, placing it at the 86th percentile. The build's combined percentile is 88.

Looking at specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and single-core score of 4300 are both excellent. The Geekbench multi-core score of 14680 is also strong. For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6604 is a good indicator of modern DX12 gaming performance. The PassMark G3D score of 32974 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 225122 provide additional confidence in its graphics capabilities. The GPU compute score of 20203 in PassMark and 212363 in Geekbench OpenCL highlight its non-gaming compute strength. When combined, these scores indicate a system that is in the top 12% of all desktop builds, capable of running any modern application with high settings. The picture is one of a very capable, high-end gaming and workstation machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 4300 single-core score in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggest this build will excel at high-refresh gaming. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance will push high frame rates, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and high bandwidth will handle detailed textures without issue. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6604 indicates strong DX12 performance for modern titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with the data compression score of 434620, provide enough headroom for encoding a stream while gaming. The GPU's NVENC capabilities (implied by the tensor cores) would also offload this task, though the fact pack does not specify NVENC hardware. The multi-threaded score of 30464 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the system can handle the simultaneous load of a game and streaming software.

Video Editing: The GPU's 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will accelerate video effects and color grading, while the CPU's high single-core performance will keep the timeline responsive. The 16 GB of VRAM is beneficial for working with high-resolution video timelines. The PassMark floating-point math score of 85759 on the CPU also aids in processing video filters.

3D Rendering: This is a scenario where the GPU takes the lead. The RTX 5070 Ti's 8960 shading units and 70 RT cores will dramatically speed up ray-traced renders. The GPU compute score of 20203 in PassMark is a strong indicator of its rendering power. The CPU's multi-threaded score of 30464 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for viewport manipulation and preparing scenes, but the final frame rendering will be GPU-bound.

Software Development: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is a boon here. A score of 14680 in Geekbench multi-core and 117078 in PassMark integer math will make compiling large codebases faster. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The ECC memory support is a plus for ensuring data integrity during long build processes.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for basic tasks, but it will never feel slow. The CPU's single-thread score of 4167 in PassMark ensures instant application launches and smooth multitasking. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is ever disabled. It would handle any spreadsheet, document, or research task with absolute ease, making it a future-proof investment for a demanding student.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This is a mature platform, meaning the upgrade path is limited to other 14th-gen (and some 13th-gen) CPUs on the same socket. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck between the two components for the latest data transfer standards.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, while the GPU's TDP is 300 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W. This provides a clear indication of the system's power requirements. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 from the same generation, to improve multi-threaded performance in rendering and compilation tasks. The memory can be upgraded to a higher-capacity or faster DDR5 kit, given the dual-channel support. The GPU is already a high-end part, so the next logical upgrade there would be several generations down the line. The 16-pin power connector on the GPU is the modern standard, so a PSU with that connector is recommended.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. It is a high-performance combination that targets the upper tier of consumer hardware, as evidenced by its 88th combined percentile. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread part from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, and the GPU is a 16 GB GDDR7 card from the Blackwell 2.0 generation. The build is designed for users who want top-tier gaming performance and substantial compute capability for content creation, all in a single system. The data indicates that this is a balanced, high-end pairing that will handle any modern workload with aplomb, though the lack of measured FPS data means performance in games is an estimate based on the strength of the individual components.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 88, placing it in the top 12% of all desktop configurations in the database. The CPU is at the 89th percentile and the GPU is at the 86th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889. It is 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-12900KS and the AMD EPYC 4344P, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, and 1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type is it?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this GPU?

A: The fact pack lists a suggested PSU of 700 W for the RTX 5070 Ti, which has a TDP of 300 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU's performance in a modern DX12 benchmark?

A: In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604. In the PassMark DirectX 12 test, it scores 127.

Q: Are the frame rates for this build measured or estimated?

A: The frame rates are estimated. The fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination, so all performance in games is projected from the individual component benchmark scores.