SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a desktop combination that leans hard on CPU strength while fielding a mid-to-upper GPU: the processor sits in the 89th percentile against all CPUs in the database, the graphics card in the 69th percentile against all GPUs, and the pairing as a whole lands at a combined percentile of 79. What makes this build curious is the shape of that imbalance — a Raptor Lake Refresh chip that trades blows with former flagship silicon, strapped to an RDNA 4.0 card built on a dense 4 nm TSMC process. The data invites a question: does the CPU outrun the GPU here, or does the GPU's modern feature set compensate for its lower raw percentile? Notably, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS figures for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than recorded in-game data.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a Passmark G3D score of 25381 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6290, the RX 9070 delivers GPU throughput in the 69th percentile — enough for high-refresh play at 1440p and comfortable ultra-settings gaming at that resolution. The i5-14600's single-thread strength (4300 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2424 in Geekbench single-core) means the CPU will rarely be the constraint in esports-style titles where frame counts climb. Estimated frame rates should be high at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K the GPU becomes the defining factor.

Streaming. Fourteen cores and 20 threads give this build headroom to encode a stream while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and Passmark Multithread result of 35848 indicate sustained parallel throughput that comfortably absorbs the overhead of broadcasting software alongside a game. The concern is thermal and power budgeting rather than compute — a 65 W TDP CPU and a 220 W GPU under simultaneous load push toward the upper edge of a 550 W suggested PSU, though the spec says that figure is the recommendation, not a ceiling to be exceeded.

Video editing. The Passmark Data Compression score of 434620 and Integer Math result of 117078 show strong media-handling throughput, and the RX 9070's 14737 Passmark GPU Compute score plus 131539 Geekbench OpenCL result provide GPU-accelerated encoding and effects grunt. Sixteen gigabytes of GDDR6 at 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth means timeline scrubbing with layered 4K footage should not hit a VRAM wall. This is a capable editing rig, not a workstation monster — the 89th CPU percentile puts it below dedicated rendering flagships but well above mainstream office machines.

3D rendering. Cinebench R20 multi-core at 12794 and R15 multi-core at 3070 describe a CPU that finishes render jobs respectably, and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 36.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same 36.13 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio, offers solid GPU-render headroom. With 56 RT cores, ray-traced preview workloads get dedicated hardware acceleration. Renders will complete at a pace consistent with the CPU's rivalry cluster — within a percent of the i9-12900KS and AMD EPYC 4344P on average benchmark scores.

Software development. Compilation, containerization, and test suites scale with multi-core throughput, and the 14600's blend of 14 cores with a 5.20 GHz boost clock covers both parallel builds and latency-sensitive single-threaded tooling. A Passmark Single Thread score of 4167 sits in line with its strong per-core showings elsewhere. DDR5 support on a dual-channel bus, plus ECC memory compatibility, adds a stability angle for long-running development workloads that most gaming chips lack.

Student and office work. For everyday productivity this pairing is generous — arguably more than the task requires. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 even allows the system to run displays without the discrete card, a useful failsafe for troubleshooting. Passmark Physics at 2330 and single-thread results across the board indicate snappy responsiveness in office applications, and the 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with browser-heavy multitasking.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 9070 is a Navi 48 die on TSMC's 4 nm node, packing 53,900 million transistors into 357 mm² — a density of 151.0M transistors per square millimetre. That density figure is the tell: this is a modern, efficiently engineered die rather than a big brute-force chip. The card runs a 1330 MHz base clock, a 2520 MHz boost, and a 2070 MHz game clock, with 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus clocked at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective), yielding 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The shader array consists of 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s. Raw FP32 compute lands at 36.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 operating at the same rate in a 1:1 configuration — a design choice that matters for workloads mixing precision types. There are 56 RT cores for hardware ray tracing, but tensor cores are absent from the specification, which frames the RDNA 4.0 approach as fixed-function RT acceleration without the dedicated matrix hardware rivals use for upscaling and AI workloads.

What do the scores say for rendering? The Geekbench OpenCL result of 131539 and Vulkan result of 58705 show strong compute performance in vendor-neutral APIs, while the Passmark G3D composite of 25381 places the card in the 69th percentile against all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals by average score are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (0.6% slower on average), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (0.8% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (1.1% slower), and the RTX 2080 SUPER (1.2% faster). That cluster tells an interesting story: the 9070 competes with cards from earlier performance tiers while carrying a far newer feature set — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, HDMI 2.1b, and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs alongside the single HDMI.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 is the most forward-looking indicator here, since that test stresses modern rendering pipelines where the RDNA 4.0 architecture's efficiencies should show. Meanwhile the older API tests — Passmark DirectX 9 at 343, DirectX 10 at 141, DirectX 11 at 281, and DirectX 12 at 74 — are relative figures within each test's own scale and are best read as coverage indicators rather than cross-comparable scores.

Benchmark Performance

Starting with the CPU: the i5-14600 posts 3070 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 433 single-core, 12794 and 1806 in R20, and 30464 and 4300 in R23 multi and single respectively. Geekbench returns 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core. The Passmark suite fills out the picture: 35848 Multithread, 4167 Single Thread, 2330 Physics, 434620 Data Compression, 25082 Data Encryption, 25674 Extended Instructions, 155 Find Prime Numbers, 85759 Floating Point Math, 117078 Integer Math, and 48043 Random String Sorting. The average benchmark score across tests is 44889, placing the chip in the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

That 89th percentile deserves scrutiny. The nearest rivals list includes the Intel Core i9-12900KS at an average score of 45094 (0.5% ahead of the 14600), the AMD EPYC 4344P at 45122 (0.5% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573 (0.7% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 (1% behind). In other words, this mainstream 14-core part statistically matches a former flagship desktop CPU and a server-branded EPYC chip. That is the headline: the 14600 delivers top-tier aggregate performance at a launch MSRP of $255.

On the GPU side, the RX 9070's individual scores are 6290 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 131539 Geekbench OpenCL, 58705 Geekbench Vulkan, 25381 Passmark G3D, and 14737 Passmark GPU Compute, alongside the Passmark G2D result of 1280. The average benchmark score of 23877 puts it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs — a solid upper-mid position.

The combined picture: a combined percentile of 79 for the pairing. The math is not simply an average of 89 and 69; the database weights the interaction. The build is CPU-forward, and that shapes every workload recommendation that follows.

Balance and Bottleneck

Here is the central tension. The CPU sits 20 percentile points above the GPU (89 versus 69). In graphically demanding games at high resolutions, the RX 9070 will be the limiter — the GPU's throughput ceiling arrives before the i5-14600's 14 cores and 20 threads approach saturation. Estimated frame rates at 4K ultra settings will track the GPU's 69th-percentile position, with the CPU idling well below its capability.

Flip to CPU-bound scenarios and the situation reverses. High-refresh gaming at 1080p, simulation-heavy titles, and large-scale strategy games will lean on single-thread performance, where the 14600's 4300 R23 single-core score and 5.20 GHz boost hold firm. In those cases the GPU has slack, and frame delivery becomes a processor question.

The bandwidth comparison is also worth investigating. The GPU commands 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth; the CPU, on a dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 bus, has no stated bandwidth figure in the FACT PACK but operates on an inherently narrower channel. For workloads that stream data — video encoding, large dataset processing — the GPU's bandwidth advantage and 16 GB VRAM buffer make it the natural compute host, supported by the 14737 Passmark GPU Compute score.

Power draw frames the balance question too. The CPU's TDP is 65 W; the GPU's is 220 W. The suggested PSU is 550 W. Under combined full load — gaming with streaming, or rendering while multitasking — the headroom between draw and supply narrows. The data implies the PSU recommendation should be treated as a floor for this pairing, with any additional drives or expansion factored in qualitatively.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake Refresh processor — codename Raptor Lake-R — manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It runs a 2.70 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.20 GHz. Cache is structured as 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a genuine differentiator for stability-sensitive builds.

The hybrid core arrangement across 14 cores and 20 threads is visible in the benchmark spread. Single-core scores — 433 in R15, 1806 in R20, 4300 in R23, 2424 in Geekbench, 4167 in Passmark — describe a chip whose best cores are genuinely fast, competitive with parts positioned far above it. Multi-core results — 30464 in R23, 14680 in Geekbench, 35848 in Passmark Multithread — show the full thread count delivering aggregate throughput in the 89th percentile.

What does this mean for real workloads? For lightly threaded applications — most games, most office software, most audio work — the 14600 behaves like a much more expensive chip. For heavily threaded work — code compilation, video encoding, physics simulation — it delivers performance statistically indistinguishable from the i9-12900KS (average score gap of 0.5%) and the EPYC 4344P (also 0.5%). The Extended Instructions score of 25674 and Floating Point Math result of 85759 further support strong SIMD-heavy workload performance.

One limitation stated plainly in the FACT PACK: the multiplier is locked. Overclocking is off the table, so the 5.20 GHz boost is the performance ceiling as shipped. The launch MSRP is $255.

Who Should Build It

1440p gamers are the primary audience. The RX 9070's 69th-percentile GPU throughput, 16 GB of VRAM, and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth align precisely with high-refresh 1440p play, where estimated frame rates should satisfy demanding players. 4K gaming is viable with settings discipline; 1080p gaming would waste GPU capacity and, more to the point, waste the CPU's headroom.

Content creators — video editors, motion designers, streamers — get a two-engine machine. The CPU's 30464 R23 multi-core score handles timeline work, and the GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan results accelerate effects and export. The FP16 1:1 throughput of 36.13 TFLOPS is a real asset for certain render paths.

Developers benefit from the 89th CPU percentile, 20 threads, and ECC support — a rare combination that suits long-lived development machines, small build servers, and reliability-conscious environments.

Students get more machine than coursework requires, with headroom to grow into heavier workloads, plus the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU as a diagnostic fallback.

Small business workstations are arguably the sleeper use case: ECC memory, dual-platform DDR4/DDR5 flexibility, and CPU performance matching an EPYC-branded part make this a credible office workstation build where the GPU also covers occasional visualization or GPU compute needs.

FAQ

Q: Is this build better for gaming or productivity?

A: The data says both, with a tilt toward productivity. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile with an average benchmark score of 44889 — matching the i9-12900KS within 0.5% — while the GPU sits in the 69th percentile. Gaming is strong but GPU-limited at high resolutions; productivity workloads exploit the CPU surplus more fully.

Q: Can it run games at 4K?

A: Estimated, yes, with caveats. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, so frame rates are projections from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 25381 Passmark G3D score, 16 GB of VRAM, and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth suggest 4K is playable with settings adjustments, while 1440p is its natural strength.

Q: How much PSU capacity is needed?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, against a 65 W CPU TDP and a 220 W GPU TDP. The 550 W figure is the stated recommendation for this pairing.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is unlocked equals false in the specification — the i5-14600 cannot be overclocked, and the 5.20 GHz boost clock is the ceiling.

Q: What memory should be used?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with ECC supported. DDR5 is the forward-looking choice; DDR4 offers platform flexibility. The FACT PACK does not state specific speed grades.

Q: How does the GPU compare to rivals?

A: By average benchmark score the RX 9070 (23877) sits between the GTX TITAN Z (23736, 0.6% behind) and the RX 6800S (24063, 0.8% ahead), with the RTX 3080 Mobile 1.1% behind and the RTX 2080 SUPER 1.2% ahead — while offering a newer feature set including PCIe 5.0 x16 and DisplayPort 2.1a.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: Desktop — the buildClass field lists "desktop," and both components carry desktop specifications including Socket 1700 and dual 8-pin power connectors.

Build Overview

This is a desktop pairing of Intel's Core i5-14600 — a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake Refresh processor released 2024-01-07 — with AMD's Radeon RX 9070, an RDNA 4.0 Navi 48 card released 2025-03-05. The CPU occupies the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of 44889; the GPU occupies the 69th percentile of all GPUs with an average of 23877; the combined build percentile is 79. The tier reads as upper-mainstream overall, with clearly above-mainstream CPU performance and solid upper-mid graphics capability. The RX 9070's launch MSRP is 549 USD; the CPU's launch MSRP is $255 — both stated here once as historical reference points. It is a build whose identity is defined by CPU surplus and GPU adequacy.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700, which dictates the motherboard ecosystem. Memory support spans DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, so a DDR5 board preserves the newest memory path, while DDR4 boards keep reuse options open. ECC support adds a workstation dimension uncommon in this segment. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU — matched neatly by the RX 9070's PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, so no interface bandwidth is left on the table.

The GPU side offers upgrade latitude: the card is dual-slot with two 8-pin connectors, a standard physical footprint that eases replacement, and the suggested 550 W PSU covers the 220 W GPU TDP plus the 65 W CPU TDP. That said, a future GPU upgrade should prompt a PSU reassessment, since the 550 W recommendation is calibrated to this pairing.

What does a sensible next upgrade look like? Given the CPU's 89th percentile versus the GPU's 69th, the data points squarely at the graphics card as the first component to replace — a faster GPU would shift the limiter without wasting the 14600's headroom. The locked multiplier means CPU upgrades require a chip swap rather than tuning. Display connectivity is future-proofed on the GPU side with HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, so monitor upgrades can precede GPU upgrades if desired.

Gaming Performance

To state it clearly once more: the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination — measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Every frame-rate statement in this section is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not recorded gameplay.

Working from the GPU's 25381 Passmark G3D score, 6290 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result, and 69th-percentile position, the expectation is strong 1440p ultra performance: this is the resolution class where the card's 16 GB of GDDR6, 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and 36.13 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput should deliver high frame rates in modern titles. At 1080p, estimated frame rates climb further, and the i5-14600's single-thread scores (4300 R23 single-core, 2424 Geekbench single-core) indicate the CPU can feed high-refresh displays without becoming the constraint in most titles.

At 4K ultra, estimates become more conservative. The GPU's percentile position relative to the very top of the database suggests settings reductions or upscaling techniques would be advisable in the heaviest modern games, though the generous VRAM and bandwidth mean texture quality need not suffer. The 56 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but ray-traced effects at 4K would be the most demanding scenario this pairing faces.

CPU-bound gaming — simulation, strategy, and large-multiplayer titles — plays to this build's strength, with the 14600 matching former flagship territory in aggregate performance. The overall estimated gaming profile: excellent at 1440p, very good at 1080p, and conditional at 4K — figures to be confirmed by measured data as it becomes available for this specific pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

AMD Radeon RX 9070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds