SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 form a desktop pairing that lands at the 75th percentile of all systems, with the CPU ranking in the 89th percentile and the GPU in the 61st. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than from direct testing.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3070 is built on NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The GPU carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus, producing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1500 MHz and the boost clock is 1725 MHz. The die is the GA104 chip, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4M per mm².

In terms of compute resources, the GPU includes 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It also has 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features. The pixel rate is 165.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 317.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 20.31 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, the latter at a 1:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores reflect a strong mid-range performer. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3162. Geekbench OpenCL returns 112821 and Vulkan returns 21022. Passmark results include a G3D score of 22214, a G2D score of 1001, and a GPU compute score of 11195. The average benchmark score across all GPU tests is 17208, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (0.7% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (1% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 7970M (1.1% ahead), and NVIDIA Tesla K40c (1.5% behind). These deltas indicate that the RTX 3070 sits in a tight performance band, with differences of roughly one percent.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p workloads, but heavy texture packs and high-resolution assets may exceed the VRAM capacity. The 46 RT cores support ray-traced effects, while the 184 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for upscaling and denoising. The FP32 throughput of 20.31 TFLOPS is sufficient for many compute tasks, but the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking shows that it is not at the top of the stack. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 indicates decent DX12 performance, and the Passmark G3D score of 22214 places it well above entry-level cards but below high-end models.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 89th percentile and the GPU’s 61st percentile suggest that the GPU will be the limiting factor for high-refresh gaming. The RTX 3070’s 20.31 TFLOPS and 448 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh play, but the 8 GB VRAM may force texture quality reductions at higher settings. The CPU, with a single-thread Passmark score of 4167 and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, can feed frames well above the GPU’s capability.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU provides ample parallel throughput for encoding and gaming simultaneously. Its Passmark multithread score of 35848 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 indicate that the CPU can handle the overhead of a live stream while maintaining game performance. The GPU’s tensor cores can also assist with AI-based encoding, but no specific encoder data is provided.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core strength is well suited for video editing. A Geekbench multi-core score of 14680 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12794 give it solid throughput for rendering timelines. The GPU’s compute score of 11195 in Passmark and its 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 help accelerate effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM may limit very large timeline previews, but the overall combination handles 1080p and 1440p projects comfortably.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache, combined with the GPU’s 46 RT cores and 20.31 TFLOPS, make this a capable entry-level 3D rendering system. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 shows strong CPU rendering, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 and the Passmark G3D score of 22214 support GPU-accelerated rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is the main constraint for heavy scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread performance is excellent for compilation and code editing. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and Geekbench single-core score of 2424 indicate fast response in IDEs. The 10 nm process and 65 W TDP make it a practical choice for sustained builds without excessive heat.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, and the CPU’s 65 W TDP allows for low-power operation. The Passmark single-thread score of 4167 ensures responsive office apps and web browsing. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it will not be a bottleneck for typical productivity tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series. It operates at a base clock of 2.70 GHz and boosts to 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a high-performance desktop chip. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process (the Raptor Lake architecture) and uses the Raptor Lake-R codename. The die size is 257 mm² and it fits the Intel Socket 1700.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by the UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not possible.

Benchmark scores are strong across the board. Cinebench R15 multicore returns 3070 points, single-core 433. Cinebench R20 multicore is 12794, single-core 1806. Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 30464, single-core 4300. Geekbench multicore is 14680, single-core 2424. Passmark results include data compression 434620, data encryption 25082, extended instructions 25674, prime numbers 155, floating-point 85759, integer 117078, multithread 35848, physics 2330, random string sorting 48043, and single-thread 4167.

The average benchmark score across all CPU tests is 44889, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-12900KS (0.5% behind), AMD EPYC 4344P (0.5% behind), AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (0.7% ahead), and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (1% ahead). This shows the i5-14600 is essentially tied with these higher-end parts, making it a high-value choice for multi-threaded workloads.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the CPU and GPU balanced, but the GPU is the weaker link. The CPU’s 89th percentile ensures it will not hold back the GPU, but the RTX 3070’s 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile mean that high-refresh gaming at maximum settings is not guaranteed. For gamers who play esports titles, the CPU’s single-thread strength and the GPU’s 20.31 TFLOPS deliver excellent frame rates, but heavy ray tracing or 4K gaming will require lower settings.

Content creators and video editors will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance. The 30464 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 35848 Passmark multithread score support long render jobs. The GPU’s compute and tensor cores accelerate effects, but the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint for high-resolution compositing. Software developers will appreciate the fast single-thread speed and the 20 threads for parallel builds.

Students and small business users can rely on the integrated graphics for basic office tasks, but the discrete GPU adds capability for light 3D work or gaming. The CPU’s 65 W TDP allows for quiet, efficient systems. The ECC memory support is an advantage for server-like workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, and the CPU TDP is 65 W, so a combined power draw of 285 W leaves headroom. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible; the next upgrade path would be a higher-tier CPU or a GPU with more VRAM. The 550 W PSU is sufficient for the current pair, but a future GPU with a higher TDP would require a larger PSU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75th.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the RTX 3070’s memory bandwidth?

A: The memory bandwidth is 448.0 GB/s, from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 220 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock?

A: The boost clock is 5.20 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 770.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a significant performance gap between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is at the 89th percentile, while the GPU is at the 61st, meaning the CPU is far more capable relative to the pool of parts. For graphics-heavy workloads, the GPU is the bottleneck; its 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile limit performance in modern games. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17208 is within 1% of several rivals, indicating a fixed performance ceiling.

For CPU-bound tasks, the CPU is rarely the limit. The 14-core/20-thread design, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464, is enough for heavy multi-threading. The single-core score of 4300 ensures fast response in single-threaded applications. The combined 75th percentile reflects the GPU’s lower standing, and the pair is best suited for workloads where the CPU’s strength is needed, while the GPU handles moderate graphics duties.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The CPU was launched at a MSRP of $255, and the GPU at a launch MSRP of $499 USD. The pairing sits at the 75th percentile overall, with the CPU at 89th and the GPU at 61st. This is a high-tier CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU, making it a good choice for productivity and moderate gaming, but not for extreme 4K or heavy ray tracing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 44889, placing it at the 89th percentile. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core 30464 and single-core 4300, Geekbench multi-core 14680 and single-core 2424, and Passmark multithread 35848. The GPU’s average score is 17208, at the 61st percentile, with its highest result being the Passmark G3D of 22214 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162. The combined percentile of the pairing is 75. These numbers indicate that the CPU will not limit the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s performance is the defining factor for graphics-bound tasks.