SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 sits in an unusual position: it carries the RTX branding and 40-series naming, but its silicon is the GA107 chip built on Samsung's 8 nm process, the same Ampere architecture that powered the prior generation. The GPU packs 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units, with a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz. Its memory configuration is the most striking limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a narrow pipe by any modern standard, and it will constrain texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering far more than raw compute throughput.

The compute figures reinforce this picture. The RTX 4010 delivers 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same 2.706 TFLOPS for FP16 (1:1 ratio), which places it in entry-level territory. The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. For ray tracing, there are 6 RT cores, and for AI-accelerated workloads, 24 tensor cores are present. The API support is modern — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — meaning the hardware can technically execute feature-rich workloads, but the small memory pool and narrow bus will throttle real-world performance.

The single benchmark score in the FACT PACK is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2893 points. That number places the RTX 4010 at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, meaning roughly four out of five GPUs in the database outperform it. The nearest rivals are telling: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907 (deltaPct -0.5%), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910 (deltaPct -0.6%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913 (deltaPct -0.7%). The RTX 4010 is effectively within 1% of these cards in this specific benchmark, yet those cards have vastly more memory and bandwidth. This suggests the Steel Nomad test is not heavily memory-bound, or the RTX 4010's architecture compensates in ways the specs do not immediately reveal. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 scores 2923 (deltaPct -1%), a card from a much older generation, which highlights how synthetic benchmarks can flatten real-world differences.

For rendering workloads, the data implies a mixed bag. The 4 GB VRAM will struggle with large scenes, high-resolution textures, or multi-pass renders. The 96.00 GB/s bandwidth is roughly one-third of what mid-range GPUs offer, so any renderer that streams geometry or textures will bottleneck. However, the 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores mean the GPU can accelerate ray-traced effects and AI denoising, provided the scene fits within memory. The 3DMark score at 18th percentile suggests that for light rendering tasks — small scenes, 1080p previews, or simple animations — the RTX 4010 is functional, but it is not a production rendering tool.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the LGA 1700 socket that has been a mainstay of Intel's desktop lineup for several generations. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to reuse older DDR4 DIMMs or move to newer DDR5 kits. The memory bus is dual-channel, and there is no memory bandwidth figure in the FACT PACK, but the support for both memory types means the platform can be configured to match budget or performance priorities. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for small business workstations or entry-level servers where data integrity matters.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU itself: Gen 5 with 16 lanes. This is a forward-looking feature, as PCIe Gen 5 doubles the bandwidth of Gen 4 for compatible devices. However, the GPU in this pairing, the RTX 4010, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is half the lane width of the CPU's full allocation. This means the GPU will not saturate the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, but the x8 Gen 4 connection is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs. The remaining PCIe lanes can be used for NVMe storage or other expansion cards.

The power situation is remarkably modest. The RTX 4010 has a TDP of 50 W and requires no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is very low by modern standards. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, so the total system draw is well under 200 W in most configurations. This opens up small-form-factor builds, silent PCs, or systems that use compact power supplies. The single-slot GPU design, at 163 mm length and 69 mm height, reinforces the small footprint.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to a few paths. The CPU socket (LGA 1700) is the last generation to use this socket, so a CPU upgrade would be limited to other 14th-gen or 13th-gen parts. The GPU, however, is the clear bottleneck in this pairing. With a 250 W PSU suggestion and the GPU drawing only 50 W, there is enormous headroom to install a more powerful GPU without changing the power supply. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot from the CPU can accommodate any modern GPU, though the physical size and power draw would need consideration. A more capable GPU with higher VRAM and bandwidth would address the primary limitation of the RTX 4010. Alternatively, the platform's DDR5 support and ECC capability make it viable for a workstation upgrade, adding more RAM or faster storage.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is a substantial single-core boost. The process node is Intel's 10 nm, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has ECC capability, and includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a strong mid-range CPU. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 3070 and single-core is 433. Moving to Cinebench R20, multi-core jumps to 12794 and single-core to 1806. Cinebench R23 shows 30464 multi-core and 4300 single-core. Geekbench results are 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 35848, single-thread of 4167, and a range of specialized tests: data compression at 434620, data encryption at 25082, extended instructions at 25674, floating point math at 85759, integer math at 117078, physics at 2330, random string sorting at 48043, and prime numbers at 155.

The percentile rank is 89 among all CPUs, meaning the i5-14600 outperforms 89% of CPUs in the database. The average benchmark score is 44889. The nearest rivals are interesting comparisons. The Intel Core i9-12900KS scores 45094 (deltaPct -0.5%), meaning the i5-14600 is essentially tied with a previous-generation flagship. The AMD EPYC 4344P scores 45122 (deltaPct -0.5%), also a virtual tie. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 (deltaPct 0.7%), meaning the i5-14600 is slightly ahead. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466 (deltaPct 1%), again a narrow margin.

