SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE

57,367 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is a desktop combination that lands in the 88th percentile of all tracked builds, and the component-level data explains why: the CPU sits in the 89th percentile versus all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 44889, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile with an average score of 57367. Both parts are above-average performers in the database, and the pairing is notably well matched in percentile terms, which is the strongest indicator in this dataset that neither component drastically overshadows the other. One important caveat applies throughout this page: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so every frame-rate statement below is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a measured figure.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With the GPU posting a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5424 and the CPU clearing 4300 in Cinebench R23 single-core, this pairing is well suited to high-refresh play at mainstream resolutions. The single-core figure matters most here: frame pacing and draw-call throughput are single-thread-bound at high refresh, and a 5.20 GHz boost clock with a 2424 Geekbench single-core score indicate the i5-14600 will not collapse under GPU-driven frame rates. Estimated from the combined 88th-percentile standing, high-refresh 1080p play is realistic in esports and lighter AAA titles, though the most demanding AAA games at ultra settings will pull estimates down toward standard refresh ranges.

Streaming. Streaming adds encoding on top of gaming, and that is a multi-core question. The i5-14600's 14 cores and 20 threads produced 30464 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 14680 in Geekbench multi-core, placing it effectively level with the Intel Core i9-12900KS (45094 average score, only 0.5% higher) and the AMD EPYC 4344P (45122, also 0.5% higher). That headroom means game plus stream workloads can be split across cores without the game thread starving — a verdict the PassMark multithread score of 35848 reinforces.

Video editing. Video work rewards sustained multi-core throughput and memory bandwidth. DDR5 support on a dual-channel bus, combined with the 30464 R23 multi-core result, supports comfortable timeline scrubbing and export work on typical projects. The GPU contributes through its Geekbench OpenCL score of 109309, which covers GPU-accelerated effects and timeline preview. This is a competent editing machine for 1080p and mid-weight 4K projects rather than an eight-core-plus workstation substitute.

3D rendering. Rendering is where the CPU's 89th percentile shows directly. Cinebench R20 multi-core came in at 12794 and R15 multi-core at 3070, both strong for a 65 W TDP part. The RX 9070 GRE's 48 RT cores and 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 output give viewport and GPU-render paths real teeth for its class. For solo artists and small studios, this combination handles production-scale scenes acceptably; heavy path-traced final frames will favor larger, hotter chips.

Software development. Compilation, containerized test suites, and static analysis scale with threads, and the PassMark data set backs the i5-14600 here: 117078 in integer math, 85759 in floating point math, and 434620 in data compression. A single-thread score of 4167 keeps interactive tooling — IDE indexing, script runs, REPL work — responsive. This is a genuinely strong developer build.

Student and office work. For everyday productivity the pairing is frankly overqualified, which is the correct kind of problem. Documents, browsers, video calls, and lecture recording all run with large margins, and ECC memory support means the platform can even be configured for data-integrity-sensitive work if the motherboard supports it.

GPU Analysis

The RX 9070 GRE is a Navi 48 chip on TSMC's 4 nm process, carrying 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die at a density of 151.0M transistors per mm². It is an RDNA 4.0 design, the generation following Navi III, and it ships with 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The 48 dedicated RT cores are the headline for ray-traced workloads; there are no tensor cores, so AI-accelerated features rely on the shader array rather than fixed matrix hardware.

Clock behavior is well defined in the pack: a 1420 MHz base, a 2220 MHz game clock, and a 2790 MHz boost. Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure is the practical ceiling for texture-heavy and high-resolution rendering, and 12 GB is sufficient for current AAA titles at mainstream resolutions, though the narrow 192-bit bus means bandwidth, not capacity, is the constraint to watch at 4K.

Rasterization throughput lands at 267.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 535.7 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 compute at 34.28 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 34.28 TFLOPS on a 1:1 ratio. The benchmark evidence: 5424 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 109309 in Geekbench OpenCL. The OpenCL number in particular indicates strong general compute for GPU rendering and effects, and the 87th GPU percentile frames the card as an upper-tier mainstream part — essentially tied with the Intel Arc A580 (0.7% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (1.2%), and the Intel Arc A570M (1.5%), and within 1.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. Modern API support is complete: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, with display outputs of one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is a build in the 88th percentile of all tracked desktops — a high-performing system by database standards.

CPU-side, the i5-14600 records 3070 multi-core and 433 single-core in Cinebench R15, 12794 and 1806 in R20, and 30464 and 4300 in R23. Geekbench returns 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core, and PassMark adds 35848 multithread, 4167 single-thread, plus the component subtests listed above. Its average benchmark score of 44889 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The rival table is the striking part: the i9-12900KS and EPYC 4344P are just 0.5% ahead on average, the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.7% behind, and the Core Ultra X9 388H is 1% behind. Within a rounding error, this i5 trades blows with a former flagship i9 and a workstation EPYC part.

GPU-side, the RX 9070 GRE averages 57367 for the 87th GPU percentile, with Steel Nomad at 5424 and OpenCL at 109309 as its recorded results. Its rivals cluster within 1.8% either direction, meaning the card sits in a dense performance band with no runaway winners or losers nearby.

Put together: an 89th-percentile CPU and an 87th-percentile GPU produce an 88th-percentile build. That near-perfect percentile symmetry is the single most useful fact in this dataset — it says the pairing is architecturally coherent rather than lopsided.

Who Should Build It

1080p and 1440p gamers are the core audience. The GPU's 87th percentile and Steel Nomad result support high-refresh 1080p and high-settings 1440p play in estimated terms, while the CPU's single-core numbers (4300 R23, 2424 Geekbench) keep frame delivery steady.

Content creators — video editors, streamers, and 3D artists — get a genuinely capable platform: 20 threads for renders and encodes, 34.28 TFLOPS of GPU compute plus 109309 OpenCL for acceleration, and 12 GB of VRAM for working set headroom.

Software developers benefit most directly from the CPU's density of strong subtest scores: integer math, compression, and encryption results all support fast builds, and the single-thread figure keeps the interactive loop smooth.

Students and small business workstations round out the list. ECC support makes the platform defensible for light data-integrity-sensitive duty, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system easy to cool in compact or quiet enclosures.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data describes an unusually balanced pair. The CPU percentile is 89, the GPU percentile is 87, and the combined percentile is 88 — exactly between them. There is no percentile gap to exploit, which means neither part systematically starves the other.

Workload-by-workload, the limiting component shifts predictably. In graphically demanding games at higher settings and resolutions, the GPU limits: its 432 GB/s bandwidth and 87th percentile define the frame ceiling, and the CPU's single-thread headroom sits in reserve. In CPU-bound scenarios — high-refresh low-settings play, simulation-heavy titles, streaming while gaming, compilation, and rendering — the 14-core/20-thread package is the constraint, but a constraint that sits level with an i9-12900KS is not a weak one.

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this combination, FPS scaling cannot be cited numerically; the estimate from the scores is that at 1080p the CPU ceiling is reachable in lighter titles, while at 1440p and above the GPU becomes the dominant limiter, which is the normal and desirable behavior for a gaming build.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing in the database — `measuredFpsUltraByGame` is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Every frame-rate statement in this section is an estimate inferred from benchmark scores, not a measurement.

Working from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5424, the 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 figure, and the 87th GPU percentile, the expectation at ultra settings is comfortable play at 1080p and 1440p across modern AAA titles, with high-refresh-rate estimates plausible in esports and well-optimized titles where the CPU's 4300 R23 single-core score can drive frames. At 4K, the 192-bit bus and 432 GB/s bandwidth become the working constraint, and estimates should be tempered accordingly. The 48 RT cores suggest ray tracing is viable at reduced settings rather than a headline feature, and the absence of tensor cores means AI upscaling relies on shader-based paths rather than dedicated hardware. DirectX 12 Ultimate support confirms the card exposes the full current feature set games check for.

CPU Analysis

The i5-14600 is a Raptor Lake-R (Raptor Lake refresh) design on Intel's 10 nm process, fabricated by Intel, with a 257 mm² die. It runs a hybrid configuration totaling 14 cores and 20 threads, a 2.70 GHz base clock, and a 5.20 GHz boost. Cache is generous: 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, includes ECC support, and exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 handles display duty in GPU-less configurations or troubleshooting. The multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom is limited to stock behavior. It fits Socket 1700, carries a 65 W TDP, and launched at a $255 MSRP.

What the benchmarks mean in practice: the R23 multi-core score of 30464 and PassMark multithread score of 35848 support sustained parallel workloads — renders, encodes, compiles — at a tier the rival table confirms is within half a percent of an i9-12900KS on average. The single-core scores (4300 R23, 2424 Geekbench, 4167 PassMark) sit at the 89th-percentile tier overall, meaning everyday latency-sensitive tasks feel fast. The subtest profile is broad rather than spiky: strong integer (117078), floating point (85759), compression (434620), encryption (25082), and string sorting (48043) results indicate no glaring weakness across workload types, with physics at 2330 and prime finding at 155 being the niche outliers.

FAQ

Q: How does the i5-14600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 44889 sits 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-12900KS (45094) and AMD EPYC 4344P (45122), 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573), and 1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466) — effectively a dead heat across the board.

Q: Is this build well balanced?

A: Yes. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile, the GPU in the 87th, and the combined build in the 88th — a near-symmetric pairing with no dominant component.

Q: What PSU does this build need?

A: AMD suggests a 550 W PSU for the RX 9070 GRE. Combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP, a 550 W unit provides the recommended headroom.

Q: Does the i5-14600 support overclocking?

A: No — the multiplier is unlocked: false, meaning the chip is not multiplier-unlocked and runs at its defined clocks.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion on this page is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory can be used?

A: The i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and the platform supports ECC memory.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: Partially. The RX 9070 GRE includes 48 RT cores, so hardware ray tracing is supported, but the absence of tensor cores means AI-accelerated upscaling runs on shader hardware rather than dedicated matrix units.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundations are modern and durable. The CPU sits in Intel Socket 1700, supports DDR4 or DDR5 on a dual-channel controller, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes — enough to run the RX 9070 GRE at its full PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface with no lane sharing concerns for a single-GPU build. The GPU itself requires a dual-slot footprint and two 8-pin power connectors, and with a 220 W GPU TDP plus a 65 W CPU TDP, the suggested 550 W PSU leaves comfortable platform headroom for the rest of the system.

The sensible upgrade path follows the bottleneck analysis. Because the GPU (87th percentile) sits marginally below the CPU (89th percentile), the next meaningful performance jump for gaming is a GPU step up, which Socket 1700's PCIe Gen 5 link will fully accommodate. On the CPU side, the same socket accepts other 14th-generation parts, so a thread-count increase is possible without a motherboard change; the locked multiplier on this i5 means clock scaling is not the route. Memory is the flexible axis: moving to faster DDR5 on the dual-channel bus is a low-friction upgrade given the chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Display connectivity is future-proofed with HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, so monitor upgrades over time are not constrained by the card.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds