SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

32,456 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious content creation without stepping into flagship pricing territory. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake-R part, anchors the system with strong single-threaded performance, while the GPU, based on the Navi 31 chip, delivers 16 GB of VRAM and substantial rasterization throughput. For this analysis, the benchmark data comes from synthetic suites and compute tests. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the CPU and GPU scores rather than direct gameplay capture.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 2.70 GHz and boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it a relatively power-efficient choice for a desktop build. The chip uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. The processor integrates UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output but is not intended for gaming workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a common layout for this generation.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44889. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 30464, while the single-core score is 4300. The multicore advantage is clearly visible in Geekbench, where the chip scores 14680 in multicore and 2424 in single-core. PassMark results further illustrate the workload profile: integer math scores 117078, floating-point math scores 85759, and multithreaded performance reaches 35848. These numbers indicate a processor that handles heavily threaded tasks like video rendering and compilation well, while the single-core scores suggest it remains responsive in everyday applications and lightly-threaded games.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i5-14600 sits within a tight competitive band. It trails the Intel Core i9-12900KS by 0.5% in average score, and similarly lags the AMD EPYC 4344P by 0.5%. Against the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, the i5-14600 leads by 0.7%, and it edges out the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H by 1%. These deltas are small enough that real-world differences would be negligible in most applications. The data shows a CPU that punches at the level of previous-generation flagship parts, but the 89th percentile ranking also means there are faster options above it — the i5-14600 is not a top-tier halo product, but it is a very capable mid-range-to-high-end workhorse.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12794 and R15 multicore score of 3070 suggest that the CPU can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads without throttling into poor performance. The PassMark data encryption score of 25082 and data compression score of 434620 indicate that the chip handles security-related tasks and archive operations briskly. The extended instructions score of 25674 and find prime numbers score of 155 are lower, but these are niche workloads. The single-thread PassMark score of 4167 confirms that the 5.20 GHz boost clock translates into strong per-core responsiveness, which is critical for older games or emulator workloads that rely on one or two threads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a RDNA 3.0 architecture GPU on the Navi 31 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, with a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The GPU has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 160 raster operation units. It includes 80 ray tracing cores, and while tensor cores are not listed, the architecture handles AI workloads through compute units. Clock speeds are set at a base of 1287 MHz, a boost of 2245 MHz, and a game clock of 1880 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The GPU's raw compute throughput is significant: FP32 performance reaches 45.98 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance doubles to 91.96 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 359.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 718.4 GTexel/s. These figures point to a card that excels at traditional rasterization and can push high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in non-ray-traced titles. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is a key differentiator, as it allows for high-resolution textures and large datasets without running out of memory. The GPU uses a 260 W TDP and requires a 600 W suggested PSU, with two 8-pin power connectors and a dual-slot cooler that measures 276 mm in length.

Benchmark scores place this GPU at the 77th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32456. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 4814, which is a modern test that reflects DX12 gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL scores 175758, and Vulkan scores 99850, showing strong compute and graphics API performance. PassMark G3D scores 27089, while GPU compute scores 15016. The DirectX 11 score of 300 and DirectX 12 score of 107 from PassMark are lower-level legacy tests, but the G3D and compute results are more representative of current workloads.

Nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro S10000, which is 0.2% ahead, and the AMD FirePro S9300 X2, which is 0.3% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 590 GME trails by 0.4%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 570X is 0.9% behind. These are older professional or budget cards, which indicates that the RX 7900 GRE sits in a performance tier where direct modern competition is scarce in the database — but the 77th percentile shows it is not near the top. The ray tracing cores are present, but the RT performance will be modest compared to the rasterization strength, so rendering with heavy ray tracing will likely see larger frame rate drops than a comparable Nvidia card.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture shows a pairing that lands at the 83rd percentile for all builds, which indicates a well-above-average system. The CPU's average benchmark score of 44889 places it at the 89th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 32456 places it at the 77th percentile. This gap suggests that the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in synthetic tests, but both are capable components. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30464 on the CPU and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4814 on the GPU together paint a system that can handle both productivity and gaming.

In terms of exact scores, the CPU achieves a Geekbench multicore score of 14680 and a single-core score of 2424, while the GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175758 and a Vulkan score of 99850. The PassMark multithread score of 35848 on the CPU and the PassMark G3D score of 27089 on the GPU provide a rough apples-to-apples comparison of compute and graphics. The CPU's floating-point math score of 85759 is higher than the GPU's PassMark compute score of 15016, but this is expected since the CPU test is a different workload.

The percentile positions are telling. The CPU at the 89th percentile means it outperforms about nine out of ten CPUs in the database, which is a strong position for a mid-range part. The GPU at the 77th percentile is slightly lower, meaning it outperforms about three out of four GPUs. The combined percentile of 83 is a weighted average that reflects the system's overall capability. The data shows that the i5-14600 will not bottleneck the RX 7900 GRE in most scenarios, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU. However, in very high frame rate scenarios at lower resolutions, the CPU's 89th percentile is not as high as some top-tier CPUs, so there may be occasional CPU limits in esports titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 30464, with a single-core score of 4300.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 80 ray tracing cores, but the architecture is RDNA 3.0, and the benchmark data does not include a specific ray tracing test score.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4814, which is a measure of modern DX12 gaming performance.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and does it support ECC memory?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900KS?

A: The i5-14600 trails the i9-12900KS by 0.5% in average benchmark score, making the performance nearly identical.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for a user who wants a desktop that excels at both productivity and gaming without going to extreme flagship budgets. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 77th percentile ranking mean that the system is well-suited for content creators who render videos or compile code, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30464 and Geekbench multicore score of 14680 show strong multi-threaded performance. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is a boon for developers working with large 3D scenes or data visualization, as it avoids memory swapping. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's single-core strength for compilation and the GPU's compute capabilities for simulation workloads.

For gamers, this system is aimed at 1440p and 4K gaming. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 45.98 TFLOPS and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-detail textures at those resolutions. The CPU's single-core PassMark score of 4167 ensures that the system remains responsive in games that are not heavily multi-threaded. Small business workstations that run office applications, database queries, and occasional rendering will find the 65 W TDP CPU easy to cool, and the GPU's 260 W TDP is manageable with a 600 W PSU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU is a fallback if the GPU is removed for troubleshooting.

The 89th CPU percentile is not the top of the charts, so users who need absolute maximum multi-threaded performance for 3D animation rendering may want to look at higher-core-count parts. But for the majority of builders who balance gaming with content creation, this pairing hits a sweet spot. The GPU's 77th percentile means it is not a halo card, so users who want 4K ray tracing at maximum settings will need a stronger GPU, but the 16 GB VRAM and 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance handle standard 4K rasterization well.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4814 and the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4300 provide a basis for these expectations. At 1440p ultra settings, the RX 7900 GRE should deliver high frame rates in most titles, given its 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and 89th percentile ranking should prevent bottlenecking at this resolution, as the GPU will be the primary limiting factor.

At 4K ultra, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM will be an asset, allowing for high-resolution textures without stutter. The pixel rate of 359.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 718.4 GTexel/s suggest the card can fill frames quickly. However, the 77th GPU percentile implies that some newer AAA titles at 4K ultra may push the card to its limits, and frame rates could drop below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes. The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 14 cores will not be the bottleneck at 4K, as the GPU is the more stressed component.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant. The Geekbench single-core score of 2424 and PassMark single-thread score of 4167 indicate that the i5-14600 can drive very high frame rates in esports titles, potentially exceeding 200 FPS in games like CS2 or Valorant. However, the GPU's 45.98 TFLOPS is overkill for 1080p, so the system would be CPU-limited in many scenarios. The data suggests that 1440p is the sweet spot for this pairing, balancing the CPU's headroom and the GPU's rendering power.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform. The i5-14600 is a 14th Gen part, so the socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the motherboard choice will dictate which type you use. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for future storage and GPU connectivity. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, but the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The CPU's 65 W TDP is low, so a modest air cooler is sufficient, leaving room in the case for other components.

The GPU has a 260 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The system's total power draw will be well under 600 W, so there is headroom for additional drives or peripherals. The GPU uses two 8-pin power connectors, which are standard on most modern PSUs. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a rare feature for a consumer chip and can be valuable for a workstation build where data integrity is critical. The memory bus is dual-channel, so using two DIMMs is optimal for performance.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed a more powerful card without bottlenecking. The 89th CPU percentile means the i5-14600 can keep up with GPUs that score higher than the RX 7900 GRE. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 memory would improve memory-bound workloads, as the CPU supports dual-channel memory but the bandwidth is not listed. The motherboard socket supports future 14th Gen upgrades, but the platform is at the end of its socket life, so a CPU upgrade would likely require a new motherboard.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 14-core, 20-thread Intel Core i5-14600 with a 16 GB AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-R part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Navi 31 chip with 5120 shading units and a 2245 MHz boost clock. The combined percentile is 83, placing this system in the top 17% of all configs in the database. The CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 77th percentile indicate a balanced system where the CPU is slightly stronger than the GPU in synthetic benchmarks.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for a stationary workstation or gaming rig. The CPU supports up to 20 threads, making it suitable for multi-tasking and content creation, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth make it a strong choice for high-resolution rendering. The system uses a 65 W CPU and a 260 W GPU, so a 600 W PSU is adequate with some headroom. The overall tier is high-mid-range, as the combined percentile of 83 is strong but not at the level of top-tier configurations that would score above 90.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $255, and the GPU's launch MSRP is $549 USD. The system does not have any measured FPS data, so the performance picture is drawn entirely from the synthetic and compute benchmark scores. The data indicates a capable machine for 1440p gaming and professional workloads, with the CPU providing strong single-threaded responsiveness and the GPU offering substantial rasterization power.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the CPU in synthetic tests, with the CPU at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 77th percentile. This means the CPU is relatively more powerful than the GPU, so in gaming workloads, the GPU is likely to be the bottleneck. The GPU's 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance is strong, but the 77th percentile suggests that more powerful GPUs exist, and those would benefit from the CPU's headroom.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression, the PassMark data compression score of 434620 shows the CPU is the primary engine, and the GPU is less relevant. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering with ray tracing, the GPU's 80 RT cores will be the limiting factor, as the CPU can feed the GPU faster than the GPU can process. The FPS scaling in gaming will show that at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4167 will limit frame rates, while at 4K, the GPU's pixel rate of 359.2 GPixel/s will be the constraint.

The data suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck for the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU is a bottleneck for the CPU in high-FPS gaming. If a user upgrades the GPU to a higher-percentile model, the CPU would keep up without needing a replacement. Conversely, upgrading the CPU to a higher-core-count part would yield little benefit in gaming, as the GPU would still be the limiting factor. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is a buffer against memory constraints, but the compute throughput is the more likely constraint in demanding titles.