For real workloads, these numbers indicate a CPU that excels at multi-threaded productivity tasks while maintaining strong single-thread performance. The 20 threads handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently. The PassMark data encryption score of 25082 suggests solid performance for security-related tasks. The floating-point math score of 85759 is relevant for scientific computing and simulation. The integer math score of 117078 indicates strong performance in general-purpose computing. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness for everyday applications and games that rely on high clock speeds.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The combination of a 14-core, 20-thread CPU at the 89th percentile and a GPU at the 18th percentile creates a specific profile. This system is built for CPU-heavy workloads where the GPU plays a supporting role. Gamers at 1080p with modest graphics settings will find the CPU more than capable, but the GPU will limit frame rates in demanding titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 places the GPU at the 18th percentile, so for gaming at higher resolutions or with ultra settings, the RTX 4010 will be the primary constraint.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and Geekbench multi-core of 14680 indicate a CPU that can handle rendering and encoding tasks. The PassMark multi-thread score of 35848 reinforces this. For video editors, the 20 threads will accelerate timeline scrubbing and export. For 3D artists, the CPU will handle physics simulation and geometry processing, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will limit GPU-accelerated rendering.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compilation speed. The integer math score of 117078 and extended instructions score of 25674 suggest strong performance in code compilation and execution of complex algorithms. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for developers who need data integrity. Students and small business users running office applications, spreadsheets, and databases will find the CPU far more powerful than needed, but the system's low power draw (65 W CPU, 50 W GPU) and small GPU footprint make it suitable for a quiet, compact workstation. The single-slot GPU and no power connectors mean this can fit in small cases, which is a plus for space-constrained environments.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data reveals a fundamental imbalance: the CPU sits at the 89th percentile while the GPU sits at the 18th percentile. This 71-percentile gap is the defining characteristic of this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads — software compilation, data processing, office applications — the system will perform exceptionally well, as the CPU's strong scores are fully utilized. The PassMark single-thread score of 4167 and multi-thread of 35848 indicate no CPU bottleneck in these scenarios.

In GPU-bound workloads — gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, video encoding with NVENC — the RTX 4010 will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 at the 18th percentile means the GPU is in the bottom fifth of all GPUs. For gaming, this means that even if the CPU can push high frame rates, the GPU will cap the output. The measured FPS scaling is not available in the FACT PACK (no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination), so the exact frame rates cannot be cited. However, the percentile gap is clear evidence: the GPU is the bottleneck in any graphics-intensive workload.

The memory configuration adds another layer. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering or texture pop-in in games with large assets. The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support (DDR4 or DDR5) are more than adequate for feeding the GPU, but the GPU's narrow memory bus means it cannot process data fast enough to keep up with the CPU. In workloads that alternate between CPU and GPU phases, such as video editing with GPU-accelerated effects, the system will switch between being CPU-bound and GPU-bound, creating a stop-and-go experience.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. There is no measuredFpsUltraByGame data, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 (18th percentile) and the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4300 in Cinebench R23, the system is likely capable of 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock will ensure that frame pacing is consistent, but the GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will limit the graphics quality. Games with low VRAM requirements or those that are CPU-bound, such as esports titles or strategy games, may run well. Games with heavy texture streaming or ray tracing will struggle, despite the 6 RT cores, because the memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s is insufficient for high-resolution textures.

At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM will be severe limitations. Frame rates will likely drop to unplayable levels in AAA titles, and even in lighter games, the low pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s will cap output. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming with settings adjusted to fit within the 4 GB VRAM budget. These are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmark scores are comprehensive. Cinebench R15 multi-core is 3070, single-core 433. Cinebench R20 multi-core is 12794, single-core 1806. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 30464, single-core 4300. Geekbench multi-core is 14680, single-core 2424. PassMark tests include data compression (434620), data encryption (25082), extended instructions (25674), find prime numbers (155), floating point math (85759), integer math (117078), multi-thread (35848), physics (2330), random string sorting (48043), and single-thread (4167). The average benchmark score is 44889, and the CPU is at the 89th percentile.

The GPU has a single benchmark score: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2893. The average benchmark score is 2893, placing it at the 18th percentile.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 54, indicating that the system as a whole sits near the middle of all desktop configurations in the database. The CPU's 89th percentile pulls the combined score up, while the GPU's 18th percentile pulls it down. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-centric tasks but lags in graphics performance. The nearest CPU rivals (i9-12900KS, EPYC 4344P, Ryzen 5 7500X3D, Core Ultra X9 388H) are all within 1% of the i5-14600, confirming that the CPU is competitive with much more expensive parts. The GPU rivals (RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, Quadro P600) are also within 1%, which is surprising given the spec differences, but it underscores the synthetic benchmark's limitations.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4010 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 supports ECC memory, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, with the GPU drawing 50 W (no power connectors) and the CPU having a 65 W TDP.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14600 is within 1% of the Intel Core i9-12900KS (deltaPct -0.5%), AMD EPYC 4344P (deltaPct -0.5%), AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (deltaPct 0.7%), and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (deltaPct 1%).

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 4010 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread score (4300 in Cinebench R23) can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's 18th percentile performance will cap FPS in most titles. For esports games with low graphics requirements, 1080p high-refresh is plausible, but AAA titles will need reduced settings.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU can handle encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant frame drops, as the multi-thread score (35848 in PassMark) is strong. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit the game's graphics quality while streaming.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 provides solid performance for timeline editing and export. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will handle light effects and color grading, but heavy GPU-accelerated effects may be slow.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong, given the 20 threads and high multi-core scores. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM, making it unsuitable for complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 117078 and extended instructions score of 25674 indicate fast code compilation. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running builds or server workloads.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the low power draw (65 W CPU, 50 W GPU) and compact GPU size make it a quiet, efficient workstation for a dorm room or small office.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-R part at the 89th percentile, while the GPU is an entry-level Ampere-based card at the 18th percentile. The combined percentile is 54, placing the system in the middle tier of desktop configurations. This is a CPU-first build: the processor is powerful enough to rival flagship parts from previous generations (within 1% of the i9-12900KS), but the GPU is a limiting factor for graphics-intensive work. The system's overall tier is mid-range, with a strong foundation for CPU-based tasks and a GPU that can be upgraded later without changing the platform or power supply.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds