SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

11,627 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1440p gaming and mixed productivity workloads. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake Refresh part, delivers strong multi-threaded performance with a 24 MB shared L3 cache, while the GPU, based on RDNA 3.0, brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 60 ray accelerators to the table. Benchmark data shows the CPU sits in the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU’s 51st percentile ranking is more modest, suggesting a pairing where the graphics card is the primary constraint in many scenarios. This analysis walks through the individual component scores, their combined behavior, and what the data implies for specific workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename. It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a 65 W TDP, a base clock of 2.70 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The chip uses a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². Cache is arranged as 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation reliability.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44889. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 30464, while single-core reaches 4300. The R20 results show 12794 multi-core and 1806 single-core, and R15 scores are 3070 multi-core and 433 single-core. Geekbench scores are 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 35848, a single-thread score of 4167, integer math at 117078, floating point math at 85759, and extended instructions at 25674. Data compression hits 434620, and encryption reaches 25082.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600 sits within a tight band. It trails the Intel Core i9-12900KS by 0.5% and the AMD EPYC 4344P by 0.5%, while leading the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D by 0.7% and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H by 1%. These deltas are small, meaning the i5-14600 is functionally equivalent to these alternatives in aggregate benchmark performance. The 20 threads make it capable for heavily parallel workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 indicates strong throughput. The single-core score of 4300 in R23 suggests responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks, such as everyday application use and older games.

The PassMark physics score of 2330 and prime number finding score of 155 are lower, indicating that the CPU is not optimized for every type of computation, but the integer and floating-point math scores are robust. The 24 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, which helps with data-heavy workloads that benefit from a larger pool of fast storage. For real workloads, this CPU handles compiling code, running virtual machines, and batch photo processing without bottlenecking, as the multi-threaded scores indicate. The 65 W TDP is low for this performance class, suggesting it is efficient under sustained load, though the boost clock of 5.20 GHz will draw more power when needed.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: The i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D’s score of 44573.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, achieved through a 256-bit bus and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 19.5 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RX 7800 XT is in the 51st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 11627.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7800 XT has 60 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile for the i5-14600 and RX 7800 XT is 70, indicating a balanced mid-to-high tier desktop system.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 30464 being a standout figure. This places it in the 89th percentile, meaning it is among the top 11% of all CPUs. The Geekbench multi-core score of 14680 and PassMark multi-thread score of 35848 corroborate this, showing that the processor excels in tasks that use all 20 threads. The single-core performance, while not as dominant, is still solid: Cinebench R23 single-core at 4300 and PassMark single-thread at 4167.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more mixed. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 4157, and in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 18290, with a Vulkan score of 54228. PassMark G3D shows 24176, while G2D is 1177. DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores are 249 and 93, respectively, and DirectX 9 scores 304. The GPU’s percentile is 51, placing it exactly in the middle of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 11627 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which scores 11680 (a 0.5% gap), and the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M at 11528 (0.9% gap). This suggests the RX 7800 XT is in a competitive middle tier, but it is not a top-tier performer by aggregate metrics.

The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative terms. The CPU’s 89th percentile versus the GPU’s 51st percentile means the system’s overall capability is gated by the graphics card in graphics-intensive tasks. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this, as it is closer to the GPU’s rank than the CPU’s. For workloads that are CPU-bound, such as compiling or rendering without GPU acceleration, the system will perform at a high level. For gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as evidenced by its mid-pack ranking.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility in choosing modules based on availability and cost, though the exact bandwidth figures are not specified. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-bandwidth graphics card or NVMe storage. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a feature often reserved for workstation chips, making this a viable option for small business servers or data integrity-focused builds.

The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, has a TDP of 263 W and requires a 600 W power supply, as per the suggested PSU rating. It uses two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, so there is no bottleneck from the interface. The GPU’s power draw is substantial, but the 65 W TDP of the CPU leaves headroom in a 600 W system for other components.

A sensible next upgrade would be to focus on the GPU, as the CPU has more headroom. The data shows the CPU is in the 89th percentile, while the GPU is in the 51st, so replacing the RX 7800 XT with a higher-tier card would improve overall system performance more than upgrading the CPU. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs the system for next-generation storage and GPUs, though current GPUs like the RX 7800 XT use PCIe 4.0. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that an upgrade to a newer CPU on the same socket could reuse existing memory, depending on the chosen type.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 51st percentile means that in most graphics-bound workloads, the GPU will be the bottleneck. Specifically, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24176 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4157 are mid-range, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 is top-tier. In gaming at 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s rendering capacity will limit frame rates, not the CPU’s processing speed.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (PassMark score of 434620) or integer math (117078), the CPU will perform excellently, and the GPU will be idle. The PassMark physics score of 2330 is lower, which could indicate a bottleneck in physics simulations that are not fully multi-threaded, but this is less common in real-world applications. The GPU’s compute score of 13473 in PassMark is modest, so for GPU-accelerated compute tasks like machine learning inference, the RX 7800 XT will not be a standout performer.

The FPS scaling in games would follow the GPU’s capability, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 4300 in Cinebench R23 is high enough to feed most GPUs. The data shows no measured FPS for this exact combination, so estimates must be drawn from the GPU’s benchmark scores. The GPU’s 51st percentile suggests it will handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but it will struggle at 4K or with ray tracing enabled, given its mid-pack DirectX 12 score of 93. The system is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, but the GPU is the limiting factor for higher resolutions or demanding graphical features.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for gamers who play at 1440p with high refresh rates, as the CPU’s strong single-core performance will support high frame rates, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth can handle modern game assets. Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464, while the GPU’s compute capabilities can accelerate some effects. Software developers compiling large codebases will see fast build times due to the multi-threaded PassMark score of 35848, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running processes.

Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet work will find this system overkill, but the headroom means it will remain responsive for years. The CPU’s 89th percentile ensures it will not be a bottleneck for productivity software, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is useful for CAD or GIS applications that load large datasets. The build is less ideal for users who prioritize maximum graphics performance, as the GPU’s 51st percentile is middling, but it is a good match for those who need a balanced system for both work and play.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24176 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4157 indicate it is a mid-range performer. In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the i5-14600’s single-core score of 4300 in Cinebench R23 would likely push frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p, but the GPU’s performance is the ceiling.

For AAA games at 1440p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 51st percentile suggests playable frame rates around 60-80 FPS, depending on the title. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 624.1 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in most scenarios. At 4K, the GPU’s modest DirectX 12 score of 93 indicates that frame rates would drop significantly, possibly below 60 FPS in demanding titles. Ray tracing performance would be limited, as the 60 ray accelerators are present but the GPU’s overall compute power (FP32 of 37.32 TFLOPS) is not top-tier.

The CPU’s performance is not a limiting factor in gaming, as its percentile is far higher than the GPU’s. The data suggests that this pairing is best for high-refresh 1080p or smooth 1440p gaming, rather than 4K or heavy ray tracing workloads. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores provide a consistent picture of a GPU that competes with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which is a 1080p-class card.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14600 with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is a 16 GB card from the Radeon RX 7000 series. The combined percentile is 70, placing this system in the upper-mid tier of all desktop builds. The CPU is the stronger component by a wide margin, ranking in the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 51st percentile.

The overall tier is defined by the GPU’s mid-pack performance, as the CPU’s high rank does not compensate for the graphics card’s limitations in GPU-bound tasks. This is a competent 1440p gaming machine and a strong productivity workstation, but it is not a high-end enthusiast rig. The build’s strengths lie in its balanced CPU performance and generous 16 GB of VRAM, with the weakness being the GPU’s average compute scores. For users who want a system that excels at both CPU-heavy work and moderate gaming, this pairing is appropriate, but those seeking top-tier graphics will need a more powerful GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core score of 4300 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame rates in CPU-bound games are not held back, but the GPU’s 51st percentile means that high refresh rates (above 144 Hz) are only achievable at 1080p with lowered settings. At 1440p, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24176 suggests frame rates around 100 FPS in less demanding titles, which is adequate for high-refresh monitors.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and multi-thread score of 35848 in PassMark provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU’s compute score of 13473 is modest, so hardware encoding via the GPU may be less efficient, but the CPU can handle this workload without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 indicates fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing for 4K footage. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth can handle GPU-accelerated effects, though its compute performance is not top-tier.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is excellent for CPU-based renderers, with scores like the PassMark integer math at 117078. The GPU can assist with GPU-accelerated renderers, but its FP32 of 37.32 TFLOPS is mid-range, so render times will be moderate.

Software development: Compilation times benefit from the 20 threads and PassMark multi-thread score of 35848. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long builds, and the CPU’s 89th percentile ensures quick response for IDE and toolchain operations.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for documents and spreadsheets, but the rapid single-core performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4167) ensures snappy application launches and multitasking. The 16 GB VRAM is unused in most office tasks, but it provides headroom for future software.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is based on the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 60 ray accelerators, though tensor cores are not listed. Clock speeds are a base of 1295 MHz, a boost of 2430 MHz, and a game clock of 2124 MHz, with memory running at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective).

Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The GPU’s pixel rate is 233.3 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 583.2 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 37.32 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 37.32 TFLOPS (1:1). The card has a TDP of 263 W, is dual-slot, and requires two 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested 600 W PSU. It supports PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark performance places the GPU in the 51st percentile, with an average score of 11627. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 4157, and Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 18290 and 54228, respectively. PassMark G3D is 24176, while GPU compute is 13473. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which scores 11680, a 0.5% difference, meaning the RX 7800 XT is statistically tied with a much older card in aggregate benchmarks. For rendering, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a strong asset for large textures and complex scenes, but the compute throughput is average, so rendering times will be moderate. The 60 ray accelerators provide some ray tracing capability, but the DirectX 12 score of 93 suggests limited performance in such workloads.